<strong>The</strong> preceding lectures have tried to bring the world <strong>of</strong>perception back to life, this world hidden from usbeneath all the sediment <strong>of</strong> knowledge and social living. In sodoing, we have <strong>of</strong>ten had recourse to painting because paintingthrusts us once again into the presence <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>of</strong>lived experience. In the work <strong>of</strong> Cézanne, Juan Gris, Braqueand Picasso, in different ways, we encounter objects – lemons,mandolins, bunches <strong>of</strong> grapes, pouches <strong>of</strong> tobacco – that donot pass quickly before our eyes in the guise <strong>of</strong> objects we‘know well’ but, on the contrary, hold our gaze, ask questions<strong>of</strong> it, convey to it in a bizarre fashion the very secret <strong>of</strong> theirsubstance, the very mode <strong>of</strong> their material existence and which,so to speak, stand ‘bleeding’ before us. This was how paintingled us back to a vision <strong>of</strong> things themselves. Reciprocally, aphilosophy <strong>of</strong> perception which aspires to learn to see the93
world once more, as if in an exchange <strong>of</strong> services rendered, willrestore painting and the arts in general to their rightful place,will allow them to recover their dignity and will incline us toaccept them in their purity.What then have we learned from our examination <strong>of</strong> theworld <strong>of</strong> perception? We have discovered that it is impossible,in this world, to separate things from their way <strong>of</strong> appearing.Of course, when I give a dictionary definition <strong>of</strong> a table – ahorizontal flat surface supported by three or four legs, whichcan be used for eating <strong>of</strong>f, reading a book on, and so forth –I may feel that I have got, as it were, to the essence <strong>of</strong> the table;I withdraw my interest from all the accidental properties whichmay accompany that essence, such as the shape <strong>of</strong> the feet, thestyle <strong>of</strong> the moulding and so on. In this example, however, Iam not perceiving but rather defining. By contrast, when Iperceive a table, I do not withdraw my interest from the particularway it has <strong>of</strong> performing its function as a table: how isthe top supported, for this is different with every table? Whatinterests me is the unique movement from the feet to the tabletop with which it resists gravity; this is what makes each tabledifferent from the next. No detail is insignificant: the grain,the shape <strong>of</strong> the feet, the colour and age <strong>of</strong> the wood, as wellas the scratches or graffiti which show that age. <strong>The</strong> meaning,‘table’, will only interest me ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it arises out <strong>of</strong> all theart and the world <strong>of</strong> perception
- Page 5 and 6:
First published in French as Causer
- Page 8 and 9:
ForewordThe seven lectures collecte
- Page 10:
are preceded by a number. We have e
- Page 13 and 14:
draws and the anxieties which he ar
- Page 15 and 16:
shortly before the war. This second
- Page 17 and 18:
After his death Merleau-Ponty’s r
- Page 19 and 20:
empiricism is not of this kind. Thi
- Page 21 and 22:
The central theme of Merleau-Ponty
- Page 23 and 24:
acknowledgement of its special stat
- Page 25 and 26:
world of perception can be dismisse
- Page 27 and 28:
When Merleau-Ponty says that scienc
- Page 29 and 30:
Florentine Renaissance, or, in a Fr
- Page 31 and 32:
photograph in which the feet look a
- Page 33 and 34:
intrinsic properties which explain
- Page 35 and 36:
which our own life has been disturb
- Page 37 and 38:
only contingently connected to a ph
- Page 39 and 40:
imagining that our dependence upon
- Page 41 and 42:
Merleau-Ponty now extends this aest
- Page 43 and 44:
etter conception of reason (e.g. di
- Page 46:
The World of Perception
- Page 50 and 51:
The world of perception, or in othe
- Page 52 and 53: explain the illusions of long- and
- Page 54 and 55: provide all the answers at a time w
- Page 56: exercise of a pure and unsituated i
- Page 60 and 61: It has often been said that modern
- Page 62 and 63: which effect certain changes in the
- Page 64 and 65: along lines running from the painte
- Page 66 and 67: In the footsteps of science and pai
- Page 68: LECTURE 3Exploring the World of Per
- Page 71 and 72: worlds of sight, smell, touch and s
- Page 73 and 74: touch. 2 To say that honey is visco
- Page 75 and 76: complexes. This is what Cézanne me
- Page 77 and 78: us and above all in the found objec
- Page 80 and 81: In the first three lectures, we arg
- Page 82 and 83: children and the sick was held back
- Page 84 and 85: person must remain open to these ab
- Page 86 and 87: flow from the centre of the ‘body
- Page 88: delegation to identify this monumen
- Page 92 and 93: Thus far we have tried to look at s
- Page 94 and 95: haunts a body and we seem to see a
- Page 96 and 97: ack to the real experience of anger
- Page 98 and 99: we have received from without and w
- Page 100 and 101: which makes us crave their assent o
- Page 102: LECTURE 6Art and the World of Perce
- Page 107 and 108: that the painter takes hold of a fr
- Page 109 and 110: do explain why, hitherto, there hav
- Page 111 and 112: looks at the things themselves with
- Page 114: LECTURE 7Classical World, Modern Wo
- Page 117 and 118: In modernity, we have a representat
- Page 119 and 120: Proust himself who raises them. As
- Page 121 and 122: works of intellectuals, then to see
- Page 123 and 124: with a feeling of completion or per
- Page 126 and 127: NotesFOREWORD1 Merleau-Ponty’s te
- Page 128 and 129: 20 Although Merleau-Ponty usually t
- Page 130 and 131: 6 Sartre, ‘L’Homme et les Chose
- Page 132: 5 Paul Valéry, passim. See, for ex
- Page 135 and 136: freedom 27-8Freud 76Galileo 21geome