09.07.2015 Views

Part II - State of New Jersey

Part II - State of New Jersey

Part II - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AMMONOIDEA 117Range outside <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>--Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi--zone <strong>of</strong> Exogyra ponderosa(Santonian, early Campanian). Western Iuterior <strong>of</strong> North America--Niobrara, Telegraph Creek, Eagle formations and equivalents (Coniaclanto early Campanian).Type.--In his first publication Morton gave no figures and did notstate any details about specimens. A year later he figured two specimensthat are presumably to be taken as eotypes, though no localitiesare assigned. As noted above, one <strong>of</strong> these survives and bears the numherANSP 19878.Baculitessp.Plate 68, Figures 5-7Ba_mlitcs ovata Ssy (part). Morton, 1828, Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. Jour.,vol. 6, p. 89, pl. 5, fig. 5 (not fig. 6) ; 1830, idcm, p. 196, pl. 8, figs.6-7 (not fig. 8).Baeulites ovatus Say (part). Morton, 1830, Am. Jour. Sol., 1st ser., vol.17, p. 280; vol. 18, p. 249, pl. 1, figs. 6-7 (not fig. 8).Baeulites ovatles Say (part). Morton, ]834_ Synopsis, p. 42, pl. 1, figs.6-7 (not fig. 8).Remarks.--Several specimens illustrated by Morton as Baculitesovatus seem not to belong to the species. Tile specimen figured ill1928 as his plate 5, figure 5, shows numerous strong ribs on the flanks<strong>of</strong> the shell. The specimen figured first in 1830 as his plate 1, figures6 and 7, and refigured several times elsewhere, shows widely spaced,extraordinarily narrow ribs that extend entirely across the flank andrenter. This specimen is ascribed to St. Georges, Del., and would thereforebe from the hit. Laurel-Navesink unit. It is preserved as specimenANSP 19496-A.Baculitessp.Plate 68, Figures 8, 9Baenlites asper Morton. Whitfield, 1892, p. 278, Ill. 46, fgs. 10-11.Baculites asper Morton? Wellcr, 1907, p. 823, ph ]09, figs. 6-7.Remarks.--This fragment <strong>of</strong> a large shell, ascribed to the Navesinkmarl at Holmdel, is indeterminable, but it is definitely not B. asper.The large size, the coarse areuatc swellings, and the oval cross section,together with the relatively high horizon, distinguish it. It suggestssome <strong>of</strong> the larger species <strong>of</strong> the genus, such as B. n*_datus Stephenson(1941, Univ. Texas Publ. 4101, p. 405, pl. 79, figs. 5-10) or B. grandisHall and Meek (1856, Am. Acad. Arts Sci. Mem., n. ser., vo]. 5, p. 402,pls. 6-8). The specimen was reported by Whitfield as in the collectionat Rutgers College but is apparently not available now.NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!