09.07.2015 Views

Part II - State of New Jersey

Part II - State of New Jersey

Part II - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX BVarious groups <strong>of</strong> fossils are not included in tl~e present vol~~me.These are :PLANTS. Those <strong>of</strong> the Raritan formation \\.ere fully deseribe(1 I)yBerry (1911) and little work has been done suhseq~~ently other than acritical analysis by Dorf (1952).FORil~ITNIFERA. This group <strong>of</strong> fossils was included in the originaledition <strong>of</strong> \\Teller, the work largely being taken from Hagg(1898). The a~lrances in the fielcl <strong>of</strong> mieropi~leontology have made much<strong>of</strong> this work obsolete and it therefore seems unlvise to reprint this seetion.Little work has been pnblishe(1 on the Cretaceous foraminifera <strong>of</strong><strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> (luring recent years. Jcnnings (1936) described somespeeies from the Cretaeeous and Eoeenc, and Cnshman (1948) describeda Cretaceous fauna from 3Iaryland inclnding species uvhieh almostcertainly occur also in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>. The foraminifera <strong>of</strong> the Vincentownformi~tion, inclu~led with the Cretaceous by Weller hut nowregar~lecl as Eoeene, have been discussed by R1eLe;ln (1952,1953).BRyOZO1l. No species <strong>of</strong> Rryozoa 11ave been reported from thetrue Cretaeeous <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>. The extensive fanna <strong>of</strong> the Vineentownformation, included in \\Teller's original volume, is now thought to be<strong>of</strong> Eocene age. A thorough discussion <strong>of</strong> this fauna was given by Canuand Bassler (1933).OSTRACODA. Only ;I few ostraeotles have been reported from theCretaceous <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong> although it is know that they occur in scvera1<strong>of</strong> the formations. Sonre ost,racodes from the Cretaeeor~s <strong>of</strong> nearbyDelaware and Maryland have l~een discussed by Schmidt (1948) andSvain (1948).I~IS<strong>II</strong>. Thc most eo~nplete ~vorlr on the fossil fish <strong>of</strong> the Cretaeeol~sand Tertiary <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> Jcrscv is that <strong>of</strong> Fowler (1911). Unfortunately,many <strong>of</strong> the locality records are very vague and it is therefore difficultto correlate the fossils \vit,h exact formations. These reeords are furtl~ereomplieated by the fact t,l~athe Hornerstonn formation at that timemas regarded as Cretaceous. 3Zany <strong>of</strong> the specimens are merely referredto the greensancl <strong>of</strong> t11c "Navesink-<strong>II</strong>ornerstolvn marl."Rapp (1946) gave i~ revisc(1 check list, but again it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!