Download PDF - Rajasthan Rural Livelihoods Project

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2.3: Estimates of forest and common lands encroached and reasons for encroachmentForestsPasture LandsProjectVillagesControlVillagesProjectVillagesControlVillagesPer cent of villages where land encroached 25.0 8.3 75.0 50.0Average area encroached (hectares) 33.6 40.0 44.2 32.2Per cent villages where General caste has encroached 100.0 100.0 88.9 100.0Per cent villages where OBC has encroached 66.7 100.0 66.7 83.3Per cent villages where SC has encroached 0.0 0.0 22.2 66.7Per cent villages where ST has encroached 33.3 100.0 11.1 83.3Per cent villages where landless has encroached 100.0 100.0 22.2 50.0Agency making efforts to removeencroachment in per cent of villagesCommunity 0.0 0.0 16.6 100.0Caste group 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0PRI 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0Officials 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0Efforts to remove encroachment in per cent ofvillagesNil 100.0 100.0 66.7 83.3Somewhat effective 0.0 0.0 33.3 16.7Effective 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Extent of irrigation and cropping intensityThe net irrigated area as per cent of net sown area is 24 per cent in Project Villages and 15per cent in Control Villages. The cropping intensity is 126 in Project Villages and 108 inControl Villages. See Table 4.Table 2.4: Cropping intensity, net and gross irrigated areaProject Villages Control VillagesCropping Intensity 129 127Net irrigated area as per cent of net sown area 40.8 86.9Gross irrigated area as per cent of gross sown area 32.8 78.3Note: Cropping Intensity is 100 times the ratio of gross cropped area to net sown areaSurface Water BodiesThere is on an average 0.5 village pond in Project Village and 1.8 in Control Villages. Onetank in each of the Project and Control Villages is used for irrigation. There is free accessto these surface water bodies. There isa canal system in one-fourth Project Villages and in8 per cent Control Villages. This is also maintained by customary norms. There are noWater user Associations regulating their usage.GroundwaterIn both Project and Control villages there are dug wells used for irrigation. The averagedepth of dug wells is 83 and 79 feet respectively. Tube wells are few and wherever theyexist, the average depth is over 130 feet. All villages have handpumps.LivestockLivestock is another resource; the presence or absence of which is directly related to thenatural resource endowment available. See Table 6. There are on an average 3 bullockcarts in Project Villages and 13 in Control Villages.- 12 -
Table 2.5: Surface water bodies and their managementProjectVillagesControlVillagesTankPer cent of villages having tanks 41.6 25.0Per cent of villages with tank irrigation 0.0 8.3Average area irrigated (hectares) 0.0 3.2Average number of farmers benefiting per village 0 3Management practiceFree access 100.00 100.0CanalPer cent of villages having canals 8.3 62.5Average area irrigated (in hectares) 16 70.4Average number of farmers benefiting per village 100 70Management practiceFree access 50.0Government controlled 100 41.7Water User Association 8.3AnicutPer cent of villages having anicut 33.3 37.5Average number of anicuts 3 1.0Per cent of villages with anicut irrigation 50.0 0.0Average area irrigated per village 18.4 0.0Average number of farmers benefiting per village 50 0.0Management practiceFree access 75 100.0Government controlled 25NadiPer cent of villages having nadi 33.3 75.0Average number of nadi 1 1.5Management practiceFree access 100.0 100.0Groundwater statusPrivate dug wellsAverage number of dug wells 8 31Average water table (ft) 38 51Private tube wellsAverage number 18 47Average depth of tube wells 173 131Percent saline/ brackish/ fluoride wells 0.0 0.0Table 2.6: Average number of livestock units and bullock carts per villageProject Villages Control VillagesLivestock units 484.7 304.9Bullock carts 31 13- 13 -
Page 1 and 2: BASE LINE SURVEYOFDPIP DISTRICTSFeb
Page 3 and 4: Chapter I: IntroductionPoverty mana
Page 5 and 6: as well as economic infrastructure
Page 7 and 8: Special care was taken to include w
Page 9 and 10: Physical infrastructure and service
Page 11: Unprotected pastureland areasTree d
Page 15 and 16: per cent and 17 per cent respective
Page 17 and 18: Crop yields and vulnerabilityThe vu
Page 19 and 20: Box 2.2: Land distribution and vuln
Page 21 and 22: School infrastructureAll villages h
Page 23 and 24: III. Financial infrastructureWhile
Page 25 and 26: Table 2.25: Basic demographic chara
Page 27 and 28: doctorNot available or too far 57.4
Page 29 and 30: onded to the landlord. The hali if
Page 31 and 32: Table 2.35: Ratio of women to men (
Page 33 and 34: Table 2.39: Kinship Network Index (
Page 35 and 36: Box 2.6: Social Capital and Gender
Page 37 and 38: Characteristics of casual wage labo
Page 39 and 40: 90Figure 1: Differential wage rates
Page 41 and 42: simple ownership index created by a

Download PDF - Rajasthan Rural Livelihoods Project

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?