10.07.2015 Views

African Indaba Articles - wildlife-baldus.com

African Indaba Articles - wildlife-baldus.com

African Indaba Articles - wildlife-baldus.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Belgrade CIC Trophy Hunting Workshop ReportBy Gerhard R DammThe Belgrade Trophy Hunting Workshop, a joint undertaking of the CIC Commissions on TropicalGame, Sustainable Use, and Trophies & Exhibitions and <strong>African</strong> <strong>Indaba</strong>, brought together more than onehundred hunters and experts from around the world – amongst them representatives from Iran and China –for two mornings during the 54 th General Assembly of the CIC.The organizers were particularly pleased by the presence of Jan Heino, Assistant Director-General, andDr Rene Czudek of the Forestry Department of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedNations, Stephen Nash the Chief of the Capacity Building Unit of the CITES Secretariat and representativesof IUCN The World Conservation Union. From the International Hunting Organizations, Dallas Safari Clubwas represented by past president Ben Carter and Executive Director Gray Thornton. Thornton alsorepresented the Boone & Crockett Club, the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep had sentPresident Ray Lee, and Chairman Peter Flack participated for Rowland Ward. Unfortunately, Safari ClubInternational (SCI), who had originally confirmed attendance through Dr. Doug Yajko, Chairman of the SCITrophy Records Committee, informed the organizers a week before the event that budgetary reasonsprevented SCI representatives to participate.John Jackson III, President of the CIC Sustainable Use Commission, and Dr Francois Schwarzenbach,CIC Vice President, chaired the first day.Gerhard Damm of the CIC South <strong>African</strong> Delegation gave the participants an in depth overview about“Trophy Hunting – Past, Present and Future” in a <strong>com</strong>prehensive presentation. You can read the full text ofDamm’s presentation in this follow-up edition of <strong>African</strong> <strong>Indaba</strong> on page 4.“We are here, because there is a need for critical analysis”, said Damm, and “trophy hunting will faceserious problems, if we fail to establish trophy hunting as conservation tool, if our actions are perceived asuncivilized and decadent, and if they are seen as morally or biologically wrong.”The objective of the meeting in Belgrade was to start a consultative process, well aware of the fact that itwould be painful. CIC members and the hunters around the world need to critically review entrenchedconcepts and unconventional out-of-the-box thinking must be encouraged. There is no substitute forpermanent dialogue and interaction with scientists and researchers on the one hand and with other huntingorganizations on the other hand. And if evidence points towards changing traditional concepts then changemust be for what hunters and the CIC stand for.With his remarks Damm followed the statements given in the mid April CIC press conference, where CICPresident Dieter Schramm, CIC Director General Kai Wollscheid and Dr Rudolf Guertler, Professor FriedrichReimoser, Professor Klaus Hackländer and Dr Peter Lebersorger informed the media that the CIC willconsider future changes in trophy scoring. For example, the so-called “Beauty-and Penalty-Points” may beeliminated and the age of the trophy animal could be included in the scoring methods. Furthermore, it iscontemplated to discontinue the ad-hoc scoring <strong>com</strong>missions. Hunting ground owners as well as huntersmight have to submit evidence with respect to the origin of the hunted animals, i. e. whether they <strong>com</strong>e froma free range environment or from fenced areas.Damm mentioned that Dr. A Bubenik had brought up the issue of trophy scoring already decades ago inthe supplemental article “Socio-Biological Versus Hunters’ Viewpoints in Antlers and Horns” published inWerner Trense’s 1989 book “The Big Game of the World” (Paul Parey Verlag, Germany). Bubenik thenclaimed “that the designers of the trophy scoring formulas were all more experienced as hunters, rather thanas biologically minded sportsmen or naturalists”. In view of the mentioned issues around horned and antleredgame, Bubenik’s concluding remarks, written almost 20 years ago, are still valid today. <strong>African</strong> <strong>Indaba</strong> ispresently negotiating with the publishers for permission to make Bubenik’s article available online on the<strong>African</strong> <strong>Indaba</strong> webpage. We will inform the readers, when this important paper can be downloaded.In concluding his key-note presentation, Damm said “We need contemplate what threatens to destroy thehunters’ image. We need to establish the real meaning of trophy hunting. We need to reaffirm our credibilityas conservationists and true hunters. We owe it to the wild spaces and the game we pursue therein. We138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!