It hardly seems possible that <strong>Dick</strong><strong>Larkin</strong> is no longer with us. He was part<strong>of</strong> the NAPAA family from the beginning.To many <strong>of</strong> us, the name <strong>Dick</strong> <strong>Larkin</strong>is synonymous with NAPAA.I attended my first NNOAC/NAPAAmeeting in Chicago in November <strong>of</strong>1992, nearly two years after the associationwas founded. I was intrigued bythe communications the association wasmailing to the agency force <strong>and</strong> was curiousto learn more. They were well-written,relevant <strong>and</strong> focused on the criticalagent issues <strong>of</strong> the day. <strong>Dick</strong> was theeditor <strong>and</strong> driving force behind Direct-Writer magazine <strong>and</strong> authored many <strong>of</strong>the articles that appeared in its pages.I joined the association at the NNO-AC Convention the following year <strong>and</strong>have attended every conference since.For the first few years as a member <strong>of</strong>NNOAC, I would devour <strong>Dick</strong>’s articlesin DirectWriter magazine. He was sucha talent. His crowning achievement,however, was a 74 page exposé titled TheNOA Investigative Report, which waspublished in 1994. This stunning reportdemonstrated <strong>Dick</strong>’s thoroughness <strong>and</strong>tenacity to arrive at the truth. At thetime <strong>of</strong> his death, he was working on asecond such exposé, tentatively titled TheEA Investigative Report.Looking back, I learned a great dealfrom <strong>Dick</strong>, some posthumously. Besideshis writing skills <strong>and</strong> sharp intellect, hewas always calm, cool <strong>and</strong> collected. Inever saw him get angry. Nor did I everhear him raise his voice or complain. Henever showed fear or impatience <strong>and</strong>always maintained an air <strong>of</strong> quiet confidence.But most <strong>of</strong> all, he cared.They say that you don’t fully realizewhat you have until it’s gone, which ishow I feel at this moment. I will misshim <strong>and</strong> hope that I continue to learnfrom his example.Jim FishNAPAA Executive DirectorGulfport, MSThe first time I met <strong>Dick</strong> <strong>Larkin</strong> wasat a conference. I had been a NAPAA directorfor a few years when he was electedto the board again after spending someyears away. I had heard <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dick</strong> <strong>and</strong> hispast accomplishments <strong>and</strong> activity withNAPAA, but had never met him.The first people to arrive at a conferenceare usually the board members. Wesee each other at the check-in counter,lobby, the hotel bar or in the hallways.That year was no different. On the wayback to my room I passed by a table full<strong>of</strong> board members. We are always happyto see each other, so I start hugging,meeting, greeting <strong>and</strong> listening to travelstories, etc. As I’m st<strong>and</strong>ing there talking<strong>and</strong> hugging, I notice a gentleman acrossthe table. At first I was thinking, “Who’sthat guy?” Then I remembered that itmust be the board member I’d never metbefore, <strong>Dick</strong> <strong>Larkin</strong>. I notice he is not reallysmiling or frowning but seems to betaking stock <strong>of</strong> me. Probably, somethingsimilar to what I was thinking…. “Whois this person?”We were introduced <strong>and</strong> we performedthe customary h<strong>and</strong>shake <strong>and</strong> then engagedin some small talk. I noticed, justfor a minute, that when my name wasmentioned it seemed as if he didn’t expectme to be the one board member that hedidn’t know. At least that was my impression.Maybe I didn’t look or act like heexpected. Not sure. Not in a bad way, butI noticed a bit <strong>of</strong> surprise.For a few years we attended meetingsboth over the phone <strong>and</strong> in person.Each time I visited with <strong>Dick</strong>, much <strong>of</strong>our discussion focused on NAPAA business,the insurance industry or a currentnews story. We were friends, but as withany group you always become closer tosome than others. I spoke to two or threeother board members more <strong>of</strong>ten, sharedjokes, etc. But when it came to asking aquestion or wanting an opinion, I wouldalways include all the board members.<strong>Dick</strong> always had good insight. On occasion,this would lead to a conversationbetween just the two <strong>of</strong> us. It was alwaysa pleasurable <strong>and</strong> courteous discussionbetween two colleagues. I never knewwhat he thought <strong>of</strong> me, but then I neverreally thought about it. He just seemedto be okay with me <strong>and</strong> appeared to reallylisten to what I had to say. I startedto underst<strong>and</strong> him as a gentleman <strong>and</strong> a“gentle man” as well.Never was this more clear to me thanjust last year. I had decided not to runfor a board position for the 2008-2009term because I was pregnant. It was myfirst child, so I wanted to focus on it. Noone knew until last summer, when I announcedto the board that I was about4½ months pregnant. I received wellwishes <strong>and</strong> congratulations from everyone.A few months later, I invited themto visit my unborn child’s Website. Therewere a few sonogram pictures, an updateon the pregnancy, how it was going <strong>and</strong>a guestbook area where visitors couldleave comments. Again, there were manywonderful comments <strong>and</strong> congratulations.I wasn’t really sure <strong>Dick</strong> would bethe type to sign a guestbook, but then Iread the following, “Congratulations <strong>and</strong>Best Wishes. I hope she gets your integrity<strong>and</strong> feisty DNA. Keep us posted.– <strong>Dick</strong> <strong>Larkin</strong>.”As I said, I never really knew what hethought <strong>of</strong> me. Now I did. Truthfully, Iwas honored by his words. I have to admitit made me tear up a bit. I thought itwas such a nice thing to say. I looked at itmany times during the last months <strong>of</strong> mypregnancy <strong>and</strong> each time it made me tearup. I always planned to keep the Websiteas a paper tribute for my daughter. I neverthought it would be a tribute to him, aswell. His kind words will live on. Thankyou <strong>Dick</strong>, you are a true “Gentle Man.”Cheryl EnglishFormer NAPAA DirectorValrico, FL20 — Exclusivefocus Summer 2009
usiness tipsThe Internet Insurance Market:Friend <strong>and</strong> Foe?BY LORI REEDInternet ShoppersThe Internet has changed most <strong>of</strong> theways we operate our daily lives. Yes, westill may go to sporting or musical events,but now we can buy those tickets online,<strong>and</strong> if we miss the event, we can immediatelycheck out the results on some newsWebsite. However, the biggest impacthas been in how people gain informationabout almost anything: the weather,word spellings, symptoms <strong>of</strong> an illness,what friends are doing, degrees a college<strong>of</strong>fers <strong>and</strong>…shopping for insurance. Andthis Internet-gained information is beingused to influence all sorts <strong>of</strong> buyingdecisions. In fact, in a recent comScorereport, 65% <strong>of</strong> the people surveyed saidthey used the Internet to make buyingdecisions.And who would have thought 32 millionpeople would submit online quoterequests for auto insurance? Until thepast few years, most <strong>of</strong> the insuranceselling process was through referrals <strong>and</strong>personal meetings. But in recent years,except for last year, the number <strong>of</strong> peopleshopping online for insurance has beenincreasing at a 15% annual rate accordingto comScore. This means that when consumersrealize they need to reassess theirinsurance coverage, millions turn to theInternet first. And insurance agents don’twant to miss these millions <strong>of</strong> potentialcustomers.Too Many ChoicesWhen consumers go online, they typicallydon’t type in a specific insuranceagent’s name, they go to a search enginesuch as Google <strong>and</strong> type in the keyword“‘insurance.” According to Google, inApril the keyword “auto insurance” wasused as a search phrase 30 million times.“Auto insurance quote” <strong>and</strong> “auto insurancequotes” were shown to compriseanother 6 million or so searches. Thesestatistics fluctuate <strong>and</strong> aren’t 100% accurate,but suffice it to say, there are a hugenumber <strong>of</strong> potentially interested consumerschecking out insurance throughthe search engines.The problem is, if someone enters thesearch words “auto insurance” in Google,there are over 90 million matches or linksto Web pages. So in essence, there are 90million sources <strong>of</strong> information for thepeople researching insurance <strong>of</strong>ferings.The Internet has become congested withinformation – so much so that it is increasinglydifficult for consumers to findwhat they are looking for. But it is evenworse for small businesses, includinginsurance agencies, to get noticed whenthere are so many distractions.A few years ago, people were moreinclined to go directly to a Website bytyping in the address, or URL, <strong>of</strong> theWeb page they wanted to visit. But thehabit <strong>of</strong> most users now is to just entersome <strong>of</strong> the words into a Google search.According to a Yahoo survey, 72% <strong>of</strong> therespondents don’t remember the URLsthey see advertised on TV; they use asearch engine instead. Unfortunately, thesearch engines make it much easier forthe insurance shopper to be distracted bythe competition. A full 79% <strong>of</strong> the autoinsurance shoppers questioned ended upbeing introduced to a new auto insuranceSummer 2009 Exclusivefocus — 21