chapter 6 george ward based planning - George Municipality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Category: Excellent Satisfactory Poor No ResponseAccess to electricity 66.67% 22.22% 11.11% 0.00%Electricity Supply 66.67% 22.22% 11.11% 0.00%Street Lighting 44.44% 55.56% 0% 0.00%Solid Waste:Refuse Removal 44.44% 33.33% 22.22% 0.00%Recycling of Refuse 44.44% 44.44% 11.11% 0.00%Cleaning of your ward 0% 77.78% 22.22% 0.00%Land, Planning and Housing:Low cost housing 0% 11.11% 22.22% 66.67%Traffic Management 0% 22.22% 66.67% 11.11%Public Transport 0% 0% 77.78% 22.22%Covered Public Transport bays 0% 0% 44.44% 55.56%Taxi Ranks 0% 11.11% 22.22% 66.67%Community Facilities:Schools 22.22% 33.33% 0% 44.44%Cemeteries 0% 33.33% 11.11% 55.56%Clinic 0% 55.56% 0% 44.44%Church 33.33% 55.56% 0% 11.11%Community Halls 11.11% 33.33% 11.11% 44.44%Children Play Parks 11.11% 55.56% 33.33% 0.00%Youth centres and entertainment 0% 22.22% 22.22% 55.56%Recreation facilities and sports field 33.33% 22.22% 0% 44.44%Libraries 11.11% 33.33% 11.11% 44.44%Internet Facilities 0% 11.11% 22.22% 66.67%Safety and Security:Police Stations 0% 44.44% 22.22% 33.33%Police Visibility 0% 33.33% 66.67% 0.00%Fire stations 0% 44.44% 11.11% 44.44%Disaster Management 11.11% 33.33% 11.11% 44.44%Response rate 11.11% 44.44% 22.22% 22.22%Table 6.16: Ward Satisfaction SurveyTHE WARD SWOT PROFILEThe table below highlights the results of the SWOT profiling that was performed for the current (2012) IDPprocess for the respective ward. In the table below, the wards profiled the ward accor ding to strengths andopportunities on the one hand and the weaknesses and threats of the other.Grow George:Strengths and OpportunitiesLand is available for development.Tourism potential exists in the ward.Recreational and sporting facilities development potential.Weaknesses and ThreatsShortage of tourism opportunities.Lack of commercial activities (business).Poor economic climate/poor stimulation of economic climate.Page | 87
Strengths and OpportunitiesSpare capacity for water, electricity and sewagedevelopment.Use of mountain for tourism.Keep George Safe and Clean:Low crime levels.Several security residential complexes.Healthy living area.Extended Public Works Program (EPWP) to keep areasclean and remove alien vegetation in ward.Recycling opportunities.Lots of trees and municipal maintenance thereof is good.Deliver Services in George:Police and traffic services are available.Good service levels for basic services.Blue Drop – quality of drinking water.Green Drop – quality of recycling water.Implementation of the Integrated Transport Plan (gettingpeople to the hospital).Infrastructure for water, electricity and sewage is good forthe next 20 years.Participate in George:Strong ward committee.Value system – community participation.Support available to stimulate community.Potential for ward based newsletter.Govern George:Policies for governance are in place.Active strong citizen watchdogs.Culture of clean and transparent government.Weaknesses and ThreatsRed Tape with regards to use of mountain for tourism.Bad administration and communication between themunicipality and the public.Potential shortage of water (climate change).Police visibility and response time ineffective.Speeding and reckless driving of taxi’s.Un-kept and undeveloped open stands.Break and entering (crime).Invasive alien vegetation.Late night racing in Witfontein/Langenhoven Road.Squatters in neighbourhood and half built houses.Unsafe open swimming pool in Heather lands.Drug abuse.Poor maintenance of police building in Heatherlands.Neighbourhood watch is non-existent.Opening and going through of garbage bags causing litter(vagrants).Ineffective traffic services and poor response time of police.Bad traffic management.Availability of funds for service delivery.Poor public transport.Inequality of service delivery.Road, storm water and water reticulation infrastructure gettingold (more catchments needed).Police breaking the law (Heatherlands).A number of roads need to be sealed (potholes).Lack of one stop customer services.Community apathy.Poor feedback and communication with community.No community centre/hall for ward.Bias allocation of funds.Dismal audit report created bad perception in ward.No system exists where community can track progress of theIDP project implementation.Ineffective training of municipal officials, while training isavailable.Table 6.17: Ward 3 SWOT ProfilePage | 88
Page 5: SERVICE DELIVERYThe ward was analys
Page 11: 6.2.2 WARD 2 Denneoord, Fernridge,
Page 14 and 15: Category: Excellent Satisfactory Po
Page 17 and 18: Figure 6.3: Ward 3WARD COUNCILLOREr
Page 19: Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 23 and 24: Ward PlanProject / Programmes Prior
Page 25 and 26: Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 29 and 30: HousingFocus AreaTraffic ControlRec
Page 31 and 32: 6.2.5 WARD 5: Levelia, Loerie Park,
Page 35 and 36: Strengths and OpportunitiesTourism
Page 37 and 38: Table 6.31: Ward 5 Input6.2.6 WARD
Page 41 and 42: The table below highlights the resu
Page 45 and 46: Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 49 and 50: Govern George:Strengths and Opportu
Page 51 and 52: Charles StanderWARD STATISTICSThe s
Page 55 and 56: Strengths and OpportunitiesChildren
Page 59 and 60: The ward was analysed to determine
Page 63 and 64: 6.2.10 WARD 10: ThembalethuWARD COU
Page 67 and 68: Focus AreaDevelopment needsRecreati
Page 69 and 70: Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 71 and 72:
Category: Excellent Satisfactory Po
Page 73 and 74:
Focus AreaRoads & Storm waterHousin
Page 75 and 76:
6.2.12 WARD 12: ThembalethuWARD COU
Page 77 and 78:
Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 79 and 80:
The projects identified for Ward 12
Page 81 and 82:
The ward was analysed to determine
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Ward PlanProject / Programmes Prior
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Focus AreaRecreation and SportOther
Page 93 and 94:
The statistics available for Ward 1
Page 95 and 96:
The table below highlights the resu
Page 97 and 98:
6.2.16 WARD 16: New Dawn ParkWARD C
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Grow George:Strengths and Opportuni
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
SERVICE DELIVERYThe ward was analys
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Focus AreaDevelopment needsStreet).
Page 111 and 112:
6.2.18 WARD 18: Loeriepark, Tweeriv
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Strengths and Opportunities(Cheese
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
The projects identified for Ward 19
Page 125 and 126:
Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Participate in George:Strengths and
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Electricity for lighting 1 904 HH 5
Page 135 and 136:
The table below highlights the resu
Page 137 and 138:
Table 6.123: Ward 21 Input6.2.22 WA
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Strengths and OpportunitiesTraining
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Strengths and OpportunitiesMore com
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
WARD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY:T
Page 157 and 158:
Strengths and OpportunitiesWeakness
Page 159 and 160:
Strengths and OpportunitiesWeakness
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Strengths and OpportunitiesLaw enfo
Page 169 and 170:
Strengths and Opportunitiesmembers
Page 171 and 172:
MAP to be obtained from deptFigure
Page 173 and 174:
DepartmentDepartment of HealthProje
Page 175:
DepartmentProject DescriptionC0993:
show all

chapter 6 george ward based planning - George Municipality

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?