chapter 6 george ward based planning - George Municipality

Category: Excellent Satisfactory Poor No ResponseMaintenance of Gravel Roads 12.07% 8.62% 62.07% 17.24%Maintenance of Storm water ducts 0% 0% 0% 100.00%Water and Sanitation:Access to water 31.03% 22.41% 34.48% 12.07%Access to Sanitation 20.69% 17.24% 56.90% 5.17%Energy:Access to electricity 24.14% 27.59% 32.76% 15.52%Electricity Supply 27.59% 13.79% 50% 8.62%Street Lighting 10.34% 12.07% 72.41% 5.17%Solid Waste:Refuse Removal 15.52% 34.48% 31.03% 18.97%Recycling of Refuse 8.62% 20.69% 55.17% 15.52%Cleaning of your ward 18.97% 17.24% 60.34% 3.45%Land, Planning and Housing:Low cost housing 10.34% 6.90% 67.24% 15.52%Traffic Management 12.07% 17.24% 63.79% 6.90%Public Transport 13.79% 6.90% 75.86% 3.45%Covered Public Transport bays 13.79% 6.90% 62.07% 17.24%Taxi Ranks 13.79% 1.72% 82.76% 1.72%Community Facilities:Schools 44.83% 25.86% 22.41% 6.90%Cemeteries 12.07% 12.07% 62.07% 13.79%Clinic 15.52% 12.07% 67.24% 5.17%Church 29.31% 13.79% 43.10% 13.79%Community Halls 43.10% 12.07% 36.21% 8.62%Children Play Parks 5.17% 1.72% 77.59% 15.52%Youth centres and entertainment 8.62% 1.72% 77.59% 12.07%Recreation facilities and sports field 13.79% 15.52% 58.62% 12.07%Libraries 12.07% 5.17% 67.24% 15.52%Internet Facilities 8.62% 5.17% 72.41% 13.79%Safety and Security:Police Stations 12.07% 10.34% 62.07% 15.52%Police Visibility 5.17% 13.79% 62.07% 18.97%Fire stations 5.17% 13.79% 65.52% 15.52%Disaster Management 8.62% 6.90% 70.69% 13.79%Response rate 3.45% 1.72% 72.41% 22.41%Table 6.40: Ward Satisfaction SurveyTHE WARD SWOT PROFILEThe table below highlights the results of the SWOT profiling that was performed for the current (2012) IDPprocess for the respective ward. In the table below, the wards profiled the ward according to strengths andopportunities on the one hand and the weaknesses and threats of the other.Page | 114