chapter 6 george ward based planning - George Municipality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Total % Description Challenges / BacklogCommunity hallsParks & sport fieldsLibrariesServices by other spheres of governmentMulti-purpose centreTo be addedHospitals / ClinicsSchoolsCrèchesPolice stationTable 6.21: Ward 4 Service delivery StatusWARD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEYThe IDP ward profiling process (undertaken during the end of 2011 and the beginning of 2012), required thoseattending to complete a survey form in which the performance of the municipality and the standard of servicedelivery and infrastructure in the respective ward were to be rated. The table below shows the results of thissurvey. The “No-response” category highlights the lack of such of facility or lack of access to such facilities withinthe ward, or it can highlight the individuals’ un-awareness of such facilities in the ward.Category: Excellent Satisfactory Poor No ResponseRoads and Storm water:Maintenance of existing Roads 0% 34.38% 65.63% 0.00%Maintenance of Gravel Roads 0% 25% 71.88% 3.13%Maintenance of Storm water ducts 9.38% 18.75% 65.63% 6.25%Water and Sanitation:Access to water 37.50% 25% 34.38% 3.13%Access to Sanitation 34.38% 18.75% 40.63% 6.25%Energy:Access to electricity 12.50% 34.88% 46.88% 6.25%Electricity Supply 9.38% 28.13% 56.25% 6.25%Street Lighting 3.13% 18.75% 75% 3.13%Solid Waste:Refuse Removal 28.13% 31.25% 40.63% 0.00%Recycling of Refuse 12.50% 25% 56.25% 6.25%Cleaning of your ward 12.50% 28.13% 56.25% 3.13%Land, Planning and Housing:Low cost housing 0% 40.63% 53.13% 6.25%Traffic Management 0% 6.25% 87.50% 6.25%Public Transport 6.25% 18.75% 71.88% 3.13%Covered Public Transport bays 0% 0% 93.75% 6.25%Taxi Ranks 0% 0% 100% 0.00%Community Facilities:Schools 3.13% 28.13% 46.88% 21.88%Cemeteries 0% 37.50% 53.13% 9.38%Page | 93
Category: Excellent Satisfactory Poor No ResponseClinic 6.25% 25% 65.63% 3.13%Church 6.25% 21.88% 68.75% 3.13%Community Halls 6.25% 28.13% 59.38% 6.25%Children Play Parks 0% 6.25% 90.63% 3.13%Youth centres and entertainment 0% 0% 96.88% 3.13%Recreation facilities and sports field 0% 15.63% 81.25% 3.13%Libraries 6.25% 43.75% 46.88% 3.13%Internet Facilities 0% 0% 96.88% 3.13%Safety and Security:Police Stations 3.13% 15.63% 78.13% 3.13%Police Visibility 3.13% 25% 65.63% 6.25%Fire stations 0% 6.25% 90.63% 3.13%Disaster Management 0% 6.25% 87.50% 6.25%Response rate 3.13% 0% 90.63% 6.25%THE WARD SWOT PROFILETable 6.22: Ward Satisfaction SurveyThe table below highlights the results of the SWOT profiling that was performed for the current (2012) IDPprocess for the respective ward. In the table below, the wards profiled the ward according to strengths andopportunities on the one hand and the weaknesses and threats of the other.Grow George:Natural Beauty of the area.Strengths and OpportunitiesNational Park and its aesthetic as well as tourism potential.Moderate climate of the area.Long sandy beaches.Good Hotels, Guesthouses and Restaurants.Eco- Tourism potential (Hiking, Birding etc.).Adventure-Tourism potential (paragliding, canoeing,abseiling, diving and mountain biking).Re-open Kleinkrantz Tourist Resort.Reintroduction of Choo-Tjoe.Keep George Safe and Clean:Wilderness is small and compact so should be easy to keepsafe & clean.Existing Neighbourhood Watch organisations can be betterutilized.Reliable refuse collection service.Clean drinking water.Weaknesses and ThreatsInadequate maintenance of Municipal infrastructures, forexample roads due to lack of finance.Lack of Municipal expertise in tourism marketing.Lack of adequate Municipal finance to promote tourism.Ineffective local tourism office with inadequate operating hours.Municipal Town Planners continually allowing inappropriatedevelopment.Inadequate public facilities at beaches (Toilets etc.).No “Blue Flag” beach status.No events to attract tourism.General lack of Municipal funds due to previous profligacy.Inadequate maintenance of Municipal infrastructure.Total lack of Municipal Law Enforcement.No formalised taxi rank.Inadequate Municipal grass cutting and street cleaning.Inadequate maintenance of painted road lines.Inadequate directional signage.Inadequate parking.Page | 94
Page 5: SERVICE DELIVERYThe ward was analys
Page 11: 6.2.2 WARD 2 Denneoord, Fernridge,
Page 14 and 15: Category: Excellent Satisfactory Po
Page 17 and 18: Figure 6.3: Ward 3WARD COUNCILLOREr
Page 19 and 20: Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 21 and 22: Strengths and OpportunitiesSpare ca
Page 23 and 24: Ward PlanProject / Programmes Prior
Page 25: Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 29 and 30: HousingFocus AreaTraffic ControlRec
Page 31 and 32: 6.2.5 WARD 5: Levelia, Loerie Park,
Page 35 and 36: Strengths and OpportunitiesTourism
Page 37 and 38: Table 6.31: Ward 5 Input6.2.6 WARD
Page 41 and 42: The table below highlights the resu
Page 45 and 46: Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 49 and 50: Govern George:Strengths and Opportu
Page 51 and 52: Charles StanderWARD STATISTICSThe s
Page 55 and 56: Strengths and OpportunitiesChildren
Page 59 and 60: The ward was analysed to determine
Page 63 and 64: 6.2.10 WARD 10: ThembalethuWARD COU
Page 67 and 68: Focus AreaDevelopment needsRecreati
Page 69 and 70: Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 73 and 74: Focus AreaRoads & Storm waterHousin
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.12 WARD 12: ThembalethuWARD COU
Page 77 and 78:
Total % Description Challenges / Ba
Page 79 and 80:
The projects identified for Ward 12
Page 81 and 82:
The ward was analysed to determine
Page 83 and 84:
Category: Excellent Satisfactory Po
Page 85 and 86:
Ward PlanProject / Programmes Prior
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Focus AreaRecreation and SportOther
Page 93 and 94:
The statistics available for Ward 1
Page 95 and 96:
The table below highlights the resu
Page 97 and 98:
6.2.16 WARD 16: New Dawn ParkWARD C
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Grow George:Strengths and Opportuni
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
SERVICE DELIVERYThe ward was analys
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Focus AreaDevelopment needsStreet).
Page 111 and 112:
6.2.18 WARD 18: Loeriepark, Tweeriv
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Strengths and Opportunities(Cheese
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
The projects identified for Ward 19
Page 125 and 126:
Ward #% ofWard% ofMunicipalAreaComm
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Participate in George:Strengths and
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Electricity for lighting 1 904 HH 5
Page 135 and 136:
The table below highlights the resu
Page 137 and 138:
Table 6.123: Ward 21 Input6.2.22 WA
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Strengths and OpportunitiesTraining
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Strengths and OpportunitiesMore com
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
WARD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY:T
Page 157 and 158:
Strengths and OpportunitiesWeakness
Page 159 and 160:
Strengths and OpportunitiesWeakness
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Strengths and OpportunitiesLaw enfo
Page 169 and 170:
Strengths and Opportunitiesmembers
Page 171 and 172:
MAP to be obtained from deptFigure
Page 173 and 174:
DepartmentDepartment of HealthProje
Page 175:
DepartmentProject DescriptionC0993:
show all

chapter 6 george ward based planning - George Municipality

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?