SR99 Bored Tunnel-Assessment of Settlement Impacts ... - SCATnow

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table E-2. Level 2 MonitoringItemManual Building Survey PointQuantity Per Building4 minimumTilt Meter 8Manual Crack MonitorsTBDManual Crack PatchesTBDData Acquisition Station 1Table E-3. Level 3 MonitoringItemManual Building Survey PointQuantity Per Building4 minimumTilt Meter 8GPS Rover or AMTS (with multiple line-ofsightlocations, Robotic Total Stationmonitoring becomes more economical)2Data Acquisition Station 1Manual Crack MonitorsTBDManual Crack PatchesTBDThe Alaskan Way Viaduct & Seawall Replacement Program March 2010Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel - Assessment of Settlement Impacts to Buildings E-16Public Disclosure Request 11-0123 for Elizabeth Campbell - 2nd installment
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMM
Page 7 and 8:
Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel -Assess
Page 9 and 10:
The damage classification for the r
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 Program Description & Backgroun
Page 13 and 14:
2.2 Tunnel Project DescriptionThe T
Page 15 and 16:
2.2.3 North Access Project Descript
Page 17 and 18:
3.0 Building AssessmentThe tunnel a
Page 19 and 20:
. History of settlement - based upo
Page 21 and 22:
4.0 Settlement and Ground Movement4
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3. Generalized Transverse Se
Page 25 and 26:
5.0 Building Response to Excavation
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2. Building Damage Classifica
Page 29 and 30:
tunnel axis), the settlement trough
Page 31 and 32:
6.0 Results of Structural Analyses6
Page 33 and 34:
Therefore, high-rise buildings alon
Page 35 and 36:
Table 4. Summary of Building Damage
Page 37 and 38:
PROPERTY IDPROPERTY ADDRESSAPPROXIM
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
7.0 ReferencesAttewell, P.B.; Yeate
Page 49 and 50:
Appendix ATunnel Alignment Plan She
Page 51 and 52:
A1Legend! ! SeawallPiersAreawaysTun
Page 53 and 54:
T161NOTES :1) ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE
Page 55 and 56:
A3LegendMONORAILEBIAreawaysTunnelTu
Page 57 and 58: Appendix BBuilding Damage Classific
Page 59 and 60: Figure B-1. Graphical Illustration
Page 61 and 62: Appendix CBuilding Assessment Forms
Page 63 and 64: List of Abbreviations Used in Build
Page 65 and 66: Distance to Tunnel:• Horizontal o
Page 67 and 68: example, T311 and T312 are the same
Page 69 and 70: Appendix DBoscardin and Cording Ana
Page 71 and 72: Table of Contents1.0 B&C ANALYSIS M
Page 73 and 74: 1.0 B&C Analysis MethodThe building
Page 75 and 76: Offset, Yδε hLβDeparture from tu
Page 77 and 78: Figure D-1. Building Location Coord
Page 79 and 80: 1.00.90.80.7G((X-XT)/KZ)0.60.50.40.
Page 81 and 82: 2.0 B&C Damage ClassificationsTable
Page 83 and 84: 3.0 E/G RatioE/G is based upon Tabl
Page 85 and 86: 4.0 Building HeightBuilding height
Page 87 and 88: 5.0 Foundation DepthThe analysis to
Page 89 and 90: Appendix EMonitoringThe Alaskan Way
Page 91 and 92: Table of Contents1.0 INTRODUCTION .
Page 93 and 94: 1.0 IntroductionThe potential groun
Page 95 and 96: 2.0 Basic MonitoringManual survey p
Page 97 and 98: 3.0 Tilt Meter Monitoring3.1 Goals3
Page 99 and 100: 4.0 GPS Monitoring4.1 Goals4.2 Impl
Page 101 and 102: 5.0 Automated Monitoring Total Stat
Page 103 and 104: 6.0 Distributed Data Acquisition6.1
Page 105 and 106: The emerging capability of wireless
Page 107: 7.0 Levels of MonitoringEach buildi
show all

SR99 Bored Tunnel-Assessment of Settlement Impacts ... - SCATnow

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?