SR99 Bored Tunnel-Assessment of Settlement Impacts ... - SCATnow

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Alaskan Way Viaduct & Seawall Replacement Program March 2010Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel - Assessment of Settlement Impacts to BuildingsPublic Disclosure Request 11-0123 for Elizabeth Campbell - 2nd installment
List of Abbreviations Used in Building Evaluation FormsACTAVEB&CCMUDPDEIFSGWBHSSKSILFRSPSEPSFPSIPTSCLSPUSTT&GTITYPURMWYAcoustical Ceiling TileAvenueBoscardin and Cording [1989] Analysis MethodConcrete Masonry UnitCity of Seattle Department of Planning and DevelopmentExterior Insulation and Finish SystemGypsum Wall BoardHollow Structural Section (steel)Kips per Square Inch (1 kip = 1000 pounds)Lateral Force Resisting SystemPuget Sound EnergyPounds per Square FootPounds per Square InchPost-Tensioned (concrete)Seattle City LightSeattle Public UtilitiesStreetTongue and Groove (timber decking)Tenant ImprovementTypical conditionUnreinforced MasonryWayThe Alaskan Way Viaduct & Seawall Replacement Program March 2010Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel - Assessment of Settlement Impacts to Buildings C-1Public Disclosure Request 11-0123 for Elizabeth Campbell - 2nd installment
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMM
Page 7 and 8:
Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel -Assess
Page 9 and 10:
The damage classification for the r
Page 11 and 12: 2.0 Program Description & Backgroun
Page 13 and 14: 2.2 Tunnel Project DescriptionThe T
Page 15 and 16: 2.2.3 North Access Project Descript
Page 17 and 18: 3.0 Building AssessmentThe tunnel a
Page 19 and 20: . History of settlement - based upo
Page 21 and 22: 4.0 Settlement and Ground Movement4
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3. Generalized Transverse Se
Page 25 and 26: 5.0 Building Response to Excavation
Page 27 and 28: Table 2. Building Damage Classifica
Page 29 and 30: tunnel axis), the settlement trough
Page 31 and 32: 6.0 Results of Structural Analyses6
Page 33 and 34: Therefore, high-rise buildings alon
Page 35 and 36: Table 4. Summary of Building Damage
Page 37 and 38: PROPERTY IDPROPERTY ADDRESSAPPROXIM
Page 47 and 48: 7.0 ReferencesAttewell, P.B.; Yeate
Page 49 and 50: Appendix ATunnel Alignment Plan She
Page 51 and 52: A1Legend! ! SeawallPiersAreawaysTun
Page 53 and 54: T161NOTES :1) ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE
Page 55 and 56: A3LegendMONORAILEBIAreawaysTunnelTu
Page 57 and 58: Appendix BBuilding Damage Classific
Page 59 and 60: Figure B-1. Graphical Illustration
Page 61: Appendix CBuilding Assessment Forms
Page 65 and 66: Distance to Tunnel:• Horizontal o
Page 67 and 68: example, T311 and T312 are the same
Page 69 and 70: Appendix DBoscardin and Cording Ana
Page 71 and 72: Table of Contents1.0 B&C ANALYSIS M
Page 73 and 74: 1.0 B&C Analysis MethodThe building
Page 75 and 76: Offset, Yδε hLβDeparture from tu
Page 77 and 78: Figure D-1. Building Location Coord
Page 79 and 80: 1.00.90.80.7G((X-XT)/KZ)0.60.50.40.
Page 81 and 82: 2.0 B&C Damage ClassificationsTable
Page 83 and 84: 3.0 E/G RatioE/G is based upon Tabl
Page 85 and 86: 4.0 Building HeightBuilding height
Page 87 and 88: 5.0 Foundation DepthThe analysis to
Page 89 and 90: Appendix EMonitoringThe Alaskan Way
Page 91 and 92: Table of Contents1.0 INTRODUCTION .
Page 93 and 94: 1.0 IntroductionThe potential groun
Page 95 and 96: 2.0 Basic MonitoringManual survey p
Page 97 and 98: 3.0 Tilt Meter Monitoring3.1 Goals3
Page 99 and 100: 4.0 GPS Monitoring4.1 Goals4.2 Impl
Page 101 and 102: 5.0 Automated Monitoring Total Stat
Page 103 and 104: 6.0 Distributed Data Acquisition6.1
Page 105 and 106: The emerging capability of wireless
Page 107 and 108: 7.0 Levels of MonitoringEach buildi
show all

SR99 Bored Tunnel-Assessment of Settlement Impacts ... - SCATnow

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?