Parsons - 2010 Construction Management for AWV.pdf - SCATnow

PARSONS600 University Street, Suite 700 • Seattle, WA 98101 • (206) 494-3101 • Fax: (206) 494-0960 • www.parsons.comJanuary 26, 2011Washington State Department of TransportationAlaskan Way Viaduct Program Office999 Third Avenue, Suite 2424Seattle, WA 98104Re:SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesDear Sir or Madam:We are pleased to submit this proposal for the Construction Management services for the SR 99 Design-Build project. Inproviding Construction Management services to WSDOT, we will integrate and work closely with WSDOT, the SR 99project management team, and the design-builder to deliver the SR 99 Design-Build project. The Parsons team brings theperfect balance of a professional history of worldwide tunneling construction management (CM) experience andextensive CM experience on transportation design-build tunnel contracts, providing WSDOT the reassurance of a trustedand experienced team that understands its role on this project. Parsons will lead our team, which includes Halcrow Inc.,CMTS Inc., The VOSK Group, and a number of recognized technical support experts. Although not required, we arepleased to integrate CMTS, a minority-owned firm, and VOSK, a DBE firm, into our team, and continue our dedication tosupporting these businesses. Collectively, we have performed every role – construction manager, equity partner,program manager, designer, and contractor – and can offer this experience to WSDOT.Leadership with Careers Completely Dedicated to Tunnel ConstructionWe believe there is no one better suited to successfully anchor our team than our Resident Engineer, Greg Colzani. He isa recognized expert in soft ground tunneling, who has been practicing CM for 30 years. He has filled key roles forsignature tunnel projects including the Willamette River CSO program in Oregon, the I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnels inColorado, and the South Bay Ocean Outfall in California. As the Construction Manager in Portland, Greg managed anintegrated client and consultant CM team to work collaboratively with the contractor during preconstruction tocomplete the design, evaluate methods, and develop project plans. This process saved millions of dollars through theintroduction of risk-reducing, innovative construction technologies to the country, including slurry TBM technology andsteel-fiber reinforced tunnel segments. Not only a tunneling specialist, Greg has CM experience with highway tunnelcontrol and ventilation systems, installation, integration, and commissioning.We are providing the added value leadership of Steve Minassian, PE, to coordinate all CM service activities. Similar toGreg, Steve has spent his career in tunneling. Over the past 25 years, he has fulfilled many diverse roles serving thetunneling industry. Steve has served as the Design Manager and Construction Manager on several high-profile, softground tunneling projects, as well as serving as the Project Manager for the Port of Miami Tunnel project, where he wastasked with leading the design-build joint venture’s design efforts for the largest-diameter TBM tunnel in the UnitedStates to date. Steve has participated actively in risk management, partnering, and dispute resolution board proceedings.Professional History Provides Greatest Assurance of SuccessThe Parsons team is currently working on or has completed work as the CM on 10 recent,complex tunnel design-build projects. We understand the differences of this role versus a traditional design-bid-buildproject. As a result, we have developed specific CM plans and processes, proven tools, and qualified personnel to managethe cost, schedule, and quality objectives of the design-build projects. Locally, our team has made a commitment to thisregion by delivering transportation solutions since 1929, including key WSDOT projects such as the SR 532 CorridorImprovements Design-Build project; the I-405 Corridor Program; and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge project. We lookforward to continuing to partner with WSDOT, and will draw on our experience with WSDOT’s procedures andregulations.

Halcrow is a premier tunnel designer and constructor, with marquee projects around the world.Their roles in major tunneling projects include design, engineering support during construction, and constructionmanagement, which gives them a complete perspective on different types of project delivery methods, including designbuild.Most importantly, both Parsons and Halcrow have design-build experience as an equity partner, so we know whatit takes to manage a project of this size.We offer an outstanding group of CM professionals who have experience working on many of the world’s largesttunneling projects, including the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, the Dubai Metro Red and Green Lines, the Al Salam StreetTunnel, and the Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Program. In addition, our team includes technical experts fromprofessional and academic backgrounds, who are considered world leaders in their fields. They will provide us with themost innovative expertise and technical advice on specialized disciplines such as settlement mitigation and hyperbaricinterventions, so that we can provide the strongest possible CM services support to WSDOT.Our individuals’ and firms’ experience alone differentiates our team from the rest. Additionally, our significant efforts aspart of the Seattle Tunneling Group, in which we prepared a full proposal, a comprehensive cost/time risk assessment,and a 30 percent design to bid on the bored tunnel project, uniquely qualifies us to assist WSDOT in managing the SR 99CM Services project. Parsons and Halcrow have developed a comprehensive understanding of the project’s risks andattributes to the community, and our experience in soft-ground, pressurized-face tunneling as both a designer and aconstructor gives us the capacity to assist WSDOT with the CM of this major project.As two top-tier design-build firms with additional strong support, the Parsons team brings an understanding of theimportance of partnership, integration, and team-building with WSDOT. We understand that the right combination ofmanagerial and technical expertise will provide the most benefit to WSDOT, while allowing us to seamlessly integratewith the project team.Combined, our tunnel CM experience, design and design-build expertise, thorough knowledge of the SR 99 Design-Buildproject, and integrated team experience with WSDOT, provides WSDOT with a uniquely qualified team to support its CMprogram and ensure successful delivery of the SR 99 Design-Build project.We thank you for the opportunity to present our local team and proposed approach to this project. Further, we confirmthat Parsons has no conflict of interest in submitting this package, and all staff members on our team are expected toavoid conflicts of interest at all times.Our single point of contact for this project is Rick Chapman, PE, who can be reached at:ParsonsAttn: Rick Chapman, Vice President, Area Manager600 University Street, Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Phone: (206) 494-3109/Fax(206) 494-0960Email: Rick.Chapman@parsons.comWe thank you for the opportunity to submit these qualifications and look forward to working closely with you again.Sincerely,PARSONSThomas Barron, President, Parsons Transportation Group Inc.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99BExecutive SummaryExecutive SummaryThe SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project, which will replace the aging Alaska Way Viaduct and restore thewaterfront as a usable community space, is yet another opportunity to reshape the face of Seattle. As part of the Seattlecommunity, we look forward to being a part of this landmark project that will build the largest bored tunnel in the world.The SR 99 design-builder will construct a first in the world, 58-foot diameter tunnelusing an earth pressure balance (EPBM) “mega” machine. The tunnel project has severalchallenges, including varying soft soil conditions, submerged construction environments,and significant site constraints. There are many risks related to constructing a tunnel alongthe proposed alignment. One of the greatest risks is ground settlement caused by overexcavationat the face of the tunnel excavation, which can lead to significant settlementof buildings and adjacent infrastructure. For the bored tunnel project, settlement is ofparticular concern due to the number of sensitive buildings and critical infrastructure inthe tunnel’s vicinity. We understand these risks and provide the best team to assist WSDOTin managing the project beginning on Day 1.The Parsons Team’s Local and Worldwide CM Expertise Provides a CM Approach forDesign-Build That ProtectS WSDOT’s InterestsThe Parsons team is ideally suited to provide first-classCM services that will complement WSDOT’s CM program,to help ensure that the design-builder delivers a qualityproject safely. We have assembled a team that includesour strongest, most experienced tunnel constructionmanagers, supported by recognized tunnel designand construction professionals from both industry andacademia. We can mobilize Parsons’ and the team’scombined staff of over 21,000 employees. Our teammembers and firms possess the unique set of skillsdescribed below to help WSDOT deliver a successfulproject.• Experience in large diameter transportation tunnelCM, including design-build CM• Thorough knowledge of the SR 99 Bored TunnelAlternative Design-Build project• Integrated team experience with WSDOT, and a clearknowledge of WSDOT’s procedures and processes.Through our success with delivering over 250 complextunnel projects worldwide, we have developed keysystems and processes particular to the management oftunnel construction. For example, we have developedParsons’ CM Experience in TunnelDesign-Build Protects WSDOT’s InterestsParsons is uniquely qualified to provide CM services for the SR 99 Design-Buildproject due to our extensive involvement in design-build projects, where our roleshave ranged from CM to Construction Joint Venture Lead Partner. As such, we clearlyappreciate our role augmenting the SR 99 Design-Build project CM organization toprotect WSDOT’s interests in delivering a safe, and efficient roadway of the highestquality. Parsons has provided CM services worldwide for major tunnel design-buildprojects, including the following current and past projects:• New Jersey Transit ARC Program−−Manhattan Tunnels−−Palisades Tunnels−−Hudson River Tunnels• Dubai Light Rail Transit−−Red Line Tunnels−−Green Line Tunnels• Dulles People Mover Tunnel• Al Salam Street Tunnels• Channel Tunnel Crossing• Channel Tunnel Rail Link• Midtown Tunnel, Hampton Roads, VA• Straights of Messina Crossing, Italy• Southern Nevada Water Authority(SNWA) – Intake No. 34

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99PDA-based inspection data collection systems that provides data supporting time and motion studies, productivity andanalysis of delay claims. We have developed project and program-wide CM plans for complex tunnel projects including theARC Tunnels in NJ and the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP) in San Francisco.Through our significant effort in this design-build pursuit, weprepared a comprehensive risk-based proposal, conducted acomplete settlement and structure protection analysis, andcompleted a 30 percent design. This process gives our team anunequalled, in-depth understanding of the project, andstrengths in the following areas:• Full understanding of WSDOT’s operational and design requirements• Risk identification and mitigation• Geological and geotechnical conditions• Comprehensive structures analysis• TBM selection and design• Comprehensive systems integration study• Continuity of staffThis experience, coupled with our risk-based approach, gives us a running startat assisting WSDOT with design reviews, evaluation of innovative ideas by thedesign-builder, and managing risks.Our only interest is to provide WSDOT withevery tool available to ensure project success.We are here to “manage”, not to “construct”.UtilitiesStructuresand Geotech.RailroadRight of way700600500400Construction300200100Partnershipand StakeholdersDesign /PS&EEnvironmentaland HydraulicContractingand procurementOur detailed risk assessment enabled the SeattleTunneling Group to apply risk-based bid costs foreach element of work.200Bored TunnelUTLSTGSettlements andmitigation measuresRR300200600500400300200100CNSROWAccidents, QualityProven technical and management approachpavement, etc.)ScheduleOne of our team’s primary goals is working collaboratively with WSDOT and the Design-Builder, and leveraging our uniqueexpertise to deliver a quality project safely, on time, and with manageable risks. Our approach to the technical challengesArchitecturalCut & Coveron the project will capitalize on our knowledge of CM for major tunnel projects we have successfully completed and theknowledge of our team members who have addressed first-hand the challenges facing this Design-Builder.Designissues15010050Potential changesto roadway design(including verticaland/or horizontalalignment, earthwork,Safety, quality100We have highlighted nine major risk categories and detailed a comprehensive strategy to assist WSDOT in mitigating them.One of the major risks, tunnel-induced settlement and mitigation has been thoroughly investigated by our team whichgives WSDOT added-value information to proactively monitor the Design-Builder’s performance.Our approach to assisting WSDOT in the safe delivery of CM Services will build on our successful history in partnering withWSDOT and other consultants in a co-located, integrated team environment. We will assist WSDOT in developing a workableCM plan, support the execution of that plan by providing the appropriate level of personnel and technical expertise, andmaximize WSDOT training opportunities. We will continue our successful delivery of CM Services through the consistentapplication of WSDOT’s policies and procedures to implement the requirements to the design-build contract.Our technical and managerial approach discussed in detail in Section E demonstrates our understanding of the projectrisks and how to manage them effectively.Our Leadership Team Drives Quality PerformanceAs an added value to WSDOT, we will provide Steve Minassian as our CM Services Manager. Steve will be tasked withcoordinating all staffing and planning for our team, and will provide important technical and managerial support to thevaluable resources offered to WSDOT. Steve has made a career of the tunnel business with a 25-year history and a leadershipstyle that demonstrates he will collaborate well with WSDOT and the project team. Steve has served as the ConstructionManager on several complex, large-diameter, soft ground tunnel projects, including the North Shore Connector inPittsburgh, PA. He was the Design and Project Manager for the Port of Miami Tunnel project, where he led the design-buildjoint venture’s design efforts for the largest-diameter TBM tunnel in the United States. Working for tunnel contractors, he5

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99was responsible for providing efficient, safe, and cost-effective solutions to solve day-to-day construction issues. Steve hasparticipated actively in risk management, partnering, and dispute resolution board proceedings.Our Resident Engineer, Greg Colzani, will anchor our team. Greg is a recognized expert in CM of large-diameter, softground tunnel projects, with over 30 years of tunnel CM experience. In the roles of Construction Manager and ResidentEngineer, he has provided expertise in the selection of TBM machines as part of evaluations of contractors’ alternativeproposals on the Hollywood Water Quality Improvement Project and the South Bay Ocean Outfall projects in California,and the Willamette River CSO program in Oregon. He has comprehensive experience in a wide variety of shaft constructionmethods, including complex deep slurry walls, secant installations, jet grouting, ground freezing, drilled and conventionallyexcavated shafts. Greg served as the CM for the Willamette River CSO program, managing an integrated city and consultantstaff of nearly 40 people to work collaboratively with contractors during pre-construction and construction phases of thesoft ground tunnel project. Greg has also managed the installation, testing, and commissioning of tunnel ventilation andcontrol systems, including the H-3 tunnels in Hawaii and the I-70 Hanging Lake tunnels in Colorado. Greg is accomplishedin the risk assessment/risk management process.Our Pre-Construction Lead, Jon Kaneshiro, will assist in design reviews during pre-construction. Jon was the DesignManager for our SR 99 Design-Build pursuit, and will provide a seamless interface during this phase of the project. Jonhas 30 years of design management experience in planning, construction, and seismic analysis of tunnels, foundations,mass excavations, and underground projects. His expertise in tunnel engineering includes over 150 tunnels, 45 of whichhe served as Engineer of Record. As the Design Manager on more than 20 contracts, Jon’s experience includes the finaldesign of unique bolted, gasketed segmental liners. Jon’s understanding of the design and construction challenges of softground tunneling, liquefaction, fault crossing design, and the final design of deep excavations and tiebacks includes localknowledge from preliminary engineering, methodology studies, and design reviews in Seattle - the Beacon Hill tunnels,the Metro Downtown Seattle Transit (Bus Tunnel) Project, and the Sound Transit Design-Build of the Central Link ExtensionTunnels. For continuity and added value, we have retained the same key design team from our design-build pursuit toeliminate any learning curve and begin assisting WSDOT on Day 1.Our Systems Integrator, Doug Slakey, has more than 28 years of experience in the planning, engineering, design,and management of civil infrastructure projects, with over 15 years of his professional practice spent in the planning,design, and construction of highway tunnel systems, communications system architecture, and ITS. His project experienceincludes highway, railroad, and mass transit tunnels; railroad, urban transit, urban, and rural highways; and bridges. Dougwas responsible for the systems integration for the I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnels project in Colorado, which included a semitransverseventilation system with vane axial fans, and a complete traffic monitoring and control system. He was the designsystems integration lead for the Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Program, which is currently under construction on SR 24in the hills above Oakland, CA.Why the Parsons Team?Our team is ready to mobilize, and is available for this project on Day 1. The Parsons team provides the perfect blendof global talent, local experience, tunnel CM expertise, and a strong understanding of design-build delivery.Soft ground tunnel Construction Management experience. The Parsons team includes individuals with a long historyin leading CM for design-build of the largest and most technically-challenging deep tunnels in the world.Thorough understanding of the SR 99 Design-Build Tunnel. Our experience in contributing to the Seattle TunnelingGroup’s proposal for the SR 99 Design-Build project provides us with a detailed perspective of project risks andchallenges.Unique experience working in a WSDOT integrated team. The Parsons team has demonstrated their ability toeffectively work with WSDOT and consultants side by side to deliver projects meeting WSDOT’s goals and requirements.6

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99CTeam FirmsThe Parsons team was formed to provide WSDOT with the personnel and project experience it needs to successfully deliverthe SR 99 Design-Build project. In addition to technical and managerial skills, we see each of the following criteria as criticalto successfully completing the CM team:•Experience in construction management, tunnelconstruction, design and design-build, and a depth ofresources with the expertise to solve problems quicklyand effectively.•Thorough knowledge of the SR 99 Bored TunnelDesign-Build project, including understanding thescope, risks, and associated costs at a detailed level.•Integrated team experience with WSDOT and a clearknowledge of WSDOT’s procedures and processes.Each of these is important, and all three provide WSDOTwith a team that can seamlessly join WSDOT’s currentteam of personnel and consultants, with a minimallearning curve. Figure C.1 illustrates the advantages andbenefits WSDOT will receive by working with a team suchas ours, which has all of these qualities.Figure C.1 – Advantages and Benefits of Our TeamTeam FirmsParsons and Halcrow were two members of SeattleTunneling Group’s design team. We have complementedour already knowledgeable team with specific firms andindividuals to bring the best talent to WSDOT. Othermembers of our team are:• The VOSK Group, a certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), is an association of professionals who haveworked together over the past 20 years on various large, civil projects in the Puget Sound Area. VOSK specializes inproject and construction management services. Vic Oblas, one of VOSK’s principals, has been brought to the team forhis knowledge of the SR 99 Design-Build project and the complexities (both technical and managerial) it brings, as wellas his experience with tunneling operations in downtown Seattle.• CMTS Inc. , a minority-owned firm, will provide quality tunnel inspectors who bring specialized experience and depth ofresources to the team. Parsons, and specifically our proposed Resident Engineer, Greg Colzani, has extensive experienceworking with CMTS on tunneling projects.• CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd is a UK-based firm that brings world-class segmental lining inspection experience tothe team. Chris Smith, CRS’ principal, is designated as our special inspector for segmental linings.• HealthForce Partners LLC is a workplace health company specializing in occupational health services. Edmond Kay,MD, our hyperbaric specialist, is a recognized regional leader in hyperbaric medicine.7

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Table C.1 illustrates how the Parsons and Halcrow, complemented with the skills of the other team members, brings toWSDOT an array of skills and experience that meets its required CM managerial and technical needs, while bringing addedvaluein project knowledge, WSDOT knowledge, and relevant local experience.Table C.1 –Team QualificationsKEY TECHNICAL ELEMENTSPARSONSHALCROWCMTSVOSKSoft ground pressurized face TBM tunnels • • • •TBM tunnels constructed below ground water • • • •TBM instrumentation and performance analysis • • • •Pre-cast gasketed segmental concrete lining systems • • • •Hyperbaric interventions for TBM maintenance/repair • • • •Geotechnical instrumentation for structure monitoring • • • •Deep ground improvement techniques • • • •Control tunnel construction-induced ground movement • • •Deep excavation, below groundwater • • • •Support of major structures and facilities • • • •Control/mitigation settlement of structures and utilities • • •Systems integration of roadway and tunnel systems • • •Schedule and claims analysis • • •Underground safety program expertise • • •Resident engineering and inspection of tunnel projects • • • •VALUE ADDED SERVICE CAPABILITIESIntegrated team co-located with owner • • • • •Detailed knowledge of SR 99 Design-Build project scope • • • •Risk analysis of SR 99 Design-Build project • • •Understanding of SR 99 Design-Build project costs • •WSDOT Experience • •Commissioning • • •EXPERTSOur organizational chart, shown on the following page, shows our integrated team for performance of all CM services.Our key personnel form the framework of the organization and the additional staff represent further resources who areavailable for this program. The organizational chart also indicates the functional authority, lines of communications, andresponsibility of the positions.The Parsons team has extensive local and worldwide experience in deep tunnels, soft ground large bored tunnels, andtunnels with extensive systems installation and integration. We will draw on our knowledge of the SR 99 Design-Buildproject as well as this past work. The nine projects presented in this section demonstrate our team’s extensive experiencedesigning and constructing tunnels similar to the SR 99 Design-Build project. This experience and expertise in large boredtunnels will greatly complement our CM services work.8

* Key StaffFirmBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99(C) CMTS, Inc.(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PESettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-ConstructionCM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Task Force TeamsDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Construction Planning TeamCM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*9

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99ARC Tunnel Project/Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel ProjectNewark, NJPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:Newark, NJContract Dates:6/09 - 10/10Total Dollar Amount:$8.7 billionServices Provided:Construction ManagementPROJECT BACKGROUNDThe CM Consortium tri-venture was contracted by New Jersey Transit for project control and construction management(PCCM) services in support of the Access to the Region‘s Core (ARC) project, and selected the ARC alternative known as theTrans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project. This project doubles the rail capability from New Jersey into midtown Manhattanthrough construction of the following:• Platform, concourse, and track improvements to the existing Frank R. Lautenberg Station in Secaucus, New Jersey• Two new single-track tunnels beneath the New Jersey Palisades (hard rock TBM tunnels) and the Hudson River (softground earth pressure balance TBM (EPBM) tunnels) connecting with four single-track tunnels in Manhattan (hard rockTBM tunnels)• Construction of the New York Penn Station Expansion to the north under 34th Street between 6th and 8th Avenues• Improvements to rail infrastructure in New Jersey to provide expanded one-seat-ride opportunities to midtownManhattan from various rail lines• Supporting investments such as electrification, traction power, track improvements, rail yards, signal systems, and facilitiesSignificant Challenges and/or InnovationsAlthough the project was suspended during the initial stages of construction, the CM Consortium developed numerousinnovations during pre-construction. Responding to public concerns for providing safe, reliable transportation thatpromotes sustainable commuting patterns was at the core of the ARC project. Rail transit promotes sustainability byreducing emissions and providing an efficient, economical, and environmentally conscious way to travel. By doubling therail capability from New Jersey into Midtown Manhattan, the ARC project would have allowed more people to use this“green” form of transportation as their primary means of commuting.Sustainability is also being incorporated into the project through various construction methods. For instance, the New YorkPenn Station Expansion (NYPSE) cavern, the largest underground station in Manhattan, was scheduled to be constructedusing green building practices that reduce water usage and heating and cooling loads. During construction, the contractorwould have been required to meet significant guidelines with respect to air quality and emissions.Roles of Major ParticipantsParsons is the managing partner for the CM Consortium tri-venture. The CM Consortium is contracted to perform servicesthat align with a conventional construction management function and a project controls/oversight function. Majorservices included in the CM Consortium’s scope include review of preliminary engineering design work for constructability,review of geotechnical methodologies, development of a project control plan, review of the baseline budget preparedby the partnership design team, and resident engineering and inspection services. In addition, the CM Consortium isrequired to provide various other services, including developing a plan to control the scope and budget, supporting aproject management plan that integrates design and construction, developing a risk management plan, and developingthe Procedures Manual, which is intended to document the applicable quality management responsibilities of the CMConsortium through the life of the project.12

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Al Salam Street TunnelAbu Dhabi, UAEPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:Abu Dhabi MunicipalityContract Dates:5/2008 - 1/2012Total Dollar Amount:$1.4 billionServices Provided:Designer, Engineering Support DuringConstruction, Construction ManagementPROJECT BACKGROUNDAl Salam Street is a major urban arterial in Abu Dhabi’s central business district. Parsons was awarded a contract to designand supervise construction of major improvements to upgrade Al Salam Street to a freeway level of service. The projectcovers a total length of 9,800 feet, 8,200 feet of which will be a combination of depressed roadways and tunnels.The $1.4 billion project involves design and construction supervision of a major tunneling project in the heart of Abu Dhabi’scentral business district. The tunnel will carry four lanes of traffic in each direction from the Port Zayed area to beyond theintersection with Al Falah Street. Tunnels to connect Al Corniche Road with Al Salam Street are also being constructedas part of this project. The project included major detour work to minimize disruptions in a very densely populated partof the city. In addition, the project involves extensive utility relocations, while preventing disruption of services duringconstruction.Over the length of the project, the new tunnel adds four lanes of uninterrupted traffic-carrying capacity, resulting in acapacity addition of more than 6,000 vehicles per hour to this vital area of the city.The state-of-the-art tunnel safety and management system will coordinate ventilation, fire detection and suppression,lighting, public address, environmental management, electrical power supply, emergency broadcasting, radiore-broadcasting, security and surveillance, traffic detection and control, and traveler information to a centralized monitoringand control facility.Significant Challenges and/or InnovationsIn anticipation of this major project, Parsons co-hosted a series of forums to prepare short-listed contractors for tendering.The forums offered the opportunity for potential contractors to keep updated with project developments, for what will beone of the largest and most complex construction projects ever undertaken in Abu Dhabi. This better prepared them totender and have the resources required ready, should they be awarded the contract.Roles of Major ParticipantsParsons designed and is supervising construction of two new tunnel interchanges on Al Salam Street through thedense business district of the capital highland city. Al Salam Street’s through traffic will be depressed below surfacelevelintersections. The depressed roadway for each interchange, carrying four lanes of traffic in each direction, will beapproximately 2,800 feet in length. At the surface, signalized intersections will serve local traffic movements to the adjacentresidential areas. Ramps will provide access to and egress from Al Salam Street.13

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Channel Tunnel Rail LinkLondon, UKPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:London and Continental RailwaysContract Dates:10/98 - 11/07Total Dollar Amount:$9.2 billionServices Provided:Procurement Manager, Designer,Construction Manager, Engineering SupportDuring ConstructionPROJECT BACKGROUNDThe Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) is a 68-mile-long high speed rail line linking the existing Channel Tunnel to St. PancrasTerminus Station in London. Some of the major components of the project included:• An 11-mile-long, twin-bore tunnel including a 26.7-foot excavated diameter TBM-driven tunnel under central London,lined with steel-fiber, reinforced concrete segments• A 1.5-mile-long, twin bore tunnel using including a 26.7-foot excavated diameter TBM-driven tunnel under the RiverThames, lined with steel-fiber, reinforced concrete linings, and 4,250 feet of cut-and-cover approach tunnel• A 2-mile-long, single bore, twin track New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) tunnel (46 feet equivalent diameter) throughthe North Downs ChalkThe type of tunnel lining varied for each construction type. Steel-fiber, reinforced precast concrete segments were used inconjunction with EPBMs. Associated mechanical and electrical equipment, including the overhead catenary, was installedwithin the tunnels. Final completion of the tunnel included installation of track, slab, and rail, a 2.6-foot-wide inspectionwalkway, a 4.9-foot emergency egress walkway, and fire/life safety systems. The project has won several national engineeringawards.The CTRL project included a state-of-the-art ventilation system to control smoke during fires in the tunnel. The ventilationsystem required the construction of five ventilation shafts within the London section of the project. In addition, the shaftsalso provided emergency egress and pressure relief to reduce transient pressures.Significant Challenges and/or InnovationsThe $9 billion CTRL project was the largest and most complex civil engineering project ever undertaken in Europe, spanning 10years and involving 45 main contractors to construct. The project pioneered the use of steel-fiber, reinforced concrete segmentaltunnel linings for TBM-driven tunnels. This was also the first and largest use of polypropylene fibers in a segmental tunnel liningto improve performance in the event of a fire.The tunnel section in central London passes under approximately 3,000 domestic and industrial buildings, 67 bridges, 7.4miles of surface railways, 600 utility crossings, and under or over eight operational railway tunnels. One of the project team’spriorities was to comprehensively assess potential ground movements and impacts on structures along the alignment.The TBM tunnel construction necessitated extensive underpinning, ground improvement, and monitoring work to protectmany of these structures.Roles of Major ParticipantsHalcrow had overall design responsibility for all underground structures, provided CM services and engineering supportduring construction, and was an integral part of the procurement team.15

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99I-405 Corridor ProgramBellevue, waPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:WSDOTContract Dates:03/2002 - 03/2012Total Dollar Amount:$1.5 billionServices Provided:Design and CM Services for Design-Builid andDesign-Bid-Build ProjectsPROJECT BACKGROUNDThe I-405 Corridor Program includes the design and construction of $1.5 billion worth of improvements along the I-405corridor. The program is comprised of seven design-build and five design-bid-build projects.Among the I-405 Corridor Program’s many successes is the project team’s goal to leave the environment better than wefound it. As part of the GEC, Parsons helped develop the environmental compliance database used by design-buildersto track progress and monitor the successful completion of environmental commitments made in the environmentaldocuments and permits. To date, the ten I-405 projects that have been awarded are on schedule, within budget, and havemet all legislatively mandated milestones.Significant Challenges and/or InnovationsOn the I-405/NE 8th St. to SR 520 Braided Ramps Project, Parsons worked with WSDOT to streamline the right-of-wayacquisition process. Appraisals were started prior to final approval of the right-of-way plans, shortening the overall right-ofwayacquisition process by as much as six months.Parsons helped WSDOT to assign risk more appropriately, and therefore receive more competitive bids. Parsons helpeddevelop the process that integrates RFP production, design, and cost estimating, which ultimately helped WSDOT maximizeits available budget.Parsons developed a self-directed design quality management program for the I-405 Corridor Program, which was basedon Parsons’ quality management plan, successfully used on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Design-Build project. Parsons’independent quality auditor reviewed and recommended several process improvements to the environmental qualityprocess, which were immediately implemented, and WSDOT has adopted the process as their standard in developingenvironmental documents.Parsons facilitated the shift in responsibility for QA/QC from WSDOT to the design-builder, and provided quality verificationinspectors with experienced personnel from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge project.Parsons’ staff wrote the traffic management section of the RFPs to minimize inconvenience to the public and maximizesafety during construction. We also review design-builder traffic management proposals, coordinate with the NorthwestRegion Traffic Office, and ensure implementation during construction.Roles of Major ParticipantsAs a member of the general engineering consultant (GEC) co-located team, Parsons is providing design, programmanagement, preparation of RFQs and RFPs for design-build projects, and construction management services for WSDOT.Parsons has many full-time managerial and technical staff overseeing this work.16

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Willamette River CSO ProgramPortland, ORPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:City of Portland, Bureau ofEnvironmental ServicesTotal Dollar Amount:$1.2 billionContract Dates:9/02 - 2011Services Provided:QA/QC Inspection: (Tunnels, Shafts, Grouting) SpecialInspection: (Electrical, Mechanical, Structural)Engineering and CADD SupportPROJECT BACKGROUNDPart of a comprehensive $1.2 billion project to reduce sewer overflows, the Willamette River Combined Sewer Overflow(CSO) Program includes two large and technically challenging projects, the West Side CSO Project completed in 2006 andthe East Side CSO on schedule for 2011 completion. The project involved intercepting existing outfalls with 14 deep slurrywall shafts and 48,000 feet of 14- and 22-foot inside diameter tunnels mined 100 feet below groundwater in highly variablesoft soils using three slurry mix shield TBMs, the first used in the United States. The deep tunnels are lined with a one-passconcrete segmental lining. The tunnel alignments pass near or under several critical, sensitive structures, including five ofthe city’s major bridges. Deep ground improvement techniques were used to provide pre-support for these structures.Significant Challenges and/or InnovationsThe client, design team, construction manager, and contractor co-located and collaborated for nine months to develop thefinal design, cost estimates, TBM procurement, and work and safety plans. This process allowed the team to use technologiesnew to the United States including slurry TBMs, jet grouting to 320 feet, 200-foot deep slurry walls, and 120-foot deep reinforcedconcrete tremie plugs. Both contractors earned OR-OSHA VPP Star status in Oregon (two of only four contractors statewide).Roles of Major ParticipantsUnder the supervision of the Construction Manager, CMTS provided QA/QC inspection and engineering support for alldisciplines on the project. Key team members Greg Colzani and Jan Babendererde served as Construction Manager and TunnelEngineer on the project as well. Halcrow and Chris Smith provided segment design and fabrication contractor support.Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel ExpansionSeattle, WAPROJECT DETAILSClient Representative:Seattle Sound TransitTotal Dollar Amount:$95 millionContract Dates:2004- 2007Services Provided:Project Management, ConstructabilityPROJECT BACKGROUNDThe $95 million Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Expansion project involved the expansion of the Seattle bus tunnel toallow conversion to dual-mode transportation, including bus and light rail. The project included the renovation of theexisting bus tunnel and upgrade of all mechanical and electrical systems.Significant Challenges and/or InnovationsThis project involved significant coordination between disciplines for a major underground project with restricted accessin the urban Seattle environment.Roles of Major ParticipantsThe VOSK Group provided project management support for the project. Vic Oblas served as Project Manager and providedconstructability, construction coordination, and commissioning support .17

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99DKey Team QualificationsThe Parsons team brings together personnel with world-class tunneling CM and design-build experience, combined witha strong connection to WSDOT and its practices. Understanding the SR 99 Bored Tunnel Design-Build project, as well asunderstanding WSDOT’s processes and procedures are critical components to complementing WSDOT’s project CM team,and is highlighted in this submittal by the “added benefit icon”. Our team consists of personnel selected to respond tomeet the specific needs identified by WSDOT as well as identify additional capacityand expertise to support WSDOT in other critical areas as necessary.denotes “Added Benefit”Key Personnel: We have assembled a group of key personnel highly knowledgeable in the specific tasks and roles that havebeen identified by WSDOT in this Request for Qualifications. These individuals have demonstrated their ability from pastprojects to both technically excel in their particular area of knowledge, and possess a strong background in tunnel CM anddesign-build delivery. Several of these individuals have in-depth first-hand knowledge of the SR 99 Tunnel Design-Buildproject through their participation in our pursuit and provide WSDOT with continuity of knowledge for the performanceof CM servicesAdded Value Personnel: As experienced CM providers, the Parsons team understands what is necessary to successfullydeliver this project. We have provided WSDOT with proposed candidates to support your CM efforts for all of the anticipatedwork tasks that will need to be performed throughout the life of the project. These individuals are available to meetwhatever support WSDOT may require to supplement their own staff, or positions in the Integrated Consultant Team (ICT)to fulfill WSDOT’s obligations on this project. Many of these individuals provide the added value through their experienceworking on a WSDOT integrated team, allowing for seamless integration.Depth of Resources: We understand that construction can ‘throw you a curve ball’ that requires the unexpected assignmentof resources necessary to deal with the particular issues at hand. To ensure continuity of staff and responsiveness, we haveidentified additional personnel with the requisite level of experience that provides WSDOT with a depth of resources thatcan be tapped to meet these unexpected staffing needs.Capacity to Perform the WorkThe Parsons team is committed to fully meetthe staffing needs of WSDOT to perform the CMServices requested. To that end we have identifiedleads for each of WSDOT’s specified requiredpersonnel and confirm each of their availabilityto deliver the project. In addition each lead hasbeen provided a depth of resources to draw uponto meet specific project needs correspondingto WSDOT’s desires and the design-builder’sactivitiesKey Team Qualifications18

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Technical Experts: This is an industry-defining and technically challenging project that pushes the limits in many of thetechnical areas for TBMs. The Parsons team has secured the participation of several technical experts selected from industryprofessionals and academia, widely considered leaders in their field, to provide WSDOT with the intellectual credentialsnecessary to evaluate innovative technical approaches that may be proposed by the Design-Builder.• Chris Smith, C.Eng, FICE - Segmental Lining Design and Inspection• Greg Orsolini, PE and Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SE - Structures• Edward Cording, PhD - Settlement Mitigation• Edmond Kay, MD - Hyperbaric InterventionsThe addition of these technical advisors will provide the Parsons team and WSDOT with access to a state-of-the-artknowledge pool as we complete a first of its kind tunnel project. The resume for Chris Smith is included in our key personnelsection. The remainder of the resumes are included in the appendix.Table D.1 lists our key personnel and added-value personnel, and demonstrates the type and extent of experience eachbrings to the team. Additional resumes of our available personnel, showing additional depth and breadth of our availableresources, are included in the appendicesTable D.1 – Key Staff* and Added Value StaffKEY TECHNICAL ELEMENTSGeg Colzani*Jon Kaneshiro, PE*Steve Minassian, PE*Doug Slakey, PE*Mark Bower, C.Eng*Jeff Lavinder, PE*Jan Babendererde*Dan Brown*Dan Weathers*Ben Fardi, PE*Alf Evers*Fermin Longcob*Gary Daniel*Chris Smith, C.Eng, FICE*Gordon Chen*Bryant Sanders*Nghia Giang*Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Ralph Trapani, PETony Stirbys, LEGVic Oblas, PESoft ground pressurized-face TBM tunnels • • • • • • • • • • • •TBM tunnels constructed below groundwater • • • • • • • • • • • •TBM instrumentation and performance analysis • • • • • • • •Pre-cast gasketed segmental concrete lining systems • • • • • • • • • • • •Hyperbaric interventions for TBM maintenance/repair • • • • • • • • •Geotechnical instrumentation for structure monitoring • • • • • • • • • • •Deep ground improvement techniques • • • • • • • • • • • •Control tunnel construction-induced ground movement • • • • • • • • •Deep, below groundwater excavation • • • • • • • • • • • • •Support of major structures and facilities • • • • • • • • • • • • •Control/mitigation settlement of structures and utilities • • • • • • • • • • • •Systems integration of roadway and tunnel systems • • • • • • • • • •Schedule and claims analysis • • • • • • • • • • • •Underground safety program expertise • • • • • •Resident engineering and inspection on tunnel projects • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •VALUE ADDED SERVICE CAPABILITIESIntegrated team co-located with owner • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •Detailed knowledge of SR 99 design-build project scope • • • • • • • •Risk analysis of SR 99 design-build project • • • • • • •Understanding of SR 99 design-build costs • • • •WSDOT experience • • • • • • • • • •Commissioning • • • • •Rhonda KolodjiJohn Donatelli, PE19

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Key Team Member QualificationsGreg ColzaniResident Engineer, ParsonshighlightsBlended Client/Consultant TeamSystems IntegrationUnderground SafetySoft Ground TunnelBelow WaterHyperbaric InterventionLocal ExperienceSegmental LinerGeotech InstrumentationDesign-BuildEducationB.S., Geology, Adams StateCollegeRELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCEWillamette River CombinedSewer Overflow Program– West Side CSO Projectand East Side CSO Project,Portland, ORProject Owner:Paul GribbonChief Engineer, (503) 823-7747OVERVIEWOur proposed Resident Engineer, Greg Colzani, has more than 30 yearsof experience in mining, tunneling, and heavy civil and undergroundconstruction with an emphasis in quality control and constructionmanagement. His tunneling experience includes TBM excavations in variousranges of rock and soil environments, as well as the supervision of complexexcavations in soft ground conditions. Greg has written constructionspecifications and provided constructability reviews for a number ofsoft ground tunneling projects. In the roles of Construction Managerand Resident Engineer, he has provided expertise in the selection of TBMmachines as part of evaluations of contractors’ alternative proposals.Greg has comprehensive experience in a wide variety of shaft construction methods, including complex deep slurrywalls, jet grouting, ground freezing, and drilled and conventionally excavated shafts. He has filled the roles of ChiefInspector and Project Engineer for multi-lane highway tunnel systems and ventilation contracts.Greg is experienced with the development, training, and management of CM consultant staff and blended project staffteams. He has participated actively in dispute resolution boards (DRB), risk management, and partnering activities.The $1.2 billion Willamette River CSO program includes the West Side and East Side CSO tunnel projects. The WestSide CSO project was completed in 2006, and the East Side CSO project is on schedule for 2011 completion. Theproject involved intercepting existing outfalls with 14 deep slurry wall shafts and 48,000 feet of 14- and 22-footdiameter tunnels mined 100 feet below groundwater, using three slurry mix shield TBMs, the first used in theUnited States. The deep tunnels are lined with a one-pass, steel fiber reinforced concrete segmental lining, the firstof its kind in the United States. Greg served as lead of a blended team of client and consultant staff identified toprovide overall construction management, quality assurance, work and safety planning, contract administration,and project controls for the program.South Bay Ocean OutfallContract Package No. 2,San Diego, CAProject Owner:Rolf Lee, Associate Civil Engineer,(619) 533-4660I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnels,Glenwood Springs, COProject Owner:Joe Elsen, PERegion 3 Project Engineer,(970) 384-3332The South Bay Ocean Outfall project’s major components consisted of a 200-foot-deep, concrete-lined dropshaft that used ground freezing for support; 19,000 linear feet of precast, segment-lined, 11-foot diametertunnel excavated by an earth pressure balanced TBM (EPBM) subjected up to 7 bar hydrostatic pressure; cutterreplacement was performed under hyperbaric interventions up to 3 bar. Greg developed inspection and testingplans for quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA), and supervised the Construction Manager’s QC inspection staff.He also interfaced with city and federal agencies and citizen action groups.The Hanging Lake Tunnels project includes two, multi-lane vehicular tunnels (5,000 linear feet), ventilation, andcontrol facilities. The tunnels provide a critical link to I-70 in Colorado. Greg served as the Senior Inspector forConstruction of the Cinnamon Creek operations and ventilation building, including electrical, tunnel ventilation,control systems installation, and commissioning.20

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Jon Kaneshiro, PEPre-Construction Services Lead, ParsonshighlightsDesign-BuildBlended Client/Consultant TeamRisk ManagementGeotechnicalInstrumentationLocal ExperienceEducationM.S.,Engineering Science,B.A., Geology,University of California,BerkeleyREGISTRATIONSProfessional Engineer: WA,CA, CO, OR, TXRELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCEI-25 T-REX Design-Build,Denver, COProject Owner:Matthew A. GreerStructural and HydraulicsEngineer, (720) 963-3008OVERVIEWOur proposed Pre-Construction Lead, Jon Kaneshiro, has 30 years of designmanagement experience in planning, construction, and the seismic analysisof tunnels, foundations, mass excavations, and underground projects. Hisexpertise in tunnel engineering includes over 150 tunnels, 45 of which heserved as Engineer of Record. As the Design Manager on more than 20contracts, Jon’s experience incorporates the final design of unique one-pass,bolted, gasketed segmental liners. Jon’s understanding of the design andconstruction challenges of soft ground tunneling, liquefaction, fault crossing design, and the final design of deep excavationsand tiebacks includes local knowledge from preliminary engineering, methodology studies, and design reviews in Seattle - theBeacon Hill tunnels, the Metro Downtown Seattle Transit (Bus Tunnel) project, and the Sound Transit Design-Build of theCentral Link Extension Tunnels.An important feature of this $2 billion multi-modal transportation reconstruction design-build project was the3,000-foot-long new outfall, consisting of a 15-foot diameter by 1,800-foot-long EPBM tunnel, and a 10-foot-diameterby 300-foot-long EPBM tunnel in soft ground. The innovative design solution reduced the alignment length by one-third,avoided right-of-way costs, and avoided a hazardous waste-laden route. This was the first one-pass gasketed, segmentedliner used in the United States with all dowel and rod fastening elements. Jon provided design management and detaileddesign and construction services for all of the underground work. His role extended through to the construction phase.Capital ImprovementProjects for SouthernNevada WaterAuthority, Las Vegas, NVProject Owner:Marc JensenDirector of Engineering(702) 862-3400South Bay Tunnel andOcean Outfall,San Diego, CAProject Owner:Anne SasakiAssistant Director at City ofSan Diego, Public UtilitiesDepartment,(858) 292-6469Parsons is providing program management services for $1.5 billion of capital improvement projects for the SouthernNevada Water Authority, including an evaluation of several long tunnels, pipelines, canals, and dam sites. The 20-footinterior diameter, one-pass, bolted, gasketed, precast concrete segmented Lake Mead No. 3 shafts and tunnels are boredbelow groundwater in rock, weak rock, and soft ground, mined with an optimal variable continuous drive hybrid TBM. Jonprovided program and construction management reviews for the Lake Mead shafts and associated connecting tunnelsfrom planning, geotechnical investigation and instrumentation, and design through construction. For the Lake Mead No.3 project, he prepared concept-level studies for tunneling methods, feasibility, and cost.This $140 million project involved engineering design and construction-phase services for the planning, alignment,and design of the 19,000-foot-long by 13-foot-diameter tunnel outfall, driven through soft ground using an EPBM atdepths of up to 220 feet below sea level. The one-pass, precast concrete, gasketed segmental liner had to resist the 7-barexternal hydraulic head during excavation, and also be designed for an internal pressure differential of 3 bars. This projectreceived three national awards - the 2000 ASCE Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award of Merit, the 2000APWA Environmental Project of the Year, and the 2000 AAEE Grand Prize for Design. Jon served as the Task Manager forthe tunnel, drop shaft design, and geotechnical investigations, and as the Project Manager and Field Lead for the tunnels,drop shaft, and riser shaft during construction. Jon ensured all of the client’s design criteria were met.21

Steve Minassian, PECM Services Manager, ParsonshighlightsSoft Ground TunnelBelow WaterLarge DiameterOne-Pass PrecastSegmental LinerDesign-BuildUnderground SafetyRisk ManagementEducationM.S., Civil Engineering,University of California,BerkeleyB.S., Civil Engineering, USCREGISTRATIONSProfessional Engineer, CARELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCEPort of Miami Tunnel,Miami, FLProject Owner:Louis BraisProject Director(305) 798-7144Al Salam Street Tunnel,Abu Dhabi, UAEProject Owner:Abdulla Saeed Sultan AlShamsi, Acting ExecutiveDirector of Infrastructureand Municipal Assets Sector971 2 695 7476North Shore ConnectorProject / AlleghenyRiver Crossing Tunnel,Pittsburgh, PAProject Owner:Winston SimmonsDirector of Construction(412) 566-5100Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99OVERVIEWOur proposed CM Services Manager, Steve Minassian, has for the past25 years fulfilled many diverse roles serving the tunneling industry.Steve has served as the Design Manager and Construction Manager onseveral high-profile soft ground tunneling projects. Steve was theProject Manager for the Port of Miami Tunnel project, where he wastasked to lead the design-build joint venture’s design efforts for thelargest diameter EPBM tunnel in the United States to date. As the contractor’s Project Manager, Steve successfullydelivered two large tunnel projects on time and within budget. Each project had over one million man-hoursworked without major accidents or injuries, resulting in considerable cost returns to the owner-controlled insuranceprogram. Steve has gained valuable hands-on tunneling experience working as a contractor’s Project and FieldEngineer, where he was tasked with bid estimating, engineering planning, construction operations planning,implementation, and providing efficient, safe, and cost-effective solutions to solve day-to-day construction issues.Steve has participated actively in risk management, partnering, and dispute resolution board (DRB) proceedings.The major component of this project is the 4,000-foot-long, twin-bore, 41-foot OD underwater tunnels connecting Watsonand Dodge Islands in Miami. The tunnel will be constructed using an EPBM through fill, in situ soil, and Miami Limestone,a heterogeneous weak rock formation with the potential of encountering Karst terrain and clean soil below groundwater.This tunnel will be the largest, one-pass, precast concrete, segmental lining tunnel in the United States. Steve servedas the Design Manager and Project Manager for the Bouygues Civil Work Florida Design-Build Joint Venture. His dutiesincluded overall design coordination, project management, tunnel design, geotechnical studies, and risk management.This $1.4 billion project is designed to double vehicle capacity and provide access for development. The project features amajor 3.1-kilometer-long, 45-meter-wide box structure, eight-lane tunnel that runs through the central business district,and a total of 1.2 kilometers of road access the tunnel. The state-of-the-art tunnel safety and management system willcoordinate ventilation, fire detection and suppression, lighting, public address, environmental management, electricalpower supply, emergency broadcasting, radio re-broadcasting, security and surveillance, traffic detection and control,and traveler information. Steve served as the Special Projects Manager/Technical Advisor providing construction supportto the project management/CM team. Steve’s duties included construction scheduling/sequencing/interface supportbetween the owner/design-builder and the CM, as well as providing technical construction phasing expertise.The 1.1 miles of twin-bored tunnel with a 20-foot interior diameter and an 11-inch thick one-pass, precast segmentallining was constructed using a slurry shield TBM in soft ground and soft rock conditions. Construction challengesincluded mixed-face tunneling, tunneling under the Allegheny River, tunneling within 10 feet of existing multi-storybuildings, and working (for stations) in the well-developed city center of Pittsburgh. As the Construction Manager for theproject, Steve provided day-to-day management of CM operations, monitoring of construction, QA, change and claimsmanagement, and risk management. Steve also provided constructability reviews and participated actively in partneringand DRB proceedings.22

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Doug Slakey, PETunnel Systems Integrator, ParsonshighlightsSystems IntegrationBlended Client/Consultant TeamProject KnowledgeEducationM.S., Civil Engineering, MITB.S., Engineering, HarveyMudd CollegeREGISTRATIONSProfessional Engineer: WA,CA, AKRELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCECaldecott TunnelImprovement Program,Contra Costa andAlameda Counties, CAProject Owner:Christina Ferraz, PECaltrans Project Manager(510) 286-3890OVERVIEWDoug Slakey has more than 28 years of experience in the planning,engineering, design, and management of civil infrastructure projects, withover 15 years of his professional practice spent in the planning, design,and construction of highway tunnel systems, communications systemarchitecture, and ITS. His project experience includes highway, railroad,and mass transit tunnels; railroad, urban transit, and rural highways;and bridges. Doug was responsible for the systems integration for the I-70Hanging Lake Tunnels in Colorado, which included a semi-transverse ventilation system with vane axial fans and a completetraffic monitoring and control system. He is presently acting as Systems Integration Lead for the Caldecott Tunnel ImprovementProgram, currently under construction on SR 24 in the hills above Oakland, CA.This project involves constructing a fourth bore through the Berkeley Hills near San Francisco. Tunnel systems for thisproject include a longitudinal ventilation system; tunnel fire detection systems, including linear heat detectors andCO monitors; redundant power supply systems, including dual power feeds, uninterrupted power supplies (UPS), anddiesel generators; tunnel lighting; supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems; emergency call boxes;and a traffic operations system (TOS) that included closed circuit television (CCTV) camera coverage, traffic signs andsignals, radio communication systems, and access control sensors. Doug managed the preliminary design and finalplans, specifications, and estimates (PS&Es) for the tunnel’s mechanical, electrical, and traffic control systems. He wasresponsible for the development of the overall tunnel operations and controls plan. Doug coordinated the overall systemsdesign and operator interface, and is providing oversight for the systems integration and acceptance testing.Glenwood CanyonTunnels,Glenwood Springs, COProject Owner:Joe Elsen, PERegion 3 Program Engineer(970) 384-3332Los Angeles CountyTraffic OperationsSystem, Los Angeles, CAProject Owner:Greg Damico, PECaltrans Project Manager(213) 897-9047This project involved providing preliminary engineering services, final design, and CM for a multimillion-dollar tunnelingeffort through the scenic and environmentally sensitive Glenwood Canyon area on I-70 in western Colorado. As part of a12-mile, four-lane final link on I-70, the project consisted of three elements - a 3,625-foot-long exploratory tunnel; thetwo-lane, twin-bore, 4,000-foot-long Hanging Lake Tunnel; and the 640-foot-long Reverse Curve Tunnel. Doug ensuredthat the systems requirements for fire life safety were in accordance with NFPA 502 and developed the emergencyresponse plan. He managed the team of mechanical, electrical, traffic, and systems design specialists for preparationof PS&Es for the integration of tunnel systems. During construction, Doug provided overall management for the systemsinstallation inspection team, performed systems factory inspections, and supported systems integrated start-up testing andcommissioning.Parsons provided planning and final design services for the traffic monitoring and control system for five individualfreeways in the Los Angeles County area. This network was an element of the Caltrans District 7 TOS network, providingregional traffic monitoring and control through a high-speed, fiber optic communications system to provide a robust,fault-tolerant communication network. Doug managed 10 PS&E packages for the traffic communications, monitoring,and control systems on three freeways. Doug prepared site surveys for new and existing utilities and plans in accordancewith Caltrans’ standards. He also integrated the TOS elements, including CCTV cameras, variable message signs, weighin-motionsystems, traffic detector stations, and a communication data network.23

Mark Bower, C.EngTunnel Chief Inspector, HalcrowhighlightsSoft GroundPressurized FaceTBMRisk ManagementPrecast ConcreteSegmental LiningInstallationEducationHND Civil Engineering,Portsmouth PolytechnicRegistrationsCertified Engineer, UKRELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCEThames Tideway & LeeTunnels, London, UKProject Owner:Phil StrideHead of London TidewayTunnels(020) 3147 7718DL Woolwich ArsenalExtension,Woolwich, UKProject Owner:Harvey PownallProject Director forSemperian(44) 208 331 4080Channel Tunnel Rail LinkSection 2, London, UKProject Owner:Paul ChapmanManaging Director(44) 207 391 4300Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesOVERVIEWMark Bower is a Senior Technician with over 25 years of post-educationalexperience in tunneling for both water and transportation projects. Hismain responsibilities include project management and site supervision inthe tunneling sector, including inspection of large diameter tunnels.SR 99Mark’s tunnel program experience includes program management,health and safety reviews, quality management, and liaising with thirdparties. Mark has experience in construction processes for a number ofdifferent disciplines including large diameter tunnels below water using an EPBM, one-pass segmental lining, underpinnedand caisson shafts, sprayed concrete-lined (SCL) tunnels and shafts, diaphragm wells, cast-in-situ and driven piling, precastconcrete manufacturing, structural waterproofing, settlement monitoring, grouting, ground stabilization, and railway P-wayinstallation.The $800 million Lee Tunnel contract involves the construction of a 7.2-meter diameter, 6.9-kilometer-long sewagestorage and transfer tunnel between the Abbey Mills Pumping Station and the Beckton Sewage Treatment Works. Thisproject includes the construction of four deep diaphragm wall shafts (max. depth 100 meters) associated with boththe installation and extraction of the TBM and the installation of mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, controls, andautomation (MEICA) equipment to operate the transfer scheme. Mark is carrying out site inspections of constructionprogress and safety standards, participating in site progress meetings and progress report monitoring as part of theproject QC for the initial construction phase of this project. He has also carried out site suitability reviews and providedsite layout schemes for the proposed drive and reception shafts.This $288 million project is comprised of a 3.6-kilometer, 5.3-meter internal diameter bored tunnel (through thanetsand and chalk) using an EPBM; a 15-meter diameter main ventilation shaft (wet caisson); two cross passages and fiveventilation adits spheroidal graphite iron (SGI segmental lined); and resilient and floating trackbed construction includingassociated P-way installation and diversion of existing and construction of new sewers. Mark carried out inspectionsduring construction work, reviewed the contractor’s method statements and inspection and test plans, and participatedin monitoring review panel meetings to assess settlement during and after the tunnel drives and shaft sinking.This is a $9.2 billion project comprised of a total of 9 kilometers of EPBM bored tunnels, three SCL shafts and connectingadits (principally constructed in thanet sands and chalk). Mark provided plant inspection services for one-pass, precastsegmental concrete linings for two of the three London Tunnels contracts. As part of the field engineering team, Markcarried out and reported on random inspections of construction work, checking compliance with specifications. Inaddition, he reviewed the contractor’s method statements and inspection and test plans, produced to control the work aspart of the contractor’s self certification procedures.24

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Jeff Lavinder, PE, ParsonsChief Inspector- StructuralOVERVIEWJeff Lavinder has more than 16 years of experience as a Bridge and Structures Engineer and Construction Manager. Prior toreceiving his degrees, he served as a survey technician with state and federal agencies for five seasons. Jeff’s design experienceincludes bridges, walls, falsework, structural design and detailing, computer analyses and modeling, and the preparation offinal contract documents, cost estimates, and specifications. His CM experience includes marine structures; roadway, bridge,and wall projects; contract compliance; bridge inspections; post-design services; and QA.Experience16 yearsCurrent LocationSeattle, WAI-405 Corridor Program/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2, Seattle, WA: This project is part of the $1.5 billion program forimprovements along a congested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. As the Assistant ProjectEngineer for the Renton Stage 2 project, Jeff coordinates project elements with the City of Renton, local utility companies,and government agencies such as the Department of Energy. He is responsible for reviewing and negotiating change orderswith the contractor, mediating negotiations between the contractor and the City of Renton, and overseeing all constructionactivities. Project Owner: Kim Henry, I-405 Project Director, (425) 456-8579.Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Tacoma, WA: This design-build project included a new Tacoma Narrows parallel bridge, a5,400-foot-long, three-span suspension bridge constructed within 200 feet of the existing historic suspension bridge. As theConstruction QA Manager, Jeff managed the project’s construction QA program including testing and inspections. He wasresponsible for managing the QA staff, budget, and subconsultants tasked with performing additional testing and inspectionsfor all materials and activities associated with major highway and bridge construction. Project Owner: Jeff Carpenter, StateConstruction Engineer, (360) 705-7821.Jan Babendererde, Special Consultant to ParsonsTBMOperationsExperience20 yearsCurrent LocationPortland, OROVERVIEWJan Babendererde has over 20 years of diverse underground construction and engineering experience specializing in softground tunneling and TBM design, fabrication, refurbishment, and service. Jan is equally experienced in managing tunneloperations including equipment selection, set-up, and operation; supervision of tunnel crews; monitoring machine behavior;assessing wear; and scheduling and supervising maintenance. Jan is experienced in hyperbaric operations, having coordinated/supervised over 100 interventions, and has personally participated in 60 interventions to conduct TBM cutterhead inspection andrepairs.Willamette River CSO Program – West Side CSO Project & East Side CSO Project, Portland, OR: The key projects ofthis $1.2 billion program include construction of a 48,000-foot, soft ground tunnel with 18-feet and 26-feet diameterslurry mixshield TBMs. These projects were completed below budget and ahead of schedule. Jan’s responsibilitiesconsisted of work plan/submittal development, equipment acquisition, selection of personnel, and supervision oftunnel crews. He monitored TBM wear and performance data through remote telemetry, established hyperbaricoperations, and conducted TBM maintenance under hyperbaric conditions up to 4 bar pressure. Project Owner:Paul Gribbon, Chief Engineer, City of Portland, OR, (503) 823-7747.TBM Manufacturers: Jan served as the Service Manager for Herrenknecht Tunnel Systems, one of the world’s leading TBMmanufacturers. He was responsible for service activities including machine refurbishment, shop personnel, spare partsinventory, and rental fleet management. Jan served as an engineer for the Robbins Company, where he was responsible formanaging service support for TBM fabrication, refurbishment, and field service including schedules, monitoring of fabrication,and commissioning. Project Owner: Jack Brockway, Vice President, (253) 447-2300 and Joe Roby, Vice President, (253) 872-0500.25

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Daniel Brown, ParsonsSchedulerExperience28 yearsCurrent LocationDubai, UAEOVERVIEWDaniel Brown has over 28 years of experience and extensive tunneling knowledge involving interstate highways; underground rails;sewer, and water; mine exploration and development; and heavy and light rail transit construction. His background includes design,geotechnical investigations, value engineering, CM, inspections, project controls, scheduling, and contract administration. Daniel alsohas experience reviewing shop drawings and major equipment installations for tunnel ventilation systems. In addition, his experienceincludes collecting, organizing, and analyzing project data used in cost and schedule forecasts, and using scheduling, databases,spreadsheets, word processing, document control, cost control, estimating, and project management software applications.Dubai Metro Red Line, Dubai, UAE: The Dubai Metro, a large diameter, soft ground tunnel constructed below water usingan EPBM is the first design-build, 75 kilometer (10 in tunnel) rail transit project in the Middle East region, and will form acritical backbone for the Dubai public transportation system. As the Project Controls Manager, Daniel’s responsibilities includeestablishing scheduling and performance metrics to monitor contractors’ progress; interfacing with project resident engineersresponsible for providing progress and costs forecasts for field staff; and overseeing quality, content, and the originationof data flow from field operations to the main office for analyses. Project Owner: Adnan Alhammadi, CEO Rail Agency,+ (971) (4) 290-2000.Glenwood Canyon Tunnels, Glenwood Springs, CO: The Glenwood Canyon I-70 program involved two tunnels (HangingLake and Reverse Curve) and was part of upgrading 13 miles of the existing two-lane highway to an interstate-class highway,which marked the official completion of the nation’s original interstate program. Daniel served as the Lead Inspector andlater as the Office Engineer, responsible for performing progress payments, change order negotiations, contract clarificationswith prime contractors, coordinating field measurements of bid quantities, and supplying technical submittal information toinspectors. Project Owner: Mark Nord, Bridge Asset Management and Records, (303) 512-4073.Daniel Weathers, ParsonsSafetyManagerOVERVIEWAs an internationally recognized health and safety management professional with over 25 years of experience, Daniel Weatherswas recently requested to lead a team of safety professionals in the review of the adequacy of technologies intended for useand to verify the same for the life cycle of the light rail tunnel systems projects - Dubai Metro and Al Salam Metro light railsystems - located in the UAE. He is a certified safety professional, both in the United States and Europe, and has experience withthe Hudson-Bergen Light Rail system, having developed the contractor safety and health program for working on and near theactivated and deactivated track.Experience25 yearsCurrent LocationNashville, TNArc Tunnel Project/Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project, NJ to Manhattan, NY : The project included improvements to platforms,concourses, and tracks, as well as two new single track tunnels. As the Safety Manager, Daniel was responsible for the supervisionof two regional safety managers and 48 site safety engineers (at peak production). He was also responsible for the developmentof the project construction health and safety plan, review of contract documents and contractor submittals, and providingoversight management for systems safety and security certification programs. Project Owner: Chris Dixon, Construction Manager,(408) 838-4113 .Dulles International Airport Automated Passenger Movement, Chantilly, VA: This $340 million project included EPBM tunnelboring, cut-and-cover tunnel construction, New Austrian Tunneling Method tunnel construction, and the associated civil constructionof two passenger stations. Daniel was responsible for the safety and industrial hygiene engineering functions. He developed andconducted bilingual crane signal man, rigging, and orientation programs. Daniel designed and supervised the installation of theventilation system for the TBMs. Project Owner: Richard Bowers, Former Regional Safety Manager, Clark Construction, (412) 321-4901.26

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Ben Fardi, PE, Quality Verification Plan, ParsonsOVERVIEWBen Fardi has more than 27 years of civil and structural engineeringexperience involving the design and CM of major toll roads, bridges,arterials, and light rail transit projects; underground subway tunnels;and major suspension steel bridges.Ben was the QA Manager for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Design-BuildProject, with WSDOT in an oversight role. He also participated in thepreparation and review of the RFP documents for the I-405 CorridorProgram. Ben was responsible for developing and obtaining WSDOT‘sapproval for the Quality Management Program for the SR 532 CorridorImprovements Project. He worked as an assistant Resident Engineer andLead inspector as part of the CM Consultant on the LA Metro Red Line,Segment III.Alf Evers, Interior Tunnel Structures - Inspection, CMTSOVERVIEWAlf Evers has 36 years of progressive construction experience, includingnumerous successful tunnel jobs nationwide and abroad. He is highlyexperienced in transit and highway tunnels, shafts, rail, transit, andhighway construction. Alf is equally experienced in concrete, testing,slurry walls, grouting, excavation support, safety, and record-keepingrequirements. He has supervised tunnel systems, ventilations, andfinish work, and has led QA/QC inspection teams.Fermin Longcob, Tunnel Excavation/Lining - Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWFermin Longcob has over 30 years of experience in undergroundconstruction work performing combined supervision and QC, sinkingshafts, and driving tunnels using different methods of excavationincluding EPBMs, digger shield tunnel machines for soft ground,TBMs for hard ground, the conventional methods for drilling/blasting,roadheader, the New Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM), sequentialexcavation methods (SEM) technique, stack drift, and micro tunneling.He is equally experienced in soil stabilization and support, shotcreting,rock bolting, soil nails, tie-back, sheet and soldier piles, jet grouting,and cement and chemical grouting. Fermin is experienced in structures,concreting, and interpreting construction plans. He also has a backgroundin civil and structural engineering design.LA Metro Red Line Segment III, Los Angeles, CA: Ben maintaineda QC program for this $325 million project that included twomajor cut-and-cover stations, access shafts, a parking structure,underground facilities, cross passages, and twin tunnel line sectionsdriven through the Santa Monica mountains using two 20-footdiameter Robbins TBMs. He also managed the field inspectors’day-to-day assignments. Project Owner: Henry Fuks, Deputy CEPM,(213) 922-7282.I-405 Corridor Program, Kirkland-Bellevue-Renton, WA: Ben isthe Deputy Engineering Service Manager for this program, whichinvolves the implementation of a $1.5 billion program for improvementsalong a congested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitanarea. He is responsible for developing/negotiating design andconstruction agreements for utility relocations. Project Owner: BruceDibert, Engineering Service Manager, (425) 456-8542.Alameda Corridor, Wilmington, CA: Alf was the Chief Inspector for theAlameda Corridor in Wilmington, CA, where he supervised 10 inspectorsfor rail installations, two steel truss bridges, three steel girder bridges, aconcrete box girder viaduct, and utility relocations. Project Owner: AlamedaCorridor Transit Authority, (310) 816-0460.Tren Urbano (transit) Tunnels, Puerto Rico: Alf served as the ChiefInspector on the Tren Urbano (transit) Tunnels project in Puerto Rico.He supervised QA/QC oversight for two stations and four miles of earthbalance TBM tunnels. Project Owner: Joe Mundo, Construction Manager,(787) 690-6688.West Side Willamette River CSO Program, Portland, OR: This projectconsists of 18,000 feet of 14-foot diameter, segment lined tunnel excavatedusing a slurry mixshield TBM. The tunnel alignment ran under and alongsidethe Willamette River in soft soils with a 3.6 bar hydrostatic pressure. Fermin’sduties as the Senior Tunnel inspector were to monitor and document TBMoperations, liner installation, backfill grouting, and hyperbaric interventions.Project Owner: Neal Choate, Inspection Supervisor (503) 823-6496.Big Walnut Augmentation Rickenbacker Interceptor (BWARI) Part 1,Lockbourne, OH: Fermin was the Lead Inspector on this project that consistedof a 14-foot diameter tunnel, 4 miles long, excavated in soft saturated groundusing a Lovat EPB machine with one-pass bolted, precast concrete segmentlining and seven shafts. Fermin’s duties as the Senior Tunnel inspector were tomonitor and document TBM operations, liner installation, backfill grouting,and hyperbaric interventions. Project Owner: Tatyanna Arsh, Executive Director,(614) 645-8276.27

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Gary Daniel, Tunnel Excavation/Lining - Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWGary Daniel has over 32 years of experience in heavy civil constructionwith an emphasis on tunnels involving rock, soft ground, shaft sinking,TBMs, EPBMs, drilling and blasting, shields, micro-tunneling, pipejacking, and concrete structures. He has worked in progressive levels ofresponsibility from laborer, foreman, and superintendent to his currentduties as a civil inspector. He has assisted in bid preparations, preparedsites, and coordinated work schedules, construction equipment rentals,and material procurement.Orange County Sanitation District IPMC, Fountain Valley, CA: This projectincluded a 5,455-foot-long, 9 -foot diameter soft ground tunnel excavatedusing a Herrenknecht EPBM. Gary was the Supervising Inspector responsiblefor monitoring TBM performance and ground support installation. ProjectOwner: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering (714) 593-7300.Sacramento Regional Sanitation District; Sacramento River Crossing,Sacramento, CA: Gary was the Supervising Tunneling Inspector for two 2,100-foot-long, 14-foot diameter soft ground tunnels under the Sacramento River.He monitored TBM performance, segment installation, and backfill grouting.Project Owner: Matthew Crow, Construction Manager, (512) 483-9377.Chris Smith, C.Eng, FICE, Segment Fabrication - Inspection, CRS Engineering ConsultantsOVERVIEWChris Smith has been involved in tunneling for 40 years. Initially as theEngineering Director of one of the world’s largest suppliers of tunnellinings, he was responsible for the detailed design and specificationsof the linings systems on numerous contracts. Chris has extensiveexperience using every type of TBM and lining system, and has beeninvolved “hands on” with many contractors worldwide, solving theirspecific requirements.As the current Principal of CRS Engineering Consultants, Chris is anindependent expert in segmental lining design and manufacturing,with a detailed knowledge of lining components, mould design,manufacturing techniques, and logistic system issues involved inhandling and delivering segments.Gordon Chen, Vent Building Mechanical/Finishes - Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWGordon Chen has seven years of experience in energy assessment,project management, mechanical engineering, and CM. His experienceincludes working with education clients on facility assessment projectsin Denver, and renovation and improvement projects for educationclients in California. He has a unique combination of both engineeringand field construction experience.East Side Willamette River CSO Project, Portland, OR: Chris initiallyassisted the client in the detailed design of the tunnel lining, and wasthen responsible for establishing the segment factory productionsystem, including all moulds and specialized production equipment.He provided and then implemented detailed method statements andquality plans, trained on-site personnel, and provided initial productionsupervision and production management. Project Owner: Paul Gribbon,Chief Engineer, City of Portland, OR, (503) 823-7747.Channel Tunnel Rail Link, London, UK: Chris first worked on the detaileddesign of the lining system and was then responsible for the design,planning, and establishment of the on-site factory production system. Heprovided detailed method statements and quality plans, and implemented theproduction control system, training the supervision and production personneland instructing on all aspects of manufacture. Project Owner: Ben Ruse,Director, (44) (0) 771-715-1070.Mt. Diablo Unified School District Bond Program – MechanicalUpgrade, Concord, CA: Gordon served as a Construction Manager forPhase 1 of the mechanical HVAC system updates at 13 schools, where heoversaw installation in three different schools. His work included removingexisting furnace units and installing new furnace units, condensingunits, split system heat pumps, branch circuit controllers, refrigeratepiping, electrical feed, roofing, and fence enclosures. Project Owner:Pete Pedersen, Bond Program Administrator, (925) 682-8000.Mt. Diablo Unified School District Measure C Bond Program,Concord, CA: Gordon served as an Assistant Construction Managerfor a general obligation bond to improve school buildings andgrounds. His work included major Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) upgrade improvements at four different schools. Project Owner:Pete Pedersen, Bond Program Administrator, (925) 682-8000.28

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Bryant Sanders, Grouting/Ground Improvement - Inspection, CMTSOVERVIEWBryant Sanders has over 18 years of underground and heavy civilexperience, and four years of tunnel construction experience. Bryantprovided QC inspection services for tunneling and microtunnelingin varied soil conditions and below the groundwater table. Heis experienced in deep shaft construction, ground improvementtechniques, and pipeline work. Bryant is accustomed to working incongested areas and on rotating shifts.Nghia Giang, Off-Site Materials Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWNghia Giang has more than 12 years of experience in civil and structuralengineering for major highway and road improvement projects involvingdesign-build delivery systems. His project work includes the constructionof new major bridge structures, widening of existing structures, tollroads, suspension steel bridges, asphalt and concrete pavements, majorearthworks, utility installations, drainage, and the first high-occupancytolllane project in Washington State. Nghia has a good understandingof WSDOT’s QC/QA requirements, and was responsible for implementingthe Quality Management Program for the SR 532 Corridor ImprovementsProject, as part of the Project Management Plan.Bob Lenz, PE, CCM, Construction Planning Lead, ParsonsOVERVIEWBob Lenz has over 32 years of experience in both design andconstruction management for major highway and road improvementprojects involving design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems.His project work has included the construction of new major bridgestructures, widening of existing structures, tunneling, asphalt andconcrete pavements, major earthworks, utility installations, surface/sub-surface drainage, underground parking structures, and lightingand ventilation systems. Bob has functioned both as a representative ofthe client and as a key member of design-build teams, and has led thequality efforts on both.East Side Willamette River CSO Project, Portland, OR: Thisproject’s scope includes construction of a 6-mile-long, 22-footdiameter tunnel, seven tunnel shafts, and 30,000 feet of newpipelines. Bryant inspected deep shaft construction and tunnelingoperations to ensure compliance with specifications and plans.Project Owner: Paul Gribbon, Chief Engineer, (503) 823-7747.Willamette River CSO Program – Balch Consolidated Conduit,Portland, OR: The scope of work includes an 8,500-foot pipelineconstructed at depths of 20 to 75 feet below the groundsurface. Bryant inspects shaft and microtunnel operationsto ensure compliance with project specifications and plans.Project Owner: Sue Williams, Contract Manager, (503) 823-5520.I-405 Corridor Program, Kirkland-Bellevue-Renton, Seattle, WA:Nghia was the Construction Compliance Auditor for this project that involvesthe implementation of a $1.5 billion program for improvements along acongested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. Heaudited the design-builder’s quality program activities to ensure adherenceto the Quality Management Plan and contract. Project Owner: Robyn L. Boyd,Project Engineer, (425) 471-3386.I-93 Viaduct and Central Artery/Tunnel, Boston, MA: Nghia was a FieldEngineer on this $200 million project that included construction of aviaduct and ramp structures forming an interchange connecting Route 1,Storrow Drive, and the I-93 roadways. He has experience using a varietyof construction methods including cast-in-place viaduct construction andstressing and grouting of post tensioning. Project Owner: Lisa Hodgson,Project Engineer, (425) 496-2038.E470 Tollway, Segments II/III Design-Build Project, Denver, CO: Bobrepresented the owner as the Construction Monitoring/QA Manager of theProject Oversight Engineer. The scope of work included systems installationand integration for the numerous mainline and ramp toll collection facilities,and underground facilities at the main toll plazas and administrationbuilding, in addition to the 29 bridge structures constructed along the 30mile alignment. Project Owner: Matt McDole, Director (now with another firm),(303) 790-8474.U.S. 60 Design-Build Project, Tempe, AZ: Bob was the ConstructionQuality Manager for this $185 million project to widen 12 miles of U.S. 60.The project included several bridge widenings; a new 11-span HOV structureat I-10; extensive construction of soil nail walls, retaining walls, and soundwalls; and new Portland cement concrete pavement with a rubberized highperformance bituminous (HPB) overlay. Project Owner: Larry Langer, AssistantState Engineer, (602) 712-7559.29

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Added Value Staff QualificationsRalph Trapani, PE, ParsonsClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementOVERVIEWRalph Trapani has over 35 years of experience managing transportation projects in difficult terrain. With over 25 years of stateDOT experience as a Project and Program Engineer, he has managed several large corridor projects including I-70 throughGlenwood Canyon and the Hanging Lake Tunnels in Colorado. Ralph also managed construction claims analysis resulting fromthe construction of I-70 over Vail pass.Experience35 yearsCurrent LocationDenver, COI-70 Hanging Lake Tunnels, Glenwood Springs, CO: The I -70 Glenwood Canyon tunnels were blasted through rock for adistance of approximately 4,000 feet. These are innovative facilities that are the first vehicle tunnels built in the United Statesusing rock reinforcement and shotcrete as permanent support. Ralph served as the owner’s Project Manager for planning,design, and construction of the tunnels. Project Owner: Joe Elsen, PE, Region 3 Program Engineer, (970) 384-3332.I-70 Mountain Corridor Cost Validation Study, Golden to Glenwood Springs, Colorado: For the Colorado DOT, Ralphmanaged a multi-disciplinary team to validate the cost of an over $3 billion mountain corridor project. The project extendedfor 144 miles, and included a proposed highway widening, a third bore of the Eisenhower/Johnson memorial tunnels, and anadvanced guideway system. The study included a cost validation and integrated cost and schedule risk assessment using anapproach similar to WSDOT’s CEVP® process. Project Owner: Peter Kozinski, PE, Resident Engineer, (970) 471-3540.Tony Stirbys, LEG, ParsonsMonitoring/InstrumentationEngineerOVERVIEWTony Stirbys has more than 30 years of interstate and international design, design-build, and construction geotechnical experiencein tunneling, mining, bridges, roadway, and railway projects. He spent 15 of those years working on tunneling projects in hardand soft ground conditions using pressurized-face TBM methods, drill and blast techniques, and hand mining techniques in urbanenvironments. Tony is currently the Geotechnical Lead on WSDOT’s I-405 Corridor Program.Experience31 yearsCurrent LocationSeattle, WAI-405 Corridor Program, Kirkland-Bellevue-Renton, WA: The I-405 Corridor Program includes the design andconstruction of $1.5 billion worth of improvements along the I-405 corridor. The program is comprised of six design-build andfour design-bid-build projects. Tony is the Geotechnical Lead for WSDOT’s I-405 Corridor Program GEC team and he overseesall of the geotechnical activities along I-405, including oversight of preparation of geotechnical baseline reports, geotechnicalinput into the preliminary roadway/structures/drainage design drawings, and RFP documents in a co-located office withWSDOT. Project Owner: Kim Henry, Project Director, (425) 456-8579.Los Angeles Metro Rail Line, Los Angeles, CA: The Los Angeles subway line consisted of 17 miles of twin 22-foot diametertunnels and cut-and-cover stations, which were excavated in an urban environment with buildings and utilities along thealignment using open-faced TBMs equipped with breasting tables and orange peel doors for support. Tony was the ResidentGeotechnical Manager and was responsible for structures/facilities instrumentation monitoring, reviewing the geologicalcharacterization of the ground conditions along the alignment, assessing the ground/building settlement, and developingthe ground/building support/improvement. Project Owner: Henry Fuks, LACMTA Deputy Executive Officer, (213) 922-7282.30

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99Vic Oblas, PE, Interagency/Commissioning Coordinator, The VOSK GroupOVERVIEWVic Oblas has more than 40 years of experience as a Civil Engineer ona wide variety of projects. He has managed work through all phases,overseeing planning, design, and construction of major multidisciplinaryprojects. His work has included both project work andadministrative duties on major public works infrastructure projects. Vicspent 14 years in the consulting engineering community performingplanning studies, design, and CM, and 12 years with the Municipalityof Metropolitan Seattle serving in increasingly responsible positions,including Director of Technical Services.Rhonda Kolodji, WSDOT Compliance/Reporting, ParsonsOVERVIEWRhonda Kolodji is a Resident Engineer with more than 19 years ofexperience involving the management of contractors’ payments fortransit, airport, commercial, petrochemical facilities, and roadwayprojects. She also has experience involving cost control, writing changeorders and construction bulletins, roadway and bridge field inspections,procurement, and document control. In addition, Rhonda has providedtraining of WSDOT document control specialists.As a Resident Engineer, Rhonda has extensive experience involvingscope development for the change order process and providing thecomplete change order package for owner approval. She also has bridgeand roadway field inspection experience.John Donatelli, PE, Risk Mitigation, ParsonsOVERVIEWJohn Donatelli is a Senior Project Manager with more than 15 years ofcivil engineering experience in design, management, and constructionof complex and high-profile transportation projects. John’s experiencealso includes participation in cost and risk reviews for approximately20 projects. He has conducted risk analyses for the owner and themanaging partner on design-build projects. As the Cost Lead on fourprojects, his duties included assisting with leadership and facilitationof project workshops, leading the review and validation of estimates,supporting the development of a risk register, and reviewing the projectschedule.SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project, Seattle,WA: Vic is performing construction planning, staging, and maintenanceof traffic. His most recent task was development of alternatives for ferrytraffic holding during tunneling. Project Owner: Ali Amiri, EngineeringManager, (206) 805-5313.Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Retrofit and Expansion, Seattle,WA: Vic was the Resident Engineer for the retrofit of the existing bustunnel for conversion to light rail. Project Owner: Ahmad Fazel, Director ofLink Light Rail, (206) 398-5300.I-405 Corridor Program, Seattle, WA: Rhonda is the OfficeEngineer for the program, which involves the implementation of a $1.5billion program for improvements along a congested 30-mile corridor inthe Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. She processes submittals, writeschange order specifications, manages budgets, and updates andmanages project documentation logs, and has led the close outdocumentation of several D-B projects. Project Owner: Brian Nielsen,Project Engineer, (206) 805-5426.Concourse A & Main Terminal (South Terminal Expansion Project),Seattle, WA: Rhonda was the Resident Engineer on this $4.1 billioncapital improvement effort at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport thatincluded the construction of a 1 million-square foot, 14-gate airportterminal with an office tower. She received and reviewed submittals,prepared change orders, verified invoices, and managed the trend logfor the south terminal project. Project Owner: Anne Monks , ConstructionManager, (206) 787-3798.SR 532 Corridor Improvements Design-Build, Stanwood andCamano Island, WA: John is in an advisory role for this $50 milliondesign and construction project, which includes the replacement of theGeneral Mark W. Clark Memorial Bridge over the west passage of theStillaguamish River. He supported the project management team,conducted client assessments, and interfaced with WSDOT’s projectdirector. Project Owner: Robyn Boyd, Project Engineer, (425) 225-8754.I-405 Corridor Program, Seattle, WA: John was the EngineeringManager for this project that involves the implementation of a $1.5billion program for improvements along a congested 30-mile corridor inthe Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. He was responsible for allengineering disciplines, including management and administration ofthe engineering design, budget, and schedule. Project Owner: Kim Henry,Project Director, (425) 471-3386.31

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management ServicesSR 99EApproach to WorkApproach to WorkTechnical approachOur technical approach to providing staff augmentation CM services to WSDOT is focused on providing assistance in thekey tunnel technical specialty areas to lower risks for WSDOT and associated stakeholders, as outlined in this section. Ourorganization and approach to monitoring and managingFigure E.1 –Advantages and Benefits of Our Teamthe tunnel construction in key technical areas is based on:•Combined Tunnel Expertise in Design, ConstructionManagement, and Design-Build•Thorough Knowledge of the SR 99 Design-Build Project•WSDOT Integrated Team ExperienceWe have assembled an unrivaled team of CM expertsand firms with a proven record of managing projectssimilar to the SR 99 Design-Build project. Our team iscomprised of tunnel CM experts strengthened by keydesign individuals from our SR 99 design-build proposalteam, who met regularly with WSDOT to complete a 30percent design, conduct a detailed geotechnical analysisof anticipated ground conditions, evaluate TBMtechnologies/manufacturers, evaluate settlement criteria,perform a detailed risk assessment, evaluate traffic/fire/life/safety issues, and provide a detailed construction bid toperform the work. This highly qualified team is furtherenhanced by individuals experienced in working in anintegrated team environment with WSDOT. One of the keyelements of this process was our risk-based approach. Ourdetailed risk assessment enabled the Parsons team to apply risk-based bid costs for each element of work. This approach wasused additionally to evaluate the cost/risk relationship of construction options.Our knowledge of the project at a very detailed level, coupled with our commitment to hold a 30 percentequity share in the design-build effort, is a clear demonstration of what sets us apart from other firms.We feel that this knowledge, coupled with an unparalleled staff experienced with managing complex tunnel and roadwaystructure construction projects (using similar technologies and construction methods) will allow us to look at the designbuilder’sfinal design development and construction efforts eye-to-eye, to assist WSDOT in successfully delivering theproject with minimized risks. The team assembled for this proposal brings a world-wide portfolio of successful tunnelprojects, coupled with extensive local and WSDOT construction experience, to best assist in delivering the project. TheParsons team has an in-depth understanding of the key risks involved in the design and construction of the tunnel bore,32

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99internal structures, systems, and approach structures. Many of these risks mirror the key design and construction technicalelements identified by WSDOT in this RFQ. Our risk assessment and risk response plan evaluated hundreds of risks. Thefollowing sections discuss the risks having the greatest impact on cost and schedule (as related to the key technicalelements identified by WSDOT) and describe the roles of the CM required to mitigate them.1Soft Ground Pressurized Face TBM Tunnels Constructed Below GroundwaterBenefits to WSDOT• SR 99 TBM analysis and tendering provides a greater understanding of the“mega-machine” TBM• Nearly 20 years of experience managing, designing, and constructing softground, pressurized face TBM projects, worldwide• Experts in successfully implementing and monitoring new TBM technologiesParsons has completed over250 tunnel projects worldwide,including successfullyproviding CM services for 11major design-build projectssuch as the Dubai Metro andthe Dulles Rail Extension.The Parsons team has spent several months evaluating TBM design and selection for SR 99. With this knowledge, we provideWSDOT with the best resources to evaluate a first-in-the-world “mega-machine” to be procured to construct this project.Critical review of TBM designs, thrust and torque requirements, and work plans including monitoring of all TBM functions(including soil conditioning) will need to be carried out at all times during the excavation cycle to minimize the risk forTBM induced settlements. In addition, proper sizing of all TBM components are necessary to provide a robust design.Our in-depth analysis provides us with an unmatched understanding of available technologies as directly related to theSR 99 Design-Build project, and allows us to provide WSDOT with a technical review that incorporates our knowledge ofthe project, as well as our lessons learned from U.S. and global tunneling projects. Parsons and Halcrow have worldwideexperience in managing and designing successful soft ground sub-aqueous tunnels, including the Dubai Metro Red andGreen Lines, the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, and San Diego’s South Bay Tunnel Outfall (SBTO). Steve Minassian was the TunnelDesign Manager for the Port of Miami Tunnel, tasked with specifying the largest pressurized face TBM to date in NorthAmerica, and has designed, procured, and managed TBM operations as a contractor’s project manager. Greg Colzani hasserved as a Resident Engineer and Construction Manager on several significant soft ground tunneling projects, includingSBTO and Portland’s Willamette River Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Program, where he was involved with the design,procurement, and implementation of the first three slurry mix-shield TBMs in North America. Jon Kaneshiro specified theEPBM machine for the SBTO project (7 bar), and is an industry leader through his comprehensive, worldwide investigationof TBM manufacturers and technologies. He has reviewed tunnel machine specifications for several projects over the last15 years. Shimi Tzobery is a specialist in TBM design and monitoring. Shimi served as Parsons’ TBM specialist tasked withdesign reviews and in-factory inspection and testing of the hybrid TBM for the Lake Mead Intake No. 3 project in Nevada,where the TBM can be exposed to up to 12 bar of hydrostatic pressure.Assessing the RisksKey RisksThe soil properties in downtown Seattle are anticipated to be highlyvariable, with layers of plastic clays with high stickiness potential• TBM designand silts and other zones with non-cohesive soils, including gravel,• Unprecedented tunnel diameter/Proper balance of earth pressureboulders, and high water pressures. Mixed face conditions are• Proper maintenance of the TBM, especially the cutterheadforeseen in most parts of the alignment, so the machine must be able• Proper ring build and filling of annular space• Difficult ground conditions/High water pressuresto adapt rapidly to the ground conditions. Therefore, the design must• Properly operated TBMcover all of the potential issues caused by this variable environment.Soft ground tunneling provides its own set of challenges, butcoupling that with high ground water, an unprecedented tunnel diameter and a congested urban environment creates avery special tunnel challenge. Instabilities in mining can lead to lost ground, unacceptable settlements, sinkholes at the33

ground surface and structure damage. Consequently, a TBM capable of balancing external groundwater and soil pressuremust be used to control excavation rates and groundwater inflow, as well as maintain stability of the tunnel face.It is understood that the successful design-builder has selected the earth pressure balanced TBM (EPBM). Our teamevaluated all available pressurized-faced machine technologies and all of the associated risks as related to the SR 99Design-Build project. While all technologies have their share of risks and benefits, EPBM technology has many benefits andeconomies for soft ground tunnels; however, this is generally for smaller diameters, not in the mega sizes, primarily dueto higher risks. EPBM function is compromised in the loose granular soils, which will require a high volume of polymer soilconditioners to improve face support. Our soil evaluation indicates several areas of soils with high stickiness potential thatwill require additional soil conditioning to prevent plugging of the cutterhead, increased wear, critically increased torque,and face support issues.The mega-diameter of the EPBM creates issues not experienced with smaller TBMs. The pressure differential between thetop and bottom of the EPBM is significant and will require special procedures and conditioners to maintain stable facepressure. Unusually high thrust and power requirements for the cutterhead is a tremendous risk and concern in variableface conditions. This project has an unprecedented diameter using EPBM mode tunneling, considering the difficult groundconditions. Our job will be to confirm that the EPBM operations are synchronized with the ground conditions and theproper mitigation measures are implemented and monitored.TBM maintenance, if not performed at proper intervals, can cause excessive wear, extended hyperbaric interventions, andunnecessary delays. Routine maintenance will generally minimize the need for significant repairs. A robust TBM designedto reduce wear and extend component life must be provided.In Portland, Greg Colzani and Jan Babenderderdeevaluated TBM cutter wear and recommendedafter-market cutters that would double the distancebetween cutter changes.For most of the alignment, the cutterhead will requireaccess through the plenum under hyperbaric conditions tomaintain face stability. Wear plates, wear indicators, highperformance cutting tools, and unprecedented soilconditioning must be part of the risk reduction plan. Theproper amount of face pressure must be applied in theinspection area so as not to leak air to the surface. Depending on ground conditions, additional face support throughgrouting may need to be performed to prevent face collapse. When mining is resumed, the evacuated plenum must berecharged with bentonite or a bentonite rich inert backfill material to ensure that over-mining is prevented.To ensure the long-term performance, the segmental liningmust be transported and erected in the tunnel withoutdamage to exacting tolerances. Subsequently, the annulargap between the liner and surrounding soil must be filledwith grout, concurrent with TBM advance, to preventovalization and ground loss. Our team researched andevaluated segment installation and annular space groutingprocedures to address the unique risks associated with the‘mega-diameter’ tunnel.Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99The TBM cutterhead must be designed to handle all conditions represented in the Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR). Thedesign-builder’s TBM design tunnel excavation plans must include operational guidelines for mining through changes inmaterial, boulders, granular soils, and soils with high stickiness potential.Our team has the understanding and demonstrated experience to manage the tunneling risks of the SR 99 project. TableE.1 provides representative examples of our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, to manage these and similarproject risks.34

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Table E.1 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionTBM Design/Operation:• Loss of control of the face pressuresdue to high pressure gradient betweencrown and invert level• Inability to provide for a homogenousmixture of excavated materialsgiven the extremely high probabilityof mixed face or variable soil andgroundwater conditions• Failure of critical TBM components• Immobility of cutterhead• Unexpected inundationWater-Bearing Running SandsLoss of face pressure/poor mixingin the earth plenum triggersuncontrolled flow of running sand/water into the plenumGround Loss at The Face• Surface settlement is caused by loss ofground at the face, above and aheadof the face, and if shunt flow occursbehind the face, especially for re-startafter stop and interventionGround Loss Around the Tail Skinand Segmental Lining• Surface settlement occurs by excessiveground loss around the shield orimperfect grouting of the annularbehind the tunnel liningThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder’sdesign provides:• Redundant safety factors for the design of TBM componentsdedicated to control the pressure balance• Redundant sensors to monitor face pressures• A supply of bentonite fully available to fill up the chamber inthe event of pressure loss after manned interventions• Numerical/physical model of mixing in the plenum• Additional wear plates, wear detectors, and redundantcutters to minimize interventions• Proper sizing of TBM components to take into account thelarge-scale tunnel• Mechanisms for keeping the cutterhead from becomingimmobile in sticky soil• Adequate ports for lubrication and conditioning for pressurebalance and control of water pressureThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder’sdesign provides:• Designs TBM and procedures to withstand added facepressure• Provides soil conditioning and additional bentonite supplyfor injection, as requiredThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder’sdesign provides:• Selects and designs the TBM to provide soil conditioningincluding bentonite injection, if necessaryThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder’sdesign provides:• Designs grout for anticipated ground conditions• Designs a robust grouting system and a redundant back-upsystemThe CM team must monitor the design-builder’sactivities to confirm:• Extensive factory testing of the TBM• TBM is maintained in accordance with manufacturers’recommendations• Face pressure is maintained at all times• Proper conditioning program is tested and used• Monitoring of all machine and operational functions• Plenum filling is completed prior to re-mining• Redundant systems are in place and operational• Backfill grouting system is operating as designedThe CM team must monitor the design-builder’sactivity to confirm:• Fabricates and operates the TBM to increase control of theface in high pressure areas• Uses soil conditioning and additional bentonite injection asrequired.The CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Refills the chamber with bentonite or other material ascompressed air is lowered• Performs cutter changes in partially evacuated plenum,refilling and mining ahead and repeating, conducting workin partially filled chamber to reduce the pressure differentialfrom top to bottomThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Controls grout injection with the TBM advance• Provides a robust grouting system and a back-up system• Injects bentonite in the annular space around the TBM shield• Verifies grout by coring and performs secondary grouting2One-Pass Pre-Cast Bolted Gasketed Segmental Concrete Lining SystemsBenefits to WSDOT• Large diameter segment design, fabrication, and inspectionexperience• In-depth understanding of project-specific geotechnicalconditions as related to lining designOur team members and companieshave designed, fabricated, installed, andinspected over 100 miles of segmentlinedtunnels, including the 10.84-meterDublin Port Tunnel and the 11.34-meterinterior diameter Brisbane Airport Link.35

Understanding the critical nature of a properly designed, fabricated, and installed one-pass tunnel lining, the Parsonsteam has assembled a group of world-class segmental lining experts to evaluate the design, develop qualityplans, monitor fabrication, and trouble shoot installation issues. Anthony Harding has designed dozens of tunnellining systems including the 11.34-meter interior diameter Brisbane Airport Link. Anthony was the lining designer for theSR 99 Design-Build project proposal effort, and understands the project-specific design challenges. Chris Smith has 40years of experience designing and fabricating tunnel lining systems, including the 10.84-meter Dublin Port Tunnel and the10.4-meter Hamdi Tunnel in Egypt.Chris helped pioneer the use of one-pass and steel-fiberreinforced lining systems. He developed ISO compliantquality and training systems for segment fabricationfacilities. Both our Resident Engineer and Chief Inspectorhave extensive segment fabrication quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) experience and one-pass tunnelconstruction experience as well. Greg Colzani workedwith Chris Smith and Halcrow’s engineers to successfully implement the use of a steel-fiber-only reinforced one-passlining system for the City of Portland, OR. This was the first use of this technology in North America. Greg and Parsons havealso prepared QC/QA plans and trained numerous inspectors on several similar precast concrete segmented liner designsin North America, including SBTO, the I-25 T-REX in Denver, and Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) in Lake Mead.Mark Bower was the Field Engineer responsible for precast lining fabrication inspection for the Isle of Grain Precast Facilityin Kent, UK, supplying the Channel Tunnel Lining.Assessing the RisksBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Our team members and companies have designed,fabricated, installed and Inspected over a 100 milesof segment lined tunnels including the 10.84 mDublin Port Tunnel and the 11.34m ID BrisbaneAirport LinkKey RisksThe bored tunnel excavation will be supported by a one-pass pre-cast boltedgasketed concrete segmental lining that will also serve as the final tunnel operational• Dimensional requirements for fabrication,lining. Therefore, this lining must be robust, durable, and water tight. Failure to delivererection, and servicesuch a system will create serious life cycle and operational issues in the future. A• Design for loading – construction andTBM-bored tunnel requires that the ground support system be compatible with thelong-term• Design and detailing of gaskets, fixtures, andTBM operation. The TBM-segmented liner system must be able to withstand service,fittingsseismic, construction, ground, and hydrostatic loads. The jacking configuration,• Production of segments to requiredgaskets, clearances to shield, joint geometry, gasket location, tail seal geometry, andtolerancestapers must all be compatible with each other. The Parsons team evaluated critical• Storage, handling, and installation of liner design risks for constructability, loading, and performance requirements, as wellsegmentsas lining fabrication, installation, and annular backfilling procedures required forproper ring installation. As discussed above, our team has the experience to managethe risks associated with one-pass lining systems. Table E.2 provides representative examples of our methodology, actingas CM support to WSDOT, to manage these and similar project risks.Table E.2 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionLong- Term Load Increases In CohesiveSoils• Long-term loads on the lining in cohesivesoils will expose lining to loads higher thanexpectedThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Provides a robust design• Provides TBM-liner system compatibility• Increases the safety factor for concrete strengthand durability or adds thickness to manage theworst case in the GBRThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Implements any specially designed segmented liner sectionswhere needed for ground conditions or other special conditions36

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Table E.2 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionLiner Quality (Fab)• Loss of face pressure/poor mixing in theearth plenum triggers uncontrolled flow ofrunning sand/water into plenumLiner Quality (Install)• Concrete liner sections not installed inaccordance with tolerance or qualityrequirements, leading to improper fit,damage, or leakageThe CM team will:• Review the design-builder’s fabrication and QC/QA plans• Develop Quality Verification (QV) proceduresand a training program for CM staff and WSDOTemployees• Verify that the design-builder designs andprocures robust molds• Verify that the design-builder’s fabricator isqualified and the plant can meet productionschedulesThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Liner design accounts for handling and installationloads• TBM/liner interface is designed properly• Annular grout design is tested for compatibilitywith the TBM and has enough strength to supportthe liningThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Verifies design geometry, gasket, and connection details• Provides laser 3-D verification of moulds• Ensures proper curing• Reviews and test mix designs• Performs rigorous QC/QA program• Provides liner test ringsThe CM team will:• QV of operations (continuous plant inspection)The CM team must monitor the design-builder’s activityto confirm:• Proper ring selection through telemetry/back-checked by thefield engineer• Crew training/proper installation measurement• Immediately backfill grout through the tail shield, grout hasenough strength to support rings• Annular grout meets specified strength• Continuous rigorous inspection of the liner installation3Hyperbaric Interventions for TBM Maintenance/RepairBenefits to WSDOT• Hyperbaric experience in all roles – safety, management,operational, and medical• High-pressure intervention work• Hands-on experience – Our people have performed the workOur hyperbaric team has been involvedwith over 500 interventions, includingover 70 self-performed interventions upto 4 bar.Parsons has assembled a group of in-house and consultant hyperbaric experts with specific TBM intervention experience indifficult ground conditions. Greg Colzani, acting as a Construction Manager and Resident Engineer, has managed severalprojects (SBTO, East Side CSO, West Side CSO) that have included hyperbaric interventions up to 4.5 bar.Additionally, Jan Babendererde has set-up hyperbaric equipment, monitored hyperbaric work, and has personallyconducted over 60 interventions in excess of 3 bar. Bob Rogers, one of Parsons’ best safety professionals, specializesin construction diving and TBM hyperbaric operations. He has developed and reviewed contractor hyperbaric plansfor tunnel projects including the SBTO, the West Side CSO, and the Brightwater Conveyance in Seattle. Edmond Kay,MD, a hyperbaric medical consultant, has acted as the attending hyperbaric physician for the Beacon Hill, BrightwaterConveyance, and University Link tunnel projects in Seattle for workers exposed up to 6.5 bar.Assessing the RisksKey Risks• Worker safety – Increased health risks• Face stability – during interventions andpost-interventionTBM cutter replacement will require the use of hyperbaric interventions and/orextensive ground stabilization in unstable saturated soils if safe havens of stableground are not available. The first line of defense is to design a robust TBM toreduce wear. Regardless, highly abrasive soils make it necessary to inspect thecutterhead and replace cutter tools. Therefore, the design-builder will need the37

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99proper equipment and trained personnel to perform hyperbaric interventions and repairs. Once again, the large pressuredifferential that exists between the top and bottom of the TBM created by the large diameter can be problematic whenworking on the lower portion of the TBM. Extensive ground stabilization and/or submerged diving work may be required.As discussed above, our team has managed the risks associated with hyperbaric interventions on similar projects. TableE.3 provides representative examples of our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, to manage these and similarproject risks.Table E.3 Risk CM Role Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionWorker Safety• Exposure to working underhyperbaric interventions increaseshealth risksFace Stability• Loss of face stability can trapworkers; improper refilling ofplenum can cause settlementThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Provides a TBM with a robust design to reduceinterventions• Designs the TBM with proper hyperbaric equipment• Develops hyperbaric work plansThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Designs the TBM with a bentonite reserve availableto fill up the chamber and refilling prior to restartof the machineThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Maintains trained hyperbaric medical and support staff• Ensures medical treatment facilities are in place• Hires experienced workers/divers and provides extensive training• Monitors worker healthThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Maintains an available bentonite reserve and refills the chamber prior torestart of the machine• Provides the capability to perform grouting ahead and around the face toprovide additional face support4TBM Instrumentation and Performance AnalysisBenefits to WSDOT• Field-tested staff and data collection systems shorten thelearning curve – Ready Day 1• TBM experts know what the data means• Data systems easily integrate with inspection andgeotechnical data to obtain an integrated pictureParsons’ staff has developedsystems to collect and use TBMdata as a risk-reduction andproblem-solving tool on complexTBM projects, including theArrowhead Tunnels in Hemet, CA,and the Portland CSO Program.The Parsons team has the experience needed to determine, specify, and develop data management systems to monitorTBM operations. Our data systems allow the marrying of TBM data, inspector observations, and ground performance datato provide a complete picture. Shimi Tzobery will develop specific data programs for the TBM and inspection monitoring.He has developed TBM data analysis systems for complex, TBM operations, including the NYC East Side Access, theArrowhead Tunnels, and the Lake Mead Tunnel Projects. Shimi and Greg Colzani have developed PDA-based tunnelinspection systems to merge with TBM data. Jan Babendererde is well-versed in the value of TBM monitoring, as he wastasked to monitor the operation of slurry TBMs for the Willamette River CSO Program to evaluate and optimize operatorskills, monitor machine functions to develop maintenance schedules, and troubleshoot TBM functional issues.Assessing the risksKey Risks• Excessive TBM wear from improperly operated TBM• Ground loss from poor face pressure management, overexcavation, poor steering, inadequate soil conditioning, orinsufficient backfill groutingThe design-builder will provide TBM operation monitoring data as partof the SR 99 Design-Build project. Even the best designed TBMs will notserve their intended purpose if not operated properly. If unchecked, theTBM can exhibit crippling wear, alignment issues, and excessive groundsettlement to name a few. TBM data, if processed and analyzed diligently,38

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99can be a key tool for optimizing performance and reducing risks. For example, on the Arrowhead Tunnels project, Shimiprovided detailed analysis of thrust, cutterhead rotation speed, and the penetration rate from TBM data to optimizeperformance and reduce wear resulting in a key claim defense. As the CMconsultant, we will use our expertise in this field to ensure that sufficient andaccurate system records are collected, inspection data is recorded, and a highlevel of TBM and geotechnical analysis is performed. The tunnel data managementsystem will use TBM data output to develop operational profiles to correlate withsettlement monitoring systems. Comparison and interpretation of data fromthese sources will be essential to maintaining optimum tunnel performance withrespect to production and control of settlement. Table E.4 provides representativeexamples of our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, to manage theseand similar project risks.Table E.4 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionTBM Wear• Failure of critical TBM components• Excessive wear of componentsGround loss• Loss of ground in the face, overmining, improper steering, andimproper or inadequate backfillgrouting of the annular spaceThe CM team must confirm that thedesign-builder:• Provides a robust design• Provides baseline operational parameters forall TBM functions• Provides the ability to monitor all critical TBMfunctionsThe CM team must confirm that thedesign-builder:• Properly designs the TBM• Provides adequate TBM operational andmonitoring work plansThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Develops and implements an aggressive preventative maintenance program• Monitors and analyzes all TBM functions (torque, rotation, pressure balance,wear detectors, temperature, and current consumption to look for trends andanomalies not normally anticipatedThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Monitors the TBM advance rate, discharge rate, volume, face/plenum pressure,and grouting volume• Analyzes that data for each shove correlates with settlement data• Conducts daily TBM performance and ground performance meetings; takesremedial or corrective actions, as necessary5Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Protection of Existing StructuresBenefits to WSDOT• Project staff has thorough project-specific knowledge ofgeotechnical conditions• Conducted extensive ground behavior and structure analysisfor the entire SR 99 alignment• Nationally recognized tunnel behavior experts• Experts in local geologyOur team has modeled the predicted soilbehavior, and inspected and analyzed 157structures along the alignment. Our staffhas monitored structures for numeroustunnel projects including the Dulles AirportConnector, the Los Angeles Metro Rail Lineand WMATA.To help WSDOT manage the risks associated with ground performance monitoring and instrumentation optimization, theParsons team has included Tony Stirbys and Dr. Ed Cording to supplement our tunnel CM experts. Tony is well-versed inthe local geology and was instrumental in the development of geotechnical analysis, instrumentation, and buildingprotection plans for the SR 99 tunnel alignment.He performed instrumentation design andmonitoring, and implemented grouting protectionand remedial action plans for urban tunnelOur team conducted an in-depth study of the soil conditionsand analyzed all of the structures along the alignment thatcould be impacted by TBM-induced ground settlement.39

projects including the LA Metro Rail Line, the Alameda Corridor, the I-15 Reconstruction, the I-405 Corridor Program, andI-25 T-REX. Dr. Cording is one of the world’s foremost leaders in geotechnical engineering for tunneling, ground behavior, andanalysis/protection of existing structures, and he participates on numerous technical review panels and dispute resolutionboards. In addition to these resources, Greg Colzani (Resident Engineer) and Mark Bower (Chief Inspector) have participated ininstrumentation evaluations and review meetings for several soft ground tunneling projects, and are familiar with preventiveand remedial action plans to protect structures.Assessing the risksBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Key RisksThe SR 99 tunnel will travel under and adjacent to structures, utilities, and privatelyownedbuildings, all susceptible to settlement-induced damage.• Worker Safety – Increased health risks The first line of defense will be to ensure proper operation of the• Face Stability – During interventions and TBM and installation of the lining system. We will apply knowledge,post-interventioncoupled with our experience with TBM behavior, to assist WSDOTwith evaluating the design-builder’s monitoring and remedialaction plans, participate in daily monitoring meetings with WSDOT’s instrumentation consultant, andreview settlement data. At Dulles Airport, Parsons as the CM managed and monitored an automatedtotal station system to provide continuous real time monitoring of active runways and taxiways without interruption toairport operations. Table E.5 provides representative examples of our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, tomanage these and similar project risks.Table E.5 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionInadequate/Ineffective Instruments• Inability to properly monitor structures in a timelyfashion; unreliable data causes lost confidence indata; ignored data results in structure damageInadequate Remedial Action Plans• Remedial action plans do not address possiblerecovery actions; crews are slow to mobilizeresulting in settlement and structure damageThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Reviews all instrument plans and equipment toensure that proper devices are used• Ensures plans include redundant instrumentsThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Reviews all plans against structure analyses andgeotechnical conditions• Ensure the methods are practical and applicable fortheir intended purposeThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Believes and investigates all data• Jointly reviews the instrumentation and TBM performancedaily and more often for highly sensitive structuresThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Verifies that equipment and crews are in place and trainedprior to tunneling – pre install grouting pipes for futureuse, as necessary• Pre-performs ground stabilization, if necessary6Deep Ground Improvement Techniques to Limit or Control Tunnel Construction-Induced Ground MovementBenefits to WSDOT• Project staff has thorough project-specific knowledge ofgeotechnical conditions• Conducted extensive ground behavior and structure analysisfor the entire SR 99 alignment• Nationally recognized ground modification experts• Experts in local geologyHalcrow provided design and CMsupport for the Jubilee Line WaterlooStation Contract C-102 in London, UK.Grouting was performed above the newunderground station to protect historicsettlement of sensitive buildings.The Parsons team has performed extensive analysis ground characteristics and developed comprehensive groundimprovement strategies for the SR 99 Design-Build project, and has provided a team experienced at all levels, and in40

all aspects of ground modification. Our geotechnical team members are familiar with the anticipated soil behavior andhave facilitated ground modification programs throughout the country. As the Construction Manager in Portland for theCSO Program, Greg Colzani supervised several grouting inspectors to monitor a deep jet grouting program to protectfour bridges from tunnel-induced settlements. Our Chief inspector, Mark Bower, has inspected compensation andimpregnation grouting to minimize ground settlement and protect the existing structures in Europe and the Middle East.Assessing the risksKey Risks• Improper methods do not work as intended• Poorly installed methods result in collateral damage of ineffectivesupport• Methods not implemented in a timely mannerBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99As discussed above, where necessary for protection of existingstructures and utilities, ground improvements within or abovethe tunnel zone of influence can be used to limit and controlground movement due to tunnel construction. Remedial groundimprovements over the tunnel can also increase stresses on thetunnel liner. In certain cases, deep ground improvements may be usedto create a safe haven to perform cutterhead inspections and maintenance. Care needs to be used when implementingground improvement measures to ensure that these measures do not induce heave or settlement damage to the structuresbeing protected. Table E.6 provides a representative example of our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, tomanage these and similar project risks.Table E.6 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionImproperly Selected or PoorlyInstalled Methods• Improper ground improvementmethods are used, which areineffective or cause damageThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Reviews all plans against structure analysis and geotechnical conditions toensure proper methods are being applied• Reviews all plans and equipment to ensure that proper devices are used• Ensure plans include redundant monitoring instruments and that instrumentsare being monitored prior, during, and after workThe CM team must confirm that thedesign-builder:• Performs continuous inspection andmonitoring of operations to ensure that workplans are followed• Verifies the effectiveness of installationsthrough coring, testing, and other means7Deep Below Groundwater Excavation and Support of Major Structures and FacilitiesBenefits to WSDOT• Deep, below groundwater excavation shoringdesign, construction and inspection experience• In-depth understanding of project-specificgeotechnical conditions as related to shoringdesign• Experts in local geologyTony Stirbys managed the instrumentationmonitoring program and Alf Evers wasthe Senior Inspector for the excavation onthe Alameda Corridor project involving theconstruction of a shored structure that required4 million cubic yards of excavation, 950,000cubic yards of concrete, and 170 million poundsof reinforcing steel.Our CM team is well-versed in all construction methods involving deep excavation below groundwater. Steve Minassianhas designed and constructed deep shafts and excavation as a contractor’s engineer, including the freeze wall in Providence,RI. Greg Colzani has acted as the Construction Manager and Resident Engineer for conventionally shored excavations,secant pile walls, cutter soil mix walls, ground freeze operations, and slurry walls. In Portland, he was the ConstructionManager for the 120-foot deep pump station slurry wall shaft. The pump station required slurry walls 200 feet deep anda 320-foot deep, jet-grouted water cut off. Tony Stirbys and Alf Evers have extensive deep excavation monitoring andshoring experience including the Alameda Corridor project. Our local knowledge of the geology and surface constraintsare an added value.41

Assessing the risksBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Key RisksThe tunnel operations present many challenges to overcome, including largeopen excavations to launch and receive the TBM and serve as the roadway• Matching existing conditions with appropriateaccess. These deep excavations extend below groundwater and requireexcavation and groundwater control techniquescomplex shoring systems that may include dewatering, secant walls, slurry• Quality and stability of the excavationwalls, or soil-mixed support structures. Failure to select the proper methods• Base stabilityfor the soil, groundwater, and loading conditions can result in catastrophic• Improper groundwater control leading to shaft failureevents. Careful monitoring of excavations is necessary to ensure that• Protection of adjacent facilitiesstructures are performing as designed. Contingency plans must be in place• Confined site areaprior to the start of excavation. Table E.7 provides a representative exampleof our methodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, to manage these and similar project risks.Table E.7 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionShoringShoring design does not adequatelyaddress support structures ormanage groundwater; issues withpoor installation causes settlementor jeopardizes adjacent structuresThe CM team must confirm that the designbuilder:• Reviews all plans against structures analyses andgeotechnical conditions to ensure proper methods andsafety factors are being applied• Verifies that design adequately addressesbottom stability; verifies plans to ensure properinstrumentation and monitoring is providedThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Verifies all work is being performed according to approved workplans• Continuous inspection of work• Ensures remedial action plans are adequate and tools are in place forrapid implementation• Instrumentation is in place and being monitored at requiredintervals• Pre-support of high risk structures8Mitigation and Repair Procedures to Eliminate or Reduce Settlement of Adjacent Structures, Buildings, and UtilitiesBenefits to WSDOT• Complete structure survey• Comprehensive TBM/soil structure analysis• Top experts in ground performance and structuremitigation• Total understanding of the entire picture –TBM operation,monitoring, pre-supportOur SR 99 team, in conjunction withEd Cording, PhD, evaluated eachstructure along the alignment for itspotential to be damaged by tunnelinducedsettlement. Our structuralengineers developed preventivemeasures for some structures and riskcontingency plans for others.Our team performed structure protection analyses for the SR 99 alignment and developed a structure protection program.A thorough understanding of how structures will behave under tunnel induced settlements, preventive settlementarresting methods, and proper operation of the TBM are critical to the protection of existing structures. However, it wouldbe imprudent not to be prepared to implement remedial measures to support structures in the event of unanticipatedmovement. Our team of structural engineers and geotechnical experts, including Ed Cording, PhD, have evaluated eachstructure and the expected ground loss for each soil unit. This knowledge will allow us to evaluate the design-builder’sapproach, methods for effectiveness, and speed of installation. Greg Colzani and Mark Bower are experienced in manyof the commonly practiced remedial measures. Our team developed many of these evaluation techniques for WMATA andLA Metro Rail Line that have been proven successful on the Alameda Corridor, Dulles Airport Connector, and the Al SalamStreet Tunnel.42

Assessing the risksBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Key RisksA proactive plan of proper TBM selection and operation, coupled with asettlement mitigation plan, will eliminate potential settlement of some• Improperly designed or poorly selected methods causestructures and reduce settlement of others to acceptable levels. A mitigationstructure damage or do not arrest settlementand repair plan should also be in place prior to construction so that• Improperly applied methodsunforeseen settlement issues can be implemented in a timely manner. Many• Remedial methods not performed in a timely mannerof the associated risks and mitigations have been discussed above; however,a thorough understanding of the effects of ground behavior during tunneling, coupled with a full study of the structuresis required. Mitigation measures must be established for sensitive structures and contingency plans and equipment mustbe able to mobilize on short notice to prevent catastrophic results. Table E.8 provides a representative example of ourmethodology, acting as CM support to WSDOT, to mitigate these and similar project risks.Table E.8 Risk CM Role - Design and Pre-construction CM Role - ConstructionImproperly selected or poorlyinstalled methods• Improper ground improvementmethods are used, which areineffective or cause damageThe CM team must confirm that thedesign-builder:• Develops a comprehensive structuremonitoring and settlement mitigation planThe CM team must confirm that the design-builder:• Reviews all plans against structure analysis and geotechnical conditions to ensurethat proper methods are being applied• Reviews all plans and equipment to ensure that proper devices are used• Ensures that plans include redundant monitoring instruments, and thatinstruments are being monitored prior, during, and after work• Continuous inspection and monitoring of operations to ensure work plans are followed• Verify the effectiveness of the installation through coring, testing, and other means9System Integrator that Provides Oversight for Roadway and Tunnel Systems Expertise and Commissioning EffortsBenefits to WSDOT• System integrator was involved throughout the entire design-build process• National and international experience will allow innovative collaboration• Pre-construction team is the same as the design-build team - Up to speedwith WSDOT’s issues and local codes• Tunnel Resident Engineer and inspectors have systems and ventilationexperience• Mechanical systems modeled during the design-build phase and can beused during collaboration meetingsParsons used Building InformationModeling (BIM) to model the tunnelsystems and ventilation buildingsduring the SR 99 Design-Build pursuit.These efforts provide Parsons withunmatched insight to assist WSDOT inevaluating the design-builder’s designsubmittals, ensuring that all operationalrequirements are met.Transportation tunnels rely on a complex set of functional elements to maintain safe traffic flow, provide ventilation, ensurefire/life safety for passengers, provide emergency communications, and provide remote control of all tunnel systems. TheParsons team is experienced in integrating all of these elements into a functional system. We have retained our core teamof systems and ventilation specialists involved in the design-build pursuit to provide WSDOT with an “up to speed” teamknowledgeable in the project-specific operational issues. Doug Slakey, our Systems Integrator, will coordinate our teamof technical specialists, which includes Anthony Bates and Peter Woodburn. Doug has been thoroughly involved withthe SR 99 Design-Build project, as well as other complex projects including the Caldecott and the I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnelprojects. Anthony Bates brings 18 years of experience in design, installation, testing, and commissioning of tunnel systemsprojects, including the London Crossrail project, the Chongzun Expressway, and the Stonehenge Tunnel. Peter Woodburnis a specialist with 17 years of extensive experience in fluid mechanics analysis for a wide range of sectors, including firesafety engineering and ventilation. Greg Colzani has served as the Chief Inspector and Project Engineer for ventilationand systems contracts for the I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnel and the H-3 Trans-Koulau Tunnels projects. During construction,our Systems Integrator will monitor all related design-build activities including submittal reviews and factory acceptancetesting of equipment. He will also lead the verification of all design-build commissioning activities.43

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99E.2 management approachThe Parsons team understands what is required to successfully support WSDOT in managing this project. A prime objectiveof managing the delivery of the scope of services defined by WSDOT is to provide qualified personnel and technicalexpertise to perform specific CM services.Our team has considerable experience providing CM services on design-build tunnel projects. We understand the discretedifferences in managing a design-build tunnel contract, as compared to the design-bid-build delivery method. In designbuild,the CM verifies that the design-builder is conforming to the approved design, the accepted QC/QA plan, and allcontract requirements, and that proper documentation of this conformance is maintained. To fulfill our role as part of theCM team, we will complement the interests and actions of WSDOT, all project stakeholders, and the design-builder. Wewill assist WSDOT in developing the Construction Management Plan, to conform to WSDOT procedures, and to identifyclear roles and responsibilities of the integrated team to effectively manage and monitor the cost, schedule, safety, andquality objectives of the SR 99 Design-Build project. Our tunnel CM experience, our detailed knowledge of the SR 99Design-Build project, and our experience working in an integrated team environment co-located with WSDOT for the past10 years providing similar and relevant services to WSDOT on the I-405 Corridor Program as part of the generalengineering consultant provides our team with a distinct running start to meeting project requirements.Our approach to performing CM and administration services is based on our knowledge and experience of WSDOT and thepolicies, practices, and procedures necessary for successful management of design-build projects. This base of knowledgeapproach is further refined and tailored to our specific role on WSDOT’s Integrated Consultant Team. We have structuredour approach to address particular elements of the pre-construction and construction phases of the project, as outlinedin WSDOT’s RFQ.Phase I – Pre-Construction ServicesGeneral Construction Management ServicesThe activities performed during the pre-construction phase fall into three distinct categories.• Establish and implement a tunnel-specific Construction Management Plan• Provide technical personnel and expertise for participation in task force and other project meetings• Prepare specific plans to manage, inspect, assess, and report on the construction activitiesOur unique, long-term experience working in an integrated WSDOT environment allows us to ‘Quick Start’ these activitiesso our beneficial interaction with the project team can start ‘Day 1’ following Notice to Proceed.Construction Management PlanWe will leverage our experience as CM on tunnel design-build projects and our knowledge of WSDOT procedures to assistin preparing the CM plan, to clearly define roles and responsibilities of all parties, and to ensure it is fully integrated withthe program-level CM plan. The goal is to achieve the cost, schedule, safety, and quality objectives for the project. The planshould demonstrate how our staff integrates into and supports WSDOT’s CM team. We can adapt our existing tunnel CMexperience and WSDOT management experience for design oversight and task force participation to guide our activitiesstarting Day 1, until the final SR 99 CM Plan is adopted. This assures that accepted and proven procedures will be followedimmediately for ‘over the shoulder’ reviews and task force participation without delay, a clear benefit to WSDOT.The CM plan will emphasize “develop and plan” activities during the pre-construction phase and transition to a “deliveryand execute” focus during construction. We have developed comprehensive CM plans for large, complex tunnel programsincluding the ARC project in New Jersey and the Al Salam Street Tunnel projects in Abu Dhabi. The plan will be basedon incorporating the protocol and procedures already established by WSDOT and the design-builder to ensure theircompatibility and efficiency to produce the desired results. The CM Plan will contain subset plans for specific activities tobe integrated with WSDOT and the design-builder including:44

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99• Communication Plan• Submittal Management Plan• Administration Plan• Safety Plan• Document Control Plan• Staffing PlanTeam Management/StrategiesThe Parsons team provides continuity across phases by maintaining essential personnel throughout the project, whichhas proven essential during our tenure on the I-405 Corridor Program integrated team with WSDOT. We are committedto participating in team management meetings with WSDOT, the Integrated Consultant Team, and the design-builder toprovide the maximum opportunities to guide the management strategies on the project. The SR 99 Design-Build project ishighly complex and establishes a new milestone within the industry. We have identified executives who can participate inexecutive-level project reviews together with WSDOT, to provide management level oversight.Staffing PlanThe success of WSDOT’s CM efforts depend in part on the strategic planning of future staffing needs, the assignment ofthe necessary staff commensurate with the level and complexity of the design-builder’s activities, and access to a depthof resources to adequately respond to changing conditions. Our Staffing Plan will combine the integration of the designbuilder’saggressive 24/7 schedule; the resources, capabilities, and availability of WSDOT staff and their other consultants;and our knowledge of the design-builder’s risks to identify the staffing levels andexpertise required. We have identified our key personnel who will provide the expertiserequested by WSDOT, along with additional personnel who provide the depth ofresources necessary to successfully staff this project. Our Staffing Plan will identify‘knowledge transfer opportunities’ to train WSDOT personnel to augment the staffingrequirements on the project. For example, Greg Colzani trained city inspection staffto provide QC/QA oversight of one-pass concrete lining production for the PortlandCSO Program and the SBTO projects. Both projects delivered segments with less thana 0.5 percent repair/rejection rate.Risk Management PlanOur team thoroughly understands the risks associated with every aspect of this SR 99 Design-Build project, the time/costimpact of each risk occurrence, and potential mitigation measures. Our Risk Management plan will focus first on theNo other CM team knows the riskson this project better than Parsons.evaluation of the designbuilder’srisk register tounderstand their identifiedrisks, their action plans toeliminate selected risks, mitigation measures planned to manage riskimpacts, their monitoring and instrumentation program, and their emergencyaction and intervention plans to respond to risk events. Our plan will identifyhow we will monitor the design-builder’s compliance with their establishedrisk protocols, assess and report on their performance and reporting, provideindependent verification where requested by WSDOT, and comment on riskconcerns of our technical experts that may be assigned on the project.SR 99 Risk Register ExampleWe have extensive risk management experience for tunnel projects, design-build projects, and complex constructionprograms. Our risk management activities will be led by John Donatelli and Greg Colzani. John has provided riskmanagement services for WSDOT and the Straits of Messina crossing in Italy – a complex rail and highway project thatincludes over 75 kilometers of large tunnels.Design-Build Task Force MeetingsWe routinely participate in all task force meetings held on our design-build projects, and have done so representing allthree perspectives of designer, contractor, and owner. This provides us with a thorough understanding of how each group45

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99uses the information to perform their respective tasks. We will provide our tunnel expertise to assist WSDOT to ensure thatthe design-builder’s design satisfies all requirements and minimizes risks. Themembers of our team are well-versed in the collaborative process and our We are here to provide “Technicalproject understanding will allow us to provide productive input into the and Management” services, notprocess from ‘Day 1’.to “Construct” the project.Project Schedule and Expenditure Review and AnalysisOur team has an thorough knowledge of the scope of this project and provides WSDOT with a valuable resource tounderstand the intricacies of the design-builder’s schedule. We can assist WSDOT in ensuring all activities are realisticallylinked and durations reflect the level of effort, as well as the risk associated with the work. We can verify that the floatembedded in the schedule is appropriate and that the necessary review time for submittals in planned for. A thoroughunderstanding of the design-builder’s schedule is critical to the disbursement of funds, the effectiveness of the schedulein controlling the overall project, and the validity in establishing the cost and schedule impacts associated with changedconditions. Our ‘Designer – Contractor – Owner’ perspective provides WSDOT with a unique insight into the developmentand analysis of the design-builder’s schedule.We will conduct a weekly schedule review in preparation of discussions at project meetings. Resource availability,subcontractor coordination, and owner coordination issues will be discussed to ensure that the schedule is workable. Ourschedule review will encompass all of the elements listed below:• Weekly look ahead• Key milestones• Defined deliverables• Critical schedule change reporting• Identifying long lead itemsWe are proud to include Dan Brown on our team, who will serve as Scheduler for the project. Dan has spent his careerworking as a Project Controls Manager for world-class transportation tunnel, rail, and transit and subway projects worldwide.He brings a wealth of experience to provide a “no surprises”mentality to the project. The depth of our team, coupled with ourthorough knowledge of the project, will assist WSDOT in monitoringschedules and providing strong supporting information for claimsevaluation and defense strategies.Safety ProgramA safe construction project does not happen by accident; rather, it requires a strong commitment to safety by all projectparticipants throughout the life of the project. As an industry safety leader, Parsons brings this commitment to safety, acommitment that is carried through every level of our organization. We will leverage our strong safety culture to ensurethat our team works safely throughout the project, and we will work withParsons’ Number One Core Value isSAFETY. Our motto “Safety – Make ItPersonal” – drives how we operate.Parsons completed our SR 532 Design-Buildproject ahead of schedule, which includedan additional $3 million in project scope.other project stakeholders to ensure that a safe working environment ismaintained for all parties. All Parsons’ projects begin with a safety and riskevaluation and carry through the project life. Parsons has an industry-leadingsafety record, reflected in our EMR rating of 0.58 for 2011.Underground Safety Program ExpertiseWe have selected Dan Weathers and Bob Rogers to provide underground safety expertise on the project. Tunneling isa highly specialized and hazardous industry with inherent risks to the team’s health and safety. Dan has over 25 years ofexperience managing safety programs and projects including tunnel construction. Bob has a strong safety background aswell as having extensive hyperbaric work experience. We will support WSDOT in ensuring that the design-builder developsand implements a compliant safety program, properly addressing construction hazards associated with this project.Health and safety concerns are heightened by the soft ground tunneling aspects of this project, including risks associatedwith hyperbaric intervention, ground settlement, and other high-risk construction activities. Our approach will be to work46

proactively with WSDOT and the design-builder to keep health and safety our top priority. We will assist WSDOT in thedevelopment of a tunnel-specific Safety Plan to provide health and safety training for the SR 99 CM team.We will continue our commitment to safety into the construction phase, and will fully comply with the design-builder’sestablished project safety program. We will emphasize communication protocols to our staff, informing both WSDOT andthe design-builder of observed safety conditions consistent with the designbuilder’sauthority and responsibility for maintaining safety on the project. Wewill focus our efforts on monitoring the design-builder’s performance duringconstruction; their success in maintaining the safety of the public, their ownforces, and all involved in the construction phase; evaluation of trends in safetycompliance and incidents; and observed compliance with their safety plan.We will implement this by using both random site and task-specific safety‘report cards’ to provide an objective measurement of safety complianceand performance. We will also provide WSDOT with reports on the safetyperformance of all self-executed activities of our CM team and share ‘lessonslearned’ that can enhance the safety of all involved in the project.Partnering and Team BuildingPartnering reinforces the importance of each party and their interdependence necessary for the project to be a success. Aunified team that represents the strength of the ‘three-legged stool’ (Design-Builder – Owner – CM) concept is critical to aproject’s success. Partnering is a team building element that must span the entire organizational chart to be successful.Once the partnering philosophy is adopted and implemented,follow-up sessions to ‘measure’ performance, build on what isworking well, and change direction to improve on challengesencountered, is also critical for continued success and a teamapproach in managing challenges that arise. We have successfully participated in partnering on all of our design-buildprojects and have a long history of partnering with WSDOT. Our experiences from those project successes will be sharedwith WSDOT in contributing to the partnering established for this project.Claims AssistanceOur goal of avoidance and management of claims starts ‘Day 1’ through a clear understanding and confirmation of thescope of work, the responsibilities of each party, and how the management of risk elements have been identified by thedesign-builder. WSDOT’s ability in determining ‘entitlement’ is the backbone to change management. Our team is uniquelyqualified to provide WSDOT with recommendations on entitlement and the actual impacts associated with a claim, whichprovides WSDOT with the necessary tools for successful claims negotiations. We are prepared to execute a subtask to assistWSDOT in claims support. Initial claims assistance starts with the development of a potential claims register extracted fromthe initial risks identified by the design-builder. This will be expanded to incorporate contract provisions, RFIs, and changedconditions that arise as the project progresses. The claims register will be maintained and developed as potential claimsissues are either dismissed due to non-occurrence, or tracked to provide a comprehensive data record for use by WSDOTduring claims negotiations.Phase II – Construction ServicesBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99In 2008, Parsons’ Corporate Safety Program receivedOSHA’s highest achievement in their CorporateVoluntary Protection Program which is a “Star” status.Our CM staff use the partnering philosophyas their daily standard operating procedure.General Consultant Management ServicesOur focus for the performance of the CM services for the SR 99 Design-Build project will transition from an emphasison ‘planning, development, and preparation’, to a focus on ‘execution, monitoring, reporting, and resolution’ toaddress the activities of the design-builder during the construction phase. All of the plans and procedures developed in thepre-construction phase will be implemented in the sequence corresponding to the Design-Builder’s construction schedule.Management services will continue from the pre-construction phase such as project reporting, staff management, taskforce participation, over-the-shoulder design reviews, and agency coordination, and be tracked following the procedures47

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99prepared during the pre-construction phase. The continuity of retaining staff as authorized by WSDOT will facilitate aseamless transition between phases and ensure proper management of the SR 99 Design-Build contract.Successful Staffing DeliveryThe Staffing Plan for performing CM services transitions during the construction phase to more of a ‘living’ document, outof necessity. The initial staffing plan will rely on forecast demands, anticipated technical needs, and planned sequences,reflecting both the design-builder’s project schedule, as well as our expertise and knowledge of the requirements toperform the needed CM services. During construction, needs and events become more concrete, so our staffing plan willadjust to the design-builder’s performance to provide WSDOT with advanced notification of the actual staffing demandsfor the CM services. We will continue to identify ‘knowledge transfer’ opportunities to optimize WSDOT’s staff utilizationduring construction. Depending on CM staffing assignments authorized by WSDOT, knowledge transfer opportunitiesare anticipated in the areas of project documentation, submittal management, prefabrication, and documentation ofinstrumentation and monitoring.Tracking RisksThe impact of anticipated risk conditions that ultimately materialize on the project is based on a combination of the accuracyof the forecasted risk, the effectiveness of the mitigation measures implemented, and the timing of when appropriatemeasures are put to task to control that risk. We will continually monitor and timely report on project performanceassociated with these risks to ensure risk conditions can be accurately and thoroughly evaluated by WSDOT and theIntegrated Consultant Team. Additional unidentified risks are likely to be encountered and will be treated in the samemanner to reduce adverse impacts to the project.CM Plan DeliveryWe are prepared to provide an on-site, multi-disciplined field office engineering staff and project controls staff to workwith WSDOT and the Integrated Consultant Team. A successful project requires the maintenance of accurate and completerecords. The team has exceptional experience in using and maintaining the Primavera Contract Manager system forelectronic archival and retrieval of project documentation. All project communications such as correspondence, RFIs,submittal logs, construction daily reports, shop drawings, meeting minutes, and invoices are entered into the systemelectronically so that all parties can review and respond appropriately. Electronic communication reduces the processingtime and provides an accurate historical record of the project.Design-Build Task Force MeetingsWe will continue to participate in all task force meetings held on the project, and initiate participation on those specific tothe construction phase, which will include building monitoring and instrumentation, TBM operations, quality performance,and safety, to name a few. We will continue to participate in all project meetings including monthly progress meetings, dailyand weekly coordination and task force meetings, issue resolution meetings, and those established specifically for punchlist,final inspection, and final closeout of the contract. As may be directed by WSDOT, we will prepare meeting agendas, conductmeetings, and prepare meeting minutes for distribution to all appropriate parties.Project Schedule and Expenditure Review and AnalysisOur CM team will participate in task force meetings related to the project schedule updates prepared and submitted by theDesign-Builder on a monthly basis. We will use several sources to support our verification of the Design-Builder’s progress,including the reported progress on the weekly look ahead schedules, observed progress on site, the disposition of qualityissues yet to be resolved, and specific productive work that may have been progressed outside of the planned sequence ofwork. We will support WSDOT in reconciliation meetings with the design-builder on a monthly basis, and follow-up on thefinal monthly progress payments submitted to ensure all agreed-to adjustments are accurately reflected.Technical reviews of the design-builder’s monthly schedule updates will be performed in accordance with directions fromWSDOT to ensure the logistics are consistent with the approved baseline schedule for the project. We will prepare ananalysis report documenting our findings and coordinate with the design-builder as authorized to maintain the credibility48

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99of the schedule updates in accurately reflecting the progress on the project. Monthly schedule updates will be used toupdate the planned performance of CM services to keep WSDOT current on the staffing plan and resources needed as theproject progresses.Construction Contract ManagementBy its very nature, tunnel construction is an imperfect process with many inherent risks involved. The variable nature ofsoil conditions and linear nature of tunnel projects often result in contract changes. Recognizing this is important to thesuccessful management of a tunnel construction project. We understand the importance of prompt resolution of changeson the project. Unresolved changes become claims, which result in increased costs for all parties. Our team will work withWSDOT to avoid claims by monitoring the work schedules and expediting information from project participants. Our goalis to resolve all issues at the lowest possible level without escalating the issue to claim status or to the dispute resolutionboard. To facilitate this concept, Parsons supports WSDOT’s choice to incorporate formal partnering into the project. Onthe WMATA Franconia Tunnel segment, formal partnering enhanced project communication, enabling the project to besuccessfully completed without a single change order.Change and claims analysis relies on the contract and project documents to answer the following key questions:• Did a change to the contract documents occur?• What are the time and cost impacts of the change?• Who is responsible for the change?• Based on the impacts, what costs can be quantified?Parsons’ team members have managed, evaluated, and resolved disputes and claims on many large and complex tunnelconstruction projects, including more than a dozen using the design-build delivery method. Parsons has a full-timededicated construction claims group that will be over seen by Ralph Trapani, available to assist WSDOT with claims issuesshould WSDOT authorize the subtask for this support effort.Partnering and Team BuildingParsons will maintain our partnering commitment throughout the constructionphase. We have repeatedly participated in, and reaped the benefits of successfulpartnering on our past projects, and we understand the importance of follow-upwith all work groups periodically throughout the course of the project. Thisongoing partnering focus aids in reinforcing the partnering philosophyestablished at the beginning of the project, and provides the means to capturework practices that are proving successful and adopting them to improve onall operations. We have successfully used a ‘partnering score card’ that capturesthe impressions and experiences of the entire project team, so successes can beshared and difficulties can be corrected in a timely fashion.Parsons has won the very prestigious Marvin M.Black award on numerous projects including T-REXField InspectionThe focus of our inspection activities will be geared towards independent verification of the design-builder’s performanceand compliance with contract requirements. This verification will be carried out using a structured observation and auditedperformance program, in combination with a periodic detailed assessment of specific work elements. These activities willbe carried out with WSDOT’s staff whenever possible, to maximize the training opportunities on the project in accordancewith our knowledge transfer objectives. We will update our staffing forecasts with actual deployment data to maintainaccurate staffing forecasts and ensure adequacy of resources to meet WSDOT’s obligations on the project. The Parsonsteam will provide the levels and expertise of inspection personnel as authorized by WSDOT throughout the project. At theconclusion of construction, we will emphasize the importance of providing timely close-out and punchlist inspections tomaximize the opportunities to deliver a functioning project to WSDOT and the public.49

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99The design-builder is responsible for implementing a QC/QA program. In support of WSDOT’s CM activities, our team willimplement an Independent Quality Verification and Assurance Plan to monitor the design-builder’s activities, to ensureconformance with their approved QC/QA Plan through the following:• Review of all contract documents• Field verification of work and materials• Verification of fabricated items• Evaluation of tests and inspections• Tracking and resolution of nonconformance issues• Training of CM staff and inspectors• Monitoring of QC/QA and testing activities• Testing of materials and documentation• Identification of nonconforming conditionsAll activities will be documented daily. The daily reports will be prepared by each inspector electronically and maintainedin Primavera Contracts Manager. A daily log will be generated automatically allowing the CM team real-time access toinspection details, material and labor quantities, and the complete daily ledger.Our CM staff as authorized will work closely with WSDOT and the design-builder to provide quality, verification, andassurance to ensure conformance with contract requirements. The results of the verification program will be reported toWSDOT on a monthly basis, and any deficiencies will be identified and corrected by the design-builder immediately.Off-Site and Special InspectionThis project will establish a benchmark in the tunneling industry and will rely on a global effort to provide the technicalequipment and materials to meet the demands of the work. Our team can meet the needs for international and specialinspections through Halcrow’s overseas base of operations combined with Parsons’ international operations around theworld. We routinely mobilize staff to our overseas projects and will use our international staffing logistics resources toaddress all off-site and special inspections WSDOT authorizes for execution by our CM team. Our CM staff proposed haveconducted inspections at major TBM manufacturers. Our technical specialists have witnessed factory fabrication andtesting of tunnel ventilation and control systems.DeliverablesThe Parsons team will accurately reflect the services we perform through a variety of documents and deliverables that willbe submitted to WSDOT on a daily, weekly, and/or monthly basis. All deliverables will be prepared in accordance with thetemplates and content established in the Construction Management Plan. Deliverables will be commensurate with thetypes and extent of services authorized by WSDOT, and may include, but are not limited to, the following;Table E.10 –Deliverable TableDaily Weekly Monthly Task Specific• Inspection Reports• Precast Reports• TBM Performance Reports• MOT Status Reports• Material Reports• Safety Observation Reports• Quality Summary• Safety Summary• Schedule Progress• Progress Meeting Notes• Risk Updates• Claims Status• Status Reports• Quality Status Reports• Safety Status Reports• Partnering ‘Score Card’• Schedule Status Reports• Submittal Status Logs• Quarterly Reports• Claims Analysis Reports• Safety Incident Reports50

AppendicesAppendices

SF 330 Part 1SF 330 Part 1Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5

Parsons

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 8, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmRick Chapman, PE, Vice President – Area ManagerParsons6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(206) 494-3109 (206) 494-0960 Rick.Chapman@parsons.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceGreg Colzani Resident Engineer a. Total b. With Current Firm26

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceJon Kaneshiro, PE Pre-Construction Services Lead a. Total b. With Current Firm30 1715. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S./Engineering Science (GeologicalEngineering)B.A./GeologyWA; CA, CO, OR, TX, Professional Engineer: 47532Professional Engineer: National Council of Examiners for Engineeringand Surveying Registration, 2007CA, Professional Geologist, 4235CA, Geotechnical Engineer, GE210218. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Jon Kaneshiro has facilitated technology tunneling tours for soft ground, precast liner, and large bores, including EPBM, slurryshield, and liner technology in the United States, Japan (Tokyo Bay), Germany, and France. He has authored more than 80papers, including some invited lectures, and has made presentations on geotechnology, tunneling, micro-tunneling, rockmechanics and numerical analysis, groundwater inflow into tunnels, liquefaction, seismic/fault crossing design, tiebacks, the roleof geotechnology in disputes resolutions, risk management, and partnering in underground construction. He is a member ofASCE, ACI, UCA of SME, ITA, AEG, IAEG, UTRC, GSA, and ISRM.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Capital Improvement Projects for Southern Nevada Water Authority Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Las Vegas, NV On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmParsons is providing program management services for $1.5 billion of capital improvement projects for the Southern NevadaWater Authority, including an evaluation of several long tunnels, pipelines, canals, and dam sites. Jon provided program and CMreviews for the 20-foot interior diameter, gasketed, precast concrete segmented Lake Mead No. 3 shafts and tunnels in rock, weakrock, and soft ground, which will be mined with an optimal variable continuous drive hybrid TBM.Jon provided reviews for the associated connecting tunnels from planning, geotechnical investigations, and design throughconstruction. For the Lake Mead No. 3 project, he prepared concept-level studies for tunneling methods, feasibility, and costs. Healso provided program management studies and alignment reconnaissance for over 100 miles of conveyance pipelines andtunnels in the greater Las Vegas area and northern Nevada for surface and groundwater conveyance projects.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:South Bay Tunnel and Ocean Outfall Professional Services Construction (if applicable)San Diego, CA 2001 2000(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $140 million project involved engineering design and construction- phase services for the planning, alignment, and design ofthe 19,000-foot-long by 13-foot diameter tunnel outfall, driven through soft ground using an EPBM at depths of up to 220 feetbelow sea level. The precast concrete, gasketed segmental liner had to resist the 7-bar external hydraulic head during excavation,and also be designed for an internal pressure differential of 3 bars. This project received three national awards – the 2000 ASCEOutstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award of Merit, the 2000 APWA Environmental Project of the Year, and the 2000AAEE Grand Prize for Design.Jon served as the Task Manager for the tunnel and drop shaft design and geotechnical investigations, and as the Project Managerand Field Lead for the tunnels, drop shaft, and riser shaft during construction. He ensured that all of the clients’ design criteriawere met.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Tunnel and Ocean Outfall Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Los Angeles, CA On-Going N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe $1.5 billion project consists of a 20-foot-diameter tunnel over 10 miles long with water heads over 350 feet. Parsonsperformed feasibility studies for a new outfall. Project challenges included mixed-face and squeezing ground conditions; highwater pressures; active fault crossings; gassy and contaminated ground conditions; and liquefaction, slope stability, and lateralspreading concerns in the area of the risers and diffusers. Upon completion, the tunnel and outfall will be the largest and longestmarine outfalls in the world.Jon provided design management for the feasibility study.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceSteve Minassian, PE CM Services Manager a. Total b. With Current Firm26 115. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSouthfield, MI16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S./Civil EngineeringB.S./EngineeringCA, Professional Engineer - CivilMA, Professional Engineer - StructuralFL, Professional Engineer - CivilRI, Professional Engineer - Civil18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Steve Minassian taught graduate-level courses at the University of Southern California from 1989-1991 and 1995-1997, in heavyconstruction estimating and heavy construction methods; Chi Epsilon-National Engineering Honor Society; American Society ofCivil Engineers19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Port of Miami Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Miami, FL 2010 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe major component of this project is the $660 million, 4, 000 foot-long, twin-bore 41-foot OD [underwater tunnel, connectingWatson Island in the North and Dodge Island in the South in Miami. The tunnel will be constructed using an EPBM through fill, insitu soil, and Miami Limestone, a heterogeneous weak rock formation with the potential for encountering Karst terrain and cleansoil. This tunnel will be the largest, precast concrete, segmental lining tunnel in the United States, and is claimed to be the mostdifficult tunnel for construction in the world at this time. Steve served as the Design Manager and Project Manager for theBouygues Civil Work Florida Design-Build Joint Venture. His duties included overall design coordination, project management,tunnel design, geotechnical studies, and risk management.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Al Salam Street Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Abu Dhabi, UAE On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $1.4 billion project is designed to double vehicle capacity and provide access for development. The project features a major3.1-kilometer-long, 45-meter-wide box structure, eight-lane tunnel that runs through the central business district with a total of 1.2kilometers of road access to the tunnel. This state-of-the-art tunnel safety and management system will coordinate ventilation, firedetection and suppression, lighting, public address, environmental management, electrical power supply, emergencybroadcasting, radio re-broadcasting, security and surveillance, traffic detection and control, and traveler information. Steve servedas the Special Projects Manager/Technical Advisor providing construction support to the project management/CM team. Hecoordinated construction scheduling/sequencing/interface support between the owner, design-builder, and CM, as well asprovided technical construction phasing expertise.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:North Shore Connector Project/Allegheny River Crossing Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Pittsburgh, PA 2009 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis 1.1-mile, $320 million, twin-bored tunnel with a 20-foot interior diameter and an 11-inch thick, precast segmental lining wasconstructed using a slurry shield TBM in soft ground and soft rock conditions. Construction challenges included mix-face tunneling;tunneling under the Allegheny River and within 10 feet of existing multi-story buildings; and working (for stations) in the welldevelopedcity center of Pittsburgh. As the Construction Manager for the project, Steve provided day-to-day management of CMoperations, construction monitoring, QA, change and claims management, and risk management. Steve also providedconstructability reviews and participated actively in partnering in DRB proceedings.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Providence CSO Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Providence, RI 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe scope of work included a sewer storage and conveyance tunnel for the Narragansett Bay Commission ($170 million). Theproject consists of the excavation of 16,200 feet of 30-foot diameter rock tunnel using a TBM, the installation of precast segmentallining as initial ground support and extensive pre-excavation grouting to control water inflow into the tunnel. The project includedexcavation and support of four shafts, approximately 300 feet deep, varying in size from 11-feet to 50-feet in diameter through 170feet of burden (using ground freezing and slip forming techniques) and the remaining in the rock (using drill and blast withshotcrete and rock bolts). Steve’s responsibilities were managing, planning, and supervising (over 130 employees) all aspects ofthe project.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceDoug Slakey, PE Tunnel Systems Integrator a. Total b. With Current Firm27 315. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSan Francisco, CA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)PhD/Transpersonal PsychologyM.S./Civil EngineeringB.S./EngineeringWA, Professional Engineer, 46741CA, Professional Engineer-Civil, 30879AK, Professional Engineer, 685918. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)American Psychological Association, Member, 2005-date; American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC), Member, 2007-date19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, CA On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project involves constructing a fourth bore through the Berkeley Hills, near San Francisco. Tunnel systems for this projectincluded a longitudinal ventilation system; tunnel fire detection systems including linear heat detectors and CO monitors;redundant power supply systems, including dual power feeds, uninterrupted power supply (UPS), and diesel generators; tunnellighting; SCADA systems; emergency call boxes; and a traffic operations system (TOS) that included CCTV camera coverage,traffic signs and signals, radio communication systems, and access control sensors. A new tunnel operations and maintenancecenter also provided a control center for all four Caldecott bores. The TOS system provided tunnel operators with the means tomonitor traffic and detect, verify, and respond to incidents in the tunnel. The project construction cost is $215 million.Doug managed the preliminary design and final PS&E for the tunnel mechanical, electrical, and traffic-control systems. He wasresponsible for the development of the overall tunnel operation and control plan, including the emergency response plan, and theventilation control strategy. Doug coordinated the overall systems design and operator interface with Caltrans, fire authorities, lawenforcement, Caldecott tunnel maintenance management staff, and Caltrans headquarters’ technical teams. Doug is presentlyleading the systems engineering support during construction phase and will provide oversight for the systems integration andacceptance testing.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Glenwood Canyon Tunnels Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Glenwood Springs, CO 1992 1992(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe project involved providing preliminary engineering services, final design, and CM for a multimillion-dollar tunneling effortthrough the scenic and environmentally sensitive Glenwood Canyon area on I-70, in western Colorado. As part of a 12-mile, fourlanefinal link to I-70, the project consisted of three elements – a 3,625-foot-long exploratory tunnel; the two-lane, twin-bore, 4,000-foot-long Hanging Lake Tunnel; and the 640-foot-long Reverse Curve Tunnel. The construction costs for both tunnels were $108million.As the Project Manager, Doug ensured that the systems requirements for fire-life-safety were in accordance with NFPA 502, andhe developed the emergency response plan. He managed the team of mechanical, electrical, traffic, and systems designspecialists in the preparation of PS&Es for the integration of tunnel systems. During construction, Doug provided overallmanagement for the systems installation inspection team, performed systems factory inspections, and supported systemsintegrated start-up testing and commissioning. Doug coordinated the tunnel drainage system with ventilation-system criteria anddischarge limitations.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Los Angeles County Traffic Operations System Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Los Angeles, CA 1996 1998(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmDoug served as the Project Manager for this project, which included planning and final design services for the traffic monitoringand control system for five individual freeways in the Los Angeles County area. This network was an element of the CaltransDistrict 7 TOS network, providing regional traffic monitoring and control through a high-speed fiber optics communication systemto provide a robust, fault-tolerant communication network.Doug managed 10 PS&E packages for the traffic communications, monitoring, and control system on three freeways. Through anextensive evaluation of existing freeway facilities, site surveys for new and existing utilities and plans were prepared in accordancewith Caltrans standards. Doug integrated the TOS elements, including CCTV cameras, variable message signs, weigh-in motionsystems, traffic detector stations, and a communication data network. Construction costs for all 10 contracts were estimated at $24million.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceJeff Lavinder, PE Chief Inspector - Structures a. Total b. With Current Firm16 8+15. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S./Structural EngineeringB.S./Civil EngineeringCA (C59054 Civil) WA (36455 Civil)OR (71148PE Civil) ID (10509 Civil)18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Innovative Methods Used in the Design and Construction of the New Tacoma Narrows Bridge Substructure Elements, presentedat the 2005 Western Bridge Engineer’s Seminar, Portland, Oregon; Tacoma Narrows Bridge Project Means and Methods ofSuperstructure Erection, presented at the 2007 Western Bridge Engineer’s Seminar, Boise, Idaho; Innovative Methods Used inthe Design and Construction of the New Tacoma Narrows Bridge, presented at the 2008 Structures Congress, Vancouver, BritishColumbia.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening (Renton Stage 2) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Renton, WA On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project is one stage of the comprehensive program for improvements along a congested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. Parsons is providing program management services to assist WSDOT with overseeing the I-405Corridor Program’s projects. These services include project management, programmatic planning, environmental documentation,and engineering services. The $83.6 million Renton Stage 2 project is on track to be completed six months ahead of schedule.As the Assistant Project Engineer (Deputy Project Manager) for WSDOT, Jeff Lavinder is responsible for administration andexecution of the design-build project. His responsibilities include participation in the management team, review of the design andconstruction schedule, review of plans and specifications for compliance with the contract documents, review of monthly invoicesfrom the contractor, writing and review of change orders, and coordinating the construction work with the contractor and WSDOTinspectors.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Tacoma Narrows Bridge Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Gig Harbor, WA 2008 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $750 million design-build project included a new Tacoma Narrows Parallel Bridge, a 5,400-foot-long, three-span suspensionbridge constructed within 200 feet of the existing suspension bridge in Tacoma, WA. Bridge work included new caissons, towers,anchorages, suspension system, stiffening truss, and deck. The approach roadway work for SR 16 included 2.5 miles of highwayrealignment and widening, a new interchange bridge and ramps, signing, striping, a pump station, drainage, retaining walls,lighting, and toll facilities. Upgrades to the existing suspension bridge were included to modify the deck/barrier system and provideseismic improvements.Jeff served as the Lead Structural Support Engineer and Wall Design Manager for the design phase of the project. He wasresponsible for the preparation of plans, writing project specifications and special provisions, and coordination between designoffices. He also served as the Engineering Support During Construction Manager throughout the entire duration of the project. Hewas responsible for all field changes, budgets, as-builts, and shop drawings. For the last three years of the project, Jeff served asthe Construction QA Manager, responsible for testing and inspection for the entire project.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Ferry Landing Replacements, Steilacoom and Ketron Island Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Pierce County, WA 1998 1998(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmJeff was the Engineer-on-Site for the $11million replacement of two ferry landing facilities. The project included a pile-supported,concrete access trestle; a movable concrete transfer span with apron; a concrete pontoon with a guide pile system; wingwalls formooring dolphins; water and sewer utilities; electrical power and lighting; and widening of the approach roadway to two lanes.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceJan Babendererde TBM Monitoring a. Total b. With Current Firm20 015. Firm Name and Location (City and State)Special Consultant to ParsonsDenver, CO16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S./ Mechanical EngineeringN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)N/A19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Willamette River CSO Program – West Side and East Side CSO Professional Services Construction (if applicable)ProjectsPortland, OR On-Going 2005 (W); 2011 (E)(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe $1.2 billion Willamette River CSO Program includes the West Side and East Side CSO tunnel projects. The West Side CSOProject was completed in 2006, and the East Side CSO project is on schedule for completion in 2011. The project involvedintercepting existing outfalls with 14 deep slurry wall shafts and 48,000 feet of 14- and 24- foot diameter tunnels mined 100 feetbelow groundwater, using three slurry mix shield TBMs, the first used in the United States. The deep tunnels are lined with a onepasssteel fiber reinforced concrete segmental lining. The projects were delivered through a qualifications-based, costreimbursablemethod. The client, design team, construction manager, and contractor were housed in a single facility and workedcollaboratively for nine months to develop the final design, cost estimates, TBM procurement, and work and safety plans. TheKiewit-Bilfinger Berger (KBB) Joint Venture also received the OR-OSHA VPP Star status, which has been achieved only four timesin Oregon.As a member of the contractor’s East Side CSO team, Jan’s responsibilities during the start-up phase included work plans, sitelayouts, and submittals. He was also responsible for equipment acquisition and selection of key personnel. Jan trained a tunnelfield engineering staff in TBM operations, generated TBM production and maintenance schedules, and monitored TBM wear andperformance data through remote telemetry. He established hyperbaric operations and conducted TBM maintenance underhyperbaric conditions up to 4 bar pressure. Jan managed a spare parts inventory ($2 million) and served as the superintendent forthree tunnel crews, simultaneously. As a member of the contractor’s West Side CSO team, Jan was responsible for planning,designing, acquisition, fabrication monitoring, and installation of tunnel equipment, including two 16–foot OD mix shieldTBMs, aseparation plant, and compressed air (hyperbaric) equipment, as well as shaft preparation for TBM startup and operation.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Herrenknecht Tunneling Systems Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Auburn, WA 2002 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmJan served as the Service Manager for Herrenknecht Tunnel Systems, one of the world’s leading TBM manufacturers. He wasresponsible for all After Sales and Service activities in North America, including machine refurbishment, shop personnel, spareparts inventory ($1 million), and rental fleet management.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:The Robbins Company Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Kent, WA 1999 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmDuring his tenure at The Robbins Company, a major TBM manufacturer based in the United States, Jan served many rolesincluding Field Service Manager, Technical Advisor, Liaison Engineer, Research and Development Engineer, and DesignEngineer.Jan managed a service department focusing on TBM fabrication, refurbishment, field service, and supply; developed andgenerated assembly and commissioning schedules; and interfaced with the engineering staff during the design and manufacturingstages to ensure that proper fabrication and delivery requirements were being fulfilled.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceDaniel Brown Scheduler a. Total b. With Current Firm27 2.515. Firm Name and Location (City and State)Parsons International LimitedAbu Dhabi, UAE16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)A.S./GeologyN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Additional Studies: Engineering Geology, San Diego State University 1993-94; Project Management Certification Training – 2003Registered Land Surveyor S.I.T. Colorado #250 (not current)National Institute of Certified Engineering Technicians (NICET) Certified - Heavy Highways and CivilForty-Hours OSHA Hazardous Materials Training - 1994Certified Parsons Project Controls Manager – 2010Publications - Tunneling Technology Video published through the Colorado State University High School Engineering AwarenessProgram, 198619. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Dubai Metro Red and Green Lines Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Dubai, UAE 2004 On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $6.7 billion project is comprised of the Red and Green Lines. There are over 72 kilometers of new double-track guidewaywith 10 kilometers of tunnel, 37 above-ground stations, and 12 underground stations. The total program (design-build) cost isapproximately $7 billion. Daniel Brown is the Project Controls Manager, working within the program management group of ageneral engineering and program management joint venture, with a total staff of over 400. He interfaces with other programoversight and management groups such as civil, rail systems, tunnel, electrical and mechanical, surface improvements,operations, and arrangement work. Daniel oversees coordination and management of eight schedulers, three reportingspecialists, and a program assurance manager.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Hiawatha LRT, Minneapolis to Bloomington, Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Minneapolis, MN 2000 2005(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $700 million program start-up includes the design-build of 11.4 miles of light rail transit (LRT) with 16 stations, including 1.8miles of tunnel and an underground station at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. As part of a joint venture, the initial tasks involvedpreliminary engineering, project office start-up and systems, and development of an RFP for design-build procurement andselection. Daniel was the Finance and Cost Manager in support of the Project Controls Manager.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Caracas Metro, Venezuela – PB International Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Caracas, Venezuela 1996 2002(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $3 billion, 7-kilometer-long Tazon Tunnel was part of a design-build program for 43 kilometers of new railroad construction. Itincludes site access roads, large tie-back walls, and a river channelization project. Daniel served as the Project Controls Advisorfor an inspection consortium comprised of two Venezuelan firms, one Spanish firm, and Parsons Brinkerhoff, contracted toInstituto Autonomo De Farrocarriles Del Estado (Farrocarr). His primary duties included tracking construction progress andestablishing adequate project controls for inspection and cost/schedule control. Daniel trained local engineers in the concepts ofproject controls and the use of the latest software packages, and assisted in other areas such as construction method evaluationand design reviews.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Corporate Controls - Kajima Engineering and Construction Corporation Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Pasadena, CA On-Going N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmDaniel is responsible for development and supervision of the project controls group for Parsons’ tunneling operations, focusing oncost/production monitoring, claims mitigation and/or development, project startup, closeout, and training of project officepersonnel on project controls policies. He traveled to each project on a routine basis to brief project managers andsuperintendents on production measures and profitability. His other responsibilities included assisting in bidding new work byinvestigating technical requirements for TBM and/or mining method selection, geologic conditions, and contract specialprovisions. The firm had $250 million in contracts underway including rail transit and water and sewer tunnel projects. The totalcontract value is $4.5 billion.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceDaniel Weathers Safety Manager a. Total b. With Current Firm30 1.7515. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsNashville, TN16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S./Safety ManagementB.A./CounselingN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Industrial Hygiene Testing and Measurement, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Center for Disease Control;30-Hour Training Program, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Institute of Civil Engineers, Professional Member;Board of Certified Safety Professionals, Comprehensive Certification; British Tunneling Society, Professional Member; Board ofHazard Control Managers, Comprehensive Registration; American Society of Safety Engineers, Professional Member; Institutefor Occupational Safety and Health, Chartered Member; Excellence in Safety Award, British Tunneling Society Finalist;Excellence in Safety Award, UK Construction Industry, William H. Cameron Award19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:ARC Tunnel Project/Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Northern New Jersey and Manhattan, NY On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmParsons is providing project controls and CM services for the Access to the Region’s Core (ARC) Tunnel/Trans-Hudson ExpressTunnel project, including design and constructability reviews and cost validation. The project will double the rail capability fromNew Jersey midtown to Manhattan, NY. Construction work includes platform, concourse, and track improvements to the existingPenn Station; two new single-track tunnels beneath the New Jersey Palisades and the Hudson River; reorganization of NewYork’s Penn Station to the north under 34th Street between 6th and 8th Avenues; improvements to rail infrastructure in NewJersey to provide expanded one-seat-ride opportunities to midtown Manhattan from various lines; and supporting investmentssuch as track improvements, rail yards, signal systems, and facilities.Daniel Weathers is responsible for the health and safety management of this $8.7 billion tunnel project connecting Secaucus, NJ,to New York City’s Penn Station. His responsibilities include the supervision of two regional safety managers and approximately48 site safety engineers, at peak production. Daniel is also responsible for the development of the construction health and safetyplan, the review of contract documents and contractor submittals, and providing oversight management for systems safety andsecurity certification programs. He reviews and comments on design documents for potential risks associated with the proposedwork, including risk factors such as working near high voltage lines, heavy and light rail tracks, the use of cranes, sheeting andshoring adjacent to railways, excavating beneath existing railways, and the use of explosives adjacent to or near railways.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Dulles International Airport Automated Passenger Movement Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Chantilly, VA 2005 2007(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmDaniel was responsible for the safety and industrial hygiene engineering functions of a $340 million project that included EPBtunnel boring, cut-and-cover tunnel construction, NATM tunnel construction, and the associated civil construction of two passengerstations. He developed and conducted bilingual (English and Spanish) crane signal man, rigging, and orientation programs. Danieldesigned and supervised the installation of the ventilation system for the TBMs. He also established a hearing conservationprogram for a constantly relocating workforce. Daniel developed and implemented risk models for operations and worker injuryand illness reduction.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Channel Tunnel Rail Link Section 2 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2001 2005(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis was a $5.3 billion project involving the construction of approximately 28 miles of EPB, 26-foot diameter tunnels;approximately 24 miles of cut-and-cover tunnels; 14 ventilation shafts; and four rail stations, including 14 miles of tunnel beneaththe City of London. The project was completed $18 million below budget and five months ahead of schedule. Daniel established aSix Sigma program for the manufacture of concrete segments. The Six Sigma QA was achieved within three months of initiation.Daniel was also responsible for the management of the health and safety on this project. He introduced Six Sigma, failure mode,and other statistical models for the calculation of potential risks that varied from worker fatality to parts failure. The program wasrecognized for its ease of implementation and accommodation of logic, and was recognized by the Institute of Civil Engineers forExcellence in Safety Management.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceBen Fardi, PE Quality Verification a. Total b. With Current Firm20 1015. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)MSCE/Structural EngineeringCA, WA, AZ, MN ,Professional Engineer, Civil Engineering18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Certification: American Society of Quality (ASQ), Manager of Quality; Completed ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:TH 61 Hastings Bridge Design-Build ProjectProfessional Services Construction (if applicable)Hastings, MN2010 On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project consists of the design and construction of a new four-lane, tied arch bridge over the Mississippi River andapproaches, and removes the existing two-lane bridge. Parsons is the design subcontractor for the Lunda-Ames Contractor. Thelow bid was $120 million. Ben Fardi is the Construction Quality Manager, responsible for managing the entire QC/QA inspectionand testing program.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405 Corridor Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Bellevue, WA 2007 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project involves the implementation of a $1.5 billion program for improvements along a congested 30-mile corridor in theSeattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. Parsons is providing program management services to assist WSDOT with overseeing the I-405 Program of projects. These services include project management, programmatic planning, environmental documentation,and engineering services. Ben worked on design tasks and preparation of utility agreements and RFP documents.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Tacoma Narrows Bridge Design-Build Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Tacoma, WA 2002 2007(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $750 million design-build project included a new Tacoma Narrows Parallel Bridge, a 5,400 foot long, three-span suspensionbridge constructed within 200 feet of the existing historic suspension bridge in Tacoma, WA. Bridge work included new caissons,towers, anchorages, suspension system, stiffening truss, and deck. The approach roadway work for SR 16 included 2.5 miles ofhighway realignment and widening, a new interchange bridge and ramps, signing, striping, a pump station, drainage, retainingwalls, lighting, and toll facilities. Upgrades to the existing suspension bridge were included to modify the deck/barrier system andprovide seismic improvements.Ben was the QA Manager responsible for performing audits to verify conformance of the contractor’s QC program to the projectrequirements.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Los Angeles Metro Red Line Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Los Angeles, CA 1995 1999(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project involved a 3.5-mile extension to the Los Angeles Metro Rail system. The $325 million Metro Red Line NorthHollywood project included two major cut-and-cover stations, access shafts, a parking structure, underground facilities, crosspassages, and twin tunnel line sections driven through the Santa Monica mountains using two 21-foot diameter Robbins TBMs.Ben was the Assistant Resident Engineer and Lead Inspector responsible for performing the inspection and testing work.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:SR 532 Corridor Improvements Design-Build Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Stanwood and Camano Island, WA 2009 2011(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $50 million design-build project included replacement of the General Mark W. Clark Memorial Bridge over the west passageof the Stillaguamish River. Ben was the Quality Manager responsible for the overall quality program.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceFermin Longcob Tunnel Excavation Lining - Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm25 2.515. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsBoulder City, NV16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S./Civil EngineeringN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Forty hours of basic training for health and safety courses involving hazardous waste site operation; 10 hours for OSHAconstruction safety and health, excavation safety, and confined space.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Lake Mead Intake #3 Contract 2 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Boulder City, NV On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $ 45 million project consists of a 450-foot-deep, 26-foot diameter shaft, and of a 2,300-foot conventionally excavated tunnel withdimensions of 14 by 16 feet to connect the new intake shaft to the existing IPS-2 Shaft. Fermin Longcob is the Senior Inspectorresponsible for monitoring and documenting tunnel and shaft excavation, grouting, and ground support installation.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Big Walnut Augmentation Rickenbacker Interceptor (BWARI) Part 1 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Lockbourne, OH 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmFermin was the Lead Inspector for this $78 million project, which consisted of a 14-foot diameter tunnel, 4 miles long, excavated in softsaturated ground using a Lovat EPB machine with one-pass bolted, precast concrete segment lining and seven shafts. Fermin’s dutiesas the Senior Tunnel inspector were to monitor and document the TBM operation, liner installation, backfill grouting, and hyperbaricinterventions.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:West Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 2004 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmFermin was the Senior Tunnel Inspector on this $293 million project, which included 18,000 feet of 14-foot diameter tunnel minedusing a slurry mix shield TBM. Four thousand feet of the tunnel passed underneath the Willamette River. The tunnel wasconstructed in variable soft soil under 2.6 bar hydrostatic pressure. Fermin’s duties were to monitor and document all of theactivities performed by the contractor, especially performance of the slurry pressure balance TBMone-pass bolted, precastconcrete segment lining, backfill grouting, and hyperbaric interventions.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Tren Urbano (Transit) Tunnels Professional Services Construction (if applicable)San Juan, Puerto Rico 2000 2001(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $300 million transit project contains two train stations connected by twin tunnels. An EPB machine was used to drive thetunnels with one-pass support, precast concrete segmental lining. Both ends of one station are cut-and-cover. The other stationhas different types of excavation using NATM techniques and the stack drifting methods, where open cut cannot be used.Fermin’s duties included checking, monitoring, and coordinating with the design and build QC engineers in all constructionactivities. These activities include excavation with the ground initial support, structures, all embedded electrical and mechanicalcomponents, and the architectural finishing. Fermin was a Senior Inspector on the project. His duties included writing daily progressreports and monitoring and documenting subcontractor activities including the compensation grouting and shotcrete operation ofthe four NATM tunnels. Fermin monitored and documented the activities of excavation of the EPB twin tunnels including TBMperformance, alignment, and installation of the one-pass bolted, segment precast concrete lining and grouting.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceGary Daniel Tunnel Excavation Lining - Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm32 415. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsBoulder City, NV16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)N/ACA and NV/Blasting LicenseCA/Tunnel Safety Representative LicenseCA/Gas Testing License18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)CPR – First Aid19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Lake Mead Intake #3 Contract 2 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Boulder City, NV On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $45 million project consists of a 450-foot-deep, 26-foot diameter shaft and of a 2,300-foot conventionally excavated tunnel withdimensions of 14 by 16 feet to connect the new intake shaft to the existing IPS-2 Shaft. Gary Daniel is the Senior Inspector responsiblefor monitoring and documenting tunnel and shaft excavation, grouting, and ground support installation.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Lake Mead Intake #3 Contract 1 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Boulder City, NV 2010 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmGary was the Supervising Tunnel Inspector for this $32 million connection and modification project, which is a 380-foot shaft andtwo 14- by 16-foot tunnels that connect Intake #2 to Intake #3, including the installation of a gate at the bottom of the shaft tocontrol flow. The method of excavation is drill, and blast. The shaft will be concrete-lined, shotcrete-lined tunnels. A new flumeand rock deflector will be replaced on the intake. Gary is the Senior Inspector responsible for monitoring and documenting tunnel andshaft excavation, grouting, and ground support installation.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Orange County Sanitation District Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Fountain Valley, CA 2008 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmGary was the Supervising Tunnel Inspector on this $31 million project, which was a 5,455-foot-long, 9-foot diameter ribs andboards tunnel with two shafts where a Herrenknecht EPB mining machine was launched and retrieved. After tunneling, a 66-inchHobas pipe was laid, blocked, and strapped to ring steel. Gary was the Supervising Inspector responsible for monitoring TBMperformance and ground support installation.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Sacramento Regional Sanitation District; Sacramento River Crossing Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Sacramento, CA 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmGary was the Supervising Tunnel Inspector on this $45 million project, which consisted of two 2,100-foot-long, 14-foot diameter softground tunnels under the Sacramento River. He also provided inspection for the installation of two 66-inch cement mortar-lined, weldedsteel joints, and backfilling for the pipe/tunnel annulus with cellular grout. Gary monitored the TBM performance, segment installation,and backfill grouting.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceGordon Chen Vent Building Mechanical / Finishes a. Total b. With Current Firm7 515. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSan Francisco, CA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.S. / Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering N/AB.S. / Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Publications: “Improvements in Gas-Turbine Performance With Inter-Stage Turbine Burners,” AIAA Journal of Propulsion andPower volume 20, Number 5, September-October 2004. Certifications:Engineer-In-Training, Mechanical Engineering certifiedby the California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 2001.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Security Office and Reproduction Office Portable Relocation Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Livermore, CA (Chabot-Las Positas Community College District) 2009 2009(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmServed as a project manager and construction manager for several portable relocation projects from conceptual design to the endof construction (total project budget $1 million). Managed project architect during the design phase to ensure the project waswithin budget. Responsibility also included soliciting and coordinating with various contractors for abatement, demolition,earthwork, fencing, carpentry, electrical, asphalt and paving, portable movers, landscaping, etc.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Berkeley High School new Stadium, Gym demo, and new Gym and Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Classroom building; new Classrooms and Restroom portables; andClassroom Alterations at Building C;Berkeley, CA (Berkeley Unified School District) 2008 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmServed as project manager and construction manager (design and construction) for the maintenance, plant operations, andfacilities department to improve school buildings and grounds. Responsible for the design phase of a three-story classroombuilding, two-story gym building, two-story bleachers building with locker rooms and offices, one-story maintenance facilities, andsite improvements at Berkeley High School (total project budget $14 million). Also responsible for the design phase of theLongfellow Middle School annex building modernization and Americans With Disabilities Act upgrade project (total project budget$2.5 million). Other projects included design and construction for an addition of seven classroom and restroom portables, alongwith modernization of four existing classrooms at Berkeley High School (total project budget $1 million).c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Mechanical Upgrade at Clayton Valley High School, Ygnacio Valley Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Elementary, and Ygnacio Valley High School.Concord, CA (Mt. Diablo Unified School District) 2007 2007(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmServed as a construction manager for Phase 1 of mechanical HVAC system updates at 13 schools. Oversaw installation of a newHVAC system in three different schools (total project budget $14 million). Work included removing existing furnace units andinstalling new furnace units, condensing units, Mitsubishi city multisystem, split system heat pumps, branch circuit controllers,refrigerate piping, electrical feed, roofing, and fence enclosures.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Gregory Garden Elementary, Pleasant Hill Elementary, SequoiaProfessional Services Construction (if applicable)Elementary, and Valhalla Elementary Modernization.Concord, CA (Mt. Diablo Unified School District) 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmServed as an assistant construction manager for a general obligation bond to improve school buildings and grounds. Oversawmodernization of four different schools (total project budget $15 million). Work included major Americans With Disabilities Actupgrade improvements, site work, paving, roofing, seismic upgrades and deferred maintenance.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Willard Middle School Modernizations Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Berkeley, CA 2005 2005(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmProject involved a 45,000 SF renovation of a middle school, including structural upgrades (total project budget $4.5 million).Managed the entire project without project engineer or project administrator assistance. Coordinated with owner’s constructionmanager, project architects, project inspector, superintendent, and subcontractors regarding project budget and/or schedule.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceNghia Giang Off-Site Materials Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm12 315. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S./Civil EngineeringN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)N/A19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:SR 532 Corridor Improvements Design-Build Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Stanwood, WA 2009 On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe Parsons-led joint venture is responsible for the $50 million design and construction project, which involves improvementsalong SR 532 in Washington State. The project includes the replacement of the General Mark W. Clark Memorial Bridge over thewest passage of the Stillaguamish River. As the Construction QA Manager, Nghia supervised the QA testing and inspection; andcoordinated with WSDOT’s verification testing, inspection, and Independent assurance requirements.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage 1 Widening (Renton Stage 21) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Renton, WA 2007 2009(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe project involves the implementation of a $1.5 billion program for improvements along a congested 30-mile corridor in theSeattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. Parsons is providing program management services to assist WSDOT with overseeing the I-405 program of projects. These services include project management, programmatic planning, environmental documentation,and engineering services. The program proposes to alleviate traffic congestion, enhance safety, mitigate increased traffic volume,and decrease noise pollution, while maintaining or improving the environmental integrity of the corridor. The project includes theuse of expanded polystyrene geofoam lightweight fill as a design method to create zero surcharges on adjacent hospital parkinggarage foundations. Assisting in oversight of the design and construction on the I-405 Renton Stage I Design-Build Project.As the Construction Compliance Auditor, Nghia audited the design-builder’s quality program activities to ensure adherence to thequality management plan and contract. He participated in quality check point meetings for embankment, structures, retainingwalls, noise walls, drainage, and environmental controls. Nghia also audited the construction QA organization’srecords/documentation.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Tacoma Narrows Bridge Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Gig Harbor, WA 2003 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $750 million design-build project included a new Tacoma Narrows Parallel Bridge, a 5,400-foot-long, three-span suspensionbridge constructed within 200 feet of the existing suspension bridge in Tacoma, WA. Bridge work included new caissons, towers,anchorages, suspension system, stiffening truss, and deck. The approach roadway work for SR 16 included 2.5 miles of highwayrealignment and widening, a new interchange bridge and ramps, signing, striping, a pump station, drainage, retaining walls,lighting, and toll facilities. Upgrades to the existing suspension bridge were included to modify the deck/barrier system and provideseismic improvements.Nghia was the QC Inspector for all bridge and roadway construction activities. His primary responsibility was inspection ofcaissons (including rebar inspection, concrete testing and inspection, false work/formwork, finishing), bridge towers (510-foot tallwith micro silica concrete), struts, post-tensioning stressing and grouting operations, aerial cable spinning, cable compaction,cable band installation, deck erection, structural steel erection (testing and inspection of over 120,000 high-strength bolts),existing bridge seismic retrofit, utility relocations, and Highway 16 realignments. Nghia also performed density testing of soils andasphalt.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceRobert L. Lenz, PE, CCM Construction Plan Lead a. Total b. With Current Firm34 2815. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S./Civil EngineeringAZ, CO, WA, Professional Engineer18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Certified Construction Manager (CCM), Construction Manager Certification Institute (CMCI); Certified Project Manager, Parsons;Project Manager Certification Program; START/SHARP Safety Training, Parsons University Training Program; PACE QualityManagement Training, Parsons University Training Program19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Saadiyat Island Development Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Abu Dhabi, UAE 2007 2007(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmBob was the Deputy Project Manager/Transportation Design Manager for this $2 billion Saadiyat Island Project. He wasresponsible for project management and transportation design for infrastructure to support a population of 150,000. Theproject includes 60 million cubic meters of embankment, over 60 kilometers of roadways from local roads up to a 5 by 5expressway, 12 major roadway structures, a passenger rail corridor, and related civil improvements.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Transportation and Road Improvement Program (TRIP) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Abu Dhabi, UAE 2005 2005(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmAs the Project Director - Construction, Bob was responsible for construction supervision and administration services for theTRIP program, which involved over 250 technical and professional staff. The scope of work included construction of multipleconcurrent contracts valued at over $270 million involving major bridges, tunneling for pedestrian and roadway crossingsincluding lighting and ventilation systems, extensive drainage and utility work, and roadway improvements.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:U.S. 60 (Superstition Freeway) Design-Build Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Tempe, AZ 2004 2004(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmBob was the Construction Quality Manager for this $185 million project that improved 12 miles of U.S. 60, including a new11-span, high-occupancy vehicle connection with I-10. The project included extensive soil nail walls, retaining walls, andsound abatement walls, additional Portland cement concrete pavement lanes, and rubberized asphalt overlay. Bob wasresponsible for QC/QA, inspections, and materials testing. He captured over 90 percent of the $1 million in quality incentivesavailable under the Arizona DOT’s Quality Incentive Program on this project.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:E470 Tollway, Segments II/III Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Aurora, CO 2000 2000(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmBob was the Construction Monitoring/QA Manager and Project Oversight Engineer for this $321 million design-build projectthat involved the construction of a 29-mile-long tollway, including multiple toll facilities, automatic toll collection systems, and29 bridge structures. Bob performed constructability reviews, coordination of design revisions, schedule reviews, progressinvoice payments, as-built drawing reviews, and punchlist / close-out tasks.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceRalph Trapani, PE Claims/Estimating/Change Management a. Total b. With Current Firm35 615. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsDenver,CO16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S./ Architectural EngineeringProfessional Engineer, CO18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Jane Silverstein Ries Award, Colorado Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects-1993,General Palmer Awardfrom the American Consulting Engineers of Colorado-1998,Distinguished Engineering Alumni Award, University of Colorado-Boulder -1999,Special Contributor, Colorado DOT Environmental Section-2002 , Member, American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE), Member FHWA Virtual Tunnel Team, Co-author, “Glenwood Canyon I-70: Environmental Concern”, Journal ofTransportation Engineering, ASCE-May 1983,Chairman ASCE Technical Session, “Environmental Concern on HeavyConstruction Projects”, Denver-May 1985,Co-author, “Stress Wave Propagation Testing of Large Diameter Caissons, GlenwoodCanyon, Colorado”, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 3 rd International Conference-May1988,Co-author, “Design Provisions for a Replaceable Segmental Bridge Deck”, TRB, Third Bridge Engineering Conference,Denver-March 1992,Co-author “Geotechnical Aspects of the Hanging Lake Tunnels”, Glenwood Canyon, Colorado-1993,Presenter “Ten Years of Segmental Bridges in Glenwood Canyon”, American Segmental Bridge Institute-1993,Co-chairmanConference on Construction in Difficult Terrain, Snowmass, Colorado-August1994,Author “Citizens Institute Innovation”, ASCENational Convention, San Diego-October 1995,Co-author, “Hanging Lake Tunnels Revisited: Instrumentation for SupplementalStabilization Measures”, 37 th U.S. Rock mechanics Symposium, Vail, Colorado-1999, Co-author “Innovation By Teamwork:Engineering Geology of Interstate 70 through Glenwood Canyon” chapter in Engineering Geology of Colorado, Association ofEngineering Geologists (AEG), Omnipress-2003,Keynote Speaker, 57 th Annual Highway Geology Symposium, Breckenridge,CO.-September 2006,Co-Presenter,Colorado Transportation Conference, “Eisenhower Johnson Memorial Tunnels -Past,Present, and Future”-October 2006, Co-author Structural integrity inspection of the EJMT and Hanging Lake Tunnels-NorthAmerican Tunneling Conference Portland OR-2010, Presenter “Glenwood Canyon I-70” First Green Highways ConferenceASCE Denver,CO-201019. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-70 through Glenwood Canyon Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Glenwood Springs, CO 1992 1992(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmI 70 through Glenwood Canyon was a 12 mile long highway widening project through the scenic gorge of the Colorado river. The$500 million project consisted of 40 bridges and 3 major tunnels. The project was awarded the 1993 Outstanding CivilEngineering Award from ASCE. Ralph spent 12 years as the Colorado DOT project manager responsible for planning, design andconstruction.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I 70 Mountain Corridor Cost Validation Study Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Glenwood Springs to Golden, CO 2007 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role X Check if project performed with current firmFor the Colorado DOT, Ralph managed a multi-disciplinary team to validate the cost of an over $3 billion mountain corridorproject. The project extended for 144 miles, and proposed highway widening; a third bore of the Eisenhower/Johnson memorialTunnels, and an Advanced Guide way System. The study included a cost validation and integrated cost and schedule riskassessment using an approach similar to the Washington DOT CEVP® process.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:SH 119/US 6 Corridor Management Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Golden, CO On-Going 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role X Check if project performed with current firmThis corridor project leads to the gaming areas of Colorado through the north fork of Clear Creek canyon. It includes about 6 milesof highway widening, including bridges, walls, and a 4,000 foot long twin bore tunnel. Estimated costs of the corridor are about$490 million. Ralph serves as the project manager of a multi-disciplinary corridor management team that assist the Colorado DOTproject staff with all phases of transportation project management.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceTony Stirbys, LEG Monitoring and Instrumentation Engineer a. Total b. With Current Firm34 1715. Firm Name and Location (City and State)PARSONSSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)BSc/Engineering GeologyMSc/Engineering GeologyWA, Licensed Engineering GeologistUT, Professional GeologistTX ,Professional GeologistWI, Professional Geologist18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Certified Parsons Project Manager; Underground Construction Association; Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and ExplorationMember, Member of the Local ASCE (Geotechnical Section) Chapter: Author/Co-author of more than 15 professional publicationsrelated to tunnels/geology/support of excavations/instrumentation.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405 Corridor Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Bellevue, WA On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmParsons is part of the GEC for WSDOT for this program that involves the implementation of $1.5 billion of improvements along acongested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. Tony Stirbys is the Geotechnical Lead for the corridor GECprogram, and provides preliminary design and construction monitoring for all of the projects.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-25 Southeast Corridor Transportation Expansion (T-REX) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Denver, CO 2004 2004(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $1.2 billion project involved expansion of 17 miles of I-25/I-225 and the addition of a light rail extension. Tony was theGeotechnical Lead for the Kiewit/Parsons Joint Venture. His responsibilities included project management (design andconstruction) of an 1,800-foot by 15-foot diameter EPB tunnel for stormwater collection. The tunnel was excavated in sands, silts,and clays under the local groundwater regime. The internal support consisted of a one-pass, precast bolted, gasketed segmentalconcrete lining system. The stormwater collector tunnel was located under a major street, so major buildings utilities weremonitored during the excavation. An emergency compaction grouting operation was on stand-by during the excavation in theevent any significant settlement was observed in the instrumentation.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Los Angeles to Pasadena Gold Line Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Pasadena, CA 2001 2001(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $260 million project involved the design-build of 13.7 miles of double-track light rail system. Tony was the ProjectGeotechnical Engineer responsible for management of the geotechnical subconsultants, including station design, instrumentationmonitoring of historic buildings, and excavation/building support. Instrumentation monitoring and local underpinning of historicbuildings was used to prevent significant damage.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Los Angeles Metro Rail Line Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Los Angeles, CA 1997 1997(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis approximately $5 billion project constructed 22-foot diameter twin tube tunnels and associated heavy rail stations fromdowntown Los Angeles to the San Fernando Valley. Tony was the Geotechnical Construction Manager for the Parsons-Dillingham Joint Venture, responsible for tunnel/station/building structures monitoring, mapping, building/structures settlementassessment, and implementation of ground improvement control measures. Compaction grouting, chemical grouting, andtemporary and permanent underpinning of foundations were some of the techniques used to prevent damage to buildings. Inaddition, he was responsible for multiple geotechnical claims reviews and presentations to the DRB.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceRhonda Kolodji WSDOT Compliance and Reporting a. Total b. With Current Firm20 1315. Firm Name and Location (City and State)ParsonsSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S./Construction ManagementN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)N/A19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405/NE 195 th St. to SR 527 Northbound Auxiliary Lane Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Bothell, WA 2009 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmParsons is part of the GEC for WSDOT for this program that involves the implementation of $1.5 billion of improvements along acongested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. This project consisted of adding a northbound auxiliary laneand constructing a new noise wall.Rhonda’s responsibilities included writing change order specifications and justifications, and processing final change orderpackages; assisting the WSDOT Project Engineer in accurately maintaining, updating, and reporting status of the project budget;drafting serial letters and writing memos; reviewing the design-builder’s monthly invoice for compliance with contract documents;providing maintenance of project records and all project documentation functions, including paper and electronic document controlsystems; coordinating and tracking WSDOT’s review of design-build submittals, RFIs, and non-conformance reports; reviewingand tracking all documentation associated with FHWA/ARRA stewardship requirements including apprenticeship training andutilization, and DBE/EEO reports; verifying prevailing wage rates; reporting deficiencies related to FHWA stewardshipdocumentation requirements; and archiving final project records. The total project cost is estimated at $19.6 million.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405, I-5 to 169 Stage 2 Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Renton, WA 2009 On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project consisted of adding northbound and southbound lanes, replacing Benson Road structure, and other associatedhighway work. Rhonda’s responsibilities included setting up the construction office, and establishing a new electronic and hardcopy document control system in preparation for turnover to full time WSDOT employee. Total Construction Cost is $83.6 million.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405, SR 520 to SR 522 Stage 1 Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Kirkland, WA 2005 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project consisted of adding one additional northbound and southbound general purpose lane and mitigating multipleenvironmental sites. Rhonda’s responsibilities included writing change order specifications and justifications, assisting withdeveloping independent engineer’s estimates, and processing change order packages; assisting the WSDOT Project Engineerwith accurately maintaining, updating, and reporting status of the project budget; developing project status reports and trackingsheets; writing letters, memos, and meeting minutes; reviewing the design-builder’s monthly invoice for compliance with contractdocuments; processing monthly progress reports; supervising maintenance of files and all project documentation functions,including paper and electronic document control systems; coordinating and tracking WSDOT’s review of design-build submittals,RFIs, non-conformance reports, and field change requests; reviewing force account reports; and archiving final project records.The total construction cost was $49.3 million.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Concourse A and Main Terminal - South Terminal Expansion Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)SeaTac, WA 2000 2004(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project consisted of building SeaTac’s new south terminal. Rhonda’s responsibilities included requesting and reviewingsubmittals, providing field direction, preparing change orders and findings of facts, processing the contractor's monthly payestimates, verifying invoices, and assisting in preparation of as-builts and close out of the project. The total construction cost wasapproximately $300 million.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceJohn Donatelli, PE Risk Mitigation a. Total b. With Current Firm15 715. Firm Name and Location (City and State)Parsons International LimitedRome, Italy16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)B.S., Civil EngineeringWA, Professional Engineer, 4173518. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Instructor for WSDOT Training CZ2 - Risk-Based Transportation Cost and Schedule Estimate Evaluations; NHI Course No.134065, Risk Management; SHARP Certification, Parsons, 2006; Parsons PACE Quality Management Certification, Parsons,2007; Certified Parsons Project Manager, Parsons, 2006; Leadership Council, Parsons, 2006-200719. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Messina Straits Bridge Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Rome, Italy On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmJohn is currently the Engineering Manager for this $6 billion design-build project, which features a 3,300-meter suspended bridgethat will connect Italy to Sicily. When completed, the bridge will be the largest in the world. He is responsible for all engineeringdisciplines, including management and administration of the engineering design, budget, and schedule.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:SR 532 Corridor Improvements Design-Build Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Stanwood and Camano Island, WA 2009 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmJohn was in an advisory role for this $50 million design and construction project, which included the replacement of the GeneralMark W. Clark Memorial Bridge over the west passage of the Stillaguamish River. He supported the project management team,conducted client assessments, and interfaced with WSDOT’s project director.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:I-405 GECCorridor Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 2010 On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmParsons is part of the GEC for WSDOT for this program that involves the implementation of $1.5 billion of improvements along acongested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. The program includes seven design-build projects. John wasthe Engineering Manager for this program, responsible for all engineering disciplines including management and administration ofthe engineering design, budget, and schedule.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Route 3 North Transportation Improvement ProjectWestford, MAProfessional ServicesConstruction (if applicable)2004 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmJohn was the Design-Build Coordinator, responsible for managing the design of Massachusetts’ first and largest design-buildproject, the $385 million reconstruction of Route 3 from Burlington, MA, to the New Hampshire state line. The project involved thereconstruction of nearly 20 miles of freeway to current standards and complete replacement of 42 bridge structures. This projectwas the first use of an innovative design-build-finance project delivery system.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedDubai Metro, Red and Green Lines Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Dubai, UAE 2010 201023. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactDubai Roads and Transit Authority Adna Alhammadi Telephone Number(971) (04) 290-200024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)This $6.7 billion project consists of the design, construction, and operations for two lines (Phase 1 - Red Line and Phase 2 -Green Line) of the new metro light rail transit system totaling approximately 43.5 miles, of which 8 miles are in tunnels beneathdowntown Dubai and the Dubai Creek. The owner appointed the Systra/Parsons Joint Venture to be the engineer representingthe Dubai Roads and Transit Authority on this contract.The underground portion of the project was comprised of 10 cut-and-cover stations; 10 sections of single bore, double track tunnel; foursections of cut-and-cover, double track tunnel; and six intermediate shafts, which combine sump pump discharge with ventilation andescape functions.Slurry walls were used to construct the cut-and-cover tunnel, as well as the stations. Tunneling was accomplished with threeMitsubishi EPBMs, each 31.37 feet in diameter. A single pass, precast concrete, segmental liner ring, gasketed and bolted, wasused.The ground in this area is comprised of loose to medium-dense, high permeability marine sand, and cemented sand. A highwater table exists throughout the alignment with the groundwater being hyper-saline.The environmental control system is comprised of tunnel ventilation, fire protection and smoke extraction, lighting, drainage, andlifts and elevators, all controlled by the central operations control system.Due to the fact that the tunnel crossed directly under downtown Dubai, damage to buildings from ground settlement caused bythe tunneling operation was the major risk. We used a risk-based approach to assess at-risk structures, and proactive measures(i.e. monitoring, ground improvement, compaction grouting) were used where applicable to minimize the risk of damage.Close monitoring and precise adjustments of both face pressure and annular grout pressure were sufficient to limit the need forextensive ground treatment from the surface prior to mining.As part of a joint venture, Parsons was retained by the Road Transport Authority/Dubai Municipality to serve as the engineer forthe Red and Green Lines of the Dubai Metro project. Parsons is responsible for a range of professional services, includingprogram management, construction management, design reviews, and construction supervision.Parsons has more than 250 management, technical, and supervision staff overseeing the work of the project’s design-buildcontractor, verifying contract compliance, and ensuring timely project delivery.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Parsons performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a large diameter EPBM, soft-ground bored tunnel, below groundwater, with integrated systems (ventilation,mechanical, etc). Among other roles, Parsons performed CM services on this Design-Build project.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) Rolea. Parsons Pasadena, CA Program Manager, Designer,Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc. New York,NY Independent ReviewerSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number221. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedCaldecott Tunnel Improvement Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, CA On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactContra Costa TransportationAuthorityChristina Ferraz, PETelephone Number(510) 286-389024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The $2.28 billion Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Project will construct a fourth bore through the Berkeley Hills near SanFrancisco. The project includes a 3,399-foot fourth bore; short sections of cut-and-cover tunnel at each portal; seven crosspassagewaytunnels between the fourth bore and the existing third bore; a new operations, maintenance, and control (OMC)building for all four tunnel bores; and two new electrical substations.The goal of the tunnel systems was to provide a robust system developed to maintain safe operations and the ability to detectand respond effectively to tunnel incidents. Special attention was given to collaborative development of operating procedures anddevelopment of the Emergency Response Plan. In addition to Bore 4, upgrades to Bore 3 were included to provide a comparabledegree of safety systems and traffic monitoring and control.Considerations for safe operation in the event of a 100 mega-watt fire served as the basis for the ventilation, fire detection, firewater supply, and traffic control systems in particular. A longitudinal ventilation system is designed for the tunnel, due to the needto control smoke spread in the event of a fire. Computational fluid dynamics models were run to evaluate temperature profilesand smoke spread under worst case scenarios.The tunnel traffic operation systems (TOS) included typical intelligent transportation system (ITS) components such as CCTVcameras, variable message signs, and extinguishable signs. The primary vehicle detection system is based on video incidentdetection technology, supplemented with loop detector stations at the tunnel portals. Other elements of the tunnel TOS includedoor alarms on cross-passages, cross-passage monitoring CCTV cameras, an emergency tunnel communications public addresssystem, and positive traffic control at the tunnel portals.The San Francisco Bay area is considered one of the more seismically active regions in the world, and this tunnel designconsidered both rare and expected events. The design team ran multiple types of analyses to assess the lining behavior.Numerical models were then used to calculate stresses, strains, and forces from the ground behavior to the lining and structuresto ensure the results were within acceptable limits.Parsons developed a systems plan for tunnel operations, which had not previously been available to the tunnel operators. TheEmergency Operations Plan was developed jointly with the tunnel operations staff and Caltrans, and served as the basis of thecontrol system software requirements document in the specifications.Parsons was retained to provide program management, design services, and technical support for the Caldecott TunnelImprovement Project. The Parsons team assisted Caltrans in preparing the environmental document and providing publicinvolvement and outreach, and prepared preliminary designs, final designs, and PS&Es for Bore 4.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Parsons performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as it is a tunnel project with extensive mechanical, electrical, communications, fire life safety, and ventilation systemsintegration. Parsons performed design, and engineering support during construction.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleParsons Pasadena, CA Design, Engineering SupportDuring ConstructionSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number321. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedARC Tunnel Project/Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Newark, NJ 2009 201023. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactNew Jersey Transit Tom Martin Telephone Number(973) 792-378524. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The CM Consortium tri-venture was contracted by New Jersey Transit for project control and construction management (PCCM)services in support of the $8.7 billion Access to the Region‘s Core (ARC) project, and selected the ARC alternative known as theTrans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project. This project doubles the rail capability from New Jersey into midtown Manhattan throughconstruction of the following:• Platform, concourse, and track improvements to the existing Frank R. Lautenberg Station in Secaucus, NJ• Two new, single-track tunnels beneath the New Jersey Palisades (hard rock TBM tunnels) and the Hudson River (softground EPBM tunnels) connecting with four single-track tunnels in Manhattan (hard rock TBM tunnels)• Construction of the New York Penn Station Expansion to the north under 34th Street between 6th and 8th Avenues• Improvements to rail infrastructure in New Jersey to provide expanded, one-seat-ride opportunities to midtownManhattan from various rail lines• Supporting investments such as electrification, traction power, track improvements, rail yards, signal systems, andfacilitiesAlthough the project was suspended during the initial stages of construction, the CM Consortium developed numerousinnovations during pre-construction. At the core of the ARC project was responding to public concerns for providing safe, reliabletransportation that promotes sustainable commuting patterns. Rail transit promotes sustainability by reducing emissions andproviding an efficient, economical, and environmentally conscious way to travel. By doubling the rail capability from New Jerseyinto Midtown Manhattan, the ARC project would have allowed more people to use this "green" form of transportation as theirprimary means of commuting.Sustainability is also being incorporated into the project through various construction methods. For example, the New York PennStation Expansion (NYPSE) cavern, the large underground station in Manhattan, was scheduled to be constructed using greenbuilding practices that reduce water usage and heating and cooling loads. During construction, the contractor would have beenrequired to meet significant guidelines with respect to air quality and emissions.Parsons is the managing partner for the CM Consortium tri-venture. The CM Consortium is contracted to perform services thatalign with a conventional CM function and a project controls/oversight function. Major services included in the CM Consortium'sscope include review of preliminary engineering design work for constructability; review of geotechnical methodologies;development of a project control plan; review of the baseline budget prepared by the partnership design team; and residentengineering and inspection services. In addition, the CM Consortium is required to provide various other services, includingdeveloping a plan to control the scope and budget; supporting a project management plan that integrates design andconstruction; developing a risk management plan; and developing a Procedures Manual, which is intended to document theapplicable quality management responsibilities of the CM Consortium through the life of the project.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Parsons performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a large diameter bored tunnel, in both hard and soft ground, below groundwater, with integrated systems(ventilation, mechanical, etc). Parsons performed CM services on this project.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) Rolea.Parsons Pasadena, CA Construction Managementb Halcrow, Inc. New York, NY Preliminary EngineeringSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number421. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedAl Salam Street Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Abu Dhabi, UAE On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactAbu Dhabi Municipality Abdulla Saeed Sultan Al Shamsi Telephone Number(971) (2) 695 747624. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Al Salam Street is a major urban arterial in Abu Dhabi's central business district. Parsons was selected to design and superviseconstruction of major improvements to upgrade Al Salam Street to a freeway level of service. The project covers a total length of3 kilometers, 2.5 of which will be depressed roadway.This $1.4 billion project involves design and construction supervision of a major tunneling project in the heart of Abu Dhabi'scentral business district. The tunnel, 2.5-kilometers-long, will carry four lanes of traffic in each direction from the Port Zayed areato beyond the intersection with Al Falah Street. Tunnels to connect Al Corniche Road with Al Salam Street are also beingconstructed as part of this project. The project included major detour work to minimize disruptions in a very densely populatedpart of the city. In addition, the project involves extensive utility relocations while preventing disruption of services duringconstruction.Over the length of the project, the new tunnel adds four lanes of uninterrupted traffic-carrying capacity, resulting in a capacityaddition of more than 6,000 vehicles per hour to this vital area of the city.The state-of-the-art tunnel safety and management system will coordinate ventilation, fire detection and suppression, lighting,public address, environmental management, electrical power supply, emergency broadcasting, radio re-broadcasting, securityand surveillance, traffic detection and control, and traveler information to a centralized monitoring and control facility.In anticipation of this major project, Parsons co-hosted a series of forums to prepare short-listed contractors for tendering. Theforums offered the opportunity for potential contractors to stay current with developments of what will be one of the largest andmost complex construction projects ever undertaken in Abu Dhabi Island. This better prepared them to tender and have theresources needed in position should they be awarded the contract.Parsons designed and is supervising construction of two new tunnel interchanges on Al Salam Street near the new Sheikh ZayedBridge in Abu Dhabi. The through traffic on Al Salam Street will be depressed below surface-level intersections. The depressedroadway for each interchange, carrying four lanes of traffic in each direction, will be approximately 850 meters in length. At thesurface, signalized intersections will serve local traffic movements to the adjacent residential areas. Ramps will provide access toand egress from Al Salam Street.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Parsons performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a tunnel constructed in an urban environment adjacent buildings and other structures that require protection,and has state-of-the-art tunnel safety and systems. Among other roles, Parsons designed and is performing CM services on thisproject.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleParsons Pasadena, CA Design and ConstructionManagementSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number521. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedI-405 Corridor Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Bellevue, WA On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactWSDOT Kim Henry Telephone Number(425) 456-857924. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The I-405 Corridor Program includes the design and construction of $1.5 billion of improvements along the I-405 corridor. Theprogram is comprised of seven design-build and five design-bid-build projects.Among the I-405 Corridor Program’s many successes is the project team’s goal to leave the environment better than we found it.As part of the GEC, Parsons helped develop the environmental compliance database used by design-builders to track progressand monitor the successful completion of environmental commitments made in the environmental documents and permits. Todate, the ten I-405 projects that have been awarded are on schedule, within budget, and have met all legislatively mandatedmilestones.On the I-405/NE 8th St. to SR 520 Braided Ramps project, Parsons worked with WSDOT to streamline the right-of-wayacquisition process. Appraisals were started prior to final approval of the right-of-way plans, shortening the overall right-of-wayacquisition process by as much as six months.Parsons helped WSDOT to assign risk more appropriately, and therefore receive more competitive bids. Parsons helped developthe process that integrates RFP production, design, and cost estimating, which ultimately helped WSDOT maximize its availablebudget.Parsons developed a self-directed design quality management program for the I-405 Corridor Program, which was based onParsons’ Quality Management Plan, successfully used on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Design-Build project. Parsons’independent quality auditor reviewed and recommended several process improvements to the environmental quality process,which were immediately implemented, and WSDOT has adopted the process as their standard in developing environmentaldocuments.Parsons facilitated the shift in responsibility for QC/QA from WSDOT to the design-builder and has provided quality verificationinspectors with experienced personnel from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge project.Parsons’ staff wrote the traffic management section of the RFPs to minimize inconvenience to the public and maximize safetyduring construction. We also review design-builder traffic management proposals, coordinate with the Northwest Region TrafficOffice, and ensure implementation during construction.As a member of the General Engineering Consultant co-located team, Parsons is providing design, program management,preparation of RFQs and RFPs for design-build projects, and CM services for WSDOT. Parsons has many full-time managerialand technical staff overseeing this work.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Parsons performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as Parsons is working as part of an integrated team with WSDOT and other consultants, in a model similar to the SR 99Project. It demonstrates that Parsons actively partners with WSDOT and other consultants, and can manage constructionprojects according to WSDOT processes and procedures.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleParsons Pasadena, CA General Engineering ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS26. Names of Key Personnel(from Section E, Block 12)Greg ColzaniJon Kaneshiro, PE27. Role in This Contract(from Section E, Block 13)Resident EngineerPre-Construction ServicesLeadSteve Minassian, PE CM Services Manager Doug Slakey, PE Tunnel Systems Integrator Jeff Lavinder, PE Chief Inspector - Structures Jan BabendererdeTBM MonitoringDaniel Brown Scheduler Daniel Weathers Safety Manager Ben Fardi, PE Quality Verification Plan Fermin LongcobGary DanielGordon ChenNghia GiangBob Lenz, PE, CCMRalph Trapani, PETony Stirbys, LEGRhonda KolodjiTunnel Excavation/Lining –InspectionTunnel Excavation/Lining –InspectionVent BuidlingMechanical/Finishes –InspectionOff-Site MaterialsInspectionConstruction Plan LeadClaims/Estimating/ChangeMangementMonitoring/InstrumentationEngineerWSDOT Compliance andReportingJohn Donatelli, PE Risk Mitigation 29. Example Projects Key28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation insame or similar role)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1 Dubai Metro, Red and Green Lines 6 Project2 Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Program 7 Project3 ARC Tunnel Project/Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel Project 8 Project4 Al Salam Street Tunnel 9 Project5 I-405 Corridor Program 10 ProjectSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.N/AI. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date1/25/2010

Halcrow, Inc.

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 10, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmMark Johnson, Vice President - TunnelsHalcrow, Inc.6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(212) 608-3990 (212) 566-5056 johnsonmc@halcrow.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceMark Bower, C.Eng Tunnel Chief Inspector a. Total b. With Current Firm26 2115. Firm Name and Location (City and State)Halcrow, Inc.New York, NY16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)HND/Civil EngineeringCertified Engineer, UK18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Member of the British Tunneling Society, Construction Site Inspection Manager; Confined Spaces Competent Person CP1;Construction Site Manager’s Safety Certificate, BTS Underground Health and Safety Course; Site Management Safety TrainingScheme; Thames Water19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Thames Tideway and Lee Tunnels Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK On-Going N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project consists of the Thames and Lee Tunnels, that will intercept, store and divert combined sewer overflows (CSO)discharges, currently overflowing into the Rivers Thames and Lee Mark Bower is conducting site inspections of constructionprogress and safety standards and participating in site progress meetings and progress report monitoring as part of the projectquality and standards regime during the site enabling work phase of the Lee tunnel ($799.5 million). He is also conducting sitesuitability reviews and providing site layout schemes for the proposed drive and reception shafts planned for the Thames TidewayTunnel project.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:DLR Woolrich Arsenal Extension Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Woolrich, UK 2008 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $240 million project is comprised of a 3.6-kilometer, 5.3-meter internal diameter bored tunnel (through thanet sand andchalk) using an EPBM, a 15-meter diameter main ventilation shaft (wet caisson), two cross passages and five ventilation adits(SGI segmental lined), and resilient and floating trackbed construction, including associated P-way installation and diversion ofexisting and construction of new sewers.As the Deputy Site Representative, Mark performed inspections during construction work, reviewed the contractor’s methodstatements and inspection and test plans, participated in monitoring review panel meetings to assess settlement during and afterthe tunnel drives and shaft sinking, responded to site queries, assessed and resolved design/construction interface issues, liaisedwith the design team, and carried out a review of the contractor’s records for sign-off of the interim review certificates.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Channel Tunnel Rail Link, Section 2 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2004 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmAs a member of the field engineering team (Rail Link Engineering), Mark was responsible for the tunnel contract ($5.3 billion)between Stratford and Manor Park, London, totaling 9 kilometers of bored tunnels constructed using EPBMs, three sprayedconcrete lined (SCL) shafts and connecting adits (principally constructed in thanet sands and chalk), and a precast factoryproviding segmental concrete linings for two of the three London Tunnels contracts.Mark performed and reported on random inspections of construction work, checking compliance with specifications in addition tothe review of contractor’s method statements and inspection and test plans produced to control the work as part of thecontractor’s self-certification procedures. He attended meetings with both the client and the contractor, resolved problemsencountered, and reviewed the contractor’s records as part of an ongoing audit process.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Itay Sewerage Scheme Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Ascunsion, Paraguay 1999 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmMark performed tunnel monitoring of a 3.1-kilometer-long, 2-meter interior diameter, main sewer ($50 million), driven using anEPBM through weak sandstone, clay, and sands, using drill and blast methods in sandstone and basalt.As the Tunnel Supervisor, Mark provided guidance to the local inspection staff in monitoring, TBM advance and alignment, buildand grout procedures (machine drive), and excavation and support methods (rock tunnel sections). He assisted the localengineering staff with shaft sinking operations (guidance systems, mucking methods) and secondary lining activities (pumpingsystems, vibration techniques). Mark also led bi-weekly site safety tours in coordination with the contractor.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedLondon Thames Tideway Tunnels Program Management Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2001 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactThames WaterPhil StrideHead of London Tideway TunnelsTelephone Number(020) 3147-771824. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Thames Water commissioned CH2M Hill, in association with Halcrow, for program management of the London Tideway TunnelsScheme, which will intercept, store, and divert combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharges currently overflowing into the Thamesand Lee Rivers, for treatment at Beckton sewage treatment works, to bring long-term benefits to the environment and peopleusing the River Thames. (Capital cost of $5.7 billion) The scheme comprises the Lee Tunnel, the Thames Tunnel, the connectionof over 30 CSOs, and a deep-pumping station at Beckton STEW.In March 2007, the government approved Thames Water’s proposal to improve the quality of the tidal River Thames byconstructing two tunnels (the Lee Tunnel and the Thames Tunnel) to store millions of liters of storm sewage from the CSOs andtransfer them for treatment at the Beckton sewage treatment plant. The Thames Tunnel extends from Hammersmith in WestLondon to Beckton in East London. The Lee Tunnel extends from Abbey Mills in Stratford to Beckton.The tunnel passed through 14 separate London boroughs, each with their own planning constraints. The main tunnel itselfpasses beneath 40 existing tunnels and 40 bridge structures that span the River Thames. The associated 23 shaft structures and14 tunneled connections would also impact numerous third-party structures and services. A dedicated third-party infrastructureteam was established to manage these interfaces using GIS and electronic document management systems that controlled theflow of information.A CADD-based system was developed to manage the large amounts of geotechnical data obtained from extensive groundinvestigations and historic databases. This system combined GIS data with ground investigation data to enable production ofgeotechnical sections at any location using all of the current baseline information.One of the key risks involved the combination of a face intervention with very high groundwater pressures. This also led to thedevelopment of an intervention approach involving a stepping up of the mitigation measures based on observations, aimed atreducing the need for hyperbaric interventions.The design of large, deep shaft structures up to 100 feet in diameter and 260 feet deep with tunnel-to-shaft and tunnel-to-tunnelconnections in potentially unstable water-bearing ground also proved challenging. Specific construction sequences weredeveloped for construction of tunnel junctions to allow smaller drives (up to 12 feet) to connect with the larger tunnel (24 feet),while reducing the need for manual excavation and continuing compatibility with the proposed construction schedule.Thames Water awarded the program management of the London Tideway Tunnels scheme to CH2M Hill in association withHalcrow to:• Procure contracts and then manage and administer them• Control program costs• Manage change and risks• Establish program-wide policies, procedures, and standards• Manage design development• Manage finances• Manage human resources• Manage IT systems (e.g., document control, GIS, CAD)• Manage planning consent, environmental impacts, and stakeholder engagementRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this was a series of deep tunnels constructed in soft ground below groundwater using pressurized face TBMequipment. The construction is in urban London, so mitigation of tunnel-induced settlements to adjacent buildings and facilitiesis a prime concern.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Program ManagementSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number221. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedDocklands Light Rail Extension to Woolwich Arsenal Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Woolwich, UK 2007 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactWoolwich Arsenal Rail Enterprise65 Carter Lane, London EC4V 5HSHarvey PownallTelephone Number(44) (208) 331-408024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)This award-winning $288.1 million extension to London’s Docklands Light Railway was delivered under budget and seven weeksahead of schedule. The extension provides a link from Woolwich to central London, and will form a key part of the London 2012Olympics transportation network. The project included a new underground light rail transit (LRT) station at Woolwich Arsenal,which provides a multi-modal interchange with the mainline railway and local bus routes. The 2.5-kilometer LRT extensionincludes 1.9 kilometers of twin-bore tunnels, with an internal diameter of 5.3 meters. The project also includes a majorintervention shaft and headhouse, which accommodates power distribution and communications systems. It is 15 meters indiameter, 40 meters deep, and is positioned immediately adjacent to the river flood wall. There are three cross passagesapproximately 500 meters apart. The tunnels run at depths of up to 35 meters below the River Thames, with the EPBM removingover 104,000 cubic meters of material. Each end of the bored tunnel had a section of cut-and-cover built using diaphragm wallsides and a cast in-situ roof slab. The project was awarded ICE’s ‘Infrastructure Project of the Year’ and British ConstructionIndustry Awards’ 2009 ‘Best Practice Award’.On the south side of the river, the cut-and-cover approach structure passes under the Network Rail station platform. The designprocess incorporated coordination with Network Rail to gain their approval, and the design solution allowed for construction withina restricted work site during track possessions/station closures. The permanent way has been designed to ensure strictcompliance with noise and vibration criteria. This has necessitated a section of floating track slab, which has been designed anddetailed by Halcrow in consultation with specialist suppliers for rail fastenings and track slab mountings.Provisions for fire safety are critical to the design and approval of this project, and Halcrow has led consultations with the LondonFire and Emergency Planning Authority and HM Railways Inspectorate, and had prepared and implemented a fire safety strategyfor the project.Halcrow was the Lead Designer for the design-build contractor, responsible for multi-disciplinary design and management ofspecialist subconsultants. Halcrow’s scope included :• Design of tunnels and intervention/ventilation shafts• Systems and tunnel ventilation systems• Architectural and structural design of underground stations• Design of permanent way and track structure• Associated highways, drainage, and landscaping• Environmental surveys and mitigation plans• Support for the contractor’s planning applications• Specification of mechanical and electrical services, traction power systems, communications, and SCADA“The Docklands Light Railway is a fantastic success story for London. The extension to Woolwich will boost the local economyand completes another piece of the transport improvements the 2012 Games are already bringing to London.”-Ken Livingstone, Mayor of LondonRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this was a pair of large diameter deep transporation tunnels constructed in soft ground below groundwater usingEPBM equipment. The construction is in urban London, so mitigation of tunnel-induced settlements to adjacent buildings andfacilities is a prime concern.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Lead DesignSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number321. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedChannel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) – High Speed 1 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2007 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactUnion Railways, 3 rd Floor183 Eversholt St., London, EnglandNW1 1HTPaul ChapmanCTRL (UK) Ltd.Telephone Number(44) 207-391-430024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)High Speed 1 is the UK’s first high speed railway, linking central London with the Channel Tunnel. The main tunnels on thisproject were:• London tunnels: 19 kilometers of 7.15-meter diameter twin-bore tunnels, with 26 cross passages and five ventilationshafts• Thames tunnel: 2.5 kilometers of 7.15-meter diameter twin-bore tunnels• North downs tunnel: 3.2 kilometers of a 10-meter diameter sprayed concrete-lined tunnelThe project also included 18 separate cut-and-cover structures, totalling over 3.4 kilometers long. These comprise tunnels,station boxes, and tunnel approaches. This $9.2 billion project was delivered on time and within budget, and won a number ofindustry awards.The CTRL project was the largest and most complex civil engineering project ever undertaken in Europe. The planning, design,construction, and commissioning of the project took more than 10 years, and required a total of 45 main contractors duringconstruction. Some of the unique issues and successes of the project are:• Delivery of the project on time and within budget. This was partly due to the innovative use of partnering between theclient, designer, and contractors to reduce costs and save time.• The project has attracted $21 billion of regeneration in the southeast of England.• The use of every type of underground construction methodology, including TBM/NATM/cut-and-cover tunnels, in awide range of ground conditions and in very built-up urban environments. The project pioneered the use of steel fibrereinforced concrete segmental tunnel linings for the TBM-driven tunnels to improve durability and reduce costs.• Extensive underpinnings, ground improvements, and monitoring were required to protect a wide range of existingstructures along the alignment.• A very high standard of environmental assessment and compliance was achieved, including the adoption ofsustainable construction techniques.• The project required 14 million cubic-meters of earthworks, all but 1million cubic-meters of which was re-used on theproject for structural or mitigation fill.• The project required the largest archaeological investigations ever undertaken in Europe. Thirteen historic buildingswere physically moved from the alignment, 1.2 million trees were planted, and 700 hectares of woodland, grassland,and wildlife meadow were created.Halcrow personnel were responsible for:• Tunnels, shaft and portal design• Cut-and-cover structure design including in-situ boxes, diaphragm walls, and contiguous piles• Geotechnical and ground engineering• Utilities diversions• Transportation planning and traffic management• Construction planning• TBM specifications• Value engineering• Procurement activities including preparation of tender documents, tender assessments, contract formations• Project management and contract administration• Construction supervision“My warmest congratulations go to everyone involved in this project, which is a wonderful illustration of what can be achievedthrough working in partnership.” – Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II“Project of the Decade.” – London Transport AwardsRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this was a series of deep tunnels constructed in soft ground below groundwater using TBM equipment. Much of theconstruction is in urban London, so mitigation of tunnel-induced settlements to adjacent buildings and facilities is a primeconcern. Halcrow performed design and CM services on this project.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Design, Construction ManagementSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number421. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedItay Catchment Sewerage Supervision Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Ascuncion, Paraguay 2001 200123. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCorposanaCorporacion de Obras SanitariasAscuncion, ParaguayJose Berges516 c/ San JoseTelephone Number(595) (21)-210-319 or 33024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Halcrow prepared a master plan of the sewerage of the greater Asuncion area from 1984 to 1986, with British governmentfinancing. This identified the Itay catchment as the area most in need of comprehensive sewerage. Only a mixture of individualand collective septic tanks and small local sewerage schemes, giving rise to many environmental problems, previously served it.Itay catchment sewerage supervision was for the supervision of construction of a comprehensive sewerage system, preliminarytreatment plant, and submarine outfall to serve a population of 250,000 in Greater Asuncion.Halcrow was reappointed by Corposana to carry out the detailed design of the project from 1994 to 1995. Halcrow entered aconsortium with a Paraguayan consultancy, Inarec SRL, which successfully bid for the 40-month contract ($50 million) for thesupervision of the construction of the project that commenced in 1997. The tunnel was the first to be constructed in Paraguay. Itis 3100 meters long and is required to convey sewage by gravity from the main collection areas, beneath a ridge of higher groundseparating them from the river. The tunnel provides a cost-effective alternative to following the natural drainage path of the Itay,which would have involved an excessive length of trunk sewer and the discharge of effluent to the Paraguay River at a pointupstream of the raw water intake for greater Asuncion's water supply.The tunnel was constructed mainly through cemented sands (areniscas) and sands, using a tunnel TBM capable of operating ineither open or closed modes. In the closed mode, it operates on the EPBM. There is also a short section of tunnel through abasaltic intrusion, which is being constructed by traditional techniques with selective use of explosives.Challenges and Innovations:• This was the first tunnel ever constructed in Paraguay• Technology and technical skills were transferred to the local work force• A precast factory for the tunnel segments needed to be established in the country• QC and testing regimes were developed to American standardsHalcrow was responsible for monitoring a 3.1-kilometer-long, 2-meter interior diameter main sewer tunnel, driven using an EPBMthrough weak sandstone, clay and sands, and drill and blast methods in sandstone and basalt.Halcrow also guided the local inspection staff in monitoring, TBM advancement and alignment, build and grout procedures(machine drive), and excavation and support methods (rock tunnel sections). In addition, Halcrow assisted the local engineeringstaff with shaft-sinking operations (guidance systems, mucking methods) and secondary lining activities (pumping systems,vibration techniques). We led bi-weekly site safety tours in liaison with the contractor. (Contract Language - Spanish)Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this was a series of tunnels constructed in soft ground using TBM equipment. Halcrow provided design services aswell as training of inspectors.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Program Management/DesignSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number521. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedEl Salaam Canal, Suez Canal Syphon Tunnel Crossing Professional Services Construction (if applicable)El Salaam, Egypt 1999 199923. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactMinistry of Public Works andWater ResourcesNot AvailableTelephone NumberNot Available24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The El Salaam siphon crossing beneath the Suez Canal provides the vital link between the existing El Salaam Canal on the westside of the Suez Canal and the proposed development area of irrigated agriculture in Northern Sinai. The syphon (capital cost of$64 million) forms a vital component of a comprehensive land development scheme, which ultimately aims to develop 400,000fedans of arable land in Northern Sinai. (1 fedan is approximately equal to 0.5 hectares). The syphon draws water from the Nileand some agricultural run-off from an extension of the existing El Salaam Canal on the west bank of the Suez Canal, anddischarges it into the newly built Sheik el Gabar Canal on the east bank.The project consists of four parallel 5.1 meter internal diameter tunnels approximately 770 meters long with inlet and outletsurface structures connecting to the irrigation scheme. Construction commenced in January 1994 and the project wassubstantially completed in February 1999.Environmental conditions were harsh. Exposed concrete faces would be prone to aggressive chemical attack from thegroundwater and wind-born material. Measures were required to enhance the durability of all materials used on site. All concreteused on the project was mixed on site according to Halcrow designed mixes, and tested to ensure that they met the requirementsof the specification. Segments used in the construction of the tunnels were fabricated on site in a precasting factory under thestrictest supervision. A well-equipped laboratory was also established on site, and a comprehensive materials testing regime wasestablished.A single slurry type TBM was used to excavate and construct all four tunnels. It performed well under these conditions,particularly considering it required being dismantled, turned, and reassembled after the drives for Tunnels 1, 2, and 3.Construction of the tunnels involved the erection of a primary lining comprised of a 12 inch thick precast concrete ring of sevensegments and a key. Once the primary lining was complete, a mass concrete secondary lining was cast over a 2.5-millimeterthickPVC waterproofing membrane to enhance the durability of the structure.Halcrow inspected and monitored the temporary and permanent work, which included deep excavations in clay and sand,installation of wells and piezometers, installation and construction of driven shell cast in situ piles, construction of site facilities, aTBM reinforced concrete launch, and reception structures.Halcrow monitored the production of reinforced concrete tunnel linings and advised the contractor on QC procedures and workingmethods. We monitored the work from the initial stages through to the casting and curing stages, as well as monitored thewaterproof painting, repair work, and storage of completed segments.We carried out inspection duties on three of four 5.74-meter interior diameter, 0.75-kilometer-long tunnels (inverted syphons)formed at 1 in 5 maximum grade under the Suez Canal, constructed by a slurry mixshield through clays and water-bearing sandsat hydrostatic pressures up to 4.5 bar. In addition, we checked tunnel build, grouting procedures, TBM advance and alignmentrecords, and lining damage, and ensured a safe working practice implementation. Halcrow supervised caulking and repairs to theprimary lining and installation and testing of the PVC waterproof membrane.Finally, we originated pro formas and work procedures for supervising the work, tabulation of construction records, plant andlabor returns, and control of all work drawings.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this was a series of large diameter deep tunnels constructed in soft ground below groundwater using TBM equipment.Halcrow provided CM and inspection services on the project.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Construction ManagementSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number621. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedBrisbane Airport Link Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Brisbane, Queensland, Australia On-Going N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactState Government of Queensland Brendan Henry, Theiss/John Holland Joint Venture Telephone Number+(61) (434) 315-18224. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The $746 million Brisbane Airport Link is a highway project that will link Brisbane’s Central Business District to the airport. Thetotal project includes a through-link from the edge of the Central Business District to the airport, bypassing many traffic lights andbusy intersections. A separate busway will also be provided along part of the route. The main project (Airport Link) is almostentirely underground. The total Airport Link is 4.2 miles in length, incorporating two 2.9-mile-long tunnels to carry traffic in eachdirection. Of this 2.9-mile tunneled length, 1.3 miles will be constructed using EPBMs, with the remainder being constructed inrock using road-headers, along with 1.9 miles of associated bored tunnel ramps. The EPBMs will be launched into a full face ofalluvial soils comprising sands, gravels, silts, and clays in varying quantities. The first 1,500 feet of TBM tunneling will beundertaken in mixed face conditions, with rock varying from highly-weathered siltstone and sandstone to fresh tuff. The depth ofthe tunnels varies between 27 feet from ground level to tunnel crown at launch, and 240 feet to tunnel crown at the deepest point.Each TBM-driven tunnel has an outer diameter of approximately 41 feet, and will carry two lanes of traffic. The tunnel lining hasbeen designed as a steel-fiber, reinforced precast concrete segmental lining, except in the most highly-loaded locations such asfaults, and in the vicinity of cross-passages. In these locations, conventional reinforcement is added to accommodate higherbending moments and/or bursting forces at the radial joints. The invert construction area needs to be free of gantry wheels toprovide a safe area for construction. To achieve this, the gantry is supported by rails supported on special brackets that fit intothe erector cone pockets for the segmental lining.This lining represents the largest diameter, steel-fiber reinforced segmental tunnel lining in the world to date, thereby providingthe owner with the durability and associated whole-life cost benefits that arise from the removal of conventional reinforcementfrom the design. However, steel fibers are not always an adequate replacement for conventional reinforcement under allcircumstances, particularly where significant bending moments or tensile forces occur. At the deeper sections of the project, theaxial forces being transferred through the radial joints of the tunnel lining were found to result in tensile splitting forces at thosejoints that were in excess of the capacity of the fiber-reinforced concrete. To overcome this potential problem while maintainingas much of the durability benefits of fiber-reinforced concrete as possible, some reinforcing bar was introduced to the radial jointsto accommodate the higher tensile forces for just this section of the alignment. Furthermore, in cross passages and fault zones,conventionally-reinforced segments are employed due to the high movements and bending moments expected.Settlements are a particular concern. The TBM launches with less than a 1-diameter cover and passes beneath residentialproperties near the launch area. Further along, the drive tunnels pass below a number of sensitive heritage structures, some ofwhich are located in the vicinity of tunnel overpasses, where mined tunnel ramps pass over the mainline TBM tunnels.Halcrow is a subconsultant that is delivering the design of the Brisbane Airport Link Tunnel project to the Theiss/John HollandJoint Venture. Within this role, Halcrow has primary responsibility for delivery of the design of the TBM-driven portion of theproject. This responsibility has been discharged through the provision of staff to the main joint venture’s integrated design team,and designing specific elements from Halcrow offices in Australia as discrete packages of work. This included:• The provision of Anthony Harding to lead the TBM tunnel design• The provision of other Halcrow personnel into the TBM team, including another experienced segmental lining designer• The provision of personnel on the project, including the Verification Manager and Tunnel Drafting Manager• The remote design of shafts and cross-passagesa.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work Halcrow performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a larger diameter deep roadway tunnel, with integrated tunnel systems, constructed using EPBM methods. Thetunnel was constructed through and urban environment, so tunnel-induced settlements are a major concern. Halcrow performeddesign and engineering support during this program.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHalcrow, Inc. New York, NY Design ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS26. Names of Key Personnel(from Section E, Block 12)27. Role in This Contract(from Section E, Block 13)Mark Bowers, C.Eng Tunnel Chief Inspector 29. Example Projects Key28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation insame or similar role)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1London Thames Tideway Tunnels ProgramManagement6 Brisbane Airport Link Tunnel2 Docklands Light Rail Extension to Woolwich Arsenal 73 Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) – High Speed 1 84 Itay Catchment Sewerage Supervision 95 El Salaam Canal, Suez Canal Syphon Tunnel Crossing 10STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.N/AI. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date1/21/2011STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

CMTS, Inc.

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 8, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmYvonne McClain, PresidentCMTS, Inc.6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(206) 652-3345 (503) 242-0094 ymcclain@cmtsinc.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceAlf Evers Interior Tunnel Structures - Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm36 515. Firm Name and Location (City and State)CMTS, Inc.Portland, OR16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)Senior Tunnel InspectorN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Confined Space Entry; Lockout/Tagout; Erosion Control; OSHA 10-Hour Safety Compliance; Work Zone Traffic Control/Flagger19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:East Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR On-Going 2011(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe scope of work involves a 300-foot long TBM with a 25-foot diameter cutter head to construct the north drive of the tunnel,which is almost 6 miles in length. The tunnel parallels the east bank of the Willamette River from SE 17th and McLaughlin to SwanIsland, at an average depth of 150 feet. The finished interior of the finished East Side Big Pipe is 22 feet in diameter. TBM miningbegan in June 2007 at the Opera Shaft on SE Water Avenue, and reached Swan Island on April 20, 2008. The north drive was3,055 feet long and is a new drive length record in North America. The south drive was completed under budget and ahead ofschedule by four months. This project includes construction of seven tunnel access shafts, new connecting pipelines, and thePortsmouth Force Main, which will convey sewage from the Swan Island Pump Station to the Columbia Boulevard WastewaterTreatment Plant. Alf Evers serves as the Senior Tunnel Inspector, providing oversight of the tunnel inspectors and ensuringcontractor compliance with workmanship and materials with respect to project specifications and plans. The cost is estimated at$480 million.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:West Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe scope of work included TBM soft ground tunneling for 3.5 miles at a depth of 120 feet to construct a 14-foot diameter tunnellocated beneath Tom McCall Waterfront Park and crossing underneath the Willamette River, connecting with the newlyconstructed Swan Island Pump Station. This project was named as one of the country’s top 10 tunneling projects in the last 10years by Tunnel Business Magazine. Alf provided inspections of the boring of the tunnel to ensure that contract specifications andsafety requirements were met. The construction cost was $293 million and the project was completed on time and within budget.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Alameda Corridor Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Wilmington, CA 1998 2002(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis was a $2.4 billion construction project consisting of a 20-mile-long dedicated freight rail expressway linking the Port of LosAngeles and the Port of Long Beach to the rail yards east of downtown Los Angeles. Alf served as the Chief Inspector supervising10 inspectors responsible for oversight of rail inspections, two steel truss bridges, three steel girder bridges, a concrete box girderviaduct, and utility relocations.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Tren Urbano (Transit) Tunnels Professional Services Construction (if applicable)San Juan, Puerto Rico 2001 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis $300 million project consisted of the Tren Urbano Transit Tunnels in Rio, Piedras, and Puerto Rico, which included two1,000-foot stations and 4 miles of tunnels. The tunneling methods used were EPBM, stacked drifts, soft ground NATM, and cutand-cover.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:City of Portland Westside Light Rail Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 1996 1996(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe project consisted of 3 miles of twin tube tunnels at 21 feet in diameter, constructed in hard rock and built through the TualatinMountains west of downtown Portland. The project was built under an environmentally sensitive area and also included a 260-footdeep station and ventilation shaft and head house. Alf inspected all phases of construction for the 3.5-mile twin bore tunnels,shafts, and a light rail tunnel (LRT) station. The project also included major utility relocations and upgrades. This project had aconstruction value of $3.5 million.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceBryant Sanders Grouting/Ground Improvement - Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm18 415. Firm Name and Location (City and State)CMTS, Inc.Portland, OR16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)N/AN/A18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)OSHA 10-Hour Safety ComplianceAdult CPR/Standard First AidConfined Space EntryWork Zone Traffic Control/Flagger CertificationExcavation/Trench SafetyErosion Control19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Willamette River CSO Project - Balch ConsolidatedProfessional Services Construction (if applicable)Conduit ProjectPortland, OR On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThis project has a construction value of $57.3 million and an overall construction cost of $74 million for design construction andstaffing. Construction began in June 2009 with an estimated completion date of September 2011. The scope of work includesround-the-clock micro-tunneling for a total distance of 8,500 feet of 84-inch diameter conduit at depths of 20 to 75 feet deep insoft ground (groundwater), using the slurry MTBM with reinforced concrete pipe. The conduit will convey sewer and stormwaterflows from the Guilds Lake area into the West Side CSO Tunnel for delivery to the Swan Island Pump Station, with a finaldestination at the Columbia Blvd. Wastewater Treatment Plant for processing.Micro-tunneling efforts have encountered fill, soft silt lake deposits, open gravel, cobbles, boulders, and Troutdale Formationgravel. Five new access shafts are being constructed using a cutter soil mix (CSM) for support of the shaft walls.Thus far, Bryant Sanders has inspected the construction of Shafts B, G,L, and I assisted with CSM for Shaft C and the break-outpanels between Shaft B and GLI, and the excavation of Shaft C.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:East Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR On-Going On-Going(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe East Side CSO project is the largest project in the Willamette River CSO Program, with a total tunnel length of 29,260 feet.Construction began on the East Side Big Pipe in 2006, and the overall scope includes construction of 6 miles of 22-foot diametertunnel, seven tunnel shafts at depths of 85 feet to 165 feet deep, and 9,000 feet of new pipelines. The 22-foot diameter tunnelextends from southeast Portland to the Swan Island Pump Station at 100 feet under groundwater, with 120 feet of soil pressure.The tunnel is constructed of eight segments per ring at 5-foot increments.There are five micro-tunneled outfall diversion pipelines, ranging from 250 to 3,000 feet long that will convey CSO flows into themain tunnel. Construction began in 2006. The tunneling portion of the project was completed ahead of schedule and underbudget. Shaft build-outs for the seven associated new tunnel shafts will be complete in 2011.Bryant has inspected the Outfall 36 bypass, the excavation of Outfall 37, the structural build-out on Outfall 46, micro-tunnelingfrom the steel bridge to Outfall 40, shaft excavation on Outfall 46-2 to Outfall 46 (the longest drive in the Northwest), excavation ofthe Taggart Shaft, excavation of the Port Center Shaft, tunnel and tie-in into the Confluent Shaft, the big East Side CSO tunnelduring the North drive from the Opera Shaft to the Port Center Shaft, excavation of the McLoughlin Shaft, the South drive from theOpera Shaft to the Taggart Shaft, and the McLoughlin Shaft structural build-out.The overall construction cost is $480 million.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedEast Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCity of PortlandBureau of Environmental Services1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 1000Portland, OR 97204Paul Gribbon24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(503) 823-7747The City of Portland started construction of the East Side CSO Big Pipe Project four years ago. This monumental project isamong the last in the city’s 20-year CSO improvement program. The scope of work includes construction of a 6-mile long, 22-footdiameter tunnel, seven tunnel shafts, and 9,000 feet of new pipelines. The tunneling portion of the project was completed inOctober 2010, finished four months ahead of schedule, and is expected to come in under the projected budget of $480 million.CMTS, Inc. provides senior tunnel, tunnel, civil, and electrical inspectors for this project to provide inspection of all relatedconstruction components including tunnel and micro-tunneling operations, slurry wall construction, reinforced steel, backfill,tunnel liner,pipeline installation, tunnel walls, seven shafts, and build-out of those shafts. Tunnel shafts include the following:• Opera Shaft with a tunnel drive to the Alder Shaft of 4,195 feet• Alder Shaft with a tunnel drive of 3,567 feet to the River St. Shaft• Steel Bridge Shaft with a tunnel drive of 3,567 feet• River Street Shaft with a tunnel drive of 8,183 feet to the Port Center Shaft siteThe Port Center Shaft was the final destination for the tunneling operations to the north. The north drive of the East Side CSO of84-foot micro-tunneling was completed on April 19, 2008 for a distance of 3,055 feet, which is a new drive length record in NorthAmerica.Crews removed the TBM from the Port Center Shaft for maintenance and returned it to the Opera Shaft, reinstalling the TBM for“Rosie” to begin the final drive south toward its final destination at the McLoughlin Shaft. Additional shaft sites include the TaggartShaft and the McLoughlin Shaft. The south drive encompassed a distance of 7,377 feet and marked the “end of the line” forRosie, completing the six-mile East Side Big Pipe tunnel. The Alder Shaft sits at 125 feet below grade, the Steel Bridge Shaft is160 feet below grade, and the Taggart Shaft is approximately 130 to 135 feet below grade.Tunneling operations were maintained 24/7. CMTS’ inspection personnel prepare daily progress reports including time-in-motion,maintain a photo log, ensure compliance of workmanship and materials with the city’s plans and specifications, attend progressmeetings, and ensure safety compliance on site.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CMTS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a larger diameter deep tunnel constructed below groundwater using TBM equipment. CMTS providedinspection and documentation services for the CM team.a.b.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCMTS, Inc. Portland, OR Inspection and Documentation ofExcavation, Tunneling, andShafts.CRS Engineering Consultants,Edingale, Tamworth, Staffs, UKManagement of the ManufactureLtd.of Segmental LiningsSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number221. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedWest Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 2006 200623. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCity of PortlandBureau of Environmental Services1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 1000Portland, OR 97204Sue Williams24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(503) 823-5520The $293 million West Side CSO Big Pipe project started in November 2002 on Swan Island and was completed in September2006, over two months ahead of schedule.Geology of the area, which consists of sand, silt, gravel, cobble, and boulders under 100 feet of water pressure presentedobstacles to traditional tunneling methods. Based on the geology reports, a Herrenknecht TBM was selected, the first time everfor this technology to be used in the United States.Tunnel mining was performed in two drives with both TBMs lowered into the Nicolai Shaft, which is 55 feet in diameter and 120feet deep. The first drive went north under the Willamette River for 4,000 feet, connecting with the confluent shaft on Swan Island.The second drive headed south for 14,000 feet towards the Clay Street shaft. The TBMs lined the tunnel with concrete precastliner segments. Slurry micro-tunneling boring machines (MTBM’s) were used for the micro-tunneling portion of the work. Thetunnel is 3.5 miles in length and 14 feet in diameter.Four access shafts were constructed along the West Side waterfront connecting with the tunnel. Slurry walls and secant pile wallswere also constructed.In addition to the tunnel and shafts, another component of this project is the Swan Island Pump Station, which is a four-storyunderground structure built to a depth of 160 feet deep and an inside diameter of 124 feet. Associated projects include adedicated electrical substation and an operations and maintenance building.Upon completion of Phase I, construction of the Swan Island Pump Station required over 43,000 cubic yards of concrete and tiedover 5 million pounds of reinforced steel.The Southwest Parallel Interceptor is another component of the West Side CSO extending almost three miles from theintersection of S.W. Taylors Ferry Rd. and Virginia Ave. to SW Clay Street, where it connects to the tunnel. The pipe diameterranges in size from 36 inches to 72 inches.CMTS provided tunnel inspectors, specialty inspectors (electrical, mechanical, structural), civil inspectors, engineeringtechnicians, CADD technicians, and clerical support to the bureau.Our inspectors observed the work on a daily basis preparing daily progress reports and time-in-motion reports for the slurryconstruction, maintaining photo logs of the work-in-progress, attending weekly construction meetings, ensuring contractorcompliance in workmanship and materials to project plans and specifications, and observing and documenting testing procedures.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CMTS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM services project,as this is a series of deep tunnels constructed below groundwater using TBM equipment. CMTS provided inspection anddocumentation services for the CM team.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCMTS, Inc. Portland, OR Inspection and Documentation ofExcavation, Tunneling, and Shafts.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number321. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedWillamette River CSO Program- Balch Consolidated Conduit Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCity of PortlandBureau of Environmental Services1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 1000Portland, OR 97204Sue Williams24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(503) 823-5520The Balch Consolidated Conduit project is located in the Guilds Lake industrial area of northwest Portland. This project began inJune 2009 and is scheduled for completion in December 2011. This is one of the last projects necessary to complete the city’s20-year program to control combined sewer overflows.The scope of work includes an 8,500 foot pipeline constructed at depths of 20 to 75 feet below the ground surface. Oncecompleted, the pipeline will transport combined sewage and stormwater runoff from the Balch Drainage Basin to the West SideBig Pipe tunnel, where it will continue onto the Columbia Blvd. Wastewater Treatment Plant.J.W. Fowler was selected as the contractor for this $57.3 million project. Fowler is using two Herrenknecht micro-tunneling boringmachines (MTBMs) to build the conduit’s 84-inch and 54-inch diameter pipes connecting with six tunnel access shafts. TheMTBMs will tunnel through fill, soft silt lake deposits, open gravel, cobbles, boulders, and Troutdale Formation gravel. The 84-inch tunnel is being built in segments between the tunnel shafts. Shaft construction includes:• Shaft GLI – 28-foot by 20-foot rectangular shaft approximately 30 feet deep• Shaft B – 45-foot by 31.5-foot rectangular shaft, approximately 45 feet deep• Shaft C – 36-foot inside diameter round shaft, approximately 60 feet deep• Shaft D – 23-foot inside diameter round shaft, approximately 63 feet deep• Shaft L – 29-foot inside diameter round shaft, approximately 75 feet deep• Shaft M – 27-foot by 16-foot rectangular shaft, approximately 65 feet deepThe contractor is using a cutter soil mixing (CSM) machine to build the walls of four tunnel shafts. Each shaft wall will be made ofseveral overlapping panels, taking approximately 6 tons of cement to construct each panel. The Balch project is the first inOregon to use this technology.The contract will also use the CSM machine to strengthen soft soil along part of the conduit alignment mixing cement with soil,which will strengthen the soil to support the MTBM and pipeline.CMTS’ inspection personnel work varied shifts alongside the contractor. They conduct plan reviews; review and respond tosubmittals; attend the pre-construction meeting and weekly progress meetings; provide on-site, full-time inspection of materialsand work-in-progress; prepare daily progress reports; take construction photos and maintain a photo log; ensure contractorcompliance of project specifications, plans, and the Site Safety Plan; and ensure that the traffic control plan is in place andadhered to. CMTS inspection personnel will also assist in preparation of deficiency lists and project close out when the workreaches substantial completion.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CMTS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a series of deep tunnels constructed below groundwater using TBM equipment. CMTS provided inspection anddocumentation services for the CM team.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCMTS, Inc. Portland, OR Inspection and Documentation ofExcavation, Tunneling, and Shafts.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number421. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedWillamette River CSO Program - City of Portland Portsmouth Force Main Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR On-Going On-Going23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCity of PortlandBureau of Environmental Services1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Room 1000Portland, OR 97204Sue Williams24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(503) 823-5520This $55 million Portsmouth Force Main (PFM), presently under construction, is part of the City of Portland’s Willamette RiverCSO Program. The PFM will be a 66-inch diameter, 3-mile-long pressurized pipeline that will carry combined stormwater andsewage from the Swan Island Pump Station to the existing Portsmouth Tunnel. The tunnel will transport combined flows bygravity to the Columbia Boulevard Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Swan Island facility currently pumps up to 100 million gallonsper day through the Peninsular Force Main. The Portsmouth Force Main will carry up to an additional 120 million gallons per day.A 2,950-foot-long, 84-inch diameter micro-tunnel is being built through sand fill and soft silt along the south end of Segment 1.The remainder of the Segment 1 force main will be installed through open-cut excavation. A 66-inch diameter, 570-foot-long largedrainage pipe will also be installed during excavation of Segment 1.The Segment 2 tunnel is 5,850 feet long and extends up to 140 feet deep through sandy Catastrophic Glacial Flood Deposits andTroutdale Formation gravel between the south portal shaft and the north connection shaft. A 104-inch diameter TBM in openmode above groundwater is being used to excavate Segment 2 through potentially raveling ground. Temporary support consistsof steel ribs, and timber lagging. A 66-inch Hobas carrier pipe will be installed following tunnel excavation. Even though extensiveresearch was performed to identify the buried obstructions in Segment 2, unidentified cobbles and boulders were encounteredbeneath the bluff slope at the start of tunneling.Four shafts will be constructed along the micro-tunnel section:• Swan Island Pump Station Shaft• Port Center Shaft• Going Street Shaft• Anchor ShaftThrough a professional services contract with the City of Portland, Bureau of Environmental Services, CMTS provides inspectionpersonnel to perform full-time inspection services of excavation, micro-tunneling, ground improvements, and pipeline installation.CMTS inspectors prepare daily progress reports, ensure contractor compliance in workmanship and materials with project plansand specifications, maintain a photo log of the work in progress, ensure that the Traffic Control Safety Plan is in place andadhered to, ensure that the Site Safety Plan is observed and followed, attend weekly progress meetings, coordinate testing anddocument results, and prepare as-built drawings.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CMTS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this is a series of deep tunnels constructed below groundwater using TBM equipment. CMTS provided inspection anddocumentation services for the CM team.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCMTS, Inc. Portland, OR Inspection and Documentation ofExcavation, Tunneling, and GroundImprovements.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS26. Names of Key Personnel(from Section E, Block 12)Alf EversBryant Sanders27. Role in This Contract(from Section E, Block 13)Interior Tunnel Structures -Inspection Grouting/GroundImprovement - Inspection 29. Example Projects Key28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation insame or similar role)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1 East Side Willamette River CSO Project 62 West Side Willamette River CSO Project 73Willamette River CSO Program - Balch ConsolidatedConduit Project84 Willamette River CSO Program - Portsmouth Force Main 95 10STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.N/AI. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date1/14/2011STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

The VOSK Group

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 8, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmStephanie Kirby, PE -PrincipalThe VOSK Group6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(206) 501-7489 (206) 548-1173 skirby@thevoskgroup.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceVictor C Oblas, PE Interagency/Commissioning Coordinator a. Total b. With Current Firm42 315. Firm Name and Location (City and State)The VOSK GroupSeattle, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)BSCE/Civil EngineeringWA, Professional Engineer / Civil EngineeringMSCE/Civil Engineering18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)Claims Avoidance and Dispute Management, Victor C. Oblas, PE, and Stephanie A. Kirby, PE, Construction Law HandbookSecond Edition, Aspen Publishers, 2009; 2008 Marvin M. Black Award for Partnering Excellence presented by the Association ofGeneral Contractors along with Balfour Beatty Infrastructure for the Downtown Seattle Transit Project Pine Street Extension andRenovation.19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 2008 Ongoing(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role X Check if project performed with current firmIn the past two years, Victor Oblas has worked as a construction expert to help WSDOT develop staging and constructionsequencing plans for the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program. His initial task was to develop a constructiondelivery plan for the program. He is now focused on working with partner agencies to coordinate all projects within the program’sboundary to integrate information relative to construction of adjacent and inter-related projects into a joint working schedule.Project Value: $1.09 billion.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel, Retrofit and Expansion Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 2004 2008(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firm: Majoritywith a different consulting firm. Completed the projectas part of The VOSK Group.Victor was the Resident Engineer for Sound Transit for the construction of the retrofit of the transit tunnel for use by both bus andlight rail. He managed the day-to-day construction and contract activities of the project and was the main contact for allcorrespondence, disputes, claims, mitigation, change work, and schedules. Victor provided weekly and monthly constructionreports to Sound Transit and coordinated with Sound Transit in engineering design, construction site staging logistics, andinterfacing with local authorities. Project cost: $86 million.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Construction of Safeco Field Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 1997 1999(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmVictor was the Construction Manager for the Public Utilities District for the construction of Safeco Field. He helped negotiate themaximum allowable construction cost with the general contractor/construction manager (GC/CM), and developed a plan tomanage construction and QC for the District. He worked with the GC/CM, the design consultant, and the Mariners to create anintegrated management team from the resources available from all four organizations. Victor was responsible for administering allconstruction and professional services contracts, and for managing a staff of approximately 20. Project cost: $509 million.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Director of Technical Services Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 1995 1995(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmVictor was the Director of the Technical Services Department and was responsible for the design, construction, schedule, andbudget for Metro’s capital construction program for transit and water quality projects, which in 1992, exceeded $700 million forconstruction contracts awarded, and more than $100 million in outside consulting services.e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Downtown Seattle Transit Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 1986 1992(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmVictor was the Construction Manager for the Downtown Seattle Bus Tunnel. He managed a construction field office of 15 duringconstruction of the Westlake Station and Convention Place Station projects. At the end of the project, he worked with Metro’smanagement to close out all contracts and move back to Metro’s main office to manage the design section for transit andwastewater projects. Project cost: $82 million.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedAlaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA On-Going N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactWSDOT Ali Amiri Telephone Number(206) 267-638124. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The project consists of the construction of an 8,000-linear-foot bored tunnel beginning south of King Street and ending at 6 th andHarrison, in the vicinity of Broad Street and existing SR 99. The project includes roadway connections to local streets andconnections to existing SR 99 at both ends of the project.The VOSK Group provided construction planning, contract coordination analyses, and maintenance-of-traffic plans during theplanning phases of the work. VOSK was also an integral player in the development of the construction sequencing and themaintenance-of-traffic plan for the Holgate to King Stage 2 contract (now under construction), which involves the demolition andreconstruction of the southern portion of the Alaskan Way Viaduct under the state’s Moving Forward Program. VOSK’s initial taskwas the development of a construction delivery plan for the program. In later stages of planning, VOSK worked with partneragencies to coordinate all projects within the program boundary to integrate information relative to construction of adjacent andinter-related projects into a joint working schedule. VOSK also took the lead in developing alternatives for holding ferry trafficduring the peak days during the summer months to assure free flow of traffic despite upcoming construction activities. Thisanalysis places special emphasis on traffic during major events at local sports venues, taking into consideration concurrentconstruction activities along the waterfront, including the new SR 99 tunnel, the City’s Seawall Replacement project, relocation ofSeattle City Light’s115 kilovolt distribution cable, and miscellaneous projects planned by the Washington State ferry system.During the early phases of construction, the program calls for task forces to be led by the design-build contractor to assure closecoordination with WSDOT and the City of Seattle. One of the more critical task forces is for maintenance-of-traffic. The knowledgegained and the relationships developed during the referenced project will prove invaluable in creating workable vehicular andpedestrian traffic patterns, especially in the south end of the project, where stakeholders such as the Washington State Ferries,the Port of Seattle, the Pioneer Square Historic District, and the two stadiums have very specific needs relative to access for theircustomers, fan base, and constituents. The project cost is set at $1.09 billion.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work VOSK performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM servicesproject, as this work provides VOSK a comprehensive understanding of the entire SR 99 Replacement Program and thechallenges and risks to be overcome to successfully deliver it.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleThe VOSK Group Seattle, WA Construction Planning ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation in26. Names of Key Personnel 27. Role in This Contract same or similar role)(from Section E, Block 12) (from Section E, Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Victor C. Oblas, PEInteragency/CommissioningCoordinator 29. Example Projects KeyNo. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1 Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project 62 73 84 95 10STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.N/AI. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date1/24/2010STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd.

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 8, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmChris Smith, PrincipalCRS Engineering Consultants Ltd.6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(44) (0) 1827 383425 (44) (0) 1827 383425 crsconsultants@hotmail.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceChris Smith, C.Eng, FICE Segment Fabrication - Inspection a. Total b. With Current Firm40 1115. Firm Name and Location (City and State)CRS Engineering Consultants Ltd.Edingale, Tamworth, UK16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)BSc. C.EngFICE18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)N/A19. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:East Side Willamette River CSO Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 2008 2010(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role x Check if project performed with current firmThis $480 million East Side CSO project constructed by the Kiewit-Bilfinger-Berger joint venture included 9.05 kilometers of 6.70-meter interior diameter, 1.5-meter-wide, “universal” steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) linings. Chris Smith initially assisted inthe detailed design of the lining and was then responsible for the complete design, planning, and establishment of the segmentfactory production system, including the moulds and all specialty production equipment. He provided and implemented thedetailed method statements and quality plans, as well as trained the on-site supervision and production personnel. Chris wasalso responsible for plant commissioning and ongoing production management.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Big Walnut Outfall Augmentation Sewer Project Part II (BWOAS) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Columbus, OH 2006 2006(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role x Check if project performed with current firmThis $94 million project consisted of 4 kilometers of 3.66-meter interior diameter, 1.5-meter-wide, “universal” SFRC liningsconstructed by the McNally/Kiewit Joint Venture. Chris was responsible for establishing a segment factory production system at alocal precast facility. He specified and procured all of the moulds and specialized production equipment, and provided andimplemented detailed method statements and quality plans. He commissioned the plant, providing initial production supervisionand complete production management, training the on-site supervision and production personnel and instructing on all aspects ofsegment manufacture.c. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Dublin Port Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Dublin, Ireland 2003 2004(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role x Check if project performed with current firmThis project consisted of a 5.35-kilometer, 10.84-meter interior diameter, 1.7-meter-wide road tunnel accessing Dublin Docksconstructed by the Nishimatsu/Irishenco Joint Venture at a cost of $624 million. Chris was responsible for the complete design,planning, and establishment of a segment factory production system at a local, precast facility. He specified and procured themoulds and all specialist production equipment and commissioned the plant, providing initial production supervision and on-sitepersonnel training. He also provided the detailed method statements and quality plans, overseeing the implementation of theproduction QC system and training the existing supervision and production personnel, as well as instructing on all aspects ofsegment manufacture.d. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Channel Tunnel Rail Link Section 1, Contract 250 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2003 2004(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role x Check if project performed with current firmThis $3.2 billion project required 36.40 kilometers of 7.15-meter interior diameter, 1.5-meter-wide, SFRC linings. Chris initiallyacted as an independent consultant for the client’s engineer, responsible for detailed tunnel lining design. He was then responsibleto one of the successful contractors, the Nuttall/Wayss Freytag/Kier Joint Venture, for manufacturing the linings for 16.15kilometers of the project for the $230 million Contract. Chris was responsible for the design, planning, and establishment of an onsitefactory production system, including all of the specialist production equipment. He provided detailed method statements andquality plans, overseeing the implementation of the production QC system and the training of on-site supervision and productionpersonnel. He was responsible for plant commissioning and initial production management.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedEast Side Willamette River CSO Program Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Portland, OR 2008 201023. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactCity of Portland – Bureau ofEnvironmental ServicesPaul Gribbon24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(503) 823-7747The East Side CSO project in Portland was the second major tunnel contract let by the City of Portland to clean up the WillametteRiver. It involved the construction of nearly 6 miles of 22-foot diameter tunnel with 1.5 miles of 8-foot micro-tunnel and sevenassociated shafts.The contract had a tender value of $480 million and included the construction of 6,005 rings of steel fiber, reinforced concrete(SFRC) lining. The rings were of universal design and consisted of seven segments and a key. Each ring was approximately 5feet wide and 13 inches thick. There were also a number of, traditionally reinforced rings for shaft access and areas of particularlypoor ground conditions.CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd. was initially employed by Parsons Brinkerhoff, the City of Portland’s engineer, to assist thecity and the joint venture in the development of the design of the SFRC rings. CRS then assisted the joint venture in thedevelopment of a series of “value engineering” initiatives that led to contract award in March of 2006.Upon award, CRS was responsible to the joint venture for the detailed layout and design of the segmental lining manufacturingfacility, including the site layout, factory structures, internal cranes and handling system, stockyard layout, and external cranesand concrete batching plant, as well as overseeing the design and supply of the segment moulds and all specialized equipmentused in the segment manufacturing plant.CRS was also responsible for the initial training of the production management and on-site production team during plantcommissioning. They then supervised the production team and oversaw the initial casting, building up to the planned productionrate and providing ongoing supervisory management for the complete production period. CRS was also responsible forestablishing the QA system required to monitor and record the performance of the steel fiber reinforced concrete. This involvedextensive preproduction trials on the mix and on the controls for the steam curing system, as well as ongoing productionmonitoring and control.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CRS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM services project,as this is a larger diameter deep tunnel constructed below groundwater using TBM equipment and one-pass pre-cast segmentallining. CRS managed the segment production and trained the segmental lining inspection staff.a.b.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCRS Engineering Consultants,Edingale, Tamworth, Staffs, UKManagement of the ManufactureLtd.of Segmental LiningsCMTS, Inc. Portland, OR Inspection and documentation ofexcavation, tunneling, and shafts.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number221. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedChannel Tunnel Rail Link Section 1, Contract 250 Professional Services Construction (if applicable)London, UK 2003 200423. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactLondon Continental Rail Ben Ruse Telephone Number(44) (0) 771-715-107024. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The Channel Tunnel Rail Link is the twin-track, high-speed rail link between the end of the first phase of the Channel Tunnel atAshford in Kent and the final London Terminus at Kings Cross.CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd., was initially engaged by the client to act as an expert design consultant to assist in the finaldesign of the lining, ensuring that both manufacturing and construction considerations were incorporated into the system.For construction, the project was divided into multiple contracts, above-ground line construction including major bridges andviaducts, as well as a number of tunneling contracts. Contract 250 between Ripple Lane and Barrington Road was one of thetunneling contracts with a tender value of £151 million, and included the construction of 10.4 kilometers of tunnel with a diameterof 7.15 meters. The ring consisted of nine segments and a key. Each ring was approximately 1,500 millimeters wide and 350millimeters thick, and there were two types of ring, a left taper and a right taper.CRS was initially required to assist the joint venture tender team in the development of the bid with regards to the methodologyand costs for the manufacture of the lining segments. The final production scheme devised by CRS was incorporated into thejoint venture’s technical submission as part of the tender documents.Upon award, CRS was responsible to the joint venture for the detailed layout and design of the segmental lining manufacturingfacility, including the site layout, factory structures, internal cranes and handling system, stockyard layout, and external cranesand concrete batching plant, as well as overseeing the design and supply of the segment moulds and all specialist equipmentused in the segment manufacturing plant.CRS also assisted in the appointment of the production management and was responsible for on-site training of the productionteam during plant commissioning.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CRS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM services project,as this was a series of deep tunnels constructed in soft ground below groundwater using TBM equipment using one-pass precastsegmental lining. CRS managed the segment production and trained the segmental lining inspection staff.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCRS Engineering Consultants,Edingale, Tamworth, Staffs, UKManagement of the ManufactureLtd.of Segmental LiningsSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number321. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedDublin Port Tunnel Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Dublin, Ireland 2003 200423. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactDublin City Council M. Philips Telephone Number(35) (1) 222 222224. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The Dublin Port Tunnel is a twin-track road tunnel to the north of Dublin linking the M50 ring road close to the airport, to the dockscomplex to the north side of the river Liffey. It is designed to carry heavy commercial traffic out of the city without causingsignificant environmental damage, as currently exists. The contract had a tender value of £595 million and consisted of a lengthof open-cut, as well as construction of the 5.35-kilometer twin tunnel with an internal diameter of 10.84 meters. The ring consistedof six segments and a key. There were three types of ring, each approximately 1,700 millimeters wide and 350 millimeters thick,a straight ring, a left taper, and a right taper.CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd. assisted Banagher Concrete in the initial approach to the joint venture and in thedevelopment of the bid with regard to the methodology and costs for the manufacture of the lining segments. The final productionscheme devised by CRS, in conjunction with Banagher Concrete, was successful in obtaining the supply contract.Upon award, CRS was responsible to Banagher for the detailed layout and design of the segmental lining manufacturing facility,including the factory layout, the internal cranes and handling system, and the stockyard layout. CRS was also responsible foroverseeing the design and supply of the segment moulds and the reinforcement cage jigs, as well as all of the specialistequipment used in the segment manufacture.Further, CRS was responsible for developing the quality system, on-site training of the production team during plantcommissioning, supervision of the initial casting, and building up to the planned production rate.Relevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectThe work CRS performed on this project is directly relevant to the work that will be performed on the SR 99 CM services project,as this is large diameter deep tunnel constructed below groundwater using pressurized face TBM and one-pass pre-castsegmental lining.. CRS managed the segment production and trained the segmental lining inspection staff.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleCRS Engineering Consultants,Edingale, Tamworth, Staffs, UKManagement of the ManufactureLtd.of Segmental LiningsSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS26. Names of Key Personnel(from Section E, Block 12)Chris Smith, C.Eng, FICE27. Role in This Contract(from Section E, Block 13)Segment Fabrication -Inspection 29. Example Projects Key28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation insame or similar role)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1 East Side Willamette River CSO Project 62 Channel Tunnel Rail Link Section 1, Contract 250 73 Dublin Port Tunnel 84 95 10STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.N/AI. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date01/06/2011STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

HealthForce Partners, LLC

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSA. CONTRACT INFORMATION1. Title and Location (City and State)SR 99 Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management Services, Seattle, WA2. Public Notice Date 3. Solicitation or Project NumberDecember 8, 2010N/AB. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT4. Name and Title 5. Name of FirmDarin R. Smith, VP Sales & Customer RelationsHealthForce Partners, LLC6. Telephone Number 7. Fax Number 8. E-mail Address(425) 806-5735 (425) 527-1814 darins@healthforcepartners.comC. PROPOSED TEAM(Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.)(Check)PrimeJ-V PartnerSubcontractor9. Firm Name 10. Address 11. Role in This Contracta. ParsonsCheck if branch office600 University St.Suite 700Seattle, WA 98101Construction Managerb. Halcrow, Inc.Check if branch office22 Cortlandt St31 FloorNew York, NY 10007Tunnel and ventilationtechnical support & on-sitechief inspector servicesc. CMTS, IncCheck if branch office2 Union Square601 Union Street, 42 nd FloorSeattle, WA 98275Tunnel Excavation/Lining/Grouting/Ground ImprovementInterior Tunnel Structuresd. The VOSK GroupCheck if branch office4220 Whitman Ave. NSeattle, WA 98103Interagency andCommissioning Coordinatore. CRS Engineering Consultants,Ltd.Check if branch officeThe Old SchoolhouseEdingale, Tamworth, UKB79 9JJPrecast Concrete LiningSpecialiste. HealthForce Partners, LLCCheck if branch office11805 North Creek Parkway SSuite 113Bothell, WA 98011Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

ARCHITECT–ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONSPART I - CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONSD. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM (Attached)The Organizational Chart Follows This PageSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

* Key Staff(C) CMTS, Inc.Firm(CRS) CRS EngineeringConsultants, Ltd(H) Halcrow, Inc.(HF) Healthforce Partners, LLC(V) The VOSK GroupParsons Employee Unless IndicatedExecutive PanelRick Chapman, PEMichael JohnsonRalph Trapani, PEMartin Knights, C. Eng (H)Executive DirectorMichael JohnsonWSDOTCM Services ManagerSteve Minassian*, PEBored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99SettlementEdward Cording, PhDSegmental LiningChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*Technical AdvisorsHyperbaric InterventionsEdmond Kay, MD, (HF)StructuresGreg Orsolini, PE, Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SEPre-Construction CM Support Services TeamConstructionPre-ConstructionServices LeadJon Kaneshiro, PE*Construction Planning LeadGreg Colzani* & Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*Task Force Teams Construction Planning TeamDesign Review CoordinatorDon Clark, PETunnelJon Kaneshiro, PE* &Anthony Harding, C. Eng (H)Support of ExcavationJon Kaneshiro, PE* & Tony Stirbys, LEGTunnel Systems/MechanicalDoug Slakey, PE*, Robert Desrosiers,John Bumanis, PE, Paul Bates, C. Eng (H),& Peter Woodburn, C. Eng (H)Settlement MonitoringTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Edward Cording, PhDTBM DesignJon Kaneshiro, PE*, Greg Colzani*,Steve Minassian, PE*,& Jan Babendererde*Interior StructuresBill Elkey, PE, SE,Arun Bhalaik, PE, (H),& Greg Orsolini, PEMOTVic Oblas, PE (V)CM Plan DevelopmentBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Eric Ostfeld, PE,& Adam Fredericks, PEMonitoring andInstrumentation PlanningTony Stirbys, LEG, Jan Babendererde*,& Shimi Tzobery, PEHyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*,& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Safety ManagerDaniel Weathers* &Robert Meshew, C. Eng, (H)SchedulerDan Brown* & Ed MastersonTunnel Systems IntegratorDoug Slakey, PE* & Vic Oblas, PE (V)Monitoring/InstrumentationEngineerTony Stirbys, LEG & Jeremy Wehner, PEClaims/Estimating/ChangeManagementRalph Trapani, PE, Gerald Bonner, PE,& Rhonda KolodjiInteragency/Commissioning CoordinatorVic Oblas, PE (V)WSDOT Compliance and ReportingRhonda Kolodji, Bob Lenz, PE, CCM*,& Don Clark, PERisk MitigationBob Lenz, PE, CCM*, Greg Colzani,& John Donatelli, PEQuality Verification PlanBen Fardi, PE* & Eric Ostfeld, PETunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Resident Inspection - TunnelsTunnel Chief InspectorMark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Tunnel Excavation/LiningAlf Evers (C)*, Fermin Longcob*,Gary Daniel*, Robert Meshew, C. Eng (H)Grouting/Ground ImprovementBryant Sanders* (C), Lee Moore (C)& Tony Stirbys, LEGTBM Fabrication/Assembly/TestingJan Babendererde*TBM Maintenance/Intervention MonitoringJan Babendererde* & Shimi Tzobery, PESegment FabricationChris Smith*, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)& Mark Bower, C. Eng (H)*Hyperbaric SpecialistsRobert Rodgers, Jan Babendererde*& Edmond Kay, MD (HF)Tunnel Resident EngineerGreg Colzani*Chief InspectorStructuralJeff Lavinder, PE*Resident Inspection - StructuresInterior Structure PrecastFabricationChris Smith, C. Eng & FICE (CRS)*& Mark Bower, C. Eng, (H)*Interior Tunnel StructuresAlf Evers* (C), Nghia Giang*,& Jeff Lavinder, PE*Vent Building Mechanical/FinishesGordon Chen* & Tim DaleyTunnel and Traffic SystemsJoshua Cheatham, PEOff-Site Materials InspectionNghia Giang*

E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person)12. Name 13. Role in This Contract 14. Years ExperienceEdmond Kay, MD Hyperbaric Interventions – Technical Advisor a. Total b. With Current Firm27 215. Firm Name and Location (City and State)HealthForce Partners, LLCBothell, WA16. Education (Degree and Specialization) 17. Current Professional Registration (State and Discipline)M.D./Family PracticeWA /Occupational MedicineB.A./Biology18. Other Professional Qualifications (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.)American Board of Family Practice, Board Certified; Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Board Certified; Diving MedicalExaminer, Certified; Washington State Medical License, Active; BLS/ACLS/ ATLS, Current; Academic Appointments: TelevisedPresentation – “The Divers Ear - Under Pressure”; Clinical Assistant Professor of Family Medicine – University of Washington;Clinical Assistant Professor, School of Nursing – University of Washington; Diving Medical Officer – University of Washington;Diving Medical Director – Divers Institute of Technology; Professional and Academic Memberships: American Academy ofFamily Physicians; King County Medical Society; Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society; Washington Academy of FamilyPhysicians; King County Academy of Family Physicians – President 1990-1991, Executive Board Member – 1984 - 200819. Relevant Projectsa. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Beacon Hill Station and Tunnels Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 2006 N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe $225 million project includes construction of one mile of twin running tunnels and a deep mined station consisting of twinshafts and a complex configuration of vehicle, pedestrian and ventilation tunnels ranging in size from 16 to 46 feet, all in extremelypoor water bearing soils. At 160 feet deep, the tunnel boring machines required workers to perform cutterhead maintenance underhyperbaric conditions.Dr. Kay worked with Pacific Rim Diving Services International for the Obayashi Corporation as the Hyperbaric Project Physician.His services included consultation, meetings, on-site safety inspections, curriculum development, manuals/materials, teachingselected courses, and other duties as defined in the procedures manual.b. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Brightwater Project Conveyance Systems Tunnel (East, West, and Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Central)Woodinville, WA On-Going N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmThe $419 million Brightwater conveyance system includes 13 miles of pipeline built in underground tunnels 40 to 440 feet belowthe surface, shallower connector pipes, and an influent pump station to send wastewater to the plant. Some portions of the tunnelwill contain up to four pipes going to and from the treatment plant while other tunnel sections will contain only a single pipeline thatwill carry highly treated effluent to Puget Sound. The project included 3 main tunnel contracts, East, West, and Central. Allconstructed using pressurized face tunneling methods.Dr. Kay served as a Hyperbaric Physician to support contractors for all three projects. His services included consultation,meetings, on-site safety inspections, curriculum development, manuals/materials, and teaching selected courses and other dutiesas defined in the procedures manual. He also developed compression/decompression policies and procedures. Dr. Kay assistedwith the writing and filing of variances to Washington Labor and Industries (DOSH).e. (1) Title and Location (City and State) (2) Year Completed:Lake Mead Tunnel (Water Intake #3) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Boulder City, NV On-Going N/A(3) Brief Description (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) and Specific Role Check if project performed with current firmIntake No. 3 is a $447 million project designed to draw water from Lake Mead during extremely low water levels. Componentsinclude an intake tunnel constructed under high water pressures utilizing a hybrid slurry/EPB machine lined with a bolted gasketedsegmental lining, three 600 foot deep shafts, interconnection tunnels, underground pumping chamber, and pumping station.Dr. Kay reviewed the hyperbaric manual and equipment safety, and attended meetings and evaluated policies and procedures. Healso advised OSHA directly regarding safety issues in all aspects of the operation.STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number121. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedBrightwater Project Conveyance Systems Tunnel (East, West, and Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Central)Seattle, WA 2005 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactKing County/Vinci Parson/Frontier-KemperLionel Suquet (Project Manager)-CentralThierry Portofaix-CentralTelephone Number(425) 286-1600Greg Haugen-West24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)The $419 million Brightwater conveyance system includes 13 miles of pipeline built in underground tunnels 40 to 440 feet belowthe surface, shallow connector pipes, and an influent pump station to send wastewater to the plant. Some portions of the tunnelwill contain up to four pipes going to and from the treatment plant, while other tunnel sections will contain only a single pipelinethat will carry highly treated effluent to Puget Sound. The project included three main tunnel contracts – east, west, and central. Allwere constructed using pressurized face tunneling methods.Dr. Kay served as a Hyperbaric Physician to support the contractors for all three projects. His services included consultations,meetings, on-site safety inspections, curriculum development, manuals/materials, training, and other duties as defined in theprocedures manual. He also developed compression/decompression policies and procedures. Dr. Kay assisted with the writingand filing of variances to Washington Labor and Industries (DOSH).In addition, his work included the following:• Provided input to establish protocols and procedures relating to compressed air work in coordination with the contractor• As requested by the contractor, established policies on non-emergent, emergent care, and emergency transport• Ensured that the project’s Hyperbaric Manual was complete, updated as needed, and in compliance with applicablecodes and regulations• Reviewed all hazards related to compressed air work and developed specific interventions for each identified hazard• In conjunction with the contractor, reviewed all emergency procedures with the project safety team• Worked in conjunction with the contractor and the safety team to review all “near miss” accidents and develop “lessonslearned”• Reviewed all work site accidents, injuries, and incidents with the contractor and provided expertise, as needed• Reviewed anonymous work place hazard reports with the contractor• Made himself available on-call as needed, if the contractor’s hyperbaric team required immediate, on-site consultations• Performed hyperbaric training as requested by the contractor• Established and reviewed medical supplies for compressed air work to be purchased by the contractor• Reviewed medical files, as required, to verify fitness to work in compressed air environmentsRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectDr. Kay’s work on this project is directly relevant to the work he will be performing on the SR 99 CM services project. As neededand as requested by WSDOT, Dr. Kay will perform the tasks described above for the SR 99 CM Services project. He will provideoversight of the design-builder’s hyperbaric team to help WSDOT manage costs and risks in conjunction with hyperbaricinterventions.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHealthForce Partners, LLC Bothell, WA Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number221. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedBeacon Hill Station and Tunnels Project Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Seattle, WA 2006 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactObayashi Corporation/King CountyLink Light RailSteve Redmond, Assistant Project Manager24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(206) 766-8106This $225 million project includes construction of one mile of twin running tunnels, a deep mined station consisting of twin shafts,and a complex configuration of vehicle, pedestrian, and ventilation tunnels ranging in size from 16 to 46 feet, all in extremely poorwater bearing soils. At 160 feet deep, the TBMs required workers to perform cutterhead maintenance under hyperbaric conditions.Dr. Kay worked with Pacific Rim Diving Services International for the Obayashi Corporation as the Hyperbaric Project Physician.His services included consultations, meetings, on-site safety inspections, curriculum development, manuals/materials, training,and other duties as defined in the procedures manual.In addition, his work included the following:• Provided input to establish protocols and procedures relating to compressed air work in coordination with the contractor• As requested by the contractor, established policies on non-emergent, emergent care, and emergency transport• Ensured that the project’s Hyperbaric Manual was complete, updated as needed, and in compliance with applicablecodes and regulations• Reviewed all hazards related to compressed air work and developed specific interventions for each identified hazard• In conjunction with the contractor, reviewed all emergency procedures with the project safety team• Worked in conjunction with the contractor and the safety team to review all “near miss” accidents and develop “lessonslearned”• Reviewed all work site accidents, injuries, and incidents with the contractor and provided expertise, as needed• Reviewed anonymous work place hazard reports with the contractor• Made himself available on-call as needed, if the contractor’s hyperbaric team required immediate, on-site consultations• Performed hyperbaric training as requested by the contractor• Established and reviewed medical supplies for compressed air work to be purchased by the contractor• Reviewed medical files, as required, to verify fitness to work in compressed air environmentsRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectDr. Kay’s work on this project is directly relevant to the work he will be performing on the SR 99 CM services project. As neededand as requested by WSDOT, Dr. Kay will perform the tasks described above for the SR 99 CM Services project. He will provideoversight of the design-builder’s hyperbaric team to help WSDOT manage costs and risks in conjunction with hyperbaricinterventions.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHealthForce Partners, LLC Bothell, WA Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FORTHIS CONTRACT20. Example ProjectKey Number321. Title and Location (City and State) 22. Year CompletedLake Mead Tunnel (Water Intake #3) Professional Services Construction (if applicable)Boulder City, NV 2008 N/A23. Project Owner’s Informationa. Project Owner b. Point of Contact Name c. Point of ContactNevada Occupational Safety andAdministrationJohn Hutchinson24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (include scope, size, and cost)Telephone Number(702) 486-9064Intake No. 3 is a $447 million project designed to draw water from Lake Mead during extremely low water levels. Componentsinclude an intake tunnel constructed under high water pressures using a hybrid slurry/EPBM lined with a bolted, gasketed,segmental lining; three 600-foot-deep shafts, interconnection tunnels, an underground pumping chamber, and a pumping station.Dr. Kay reviewed the hyperbaric manual and equipment safety, and attended meetings and evaluated policies and procedures. Healso advised OSHA directly regarding safety issues in all aspects of the operation. His services also included consultations, on-sitesafety inspections, curriculum development, manuals/materials, training, and other duties as defined in the procedures manual.In addition, his work included the following:• Provided input to establish protocols and procedures relating to compressed air work in coordination with the contractor• As requested by the contractor, established policies on non-emergent, emergent care, and emergency transport• Ensured that the project’s Hyperbaric Manual was complete, updated as needed, and in compliance with applicablecodes and regulations• Reviewed all hazards related to compressed air work and developed specific interventions for each identified hazard• In conjunction with the contractor, reviewed all emergency procedures with the project safety team• Worked in conjunction with the contractor and the safety team to review all “near miss” accidents and develop “lessonslearned”• Reviewed all work site accidents, injuries, and incidents with the contractor and provided expertise, as needed• Reviewed anonymous work place hazard reports with the contractor• Made himself available on-call as needed, if the contractor’s hyperbaric team required immediate, on-site consultations• Performed hyperbaric training as requested by the contractor• Established and reviewed medical supplies for compressed air work to be purchased by the contractor• Reviewed medical files, as required, to verify fitness to work in compressed air environmentsRelevance to the SR 99 Bored Tunnel ProjectDr. Kay’s work on this project is directly relevant to the work he will be performing on the SR 99 CM services project. As neededand as requested by WSDOT, Dr. Kay will perform the tasks described above for the SR 99 CM Services project. He will provideoversight of the design-builder’s hyperbaric team to help WSDOT manage costs and risks in conjunction with hyperbaricinterventions.a.25. Firms from Section C Involved with This Project(1) Firm Name (2) Firm Location (City and State) (3) RoleHealthForce Partners, LLC Bothell, WA Hyperbaric Medical ConsultantSTANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS26. Names of Key Personnel(from Section E, Block 12)Edmond Kay, MD-27. Role in This Contract(from Section E, Block 13)Hyperbaric Interventions –Technical Advisor 29. Example Projects Key28. Example Projects Listed in Section F(Fill in “Example Projects Key” section below before completingtable. Place “X” under project key number for participation insame or similar role)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No. Title of Example Project (from Section F) No. Title of Example Project (from Section F)1Brightwater Project Conveyance Systems Tunnel (East,West, and Central)62 Beacon Hill Station and Tunnels Project 73 Lake Mead Tunnel (Water Intake #3) 84 95 10STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Provide any Additional Information Requested by the Agency. Attach Additional Sheets as Needed.Hyperbaric Physician ConsultingThe HealthForce Hyperbaric Project Physician will work closely with Parson’s personnel and participate in many activities andjobsite responsibilities – tailored to the needs of the specific job.Review/Revise the Medical portion of the Hyperbaric Manual, and Saturation Diving protocolThe Hyperbaric Manual and Saturation Diving Protocol is a complex document written to comply with OHSA standards, and tospecify the operational and emergency procedures affecting compressed air workers. The manual reflects current scientificknowledge on various topics, establishes the methods of worker protection, and also specifies the response to personal injury.Variances from old rules are at times required to reflect improvements in engineering, equipment, scientific knowledge, andchanging professional attitudes regarding worker safety. As the project physician, we will help administration, project engineers,OHSA inspectors and other non-medical personnel understand the physiological stresses that the human body is subjected to in ahyperbaric environment. The project physician will review the safety of decompression tables, the risk of decompression Illnessand Gas Embolism and many other complex issues to ensure worker safety.I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEThe foregoing is a statement of facts.31. Signature 32. Date1/13/2011STANDARD FORM 330 (6/2004)

Additional Staff ResumesTab 1 Additional Staff ResumesTab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5

Additional Staff Resumes Showing Depth of ResourcesShimi Tzobery, PE, TBM Maintenance/Intervention Monitoring, ParsonsOVERVIEWShimi Tzobery is a senior construction manager with more than 17years of experience in designing, coordinating, and managing complexdomestic and international tunneling construction projects, includinghighway, rail, drainage, and water infrastructure. He is experiencedin tunnel construction and design management in different typesof ground conditions from hard and soft rock to soft ground, and hasmanaged construction efforts using TBMs, roadheaders, the drill andblast method, and sequential excavation methods (SEM/NATM).New York City’s Harbor Siphon Water Tunnel, New York, NY: Shimiserved as the Tunnel Designer for a 1.8-mile-long, 12-foot diameter,harbor-crossing tunnel in soft ground between Staten Island and Brooklyn.He performed preliminary and final design, including geotechnicalreports and drawing reviews, tunnel and shaft support calculations, andpreparation of feasibility construction evaluations, along with tunneltechnical specifications. The project used an EPBM and a slurry TBM fortunnel excavation.TBM Factory Inspection for Lake Mead Intake No. 3, Southern NevadaWater Authority: Shimi provided TBM consultation and inspection servicesas an owner’s representative at a TBM factory (Herrenknecht) in Germany.He inspected and witnessed testing of a mix shield slurry TBM with hard rockexcavation capability for the construction of the $460 million, three-mile-longwater Intake# 3 tunnel project.Jeremy Wehner, PE, Monitoring/Instrumentation Engineer, ParsonsOVERVIEWJeremy Wehner is a Principal Engineer with more than 15 years ofdiverse civil engineering experience in design and construction,including complex transportation and heavy civil projects in a designbuildenvironment. He specializes in geotechnical engineering,constructability reviews, and construction services. He has constructionexperience in a wide variety of geologic settings including hard rock,hard and soft shale, expansive soil, sediment, sludge, and soft marineclays and marshes on both the east and west coasts. His experience alsoincludes a wide variety of QC testing and monitoring for soil, concrete,asphalt, and geosynthetics, and construction of utilities using trenchlesstechnologies. Jeremy is experienced with design-build projects.Edward Cording, PhD, Settlement - Technical Advisor, Consultant to ParsonsOVERVIEWDr. Ed Cording (Design Technical Review Committee and peer review)brings expertise in the tunneling industry and impacts to adjacentstructures in urban areas to the team.He is a professor emeritus from the University of Illinois, Urbana,specializing in tunneling, and has served as an industry leader in expertreview and disputes review panels throughout the nation and theworld.Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Pioneer Crossing, Lehi, UT: Jeremy was the Geotechnical Managerfor this $180 million design-build project, including the constructionof two major bridges. He was responsible for coordinating andreviewing the work of two geotechnical design subcontractors, whichincluded instrumentation and monitoring of large fills constructed oncompressible soil.I-70 Hanging Lake Tunnels, Glenwood Springs, CO: Jeremy served asthe Lead Inspector for this tunnel inspection project. He led a team of fiveinspectors who carefully mapped the cracks in the tunnel liner, and installedcrack gauges in key locations that will be monitored in future inspections.Faculty, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Urbana-Champaign, IL: Ed is a teacher and researcher in geotechnicalengineering, emphasizing the observation and analysis of behavior ofprojects in rock and soil, using the field as the laboratory in the areasof rock mechanics and rock engineering, soil-structure interaction, andexcavation and underground construction in rock and soil. His primaryareas of expertise include shield tunnel, braced excavations, buildingdistortions, and retaining walls. Ed also has experience as a GeotechnicalConsultant including pre-bid geotechnical studies, assessment andcontrol of building damage, braced excavations, evaluation and designof rock cuts, and design of linings and control of ground movement fortunnels in soil.

Tim Daley, Vent Building Mechanical/Finishes - Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWMcClellan Air Force Base, Sacramento, CA: Tim was the QATim Daley is a Mechanical Engineer with over 23 years of experiencein managing and delivering construction projects. He has had broadexperience including inspection (with emphasis on mechanicalsystems), QC, project engineering, estimating, project management,Representative for an Air Force client responsible for submittal reviewand contract compliance inspections on major projects includingrenovation of the plating shop and hazardous waste secure storagefacility. (The base has since closed).and energy audits. Tim has experience with most delivery methods Project Manager – Various Mechanical Contractors: As the Projectincluding design-build, and has employment experience with the U.S. Manager, Tim was responsible for all aspects of delivering mechanicalArmy Corps of Engineers, mechanical design-build contractors, and systems design and installation on major projects including the $60 millionproject management/CM firms.Wave Technologies Data Center, the $60 million FAA Sacramento TerminalRadar and Approach Facility (TRACON), and the $10 million Sacramento KingsPractice Facility.Lee Moore, Jr., Grouting/Ground Improvements - Inspection, CMTSOVERVIEWLee Moore has over seven years of underground and heavy civilexperience, including tunnel and deep shaft construction. He hasprovided QC inspection services for tunneling, micro-tunneling,and deep shaft construction in varied soil conditions and below thegroundwater table. Lee is experienced in CSM, secant piles and jetgrouting techniques, and pipeline work. He is accustomed to workingin congested areas and on rotating shifts.Robert Meshew, C.Eng, Safety Manager, HalcrowOVERVIEWRobert Meshew has over 30 years of experience as a Safety Manager andMiner for tunneling projects, with a focus on ensuring and promoting safetyin the workplace. He is an ideal Safety Manager because of his extensiveexperience working as a miner in the tunnels. He understands the uniquework environment and risks at hand. Robert’s highest priority is to ensurethat personnel are trained and educated in the hazards of the workplace,and empowered to perform their functions safely in conjunction with theoverall safety culture and program designed for the project.Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99East Side Willamette River CSO Program, Portland, OR: This project’sscope includes construction of a 30,000 foot long, 22-foot diameter tunnel,seven tunnel shafts, and 9,000 feet of new pipelines. Lee was responsible forinspection of shaft and microtunnel construction.Willamette River CSO Program – Balch Consolidated Conduit, Portland,OR: The scope of work includes an 8,500-foot pipeline constructed at depthsof 20 to 75 feet below the ground surface. Lee provided QC inspections forthe project.Ivanhoe Mines Copper Gold Deposit - Oyu Tolgoi, Mongolia: As aSupervisor, Robert trained the miners to install the shaft portal in Tolgoi,Mongolia, where they sunk the deepest mine ever in Mongolia at 1,385meters.East Side Willamette River CSO Program, Portland, OR: This project’s scopeincludes construction of a 30,000 foot long, 22-foot diameter tunnel, seventunnel shafts, and 9,000 feet of new pipelines. Robert joined the tunnelingteam in March 2010, bringing his inspection expertise in tunneling to helpcomplete the project four months ahead of schedule.Robert Rogers, Hyperbaric Specialist, ParsonsOVERVIEWRobert Rogers has over 30 years of experience with all phases ofunderwater, surface, and underground construction. He is experiencedwith the methods of hyperbaric work in underground constructionand associated underwater work. Robert is also experienced in surfaceprojects and confined spaces, excavation, and shoring using a variety ofmethods.Emergency Storage Project, San Diego, CA: Robert is the UndergroundSafety Manager on this project, which includes multiple tunnels, concretestorage tanks, a power-generating station, and various pumping facilitiesthat work together to store and distribute water around the county.His responsibilities include on-site management of tunnel contractorpersonnel, using the Water Authority’s schedule-driven safety process.South Bay Ocean Outfall in San Diego, CA: Robert was the Tunnel SafetyRepresentative for this project. This hyperbaric project is a tunnel under thePacific Ocean that connects two wastewater treatment plants to an offshorediffuser line. Robert created a program to train, evaluate, and care for workersgoing into high air pressure and decompression aboard the TBM.

Edmond Kay, MD, Hyperbaric Interventions, HealthForce PartnersOVERVIEWEdmond Kay, MD, joined HealthForce Occupational Medicine as theDirector of Hyperbaric Medicine in 2008. Over the last 23 years, he hasprovided technical consultation, oversight, and specialized training inmany diverse hyperbaric environments such as explosive ordinancedisposal, confined space extraction (mine safety), monoplace hospitalhyperbaric facilities (wound care), and multi-place diving operations.Joshua Cheatham, PE, Tunnel and Traffic Systems - Inspection, ParsonsOVERVIEWJoshua Cheatham has more than 11 years of civil engineering experienceinvolving design, traffic, and CM for major highway projects. His projectwork experience includes right-of-way, limited access, maintenance-oftraffic,highway detours, and temporary erosion control and sedimentplans, as well as hydraulic, roadway, structural, and sign design.When he worked for WSDOT, Joshua successfully led both designand construction projects, including the delivery of the first highoccupancy-tolllane project in Washington State.Beacon Hill Light Rail Tunnel, Seattle, WA: Dr. Kay providedconsultation, meetings, on-site safety inspections, curriculumdevelopment, and manuals/materials, as well as taught selected coursesand performed other duties as defined in the procedures manual.Brightwater East Project Conveyance Systems Tunnel, Woodinville,WA: Dr. Kay provided consultation, meetings, on-site safety inspections,curriculum development, and manuals/materials, as well as taught selectedcourses and performed other duties as defined in the procedures manual.He also developed compression/decompression policies and procedures.I-405 Corridor Program, Seattle, WA: While working for WSDOT,Joshua was the Traffic Engineer for this program, which involves theimplementation of a $1.5 billion program for improvements along acongested 30-mile corridor in the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. He ledthe team responsible for reviewing and approving the maintenance-of-trafficplans, performing traffic analyses, preparing preliminary signs, anddeveloping an intelligent transportation system (ITS) and illumination plansfor the RFPs.WSDOT – Active Traffic Management Design-Build Contract,Seattle, WA: Joshua is the Deputy Project Engineer for the project andresponsible for the day-to-day activities at the project site. The projectinvolves installing a series of speed limit, and lane status signs over each laneof I-5, I-90, and SR 520. He is responsible for budget reporting, change orders,contractor invoice reviews, and audits of the contractor’s quality program.Garold Bonner, PE, Claims/Estimating/Change Management, ParsonsOVERVIEWGerald Bonner is a Senior Program Director with more than 35 years ofexperience managing major projects including design and CM involvingthe most challenging tunneling and facilities projects in the world. Priorto joining Parsons in 2001, he held leading roles for major projects inEurope and the Middle East that required large-scale staff supervision ofboth technical specialists and subconsultants. He currently has similarresponsibilities and also serves as a Technical Director for tunneling forvarious Parsons’ projects worldwide. He has specialized knowledge oftunnel design and construction methods, including those required forsafe progress using slurry and EPBMs, and NATM and cut-and-covermethods.Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Dublin Port Access Tunnel, Dublin, Ireland; This $1.2 million, 4.5-kilometerlongtunnel contains twin 11.5-meter diameter tubes that were constructedusing TBMs, cut-and-cover, and mined tunneling methods under a residentialarea of Dublin. Prior to joining Parsons in 2001, Gerald was responsible for theoverall management, procurement, and implementation of the subsequentdesign-build contract. He managed the preliminary design and providedtechnical expertise, resulting in a deeper alignment and modern techniquesbeing selected for the tunnel construction, which subsequently afforded safeand cost-effective tunnel excavation and support.Egnatia Motorway, Greece: This 680-kilometer motorway included 189bridges totaling 40 kilometers in length and 50 tunnels with a combined lengthof over 42 kilometers and 35 major interchanges. Gerald was responsible forconstruction supervision of the technically challenging $1.8 billion central sectionof the four-lane motorway; overseeing the work of eight separate contractsthat included 15 kilometers of NATM and cut-and-cover tunnels, nine majorbalanced-cantilever bridges, and numerous culverts, and providing supervisionof the contractors’ operations. He established a geotechnical committee inpartnership with the client and contractors to make rapid decisions regardingrock support at the tunnel faces, which resulted in a relentless, safe progress.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Eric Ostfeld, PE, Quality Verification Plan, ParsonsOVERVIEWAs a Project Manager for Parsons, Eric Ostfeld has over 13 years ofbroad engineering experience that includes the design of structures,hydraulics, roadways, and environmental permitting. He has extensiveexperience on large and complex projects performing constructionand project management on projects ranging from $50,000 to $995million, as well as more than seven years of design-build experience.Eric has been employed by and had clients in private and public sectors,providing first-hand operational knowledge of both.Don Clark, PE, WSDOT Compliance and Reporting, ParsonsOVERVIEWDon Clark is currently assisting WSDOT with design oversight for theI-405 Corridor Program. He has 28 years of professional experience incivil and highway design and construction engineering. Don’s experienceincludes managing the design of highways, interchanges, local streets,and light rail transit. He also provides design quality management andvalue engineering services, and prepares cost estimates and constructionspecifications.Ed Masterson, Scheduler, ParsonsOVERVIEWEd Masterson has 36 years of project controls experience. In his capacityas a project controls manager/engineer, Ed has extensive schedulingand cost control experience. He has established project and corporatefinancial systems for the purposes of tracking, reporting, controlling,and managing. He uses state-of-the-art software to develop andmaintain schedule and cost control systems. Ed routinely providesall management levels with reports that are necessary for them tounderstand the project’s status.Northwest Anthony Henday Drive, P3, Edmonton, Canada: Ericwas the Design-Build Coordinator for this $995 million, 21-kilometerlonggreenfield project that included 29 bridges. Included in his designmanagement responsibilities was development and maintenance of theDesign Quality Management Plan.Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Tacoma, WA: This congestion and safetyimprovement project was the first major design-build project for WSDOT. Ericimplemented an audit system collaboratively with WSDOT’s consultants totrack compliance with the Quality Management Plan, performed field andmanagement system audits, and tracked non-conforming audit findingsthrough resolution to ensure satisfactory outcomes.I-405 Corridor Program, Seattle, WA: As the Design Manager forthe I-405/South Bellevue Widening project, Don was responsible forcoordinating the review of over 1,200 design submittals by the I-405team’s design discipline leads. He is currently providing roadway designoversight for the I-405/Braided Ramps project. Don is ensuring that thedesign-builder’s plans and specifications conform to WSDOT’s standardsand other contract requirements.I-5, Everett HOV Design-Build Project, WA: Don was responsiblefor roadway design oversight. He reviewed the design-builder’s plansand specifications to check conformance to WSDOT standards and othercontract requirements. He also managed the development andimplementation of a process to audit design submittals for conformanceto contract requirements, using WSDOT’s Construction Audit TrackingSystem (CATS).SR 532 Corridor Improvements, Stanwood and Camano Island,WA: Ed is the Project Scheduler for this $50 million design-build projectthat includes the replacement of the General Mark W. Clark MemorialBridge over the west passage of the Stillaguamish River. The schedule iscost-loaded and used as the primary monthly invoicing document.Seattle-Tacoma Airport Program Management, Seattle, WA: Edrepresented the owner as the Program Scheduler for this infrastructureprogram. In this capacity, he developed and tracked design and constructionof more than 130 projects. At peak, there were over 80 projects in design, andon average, 14 in construction. These projects incorporated a variety of differentproject types such as communications, electrical, mechanical, tunneling (underfreeways and roadways), plumbing (firewater), cooling towers, roads, andbaggage conveyor systems.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Anthony Harding, C.Eng, Tunnel Task Force, HalcrowOVERVIEWAnthony Harding has 12 years of experience in management and designof multi-disciplinary contracts including station design, road, and railtunnels, covering project management, design coordination, interfacemanagement, and leading medium-sized teams within large projects.He also has experiemce in the design of underground structures,including large-diameter, segmental-lined tunnels, cut-and-coverstructures, shafts, and sprayed concrete linings in rock and soft ground.Robert Desrosiers, Tunnel Systems/Mechanical, ParsonsOVERVIEWRobert Desrosiers is a Senior ITS Engineer with more than 30 yearsof design and CM experience. He has solid experience in providingsystem integrator oversight for roadway and tunnel systems, as well ascommissioning efforts.Peter Bates, C.Eng, Tunnel Systems/Mechanical, HalcrowOVERVIEWPeter Bates has more than 25 years of experience in design, installationmanagement, and supervision of electrical and mechanical projectsin the UK, Asia, and Europe. He has extensive experience in design,installation, and testing and commissioning of mechanical and electricalequipment on urban and rural highways (open roadways and tunnels)and railways in Asia and Europe, and utilities infrastructure in the MiddleEast and North Africa. Peter has special expertise in the integration ofcomplex mechanical and electrical systems.Brisbane Airport Link, Brisbane, Australia: Anthony was the Design Lead forcivil and structural elements for 2 kilometers of twin-bore, 11.34-meter interiordiameter, steel fiber reinforced segmental TBM tunnels, cross passages, andinternal structures including traffic support structures and smoke ducts. Hisresponsibilities included resource planning, requirements definition, technicalquality, and delivery to schedule.Brisbane North/South Bypass Tunnel, Australia: Anthony performed tenderdesign of this 11-meter interior diameter, segmental lining for a twin bore roadtunnel. The design included conventional and fiber-reinforced options, waterpressures of up to 6.5 bar, and fire design to hydrocarbon curve, includingexpansion effects on lining/ground interface.Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project, Boston, MA: Robert provided CMservices for Boston’s Central Artery/Tunnel project ITS. The ITS is the largestdeployment of an ITS for an urban roadway/tunnel in the United States. Healso reviewed contractor submittals and conducted site acceptance testingand inspection of installations.Al Salam Street Tunnel Project, Abu Dhabi, UAE: Robert is the SCADAITS Specialist for this project, which covers a total length of 2.5 miles,including 1.5 miles of tunnel roadway beneath the Al Salam Streetarterial. The project includes an extensive ($95 million) deployment ofSCADA and ITS systems with dual control room and remote camera tocamera (C2C) communications to the DOT’s traffic management center.Robert is responsible for design review and CM of the installation andsystems integration of the SCADA and ITS systems.London City Airport Extension on Dockland Light Railway, Woolwich,UK: Peter is the on-site engineer responsible for coordinating withutility companies and the fire authority, design reviews, and contractor’splant and equipment proposals for mechanical (pumping, drainage, andventilation) and electrical systems high voltage (HV) and low voltage(LV) cabling and distribution, DC traction power, lighting, fire protection,SCADA, ticket vending and validation, lifts, and escalators), installationand testing methodologies, coordination with civil disciplines, andensuring interface provisions.Manila LRT 2 Project, Philippines: Halcrow provided final design and CMfor a 14-kilometer, dual track line with one underground and 10 elevatedstations, and a depot. Peter was the electrical team leader responsible formanaging local staff in the liaison with utility companies to support thedetailed design, and provided construction supervision and testing of electricalfacilities and systems at 11 stations (one underground with approach tunnels)and a 5 hectare maintenance workshop and train stabling depot.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99John Bumanis, PE, Tunnel Systems/Mechanical, ParsonsOVERVIEWJohn Bumanis is a Mechanical Engineer with more than 35 yearsof experience in planning and designing heating, ventilation, andair conditioning systems for subway and road tunnel facilities.His engineering services include preparing design calculations,specifications, and drawings; computer simulations; design reviews;developing and revising design standards; preparing reports coveringmechanical equipment maintenance; and participating in field surveysand testing. John’s assignments also include resolving constructionproblems, mechanical equipment shop drawing reviews, and variousstudies involving the evaluation of mechanical systems. He is currently amember of the National Fire Protection Association 130 committee.Peter Woodburn, C.Eng, Tunnel Systems/Mechanical, HalcrowOVERVIEWPeter Woodburn has over 20 years of experience in fire life safety (FLS)engineering, smoke control, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD)analysis, particularly in the area of tunnels and underground fire safety.His specialization is tunnel ventilation and smoke control in complextunnel arrangements for road, rail, and utility tunnels, and supportingdesign development through analysis. He manages analysis and designof projects and works with a broad range of key clients across a widerange of markets.More broadly, Peter has extensive experience in fluid mechanics analysisfor a wide range of sectors, including safety engineering, ventilation,gas and pollutant dispersion, and explosions.Peter performed the bid stage design of ventilation fire-life safetysystems for the SR 99 Design-Build project.Bill Elkey, PE, SE, Interior Structures, ParsonsOVERVIEWBill is an Engineering Manager with more than 15 years of design andmanagerial experience involving major highway and railroad bridges,retaining walls, and tunnels. His experience in bridge and tunneldesign includes feasibility studies, conceptual plans, cost estimates,and preparation of plans and specifications for both highway and railstructures.Izmir-Aydin Motorway; Izmir, Turkey: John was the Chief MechanicalEngineer responsible for the ventilation and fire suppression system designfor an approximately two-mile long tunnel. This $5 million project involveddesign and construction of a 3-kilometer-long, twin-tube road tunnel.Mechanical work involved the design of a fire standpipe system complete withwater storage tank and fire pump. Mechanical ventilation was provided by ajet fan longitudinal system designed for carbon monoxide and diesel smokecontrol during normal operations, and smoke control during an emergencysituation involving a fire.Dubai Airport Tunnel, Dubai, UAE: John was the Senior Mechanical Engineerresponsible for developing design criteria and performing final design forhighway tunnel ventilation for the Dubai Airport tunnel. In addition to tunnelventilation for normal, congested, and emergency operating modes, the designincluded a fire suppression system. The project involved the construction ofapproximately 1.5 kilometers of tunnel using the cut-and-cover method.Canada Evergreen Line Rapid Transit: Peter was the Lead Ventilationand Fire Life Safety Engineer for the preliminary design of the ventilationand smoke control system for the 2-kilometer-long new LRT tunnel for theproposed Evergreen Line. The tunnel ventilation and FLS systems weredeveloped extensively to allow increased train throughput in the tunnels.DLR Woolwich Extension, UK: The 2.5-kilometer LRT extensionincluded 1.9 kilometers of twin-bore tunnels, with an internaldiameter of 5.3 meters. The project also includes a major interventionshaft and headhouse, which accommodates power distribution andcommunications systems. Peter was responsible for the fire safetyengineering for the new tunnels and station, including development ofthe fire safety strategy, and design of the smoke control system includingperformance analysis using 1-D and 3-D CFD methods.SR 532 Corridor Improvements, Stanwood and Camano Island,WA: Bill is the Engineer of Record for this $50 million design and constructionproject that includes the replacement of the General Mark W. ClarkMemorial Bridge over the west passage of the Stillaguamish River. Hisresponsibilities include overseeing all structural design efforts andinterdisciplinary coordination, leading structural task force meetings withWSDOT, and monitoring the budget and schedule. The project wascompleted ahead of schedule and within budget.Little Calumet Tunnel, MWRDGC, Chicago, IL: Bill was a StructuralEngineer for the lining design for the Little Calument Tunnel as partof the deep tunnel program for the Metropolitan Water ReclamationDistrict of Greater Chicago. He was responsible for the design of the castin-placetunnel lining of the drop shafts and vaults, including bedrockand soft ground analysis using 3-D modeling tools.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build Construction Management Services SR 99Greg Orsolini, PE, Structures - Technical Advisor, ParsonsOVERVIEWGreg Orsolini is a Structural Engineer and Principal Project Manager withover 30 years of experience in the analysis, design, and preparation ofPS&Es for transportation projects, including highway bridges, tunnels,retaining structures, and intersections. His experience includes thedesign of cut-and-cover tunnels, NATM tunneling, suspension andcable-stayed bridges, precast and cast-in-place post-tensioned concretebox girders, incrementally launched concrete box girders, prestressedconcrete I-beams, precast concrete segmental box girders, a steel-tiedarch, incrementally launched and conventional steel box girders, andsteel plate girders. Greg is also knowledgeable in current seismic analysistechniques and related design principles for bridges and undergroundstructures.Kimo Okamitsu, PE, SE Structures - Technical Advisor, ParsonsOVERVIEWKimo Okamitsu is a senior project manager and a licensed structural.He has more than 25 years of structural engineering experience inmanagement and the design of highway, rail, and pedestrian bridgesand cut-and-cover tunnels, port and harbor marine structures, andcommercial and industrial buildings. In addition to managing anddesigning new structures, Kimo also has extensive experience involvingupgrading existing structures to resist seismic events.Arun Bhalaik, PE, Interior Structures, HalcrowOVERVIEWArun Bhalaik has over 34 years of diverse, worldwide experience inproject management, design and construction of tunnels, commercialand industrial buildings, and facilities. He is a structural engineer andhas led the engineering design for large and complex projects. Arun isexperienced and knowledgeable in performance-based seismic designof structures, and has extensive experience in the design of precast,prestressed concrete construction. He has been involved with the designof concrete segments for several, segmental-lined tunnels.Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Program, Contra Costa andAlameda Counties, CA: Greg is the Project Manager for consultantservices for a new fourth bore for the Caldecott Tunnel on Highway 24using NATM with secant piles supporting the portal walls. He managedthe technical design for the new fourth bore tunnel structures, anoperations and maintenance center, tunnel traffic control and securitysystems, ventilation and fire suppression, and electrical substations. Heis currently managing engineering support during construction.Tacoma Narrows Bridge, Tacoma, WA: Greg was responsible forthe design of the suspension bridge towers, tower foundations, andgravity anchorages. He managed the structural concept development,final analysis and design, hydraulic studies, geotechnical investigation,and detailed component seismic analysis of the towers, caissons, andanchorages.Caldecott Tunnel Improvement Project, Alameda County & Contra CostaCounty, CA: Kimo Provided oversight of the structural design of the tunnelportals which consist of cut-and-cover concrete sections, and the structuraldesign lead for the design of a 2500 square-foot, two-story Operations,Maintenance, and Control Building.Tacoma Narrows Parallel Bridge, Tacoma, WA: Kimo was the caissonfoundation design lead and was responsible for the design of the caissonfoundations which support each of the suspension bridge towers. Eachcaisson measures 80 ft. by 130 ft. in plan with a maximum depth of 233 feet.Sound Transit–University Link Tunnels, Seattle, WA: The scopeof work included the design of 19-foot-diameter concrete segmentaltunnels with ground cover varying from 15 to 300 feet. Arun was theEngineer of Record, responsible for reviewing and approving thestructural calculations and design checks for the concrete tunnelsegments for in-situ static and seismic conditions, as well as static anddynamic loads from the construction means and methods.Willamette River CSO Program - East Side CSO, Portland, OR: Thescope of work included the design of a 22-foot internal diameter, concretesegmental tunnel using steel fiber reinforcement. Arun was the Engineerof Record who reviewed and approved the structural calculations anddesign checks for the tunnel segments for static and dynamic loads fromthe construction means and methods.

Bored Tunnel Alternative Design-Build ProjectDesign Build Construction Management Services SR 99Adam Fredericks, PE, CM Plan Development, ParsonsOVERVIEWAdam is a Project Manager with more than 13 years of civil engineeringexperience in design, management, and construction of complex andhigh-profile transportation projects. His expertise includes projectmanagement, estimating, budgeting, financial reporting, scheduling,management of resources, and contract negotiations. He also has heavycivil construction experience in grading, utilities, and bridges. Adamis familiar with WSDOT’s Standard Specifications and the MUTCD, aswell as the Federal OSHA standards and the Washington State WISHAstandards.SR 532 Corridor Improvements Design-Build, StanwoodCamano Island, WA: As the Deputy Project Manager, Adam is responsiblefor coordination of the design and construction of the project, includingoverseeing the design sequence and priorities. He coordinates directlywith WSDOT in the design task force meetings. Adam is also responsiblefor scheduling, budgeting, and cost estimating.Lacey Crossroads, Lacey, WA: As the Project Manager/Estimator for this$10 million project, Adam was responsible for the overall schedule andcost of the project. He scheduled resources and productivity, conductedestimates, prepared budgets, and coordinated with multiple owners (15at one time) and future tenants to address their unique constructionconcerns and associated costs.

Licenses and RegistrationsTab 1 Tab 2 Licenses and RegistrationsTab 4 Tab 5

Prime and Sub Information Packet FormPrime and SubTab 1 Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 5Information Packet Form

Parsons

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesPrimeFirm:Parsons Transportation Group Inc. 3,150Address:600 University Street, Suite 700Number of Employees:City: State: Zip Code: County:Seattle Washington 98101 KingPhone: Fax: Company Web Site:(206) 494-3101 (206) 494-0960 www.parsons.comFed. Tax ID Number:36-0982270Unified Business IdentifierNumber:D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):Contact Person:6010811351929 8711 (Engineering Services) 541330 (Engineering Services)Rick Chapman, PEEmail:N/ARick.Chapman@parsons.comFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ] Partnership [ ] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ✔] Subchapter S Corp. [ ] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ] $0 to $1 Million [ ] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ✔] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:Parsons offers a full range of engineering services: Program and project management; project controls;environmental,including water quality and stormwater management; planning; economic analysis; permitting;alternative project delivery;construction management; and comprehensive transportation and traffic engineering forhighway, rail, and marine.Note:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

Halcrow, Inc.

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesSub-consultantFirm:Halcrow, Inc.Address:22 Cortlandt St. 31st FloorNumber of Employees:City: State: Zip Code: County:Phone: Fax: Company Web Site:Fed. Tax ID Number:Unified Business IdentifierNumber:D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):2004 8711 (Engineering Services)541330 (Engineering Services)Contact Person:550 in North America and over 7,000 World WideNew York NY 10007 New York County(212) 608-3990 (212) 566-5059 www.halcrow.com20-1900891Mark JohnsonPendingEmail:N/Ajohnsonmc@halcrow.comFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ] Partnership [ ✔] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ] Subchapter S Corp. [ ] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ] $0 to $1 Million [ ] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ✔] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:Halcrow specializes in the provision of professional planning, design, and management services for infrastructuredevelopment worldwide. We provided full design and construction management services for all aspects of highway,transit and rail systems; whether for a completely new highway infrastructure, metro transit or railway line, anextension to an operating system, or the renovation and refurbishment of existing infrastructure.Note:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

CMTS, Inc.

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesSub-consultantFirm:Number of Employees:CMTS, Inc. 46Address:2 Union Square, 601 Union Street, 42 FloorCity: State: Zip Code: County:Seattle WA 98275 KingPhone: Fax: Company Web Site:(206) 652-3345 (503) 242-0094 www.cmtsinc.comFed. Tax ID Number:93-1176926Unified Business IdentifierNumber:601-925-746D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):1995 N/A237990 Other Heavy & CivilEngineering ConstructionContact Person:Email:Yvonne McClainymcclain@cmtsinc.comN/AFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ] Partnership [ ] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ✔] Subchapter S Corp. [ ] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ] $0 to $1 Million [ ✔] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:Program, Project and Construction ManagementTunnel, Electrical/Mechanical/Structural/Civil Inspection Services, CommissioningCost Estimating/Scheduling/Project Controls/Technical SupportNote:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

The VOSK Group

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesSub-consultantFirm:Number of Employees:The VOSK Group 2Address:4220 Whitman Ave. N.City: State: Zip Code: County:Seattle WA 98103 KingPhone: Fax: Company Web Site:(206) 501-7489 (206) 548-1173 www.thevoskgroup.comFed. Tax ID Number:51-0652138Unified Business IdentifierNumber:D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):Contact Person:602-768-386Email:W2F9620256D2F96202562007 8711 (Engineering Services) 541330 (Engineering Services)Stephanie Kirbyskirby@thevoskgroup.comFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ✔] Partnership [ ] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ] Subchapter S Corp. [ ] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ✔] $0 to $1 Million [ ] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:Construction Planning; Construction Management; Issue ResolutionNote:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

CRS Engineering Consultants, Ltd.

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesSub-consultantFirm:Number of Employees:CRS Engineering Consultants 1Address:The Old Schoolhouse, EdingaleCity: State: Zip Code: County:Tamworth United Kingdom B79 9JJPhone: Fax: Company Web Site:(44) (0) 1827 383425 (44) (0) 1827 383425 www.crsconsultants.co.ukFed. Tax ID Number:N/AUnified Business IdentifierNumber:D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):1999 N/AN/AContact Person:Chris SmithN/AEmail:N/Acrsconsultants@hotmail.comFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ] Partnership [ ] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ] Subchapter S Corp. [ ✔] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ✔] $0 to $1 Million [ ] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:Detailed design of precast concrete segmental tunnel liningsLogistics supply and manufacture of precast concrete segmental tunnel liningsNote:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

HealthForce Partners, LLC

Submittal Information FormProject Name or State of Washington Department of Transportation Notice to Consultants Alaskan Way Viaduct SR99 Bored TunnelRoster Category: Alternative Design-Build Project Design Build Construction Management ServicesSub-consultantFirm:Number of Employees:HealthForce Partners, LLC 45Address:11805 North Creek Parkway S Suite 113City: State: Zip Code: County:Bothell WA 98011 KingPhone: Fax: Company Web Site:(425) 806-5735 (425) 527-1814 www.healthforcepartners.comFed. Tax ID Number:27-1535285Unified Business IdentifierNumber:602-978-527D/M/WBE Certification Number:Year Firm Established: SIC Code (Name): NAICS Code (Name):20028011 (Offices and Clinics of Medical 621111 (Offices of Physicians) & 561110Doctors) & 8741 (Management Services) (Office Administrative Services)Contact Person:Email:Darin R. SmithN/Adarins@healthforcepartners.comFirm Type:[ ] Sole Proprietor [ ] Partnership [ ] C – Corp. [ ] Limited Partnership [ ] Subchapter S Corp. [ ✔] Limited Liability CompanyAnnual Gross Receipt:[ ] $0 to $1 Million [ ✔] $1 Million to $5 Million [ ] $5 Million to $10 Million [ ] $10 Million to $15 Million [ ] Over $15 MillionFirms Areas of Expertise:HealthForce is a single-source provider of workplace health solutions with a proven track record in OccupationalHealth and Hyperbaric Medical expertise.Note:Firm Name: Please ensure that the firm name listed is the same firm name that is legally assigned to the federaltax ID number. Please do not use: DBA’s – Doing Business As; Combination names when two firms are workingtogether; derivatives of your legal name; Acronyms; etc.Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number: If your firm does not have a UBI number for Washington State,please put pending in the box. You will be required to acquire a UBI Number if you are awarded the contract.

References/Past Performance EvaluationsTab 1 Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 4References/Past PerformanceEvaluations

Washington StateDepartment of TransportationPerformance EvaluationCompleted by ReferenceConsultant Name:ParsonsConsultant's Project Manager:Warren Hallam- Construction ManagerProject Name to be Evaluated on: (Work must have been completed within the last 3 years or is currently being performed.)Elwha River Bridge ReplacementType of Work:Roadway Design Plans Specs & EstimatesTransportation Study Right-of-Way X OtherConstruction / Construction ManagementContract Information: (Work must have been completed within the last 3 years or is currently being performed.)Start DateEnd DateDollar Amount of ServicesX Prime07/07 09/09 $16.8 Million ConstructionSubPerformance EvaluationRating CriteriaPlease rate each criteria on a scale of 1 to 10. 1 being low and 10 being high.1. Was the firm cooperative and responsive during any negotiations whether theywere budget related or work element related?Score1 - Low to 10 - High92. Did the firm complete the project within the total budgeted amount?3. Did the firm complete the project within the contract schedule(s)?4. Did the firm meet all of your technical standards and quality expectations?5. Was the firm's communication, both oral and written, clear and concise?6. Was the firm's project management system effective?Total Score(Total the score by adding the scores for criterias 1 through 6.)10101010958Average Score(Average the score by dividing the total score by the total number of criteria that was rated.)9.7Firm/Company Name:Clallam County Public WorksEvaluator Information:Evaluator's Name:Joe DonisiEvaluator's Title:Assistant County EngineerFirm/Company Address:223 East 4th Street Port Angeles, WA 98362Phone: 360-417-2404 Fax: 360-417-2513 Date: 01-06-11Distribution: X Original: Return to Consultant being evaluated; andX Copy: Fax to WSDOT at 360-705-6838