United <strong>State</strong>s will be used to assess the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change on flood magnitude.[Currently there are no regional pale<strong>of</strong>lood data <strong>for</strong> the eastern United <strong>State</strong>s,however, if they become available, they will incorporate them into the analyses.]These data then will be used to test and evaluate various assumptions <strong>of</strong> hydrologicmodeling scenarios <strong>of</strong> climate change effects on flood magnitude and frequency.We hope to stimulate discussion <strong>of</strong> research needs, including optimizing a balance <strong>of</strong>“ flood chasing” and detailed modeling approaches <strong>of</strong> pale<strong>of</strong>lood investigations. Ourresults indicate further research is needed that better accounts <strong>for</strong> physical processes <strong>of</strong>flooding, <strong>for</strong> sediment transport and deposition during flood conditions, and the need toimprove methods <strong>for</strong> estimating peak discharge <strong>of</strong> floods and pale<strong>of</strong>lood. There is muchwork to be done to improve our understanding <strong>of</strong> the distribution and location <strong>of</strong>sediment deposits and erosion thresholds <strong>of</strong> surfaces from extreme floods. A betterunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the physics <strong>of</strong> large flood response and better predictive capabilitiesthan those documented here is needed. Research is needed to identify other types <strong>of</strong>PSIs, if they exist, and to better understand geomorphic effectiveness <strong>of</strong> floods. Morequantification (e.g., using 1-D or 2-D hydraulic modelling to calculate pale<strong>of</strong>looddischarges, using absolute-age dating <strong>of</strong> flood deposits and validation <strong>of</strong> relative-agdatingmethods, particularly developing guidelines <strong>for</strong> more robust flood-frequencyparameter estimation procedures, regional flood-frequency analysis with pale<strong>of</strong>lood data,etc.) are essential <strong>for</strong> dam safety risk assessments, flood-inundation mapping, flood-plainmanagement, and related environmental investigations. While use <strong>of</strong> complexprocedures provide slightly more precise quantitative description <strong>of</strong> the data, dischargeand frequency estimates <strong>of</strong> extreme floods in a basin may be readily estimated by thecost-effective approach pale<strong>of</strong>lood techniques described above, the ability to havemultiple approaches that fits the needs and resources specific to a specific water-resources application are needed.Products include several reports and supporting journal articles summarizing unified,state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art techniques <strong>for</strong> flood-frequency estimation that have generalapplication <strong>for</strong> water-resources investigations. Recommendations will be proposed<strong>for</strong> changing the flood frequency analysis guidelines <strong>for</strong> consideration by the IACWDand other water management agencies. Benefits <strong>of</strong> the proposed study will includeimprove guidelines <strong>for</strong> flood hazard assessments, flood inundation mapping and asinput to risk assessments <strong>for</strong> determining appropriate levels <strong>of</strong> public safety,prioritizing projects, and allocating limited resources. A major benefit <strong>of</strong> theproposed study supports the National Flood Insurance Re<strong>for</strong>m Act <strong>of</strong> 1994 mandatesthat the Nation’s flood maps be revised in the near term and subsequently reviewedevery 5 years. The FEMA estimates that updates to existing flood insurance studiesand creating new maps <strong>for</strong> communities without mapping will cost between $800million and $1,000 million. FEMA’s Map Modernization Plan also emphasizes thatmore cost-effective methods to produce flood maps are essential.Concluding Remarks163Paper 20 – Jarrett et al
ReferencesBaker, V.R., Kochel, R.C., and Patton, P.C., (eds.), 1988, Flood Geomorphology, NewYork, John Wiley, 503 p.Changnon, David, and McKee, T.B., 1986, Economic impacts and analysis methods<strong>of</strong> extreme precipitation estimates <strong>for</strong> Eastern Colorado, Cooperative Institute <strong>for</strong>Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado <strong>State</strong> University, CIRA Paper No. 5, 75pp.Cudworth, A.G., Jr., 1989, Flood hydrology manual, U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation, AWater Resources Technical Publication, Lakewood, Colorado, 243 p.England, J.F. Jr., 1999, Draft User's manual <strong>for</strong> program EMA, at-site floodfrequency analysis with historical/paleohydrologic data. Flood Hydrology Group,Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation, Denver, CO, 52 p.Environmental News Network, 2001, Natural Disaster kill 25,000 worldwide in 2001,http//:www.enn.com/news/wirestories/2001/12/12312001/reu_disasters_45993.asp.Enzel, Y., Ely, L.L., House, P.K., Baker, V.R., and Webb, R.H., 1993, Pale<strong>of</strong>loodevidence <strong>for</strong> a natural upper bound to flood magnitudes in the Colorado RiverBasin: Water Resources Research, v. 29, no. 7, p. 2287-2297.Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1976, Flood Insurance Study,Town <strong>of</strong> Steamboat Springs, Routt Co., Colorado, revised 1983, 40 p._____, 1997a, Multihazard identification and Risk Assessment, A cornerstone <strong>of</strong> theNational Mitigation Strategy, Subpart C <strong>Hydrologic</strong> Hazards, Washington., D.C.,133-147._____, 1997b, Modernizing FEMA’s flood hazard mapping program - A progressReport, Washington, D.C., November 1997._____, 1998, Modernizing FEMA’s flood hazard mapping program - A progressreport, December 1998, URL: http://www.fema.gov/library/mapmod.pdfFoster, Jerry, 1999, Improving the state <strong>of</strong> the art in risk analysis, Hydro Review,38(6), p. 12-14.Gottesfeld, A.S., 1996, British Columbia flood scars: maximum flood-indicators,Geomorphology, 14, p. 319-325.Hansen, E.M., Schwarz, F.K., and Riedel, J.T., 1977, Probable maximum precipitationestimates, Colorado River and Great Basin Drainages, Hydrometeorological ReportNo. 49, NWS, NOAA, U.S. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Silver Spring, MD, 161 p.Hansen, E.M., Fenn, D.D., Schreiner, L.C., Stodt, R.W., and Miller, J.F., 1988, Probablemaximum precipitation estimates-United <strong>State</strong>s between the Continental Divide andthe 103rd meridian, Hydrometeorological Report 55A, NWS, NOAA, U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Silver Spring, MD, 242 p.House, P.K., Webb, R.H., Baker, V.R., and Levish, D.R. (editors), 2001, AncientFloods, Modern Hazards, Principles and Applications <strong>of</strong> Pale<strong>of</strong>lood Hydrology:American Geophysical Union, Water Science and Application 5, Washington,D.C., with accompanying CD-ROM, 385 pp.Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data (IACWD), 1982, Guidelines <strong>for</strong>determining flood-flow frequency (2nd ed., revised), Reston, Virginia, U.S.Geological Survey Office <strong>of</strong> Water Data Coordination, 28 p, 14 appendices.Paper 20 – Jarrett et al 164
- Page 1 and 2:
The National DamSafety ProgramResea
- Page 3 and 4:
collaboration and expertise, and th
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage #FOREWORD....
- Page 7 and 8:
NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND NEEDS IN SITE-
- Page 9 and 10:
FOREWORDThe Federal Emergency Manag
- Page 11 and 12:
The PMF represents an estimated upp
- Page 13 and 14:
RESEARCH AREASResearch needs were b
- Page 15 and 16:
Lack of Historical Data for Extreme
- Page 17 and 18:
should be developed that will allow
- Page 19 and 20:
• Storms used in HMR 55A and in t
- Page 21 and 22:
last 20,000 year s in submitting th
- Page 23 and 24:
d. USBR Guidelines Publication, Dam
- Page 25 and 26:
was severe. There was a potential,
- Page 27 and 28:
Thirdly, we must develop better way
- Page 29 and 30:
For most projects, the first step f
- Page 31 and 32:
Instead of lumping the loss rates t
- Page 33 and 34:
adjust the rating curve for when th
- Page 35 and 36:
In response to this situation, TVA
- Page 37 and 38:
TVA established a Regional Resource
- Page 39 and 40:
The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 41 and 42:
The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 43 and 44:
Late SpringRain on snow eventModel
- Page 45 and 46:
State of GeorgiaFEMA Workshop on Hy
- Page 47 and 48:
a. HEC1• DOS based program - glit
- Page 49 and 50:
Long te rm hydrologic needs include
- Page 51 and 52:
Current State and County PracticesA
- Page 53 and 54:
present standards and, as such, are
- Page 55 and 56:
Research Needs in Dam Safety Analys
- Page 57 and 58:
Looking at the four test cases give
- Page 59 and 60:
Hydrologic Analyses Related to Dam
- Page 61 and 62:
(iii) Modified Expected Cost Approa
- Page 63 and 64:
Parameter Estimation Based on Joint
- Page 65 and 66:
estimation of lag times and loss ra
- Page 67 and 68:
Hydrology for Dam Safety - Private
- Page 69 and 70:
Probable Maximum PrecipitationAll o
- Page 71 and 72:
The most common synthetic methods a
- Page 73 and 74:
the standard would be very conserva
- Page 75 and 76:
65Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 77 and 78:
67Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 79 and 80:
69Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 81 and 82:
REFERENCES1. U. S. Army Corps of En
- Page 83 and 84:
Overview of Flood Estimation Proced
- Page 85 and 86:
Extreme FloodsExtreme floods, the t
- Page 87 and 88:
Temporal patterns used to distribut
- Page 89 and 90:
Preliminary Estimates of Rainfall a
- Page 91 and 92:
24 to 72 hours). CRC Research Repor
- Page 93 and 94:
CURRENT AND FUTURE HYDROLOGIC RESEA
- Page 95 and 96:
ecause existing procedures are inad
- Page 97 and 98:
REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Decision BasisThe third feature of
- Page 101 and 102:
However, should it be revealed that
- Page 103 and 104:
supporting sub-processes. Therefore
- Page 105 and 106:
Probability ofFailure P f1Probabili
- Page 107 and 108:
Since any rigorous analysis is an i
- Page 109 and 110:
well, and usually do include subjec
- Page 111 and 112:
Against this background, there is n
- Page 113 and 114:
Howson, Colin., and Peter. Urbach.
- Page 115 and 116:
Procedures and Analysis Technologie
- Page 117 and 118: Currently transposition limits for
- Page 119 and 120: pro cedures are used to allow the h
- Page 121 and 122: Use of Atmospheric Models in Rainfa
- Page 123 and 124: mountain watersheds in response to
- Page 125 and 126: 18. Schaefer MG, Stochastic Modelin
- Page 127 and 128: dams which could be used to save li
- Page 129 and 130: Hydrodynamic modelMIKE 21 BACKGROUN
- Page 131 and 132: A FRAMEWORK FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF
- Page 133 and 134: c) Decision Level Risk Assessment:
- Page 135 and 136: credible estimates of extreme flood
- Page 137 and 138: Fitting a distribution to data sets
- Page 139 and 140: unoff volumes. Examples of this typ
- Page 141 and 142: used to estimate frequency distribu
- Page 143 and 144: Hosking, J.R.M., and J.R. Wallis, 1
- Page 145 and 146: in west central Arizona. The draina
- Page 147 and 148: Trial and error reservoir routings
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 1 Alamo DamAlamo Dam and Spi
- Page 151 and 152: Paper 19 - Chieh and Evelyn 146
- Page 153 and 154: esources are made to mitigate flood
- Page 155 and 156: implementing a risk-assessment meth
- Page 157 and 158: Typically, the elevation of the top
- Page 159 and 160: similar to that of the high-gradien
- Page 161 and 162: and provides a cost-effective frame
- Page 163 and 164: 10000E. Colorado
- Page 165 and 166: 10000x Peak Discharge95% confidence
- Page 167: An integrated science approach will
- Page 171 and 172: Partnerships, Proceeding of the 200
- Page 173 and 174: Flood HydrographThe flood hydrograp
- Page 175 and 176: A variety of data including informa
- Page 177 and 178: Improved Flood Frequency Extrapolat
- Page 179 and 180: RESEARCH NEEDS SUMMARYJerry Webb, H
- Page 181 and 182: o Unsteady flow computer models for
- Page 183 and 184: • Upd ate “Generalized Snowmelt
- Page 185 and 186: DISCUSSION1. Genera l - After the p
- Page 187 and 188: participant was asked to pick what
- Page 189 and 190: RISK ANALYSIS100Relative Comparison
- Page 191 and 192: WORKSHOPONHYDROLGIC RESEARCH NEEDSF
- Page 193: JOE SKUPIENPrincipal Hydraulic Engi