- Page 1 and 2:
The National DamSafety ProgramResea
- Page 3 and 4:
collaboration and expertise, and th
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage #FOREWORD....
- Page 7 and 8:
NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND NEEDS IN SITE-
- Page 9 and 10:
FOREWORDThe Federal Emergency Manag
- Page 11 and 12:
The PMF represents an estimated upp
- Page 13 and 14:
RESEARCH AREASResearch needs were b
- Page 15 and 16:
Lack of Historical Data for Extreme
- Page 17 and 18:
should be developed that will allow
- Page 19 and 20:
• Storms used in HMR 55A and in t
- Page 21 and 22:
last 20,000 year s in submitting th
- Page 23 and 24:
d. USBR Guidelines Publication, Dam
- Page 25 and 26:
was severe. There was a potential,
- Page 27 and 28:
Thirdly, we must develop better way
- Page 29 and 30:
For most projects, the first step f
- Page 31 and 32:
Instead of lumping the loss rates t
- Page 33 and 34:
adjust the rating curve for when th
- Page 35 and 36:
In response to this situation, TVA
- Page 37 and 38:
TVA established a Regional Resource
- Page 39 and 40:
The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 41 and 42:
The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 43 and 44:
Late SpringRain on snow eventModel
- Page 45 and 46:
State of GeorgiaFEMA Workshop on Hy
- Page 47 and 48:
a. HEC1• DOS based program - glit
- Page 49 and 50:
Long te rm hydrologic needs include
- Page 51 and 52:
Current State and County PracticesA
- Page 53 and 54:
present standards and, as such, are
- Page 55 and 56:
Research Needs in Dam Safety Analys
- Page 57 and 58:
Looking at the four test cases give
- Page 59 and 60:
Hydrologic Analyses Related to Dam
- Page 61 and 62:
(iii) Modified Expected Cost Approa
- Page 63 and 64:
Parameter Estimation Based on Joint
- Page 65 and 66:
estimation of lag times and loss ra
- Page 67 and 68:
Hydrology for Dam Safety - Private
- Page 69 and 70:
Probable Maximum PrecipitationAll o
- Page 71 and 72:
The most common synthetic methods a
- Page 73 and 74:
the standard would be very conserva
- Page 75 and 76:
65Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 77 and 78:
67Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 79 and 80:
69Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 81 and 82:
REFERENCES1. U. S. Army Corps of En
- Page 83 and 84:
Overview of Flood Estimation Proced
- Page 85 and 86:
Extreme FloodsExtreme floods, the t
- Page 87 and 88:
Temporal patterns used to distribut
- Page 89 and 90:
Preliminary Estimates of Rainfall a
- Page 91 and 92:
24 to 72 hours). CRC Research Repor
- Page 93 and 94:
CURRENT AND FUTURE HYDROLOGIC RESEA
- Page 95 and 96:
ecause existing procedures are inad
- Page 97 and 98:
REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Decision BasisThe third feature of
- Page 101 and 102:
However, should it be revealed that
- Page 103 and 104:
supporting sub-processes. Therefore
- Page 105 and 106:
Probability ofFailure P f1Probabili
- Page 107 and 108:
Since any rigorous analysis is an i
- Page 109 and 110:
well, and usually do include subjec
- Page 111 and 112:
Against this background, there is n
- Page 113 and 114:
Howson, Colin., and Peter. Urbach.
- Page 115 and 116:
Procedures and Analysis Technologie
- Page 117 and 118:
Currently transposition limits for
- Page 119 and 120:
pro cedures are used to allow the h
- Page 121 and 122:
Use of Atmospheric Models in Rainfa
- Page 123 and 124:
mountain watersheds in response to
- Page 125 and 126:
18. Schaefer MG, Stochastic Modelin
- Page 127 and 128:
dams which could be used to save li
- Page 129 and 130:
Hydrodynamic modelMIKE 21 BACKGROUN
- Page 131 and 132:
A FRAMEWORK FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF
- Page 133 and 134: c) Decision Level Risk Assessment:
- Page 135 and 136: credible estimates of extreme flood
- Page 137 and 138: Fitting a distribution to data sets
- Page 139 and 140: unoff volumes. Examples of this typ
- Page 141 and 142: used to estimate frequency distribu
- Page 143 and 144: Hosking, J.R.M., and J.R. Wallis, 1
- Page 145 and 146: in west central Arizona. The draina
- Page 147 and 148: Trial and error reservoir routings
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 1 Alamo DamAlamo Dam and Spi
- Page 151 and 152: Paper 19 - Chieh and Evelyn 146
- Page 153 and 154: esources are made to mitigate flood
- Page 155 and 156: implementing a risk-assessment meth
- Page 157 and 158: Typically, the elevation of the top
- Page 159 and 160: similar to that of the high-gradien
- Page 161 and 162: and provides a cost-effective frame
- Page 163 and 164: 10000E. Colorado
- Page 165 and 166: 10000x Peak Discharge95% confidence
- Page 167 and 168: An integrated science approach will
- Page 169 and 170: ReferencesBaker, V.R., Kochel, R.C.
- Page 171 and 172: Partnerships, Proceeding of the 200
- Page 173 and 174: Flood HydrographThe flood hydrograp
- Page 175 and 176: A variety of data including informa
- Page 177 and 178: Improved Flood Frequency Extrapolat
- Page 179 and 180: RESEARCH NEEDS SUMMARYJerry Webb, H
- Page 181 and 182: o Unsteady flow computer models for
- Page 183: • Upd ate “Generalized Snowmelt
- Page 187 and 188: participant was asked to pick what
- Page 189 and 190: RISK ANALYSIS100Relative Comparison
- Page 191 and 192: WORKSHOPONHYDROLGIC RESEARCH NEEDSF
- Page 193: JOE SKUPIENPrincipal Hydraulic Engi