- Page 1 and 2:
The National DamSafety ProgramResea
- Page 3 and 4:
collaboration and expertise, and th
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage #FOREWORD....
- Page 7 and 8:
NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND NEEDS IN SITE-
- Page 9 and 10:
FOREWORDThe Federal Emergency Manag
- Page 11 and 12:
The PMF represents an estimated upp
- Page 13 and 14:
RESEARCH AREASResearch needs were b
- Page 15 and 16:
Lack of Historical Data for Extreme
- Page 17 and 18:
should be developed that will allow
- Page 19 and 20:
• Storms used in HMR 55A and in t
- Page 21 and 22:
last 20,000 year s in submitting th
- Page 23 and 24: d. USBR Guidelines Publication, Dam
- Page 25 and 26: was severe. There was a potential,
- Page 27 and 28: Thirdly, we must develop better way
- Page 29 and 30: For most projects, the first step f
- Page 31 and 32: Instead of lumping the loss rates t
- Page 33 and 34: adjust the rating curve for when th
- Page 35 and 36: In response to this situation, TVA
- Page 37 and 38: TVA established a Regional Resource
- Page 39 and 40: The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 41 and 42: The Utah Hydrological ExperienceByM
- Page 43 and 44: Late SpringRain on snow eventModel
- Page 45 and 46: State of GeorgiaFEMA Workshop on Hy
- Page 47 and 48: a. HEC1• DOS based program - glit
- Page 49 and 50: Long te rm hydrologic needs include
- Page 51 and 52: Current State and County PracticesA
- Page 53 and 54: present standards and, as such, are
- Page 55 and 56: Research Needs in Dam Safety Analys
- Page 57 and 58: Looking at the four test cases give
- Page 59 and 60: Hydrologic Analyses Related to Dam
- Page 61 and 62: (iii) Modified Expected Cost Approa
- Page 63 and 64: Parameter Estimation Based on Joint
- Page 65 and 66: estimation of lag times and loss ra
- Page 67 and 68: Hydrology for Dam Safety - Private
- Page 69 and 70: Probable Maximum PrecipitationAll o
- Page 71 and 72: The most common synthetic methods a
- Page 73: the standard would be very conserva
- Page 77 and 78: 67Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 79 and 80: 69Paper 12 - Cecilio
- Page 81 and 82: REFERENCES1. U. S. Army Corps of En
- Page 83 and 84: Overview of Flood Estimation Proced
- Page 85 and 86: Extreme FloodsExtreme floods, the t
- Page 87 and 88: Temporal patterns used to distribut
- Page 89 and 90: Preliminary Estimates of Rainfall a
- Page 91 and 92: 24 to 72 hours). CRC Research Repor
- Page 93 and 94: CURRENT AND FUTURE HYDROLOGIC RESEA
- Page 95 and 96: ecause existing procedures are inad
- Page 97 and 98: REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNIC
- Page 99 and 100: Decision BasisThe third feature of
- Page 101 and 102: However, should it be revealed that
- Page 103 and 104: supporting sub-processes. Therefore
- Page 105 and 106: Probability ofFailure P f1Probabili
- Page 107 and 108: Since any rigorous analysis is an i
- Page 109 and 110: well, and usually do include subjec
- Page 111 and 112: Against this background, there is n
- Page 113 and 114: Howson, Colin., and Peter. Urbach.
- Page 115 and 116: Procedures and Analysis Technologie
- Page 117 and 118: Currently transposition limits for
- Page 119 and 120: pro cedures are used to allow the h
- Page 121 and 122: Use of Atmospheric Models in Rainfa
- Page 123 and 124: mountain watersheds in response to
- Page 125 and 126:
18. Schaefer MG, Stochastic Modelin
- Page 127 and 128:
dams which could be used to save li
- Page 129 and 130:
Hydrodynamic modelMIKE 21 BACKGROUN
- Page 131 and 132:
A FRAMEWORK FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF
- Page 133 and 134:
c) Decision Level Risk Assessment:
- Page 135 and 136:
credible estimates of extreme flood
- Page 137 and 138:
Fitting a distribution to data sets
- Page 139 and 140:
unoff volumes. Examples of this typ
- Page 141 and 142:
used to estimate frequency distribu
- Page 143 and 144:
Hosking, J.R.M., and J.R. Wallis, 1
- Page 145 and 146:
in west central Arizona. The draina
- Page 147 and 148:
Trial and error reservoir routings
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 1 Alamo DamAlamo Dam and Spi
- Page 151 and 152:
Paper 19 - Chieh and Evelyn 146
- Page 153 and 154:
esources are made to mitigate flood
- Page 155 and 156:
implementing a risk-assessment meth
- Page 157 and 158:
Typically, the elevation of the top
- Page 159 and 160:
similar to that of the high-gradien
- Page 161 and 162:
and provides a cost-effective frame
- Page 163 and 164:
10000E. Colorado
- Page 165 and 166:
10000x Peak Discharge95% confidence
- Page 167 and 168:
An integrated science approach will
- Page 169 and 170:
ReferencesBaker, V.R., Kochel, R.C.
- Page 171 and 172:
Partnerships, Proceeding of the 200
- Page 173 and 174:
Flood HydrographThe flood hydrograp
- Page 175 and 176:
A variety of data including informa
- Page 177 and 178:
Improved Flood Frequency Extrapolat
- Page 179 and 180:
RESEARCH NEEDS SUMMARYJerry Webb, H
- Page 181 and 182:
o Unsteady flow computer models for
- Page 183 and 184:
• Upd ate “Generalized Snowmelt
- Page 185 and 186:
DISCUSSION1. Genera l - After the p
- Page 187 and 188:
participant was asked to pick what
- Page 189 and 190:
RISK ANALYSIS100Relative Comparison
- Page 191 and 192:
WORKSHOPONHYDROLGIC RESEARCH NEEDSF
- Page 193:
JOE SKUPIENPrincipal Hydraulic Engi