Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...
Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...
Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SummaryIn <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> English, when prior attainment <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r background characteristics were taken intoaccount, pupils following a condensed course in <strong>Year</strong> 7 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 8 at Phase 1 <strong>Project</strong> schools achievedtest scores in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 Optional Tests that were not significantly different from those <strong>of</strong> pupils<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same age who attended Phase 1 Comparison schools.Among <strong>the</strong> pupils who were selected by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Project</strong> schools for early entry to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 tests,taking into account <strong>the</strong> test level achieved at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2, similar proportions achieved <strong>the</strong> nationalbenchmark level (Level 5) as among <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils across <strong>the</strong> country as a whole. This is anencouraging finding. However, it should be borne in mind that <strong>Project</strong> schools were advised only toenter pupils who were predicted to achieve <strong>the</strong> nationally expected level in those tests whereas o<strong>the</strong>rschools entered all <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils. The <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 test results also show that <strong>Year</strong> 8 entrants from<strong>Project</strong> schools were less likely to achieve <strong>the</strong> higher levels when compared with <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils at o<strong>the</strong>rschools.4.3 <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science results<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 resultsPupils were not assessed in science for this evaluation. However some Phase 1 <strong>Project</strong> schools chose toenter some <strong>Year</strong> 8 pupils for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science tests. 20 The proportions achieving <strong>the</strong> Level 5threshold at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 are shown in Table 7. More accelerated pupils than pupils nationally movedfrom a Level 4 at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2 to reach <strong>the</strong> Level 5 threshold.Table 7 - Proportion <strong>of</strong> pupils achieving at least Level 5 in 2005 <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science testsKS2 level<strong>Year</strong> 8 entrantsat <strong>Project</strong>schoolsProportion achieving Level 5 at KS3All entrants inEngl<strong>and</strong>StatisticallysignificantdifferenceNo. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 8entrants at <strong>Project</strong>schoolsLevel 3 15% 10% NS 27Level 4 74% 67% * 385Level 5 97% 96% NS 498NS no statistically significant difference* p