11.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SummaryIn <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> English, when prior attainment <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r background characteristics were taken intoaccount, pupils following a condensed course in <strong>Year</strong> 7 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 8 at Phase 1 <strong>Project</strong> schools achievedtest scores in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 Optional Tests that were not significantly different from those <strong>of</strong> pupils<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same age who attended Phase 1 Comparison schools.Among <strong>the</strong> pupils who were selected by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Project</strong> schools for early entry to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 tests,taking into account <strong>the</strong> test level achieved at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2, similar proportions achieved <strong>the</strong> nationalbenchmark level (Level 5) as among <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils across <strong>the</strong> country as a whole. This is anencouraging finding. However, it should be borne in mind that <strong>Project</strong> schools were advised only toenter pupils who were predicted to achieve <strong>the</strong> nationally expected level in those tests whereas o<strong>the</strong>rschools entered all <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils. The <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 test results also show that <strong>Year</strong> 8 entrants from<strong>Project</strong> schools were less likely to achieve <strong>the</strong> higher levels when compared with <strong>Year</strong> 9 pupils at o<strong>the</strong>rschools.4.3 <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science results<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 resultsPupils were not assessed in science for this evaluation. However some Phase 1 <strong>Project</strong> schools chose toenter some <strong>Year</strong> 8 pupils for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science tests. 20 The proportions achieving <strong>the</strong> Level 5threshold at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 are shown in Table 7. More accelerated pupils than pupils nationally movedfrom a Level 4 at <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2 to reach <strong>the</strong> Level 5 threshold.Table 7 - Proportion <strong>of</strong> pupils achieving at least Level 5 in 2005 <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 3 science testsKS2 level<strong>Year</strong> 8 entrantsat <strong>Project</strong>schoolsProportion achieving Level 5 at KS3All entrants inEngl<strong>and</strong>StatisticallysignificantdifferenceNo. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 8entrants at <strong>Project</strong>schoolsLevel 3 15% 10% NS 27Level 4 74% 67% * 385Level 5 97% 96% NS 498NS no statistically significant difference* p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!