11.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

Evaluation of the Two Year Key Stage 3 Project - Communities and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANNEX C - OPTIONAL TEST MODELLINGMulti-level modelling was used as <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> analysis for <strong>the</strong> Optional Test results. This is a form<strong>of</strong> multiple regression. Multiple regression enables us to examine <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong>dependent variable <strong>of</strong> interest (for example <strong>the</strong> <strong>Year</strong> 7 Ma<strong>the</strong>matics Optional Test score) <strong>and</strong> a set <strong>of</strong>independent (predictor) variables. These independent variables include whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> pupils attends a<strong>Project</strong> or Comparison school <strong>and</strong> also various background characteristics that have previously beenshown to be associated with attainment (for example prior attainment, <strong>the</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pupil <strong>and</strong>eligibility for free school meals). ‘Multi-level’ modelling takes into account <strong>the</strong> fact that pupils areclustered within schools. Failure to take this clustering into account may result in statisticallysignificant associations being reported between <strong>the</strong> dependent variable (e.g., ma<strong>the</strong>matics test scores)<strong>and</strong> an independent variable (e.g., being eligible for free school meals) when such a conclusion is notmerited.The models also allow for <strong>the</strong> possibility that, for example, at some schools pupils with higher levels <strong>of</strong>prior attainment may make greater progress than <strong>the</strong>ir schoolmates while at o<strong>the</strong>r schools it may bepupils with lower prior attainment who make relatively greater progress.It should be remembered that <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> possible values differs for <strong>the</strong> independent variables listed inTables C1 to C11. For example, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2 Ma<strong>the</strong>matics variable reported in Table C has ast<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> more than 20 points whereas <strong>the</strong> school’s percentage eligible for free schoolmeals has a st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> only 11 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> eligible for free school meals variable may ei<strong>the</strong>r take<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> zero (for those not eligible) or one (for those eligible).One means <strong>of</strong> comparing <strong>the</strong> ‘effect sizes’ for different independent variables is to express <strong>the</strong>coefficients for continuous variables (such as <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2 score) in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong>that independent variable <strong>and</strong> to express changes in <strong>the</strong> dependent variable in terms <strong>of</strong> its st<strong>and</strong>arddeviation. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> continuous variables this enables us to compare <strong>the</strong> effect size for each variablefor a comparable change in <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> those variables. That is, even though <strong>Key</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> 2 Ma<strong>the</strong>maticsscore is measured in marks (from 1-100) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> books in <strong>the</strong> home on a different scale(from 1-6), we are able to compare <strong>the</strong> two by expressing both in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation(or, as is shown in <strong>the</strong> figures, for a change <strong>of</strong> 1.41st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations). In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dichotomousvariables such as ‘<strong>Project</strong> school’ <strong>the</strong> figures indicate <strong>the</strong> change in Optional Test scores (expressed interms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation) associated with having that characteristic (that is, for example, beinga girl or attending a <strong>Project</strong> school).Such effect sizes are represented in Figures C1 to C4 as are <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> precision for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>estimated values with <strong>the</strong> lines showing <strong>the</strong> 95% Confidence Intervals for each coefficient estimated.55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!