6Recently Tommerup <strong>and</strong>Sivasithamparam (1990) describedzygospore formation in Gigaspora.Zygosporangia, zygospores or asexualsporangiospores are not reported in theother five genera, viz., Glomus,Sclerocystis,Acaulospora,Entrophospora, <strong>and</strong> Scutellospora.Therefore these five genera cannot beplaced in the Zygomycetes withcertainty (Walker, 1987).A. REPRODUCTIVESTRUCTURES1. SPORE FORMATIONThe genera of VAM fungi are separatedon the basis of asexual (anamorphic)spore formation <strong>and</strong> sporecharacteristics. The terms azygospore orchlamydospore describe the anamorphicstage of VAM fungi. Walker <strong>and</strong>S<strong>and</strong>ers (1986) did not believe that therewas good evidence for a sexual processin the formation of these spores, nor didthey have evidence that these sporeswere exclusively asexual. Therefore,they suggest using the simple term"spore" to avoid the use of azygosporewith its implied "sexual" connotation.They agreed with Koske et al. (1983),who questioned the use of the termazygospore for the description ofGigaspora reticulata, <strong>and</strong> with Koske<strong>and</strong> Walker (1984 <strong>and</strong> 1985) whodropped the term without comment.This approach of avoiding a prefixminimizes misrepresentation of thespore type. Unfortunately, this approachdoes not draw attention to the significantdifferences that exist betweenreproductive structures produced bydifferent taxa of VAM fungi.Researchers were encouraged to create asuitable alternative approach to thereproductive structures in VAM fungi(Morton, 1988).Spores in Zygomycetes can be producedsexually or asexually. Zygospores areproduced sexually by the union ofgametangia - morphologicallydifferentiated or undifferentiated somatichyphal cells. Asexual spores areproduced endogenously assporangiospores or modified somaticcells, e.g., chlamydospores (Benjamin,1979).
7Spores of VAM fungi are multinucleated<strong>and</strong> may be heterokaryotic. The sporescan germinate at different times, <strong>and</strong>some taxa reproduce sexually byforming zygospores if proper matingtypes are present, e.g., Gigasporadecipiens (Tommerup, 1987).VAM fungi can produce ectocarpicspores free in the soil or in sporocarps.Morton (1988) estimates that seventypercent of VAM fungi produceectocarpic spores. Also, VAM fungi canproduce spores in dead animals(Rothwell <strong>and</strong> Victor, 1984), in deadseeds (Taber, 1982), in plant roots(Nicolson <strong>and</strong> Schenck, 1979; Schenck<strong>and</strong> Smith, 1982; Morton <strong>and</strong> Walker,1984; Koske, 1985), in dead spores ofother VAM fungi (Koske, 1984), or onsoil surface (Gerdemann <strong>and</strong> Trappe,1974; T<strong>and</strong>y, 1975; Berch <strong>and</strong> Fortin,1983a; McGee, 1986). Spores in the soilmay be produced terminally, laterally onsubtending hyphae, or on a singlesuspensor-like cell. The sporocarpicspecies produce spores in a loosearrangement or in a highly orderedarrangement around a hyphal plexus(Gerdemann <strong>and</strong> Trappe, 1974).Spores in Glomus <strong>and</strong> Sclerocystis areformed terminally on one or morehyphae. Glomus species form singlespores or spores in sporocarps where thespores are arranged r<strong>and</strong>omly in thematrix hyphae. In Sclerocystis sporesalways form in sporocarps <strong>and</strong> arearranged around the central plexus ofsterile hyphae (Gerdemann <strong>and</strong> Trappe,1974). Both Glomus ambisporum <strong>and</strong>Glomus heterosporum form spores in asporocarp <strong>and</strong> in a manner similar toSclerocystis (Walker, 1987). Thesimilarity in sporocarp formationbetween these genera requires furtherstudy.Acaulospora <strong>and</strong> Entrophospora tend toform spores associated with a smallhyphal chamber. Spores in Acaulosporaare formed laterally on the stalk of alarge, terminal, <strong>and</strong> thin-walled hyphalchamber (Berch, 1985). However, inEntrophospora, spores are producedcompletely within the neck of the hyphalchamber (Ames <strong>and</strong> Schneider, 1979).The small chamber in Acaulospora <strong>and</strong>Entrophospora is termed a mother spore(Mosse, 1970), a vesicle (Gerdemann<strong>and</strong> Trappe, 1974), a hyphal terminus
- Page 1 and 2: Taxonomy and EcologyOf Inland Sand
- Page 3 and 4: AbstractAgropyron inerme root syste
- Page 5 and 6: IntroductionInland sand dunes in Co
- Page 7 and 8: 3Literature Review"Mycorrhiza" is a
- Page 9: 5nonsporocarpic, and produced spore
- Page 13 and 14: 9germination shield is formed, andg
- Page 15 and 16: 11wall thickening or spore inner wa
- Page 17 and 18: 13especially phosphate ions, some o
- Page 19 and 20: 15by the relative location of GOT a
- Page 21 and 22: 17D. DIFFICULTIES IN VAMFUNGAL TAXO
- Page 23 and 24: 19fungi are distributed over a wide
- Page 25 and 26: 21dune plants, the development of e
- Page 27 and 28: 23annually, a mean annual temperatu
- Page 29 and 30: 25C. EFFECTS OF SOIL DEPTH,MOISTURE
- Page 31 and 32: 27vegetated quadrats on each of the
- Page 33 and 34: 29Table 1 Occurrence of genera and
- Page 35 and 36: 31G. dominkii is the most abundant
- Page 37 and 38: 33abc d eFIG. 2 Glomus sp Light and
- Page 39 and 40: 35percent usually was strongly infl
- Page 41 and 42: 37FIG. 8 Regression of mycorrhizali
- Page 43 and 44: 39July transect data analyses (TABL
- Page 45 and 46: 41significantly with changes in the
- Page 47 and 48: 43FIG. 10 Regression of mycorrhizal
- Page 49 and 50: 45the July transect (FIG. 15). Howe
- Page 51 and 52: 47FIG. 17 Regression of mycorrhizal
- Page 53 and 54: 49C. COMPARISONS OF VAMCOLONIZATION
- Page 55 and 56: 51the survival strategies that adap
- Page 57 and 58: 53association with other species. T
- Page 59 and 60: 55believe the overriding factor is
- Page 61 and 62:
57my understanding of the ecology o
- Page 63 and 64:
59that soil characteristics and dis
- Page 65:
60AKNOWLEDGEMENTSI would like to ex
- Page 68 and 69:
61Allen, M. F., J. A. MacMahon, and
- Page 70 and 71:
63Bolgiano, N. C., G. R. Safir, and
- Page 72 and 73:
65mycorrhizal fungi: a determinant
- Page 74 and 75:
67Hayman, D. 1982. Influence of soi
- Page 76 and 77:
69Koske, R. E. 1985. Glomusaggregat
- Page 78 and 79:
71Morton, J. B. 1986. Three new spe
- Page 80 and 81:
73Powell, C. L., and D. J. Bagyaraj
- Page 82 and 83:
75Simon, L., M. Lalonde, and T. D.
- Page 84 and 85:
77Trappe, J. M. 1982. Synoptic keys
- Page 86:
79Wullstein, L. H., and S. A. Pratt