Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration:CABERNET Network Report2Tackling Brownfields:The CABERNET Multi-Stakeholder Approach2.2CABERNET ApproachIn response to this need for multi-stakeholder engagement and derived solutions,CABERNET has focused on identifying gaps in national and international approaches,and categorising tools that have been successfully used in brownfield rehabilitation byvarious stakeholder groups. CABERNET is one of the first multidisciplinary networksto focus explicitly on the reuse of brownfield within the context of a sustainable landuse policy. The Network has provided one of the few forums for the interaction of adiversity of stakeholder groups at a European level.The Network has convened a unique mix of stakeholders from over 21 countries acrossEurope¹¹, representing policy makers and industry to technologists and communitygroups, advisors and academics. Each of the individual Members are also linked toother brownfield-related networks, projects and initiatives, so extending the knowledgebase of the Network¹². This expert base allows CABERNET to examine perceived skillsgaps and build on existing knowledge to promote balanced solutions.CABERNET’s main focus has been to further understand the complex issues that areraised by brownfield regeneration from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Building onthis, the Network’s aim has been to enhance the rehabilitation of brownfield sites withinthe context of sustainable development of European cities, by sharing experiencesfrom across Europe, and by providing new management strategies, innovative tools,and a framework for coordinated research activities.The multinational representation of CABERNET has allowed a comparison of nationaland international approaches. This has resulted in the Network proposing strategiesto coordinate research and good practice initiatives in many Member States andelsewhere. CABERNET has also created a new framework of integrated thinkingthrough the development of a series of conceptual models (see Chapter 4). This inturn has generated new ideas to overcome persistent barriers. By networking withina multinational environment with different stakeholders and disciplines, the Membersof the Network have recognised more sustainable and integrated approaches to thecomplex issues of brownfield regeneration.The Network has stimulated new multidisciplinary research recommendations, whichfocus on cross cutting issues. The extensive stakeholder dialogue has also highlightedthe need for new skills in multi-disciplinary working.Specifically the Network’s innovative multi-stakeholder approach has developedrecommendations in the following areas:¹¹For a list of the CABERNET Members and the European Countries represented by the Members please go towww.cabernet.org.uk¹²For a list a list of other brownfield related contact networks, projects and international initiatives please refer to theCABERNET index to information on the CABERNET website: www.cabernet.ac.uk19
• new transferable approaches to brownfield regeneration at a regional andlocal level• good practice recommendations for stakeholders, resulting from challengingexisting paradigms and allowing new ideas and perspectives to emerge• conceptual models (Chapter 4) and proposed benchmarks (Chapter 9) forpolicies, programmes, organisations and projectsFigure 2.1: Stakeholder WheelTABLE 2.1: Key CABERNET Themes in Brownfield and Economic RegenerationCross-cutting issuesCitizen participation and decision-making(Working Group 1)Policy approaches and regulatorypractices(Working Group 2)Professional skills(Working Group 3)Sustainability componentsEnvironmental issues(Working Group 4)Social and cultural issues(Working Group 5)Economic issues(Working Group 6)As well as characterising the major dimensions of the regeneration process using theeight multi-stakeholder groups, CABERNET has also been developing a number ofkey positions, identified through the work of the six Network Working Groups (seeTable 2.1). Ten clear Network positions have emerged. As a result of the WorkingGroups’ theme-driven discussions, CABERNET has also been developing a number ofintegrated positions and recommendations.20
Page 7: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1: Summary Message• Land
Page 15: There is no standard definition for
Page 18 and 19: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 44: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 47 and 48: 4.3‘Self-developing sites’A: Pr
Page 49 and 50: 4.3 Once the stakeholder (using the
Page 51 and 52: 4.5 FIGURE 4.11: Land Use Puzzle Mo
Page 53 and 54: 4.6EnvironmentalHealthprotectionAtt
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 5: Summary Message:• CABE
Page 57 and 58: 5.1 Economic Viability and Regenera
Page 59 and 60: is able to assist with the costs (o
Page 61 and 62: 5.1.2Achieving such an ‘adjustmen
Page 63 and 64: 5.1.3Current approaches for C Sites
Page 65 and 66: 5.2Environmental Quality and Protec
Page 67 and 68: 5.2Human health / Ecotox / Risk Ass
Page 69 and 70: 5.2time as a specific parameter and
Page 71 and 72: 5.2Environmental aspects of plannin
Page 73 and 74:
5.3 Table 5.1: Social and Cultural
Page 75 and 76:
5.3 relevant to the experience of c
Page 77 and 78:
5.3 • initiate the development/cr
Page 79 and 80:
5.3 provide a high quality of life.
Page 81 and 82:
5.4.1Local governments therefore pl
Page 83 and 84:
5.4.1support and financial provisio
Page 85 and 86:
5.4.1 relevant information may take
Page 87 and 88:
5.4.1 ConclusionsEven though munici
Page 89 and 90:
5.4.2 development projects. In seve
Page 91 and 92:
5.4.2 RecommendationsIt is essentia
Page 93 and 94:
5.4.3 historically represented a ne
Page 95 and 96:
5.4.3 upwards to regional or nation
Page 97 and 98:
5.4.3 4. the relationship between s
Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 6.1: Summary Message• Cit
Page 101 and 102:
6.1 equity in the light of structur
Page 103 and 104:
6.1Good practice in the CP process
Page 105 and 106:
6.1Factor 4 - Availability of resou
Page 107 and 108:
6.1Achieving this shift will requir
Page 109 and 110:
6.2 Qualifying People: Professional
Page 111 and 112:
6.2 a mixture of apathy and anger a
Page 113 and 114:
6.2 to a community. As an example,
Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 7: Summary Message• High
Page 117 and 118:
7.2 Key Research Topics: Gaps and P
Page 119 and 120:
7.2 • Methods and frameworks to f
Page 121 and 122:
118
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 8: Summary Message• The r
Page 125 and 126:
8 an approach, key EC objectives re
Page 127 and 128:
8Furthermore, initiatives by Member
Page 129 and 130:
9.1Conclusions9.1CABERNET’s visio
Page 131 and 132:
CommentaryThe regeneration of the g
Page 133 and 134:
9.2 Obtain comprehensive data sets
Page 135 and 136:
99.3Sustainable Brownfield Regenera
Page 137 and 138:
134CABERNETwww.cabernet.org.uk
show all

Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?