Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration:CABERNET Network Report3Defining Brownfields:Scale and Nature3.2Table 3.2 The scale of European brownfield land – data collected by the CLARINET andCABERNET networks (Oliver et al, 2005²¹)CountryEstimated total area of brownfield landAustriaBelgiumBulgariaCzech RepublicDenmarkFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainyes9,000 hectares (Wallonia) 5,500 hectares (Flanders)No data available30,000 hectaresNo dataNo data20,000 hectares 5000 hectares (Lorraine) 1000 hectares (Ile de France)400 hectares (West Rhöne Alpes)128,000 hectares 18,000 hectares (Saxony)No dataNo dataNo dataNo national data 1260 hectares (Milan Province)No national data 1900 hectares (Riga only)9,000 – 11,000 hectares800,000 hectaresNo data900 000 hectaresNo dataData soon to be availableNo national data Basque Country: 7930 hectares potentially contaminated land,482 hectares industrial ruinsSwedenUnited Kingdom> 5000 hectares (estimate)65,760 hectares (England) – full regional data available910,847 hectares (Scotland) No data for Wales or Northern Ireland²¹ Lee Oliver, Uwe Ferber, Detlef Grimski, Kate Millar and Paul Nathanail. The Scale and and Nature of European Brownfields.In Proceedings of CABERNET 2005: The International Conference on Managing Urban Land, pages 274-281.Land Quality Management Press, Nottingham, 2005. ISBN 0-9547474-1-031
Suspected / potential numberof brownfield sitesData source2500 Umweltbundesamt Wien (2000)5,528 (Wallonia) 53,000 (Flanders,No data available10,000 Czech Brownfield Regeneration Strategy, Progress Report (2004) –Czechinvest30,000 Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2000)20,000 EEA (1999); Finnish Environment Institute (2001)200,000 (estimate) EEA (1999) ; Ministere de l’Environnement (2001) Les Etablissements Publics Fonciers (EPF)Direction Regionale de l’Equipement Etablissement Public Foncier Ouest Rhône Alpes362,000 Umweltbundesamt Berlin (2000)No dataNo data1,900 - 2,300 (contaminated sites) Environmental Protection Agency (2000)9,000 EEA (1999); Agenzia Nazionale per la Proteziojne dell’Ambiente (ANPA) (2001)1900 hectares (Riga only) Riga City Council (2004)110,000 – 120,000 (estimate) EEA (1999); Environmental Ministry (2000)3230 sites Ministry of Environment (2002)2000 (estimate) Lab. Nac. De Engenhaira Cicil (1998)No data Romanian Ministry of Waters and Environment (MAAP) (2000)No dataData soon to be available4,900 (potentially contaminatedsites) Basque Country: 9328potentially contaminated sites, 459industrial ruinsMinistry Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy / Environment AgencyMinisterio de Medio Ambiente (2001)IHOBE40,000 Unofficial estimate (C.Egelstig, JM AB, 2004)100,000 (England, estimate)4,222 (Scotland)National Land Use Database (2003 return - published 2004)Scottish Executive (Scottish Vacant and Derelict Land Survey 2003,published 2004)32
Page 7: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1: Summary Message• Land
Page 15: There is no standard definition for
Page 18 and 19: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 44: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration
Page 47 and 48: 4.3‘Self-developing sites’A: Pr
Page 49 and 50: 4.3 Once the stakeholder (using the
Page 51 and 52: 4.5 FIGURE 4.11: Land Use Puzzle Mo
Page 53 and 54: 4.6EnvironmentalHealthprotectionAtt
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 5: Summary Message:• CABE
Page 57 and 58: 5.1 Economic Viability and Regenera
Page 59 and 60: is able to assist with the costs (o
Page 61 and 62: 5.1.2Achieving such an ‘adjustmen
Page 63 and 64: 5.1.3Current approaches for C Sites
Page 65 and 66: 5.2Environmental Quality and Protec
Page 67 and 68: 5.2Human health / Ecotox / Risk Ass
Page 69 and 70: 5.2time as a specific parameter and
Page 71 and 72: 5.2Environmental aspects of plannin
Page 73 and 74: 5.3 Table 5.1: Social and Cultural
Page 75 and 76: 5.3 relevant to the experience of c
Page 77 and 78: 5.3 • initiate the development/cr
Page 79 and 80: 5.3 provide a high quality of life.
Page 81 and 82: 5.4.1Local governments therefore pl
Page 83 and 84: 5.4.1support and financial provisio
Page 85 and 86:
5.4.1 relevant information may take
Page 87 and 88:
5.4.1 ConclusionsEven though munici
Page 89 and 90:
5.4.2 development projects. In seve
Page 91 and 92:
5.4.2 RecommendationsIt is essentia
Page 93 and 94:
5.4.3 historically represented a ne
Page 95 and 96:
5.4.3 upwards to regional or nation
Page 97 and 98:
5.4.3 4. the relationship between s
Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 6.1: Summary Message• Cit
Page 101 and 102:
6.1 equity in the light of structur
Page 103 and 104:
6.1Good practice in the CP process
Page 105 and 106:
6.1Factor 4 - Availability of resou
Page 107 and 108:
6.1Achieving this shift will requir
Page 109 and 110:
6.2 Qualifying People: Professional
Page 111 and 112:
6.2 a mixture of apathy and anger a
Page 113 and 114:
6.2 to a community. As an example,
Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 7: Summary Message• High
Page 117 and 118:
7.2 Key Research Topics: Gaps and P
Page 119 and 120:
7.2 • Methods and frameworks to f
Page 121 and 122:
118
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 8: Summary Message• The r
Page 125 and 126:
8 an approach, key EC objectives re
Page 127 and 128:
8Furthermore, initiatives by Member
Page 129 and 130:
9.1Conclusions9.1CABERNET’s visio
Page 131 and 132:
CommentaryThe regeneration of the g
Page 133 and 134:
9.2 Obtain comprehensive data sets
Page 135 and 136:
99.3Sustainable Brownfield Regenera
Page 137 and 138:
134CABERNETwww.cabernet.org.uk
show all

Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?