signed by the ambassadors of Russia, France and Great Britain, it was pointed out that theSublime Porte was trying to manipulate the numbers in order to decrease the signification of thec<strong>om</strong>mitments mentioned in the Berlin Treaty. 143However, these ad<strong>min</strong>istrative measures did not seem to achieve the desirable results, at leastnot as quickly as necessary. The Government now took more drastic measures and started alarge-scale massacre of Armenians. Already in 1894-86 European and American newspapers andgovernments had called attention to the atrocities c<strong>om</strong>mitted against the Armenians in Ott<strong>om</strong>anTurkey. About 110,000 Armenians were killed and another 40,000 were forced to convert toIslam and over 100,000 Armenians fled to Transcaucasus, Europe and the USA. 2,500c<strong>om</strong>munities were totally emptied of their Armenian elements, their property confiscated byTurks and Kurds, putting over 500,000 Armenians in total poverty. 144 The massacres weremeasures to decimate the Armenian population, thereby di<strong>min</strong>ishing the need for reforms due tothe existence of an Armenian majority in the six Armenian provinces: Sivas, Erzurum, Kharpout,Diyarbakir, Bitlis, and Van 145 The protests and threats of intervention were not realised untilFigure 1. The Armenian vilayets of the Turkish Empire. Source: Armenica.org.143 Pasdermadjian, 1949, p. 399.144 Pasdermadjian, 1949, p. 412. Also see Gerner and Karlsson, 2005, p. 120.145 Pasdermadjian, 1949, p. 408.34
1914, when two inspector-generals fr<strong>om</strong> two neutral countries were appointed to oversee theimplementation of reforms in the Armenian provinces of the Ott<strong>om</strong>an Empire. 146 The ArmenianPatriarch requested explicitly the inspector-generals to be fr<strong>om</strong> either Holland, Denmark,Norway, or Sweden and not fr<strong>om</strong> either Belgium or Switzerland since the econ<strong>om</strong>ic andc<strong>om</strong>mercial interests between the two latter countries and Turkey were to strong to allow themto be objective. 147 This clearly indicates that the econ<strong>om</strong>ic ties were already at this time anobvious factor when considering international relations and humanitarian interventions.The Turkish Government surrendered to the reform plan quite unwillingly and only after a longperiod of strong opposition to any reforms regarding the right of Armenians and other Christian<strong>min</strong>orities in the Empire. Therefore, the global war of 1914 was regarded as the goldenopportunity which the new nationalist Turkish leaders of Union and Progress had been waitingfor to once and for all eli<strong>min</strong>ate the “Armenian question.” 148 The master<strong>min</strong>ds of the Armeniangenocide were the three leading figures of the Ittihad Party: Interior Minister and future GrandVizier Talaat Pasha; War Minister Enver Pasha; Marine Minister Djemal Pasha. 149 The Armeniannation also posed as a serious threat to the realisation of the Pan Turan, unifying all Turkishpeople under one single empire, ruled by the Ott<strong>om</strong>an Turks. Thus, when the news of the largescaledmassacres of Armenian intellectuals and civilians in Ott<strong>om</strong>an Turkey reached the outsideworld, the governments of France, Great Britain, and Russia were swift in their response whichwas delivered on May 24, 1915:Massacres have taken place fr<strong>om</strong> mid April in Erzurum, Terjan, Eghine, Bitlis, Moush, Sasoun,Zeytoun and throughout Cilicia. The inhabitants in almost a hundred villages around Van havebeen c<strong>om</strong>pletely murdered and the Armenian quarters in Van are under siege by Kurds. At thesame time, the Ott<strong>om</strong>an government has acted mercilessly against the defenceless Armenianpopulation in Constantinople. In regard to this new crime against humanity and civilisation, theallied governments declare openly to the Sublime Port that they will hold each member of theTurkish government personally responsible, as well as those who have participated in thesemassacres. 150The first stage constituted the eli<strong>min</strong>ation of the Armenian elite (eliticide). On April 24, 1915,the Armenian intellectuals were mass-arrested and brutally murdered within a day or two. 151Then it was time to eli<strong>min</strong>ate the bulk of a possible resistance – the able-bodied male population.All Armenian men between 20 and 45 (August 1914) and later men between 18 to 20 and 45 to60 were enlisted in the Ott<strong>om</strong>an Army, leaving the w<strong>om</strong>en, children and elderly practically146 Pasdermadjian, 1949, p. 471.147 Dussen, 1991, p. 401.148 C<strong>om</strong>pare with the intentionalism camp in regard to the Holocaust. See Charny, 2000, p. 313; Melson,1992, p. 7-9; Shermer and Grobman, 2000, p. 209-213; Steinman, 1998, p. 216.149 S<strong>om</strong>akian, 1995, p. 139-140.150 Hovannisian, 1967, p. 52.151 In Constantinople alone 2,345 Armenian leaders were arrested within a couple of weeks. See Alvarez,2001, p. 49. Also see Chalk and Jonassohn, 1990, p. 260; Dadrian, 2004, p. 221; Destexhe, 1995, p. 23; Jones,2006, p. 106.35
- Page 3 and 4: 1 Introduction.....................
- Page 5 and 6: War, rather confirm the version of
- Page 7 and 8: 1.2 Previous ResearchWhen discussin
- Page 9 and 10: Military Attaché and the missionar
- Page 11 and 12: situation: “It is a crime when Te
- Page 13 and 14: in the following investigation, whi
- Page 15 and 16: killed. The slaughterer slaughtered
- Page 17 and 18: interests. Despite his famous “14
- Page 19 and 20: morality, balance of power, or the
- Page 21 and 22: 4. International organisations (e.g
- Page 23 and 24: warring parties. 104 This observati
- Page 25 and 26: Concerning the protocols of the Swe
- Page 27 and 28: present in Turkey. These documents
- Page 29 and 30: He also mentions meeting an Armenia
- Page 31 and 32: the annihilation. General von Losso
- Page 33: 1.5 BackgroundIn order to understan
- Page 37 and 38: to Islam or were sold as slaves to
- Page 39 and 40: 2 Empirical AnalysisThe empirical r
- Page 41 and 42: It does not seem to be the Turkish
- Page 43 and 44: The Turks claim that, at the Russia
- Page 45 and 46: The Armenian population has equippe
- Page 47 and 48: 1917 was the revival year for the A
- Page 49 and 50: Even if the communication between t
- Page 51 and 52: implemented against the Armenian na
- Page 53 and 54: Anckarsvärd continued claiming tha
- Page 55 and 56: Germany is blamed for its accessory
- Page 57 and 58: Here Wirsén took the liberty to co
- Page 59 and 60: On February 19, news of new Armenia
- Page 61 and 62: estricted to the fields of intrigue
- Page 63 and 64: generous offer of President Wilson
- Page 65 and 66: Lange gave a detailed description o
- Page 67 and 68: skin was totally scorched. Another
- Page 69 and 70: which her recurrently emphasised th
- Page 71 and 72: The sooner calls referring to the A
- Page 73 and 74: Despite these facts, Armenia was th
- Page 75 and 76: Svenska Riksarkivet [Swedish Nation
- Page 77 and 78: Bakhtiari, Kalla det vad fan du vil
- Page 79 and 80: Chan, Steve and Drury, Cooper A., S
- Page 81 and 82: Moranian, Suzanne Elizabeth, Bearin