11.07.2015 Views

Ämnet för min C-uppsats handlar om diskussionen om vad som kan ...

Ämnet för min C-uppsats handlar om diskussionen om vad som kan ...

Ämnet för min C-uppsats handlar om diskussionen om vad som kan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which her recurrently emphasised the renewed importance of Constantinople, pointing out(mentioned twice and underlined in pages 1 and 4) that “the road to the new Russian marketdoes not pass over the Baltic Sea any more, but over Constantinople and the Black Sea ports.” 317The Republic of Armenia gone, the political ambitions started to cool down rapidly. Thesovietisation of Armenia eli<strong>min</strong>ated the only legal international spokesperson for the Armenianquestion, and the other states soon chose to “forget” the entire Armenian episode. Wallenbergproceeded to advice against all Swedish involvement in Armenian issues and continued to presentthe Armenian future as an already lost cause.2.2.3 1922In a dispatch dated June 6, 1922, Wallenberg attached an interview with the American tradeattaché, Gillespie, who claimed that the news about “atrocities” c<strong>om</strong>mitted towards Armenianswere totally false. Referring to recently published news, Gillespie asserted that his knowledgeabout, among others, the “Turkish people’s gentlemanlike qualities…does not leave any ro<strong>om</strong> fordoubt, to that effect, that it is inc<strong>om</strong>patible with the truth to talk about a poor treatment of thenon-Mohammedan element in Anatolia on the Government’s behalf.” 318 Quoting an Armenianmerchant fr<strong>om</strong> Kharpout, Wallenberg pointed out that no such thing as “Turkish atrocities[towards the Armenians] were heard of.” Attached to the same dispatch was a letter fr<strong>om</strong>Wallenberg, addressed to Hjalmar Branting in person. Here, Wallenberg wrote about Miss AnnaLindhagen, who had visited the Turkish Ambassador to Sweden, Galib Kemali Bey, andexpressed great indignation in regard to the content of the startling information presented in thetelegram Lord Curzon, Foreign Secretary of Great Britain, had sent to Sir Horace Rumbold,British Ambassador in Constantinople, in regard to the “atrocities”, published in Times.Wallenberg wrote:Since now Miss Lindhagen is chairman of the Swedish section of la Societé internationale de lafemme pour la paix et la liberté, whose centre is in Geneva, I allow myself to ask You to considerwhether it would not be appropriate to allow Miss L. c<strong>om</strong>plete knowledge about [this] delegation’swriting nr. 113, fr<strong>om</strong> May 28, this year (except the last part, which is about politics), plus today’sreport and attachments. 319Wallenberg’s analysis and reports regarding the Orient were appreciated highly by the PrimeMinster, and likewise Foreign Minister Branting. In a letter dated November 23, 1922, Brantingwrote the following to Wallenberg:It is with a great interest that I have studied the clear and illu<strong>min</strong>ating presentation in Your latestquarterly report about the Oriental situation and the meaning its development could have for our317 RA, UD, nr. 267, November 15, 1921.318 RA, UD, nr. 115, June 6, 1922.319 RA, UD, nr. 115, June 6, 1922. The cited Miss Anna Lindhagen was one of the leading Social Democratsof the time, sister to Stockholm’s Mayor, Carl Lindhagen, and active in the organisation Rädda Barnen.69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!