Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Document</strong><br />
Page 35<br />
So why did spatial issues remain a blind spot for the economic profession? It was not a historical<br />
accident: there was something about spatial economics that made it inherently unfriendly terrain for the<br />
kind of modeling mainstream economists know how to do.<br />
That something was, as you might well guess, the problem of market structure in the face of increasing<br />
returns, a problem that is even more acute in economic geography than in development economics. In<br />
development the crucial role that high development theory assigned to increasing returns was a<br />
hypothesis crucial to that doctrine, but not necessarily crucial to understanding development in general.<br />
One could do meaningful theorizing about developing countries, albeit not in the grand tradition,<br />
without sacrificing the convenient assumptions of constant returns and perfect <strong>com</strong>petition. In spatial<br />
economics, however, you really cannot get started at all without finding a way to deal with scale<br />
economies and oligopolistic firms.<br />
The reason has been well understood by many if not all urban and spatial economists, and is sometimes<br />
referred to as the problem of "backyard capitalism." The parable goes something like this: imagine (as<br />
spatial theorists often do) that the world consists of a homogeneous, featureless plain; imagine further<br />
that there are transportation costs; and finally suppose for a moment that there are no economies of<br />
scale. Would such a world give rise to the highly uneven spatial distribution of economic activity we<br />
actually see, in which most people live on the small urbanized fraction of the land, and in which urban<br />
areas themselves are highly specialized? (This paragraph was written after a disheartening look at real<br />
estate prices in Palo Alto that is, in the crowded heart of Silicon Valley.) The answer, of course, is that it<br />
would not. The efficient thing<br />
<strong>file</strong>:///<strong>D|</strong>/Export2/<strong>www</strong>.<strong>netlibrary</strong>.<strong>com</strong>/<strong>nlreader</strong>/<strong>nlreader</strong>.<strong>dll</strong>@bookid=409&<strong>file</strong>name=page_35.html [4/18/2007 10:30:09 AM]