Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
Document file:///D|/Export1/www.netlibrary.com/nlreader/nlreader.dll ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Document</strong><br />
only piece of spatial economics to gain real mainstream acceptance, von Thünen's land-use model, is a<br />
thing of beauty; but surely its appeal was more a matter of tractability than of power to explain the<br />
world.<br />
So what's the moral? We've seen how the insistence on models that meet the standards of rigor in<br />
mainstream economics can lead to neglect of clearly valuable ideas. Does this mean that the whole<br />
emphasis on models is wrong? Should we make a major effort to open up economics, to relax our<br />
standards about what constitutes an acceptable argument?<br />
Page 65<br />
No the moral of my tale is nowhere near that easy. Economists can often be remarkably obtuse, failing<br />
to see things that are right in front of them. But sometimes a bit of obtuseness is not entirely a bad thing.<br />
<strong>file</strong>:///<strong>D|</strong>/Export2/<strong>www</strong>.<strong>netlibrary</strong>.<strong>com</strong>/<strong>nlreader</strong>/<strong>nlreader</strong>.<strong>dll</strong>@bookid=409&<strong>file</strong>name=page_65.html [4/18/2007 10:30:27 AM]