marketable surplus and post harvest losses of ragi in ... - Agmarknet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER - IVAREA AND PRODUCTION OF RAGI4.1 AREA UNDER RAGI: IRRIGATED & UNIRRIGATED.4.1.1 The state-wise estimated annual average area under Ragi for the year1996-97 to 1998-99 with break-up ofirrigated and unirrigated and category of cultivators are given in Annexure I. The overall summary of thesame is presented in the following table.TABLE NO. 3AREA UNDER RAGI IRRIGATED, UNIRRIGATED AND TOTAL RAGI(CATEGORYWISE), (AVERAGE 1996-97,1997-98 and 1998-99)(‘000 hectares)CategoryArea SownIrrigated Unirrigated Total(1) (2) (3) (4)Small 87.01(14.39)(41.22)517.60(85.61)(37.61)604.61(100.00)(38.09)Medium 56.56(11.89)(26.79)419.11(88.11)(30.46)475.67(100.00)(29.97)Large 67.53 (13.32)439.34(86.68) 506.87(100.00)(31.99)Total 211.10(13.30)(100.00)(31.93)1376.05(86.70)(100.00)(The figures in parenthesis are of the percentage to the total of the column/row)(31.94)1587.15(100.00)(100.00)4.1.2 It has been observed that out of total estimated area of 1587.15 thousand hectares, under Ragi in thecountry, small category of cultivators contributed 604.61 thousand hectares i.e., 38.09 percent,medium category cultivators contributed 475.67 thousand hectares i.e., 29.97 percent and largecategory of cultivators contributed 506.87 thousand hectares i.e., 31.94 percent.4.1.3 Category-wise analysis showed that in small category, the share of irrigated area was 41.22 percent,in medium category, it was 26.79 percent, and in large category, it was 31.99 percent.4.1.4 The statewise distribution of area under ‘Irrigation and Unirrigated’, is given in table No. 4:TABLE NO. 4STATE-WISE AREA UNDER RAGI (IRRIGATED/UNIRRIGATED)(AVERAGE 1996-97, 97-98 and 98-99).(‘000 hectares)S No Name of stateAll categoriesIrrigated Unirrigated Totalarea1 23 4 5Area % Area % Area %1 Andhra Pradesh 0.00 0.00 133.66 9.71 133.66 8.422 Arunachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004 Bihar 7.08 3.35 62.74 4.56 69.82 4.405 Goa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006 Gujarat 19.67 9.32 0.00 0.00 19.67 1.247 Haryana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008 Himachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 5.83 0.42 5.83 0.379 Jammu and Kashmir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0010 Karnataka 81.10 38.42 741.38 53.88 822.48 51.82
11 Kerala 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012 Madhya Pradesh 0.00 0.00 12.14 0.88 12.14 0.7613 Maharashtra 0.00 0.00 154.30 11.21 154.30 9.7214 Manipur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0016 Mizoram 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017 Nagaland 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0018 Orissa 0.00 0.00 82.40 5.99 82.40 5.1919 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0020 Rajasthan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0021 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0022 Tamil Nadu 88.68 42.01 55.72 4.06 144.40 9.1023 Tripura 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0024 Uttar Pradesh 14.57 6.90 127.88 9.29 142.45 8.9825 West Bengal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0026 ALL INDIA 211.10 100.00 1376.05 100.00 1587.15 100.004.1.5 Karnataka occupied maximum area under Ragi (51.82%) followed by Maharashtra (9.72), Tamil Nadu(9.10%), Uttar Pradesh (8.98%) and Andhra Pradesh (8.42%) etc. In states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu,Ragi was grown mainly as irrigated crop.4.2 AREA UNDER RAGI: HIGH YIELDING VARIETIES AND TRADITIONAL VARIETIES.4.2.1 The estimate of area, under High Yielding Varieties and Traditional Varieties, are furnished in Annexure IIand summarised in Table No. 5.TABLE NO. 5AREA UNDER RAGI: HIGH YIELDING VARIETIES (HYV)AND TRADITIONAL VARIETIES (TV)(AVERAGE 1996-97,1997-98 and 1998-99).(‘000 hectares)CategoryArea sownHYV TV Total(1) (2) (3) (4)Small 371.24(61.40)(42.04)233.37(38.60)(33.15)604.61(100.00)(38.09)Medium 263.95(55.49)(29.89)211.72(44.51)(30.07)475.67(100.00)(29.97)Large 247.92(48.91)258.95(51.09)506.87(100.00)(28.07)Total 883.11(55.64)(100.00)(36.78)704.04(44.36)(100.00)(The figures in parenthes are percentage to the total of the column/row)(31.94)1587.15(100.00)(100.00)4.2.2 It has been observed that the coverage of high yielding varieties of Ragi was of the order of 883.11thousand hectares or 55.64 percent of the total area under Ragi. The coverage of traditional varieties was704.04 thousand hectares or 44.36 percent. This is a reflection of the efforts for promotion of highyielding varieties by the Ministry of Agriculture.4.2.3 The State-wise distribution of area under ‘High Yielding Varieties’ and ‘Traditional Varieties’ is given inTable No. 6.
Page 1 and 2: MARKETABLE SURPLUS AND POST HARVEST
Page 3 and 4: LIST OF ANNEXURESAnnexure No.IIIIII
Page 5 and 6: XXXXXXXXIXXXXIIXXXXIIIXXXXIVXXXXVXX
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF TABLESTable No.Content1. Di
Page 9 and 10: 32. Contribution to the Marketed Su
Page 11 and 12: SUMMARY1. In view of the persistent
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER - IINTRODUCTION1.1 The Dire
Page 15 and 16: 2.1.2 SELECTION OF SAMPLE VILLAGES:
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER - IIIESTIMATION PROCEDURELe
Page 19: V hih′ v hi h′Yˆ hi h’′k =
Page 23 and 24: (26.70) (30.10) (29.40)3. Large 164
Page 25 and 26: 19 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 27 and 28: Retention of Ragi by Farm Family Fo
Page 29 and 30: 9 Jammu & Kashmir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 31 and 32: 5.7.2 The state-wise break-up of to
Page 33 and 34: 5.9 UTILISATION OF RAGI FOR BARTER.
Page 35 and 36: TABLE NO. 24.UTILISATION OF RAGI FO
Page 37 and 38: Total Post Harvest Losses of Ragi(Q
Page 39 and 40: Losses of Ragi During Storage and T
Page 41 and 42: Total Sale of Ragi - Quarterwise(Qa
Page 43 and 44: Sale of Ragi - Agencywise(Qantity i
Page 45 and 46: Sale of Paddy - Within Village and
Page 47 and 48: 13 Maharashtra 158.82 27.12 17.0814
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER VIIIMARKETABLE SURPLUS8.1 I
Page 51 and 52: Production, Marketable Surplus and
Page 53 and 54: Annexure - I Area under Ragi - Irri
Page 55 and 56: Annexure - IIIS.No. Name of statePr
Page 57 and 58: Annexure - VRetention of Ragi for f
Page 59 and 60: Annexure - VIIRetention of Ragi for
Page 61 and 62: Annexure -IXTotal Retention of Ragi
Page 63 and 64: Annexure - XRetention of Ragi for A
Page 65 and 66: Annexure - XIIUtilisation of Ragi f
Page 67 and 68: Annexure - XIVUtilisation of Ragi f
Page 69 and 70: Annexure -XVIUtilisation of Ragi fo
Page 71 and 72:
Annexure - XVIIIUtilisation of Ragi
Page 73 and 74:
Annexure -X XUtilisation of Ragi fo
Page 75 and 76:
Annexure - XXIIUtilisation of Ragi
Page 77 and 78:
Annexure - XXIVLosses of Ragi durin
Page 79 and 80:
S.No.Name of stateLosses of Ragi du
Page 81 and 82:
Annexure -X XVIIILosses of Ragi in
Page 83 and 84:
Annexure - XXXS.No.Name of stateLos
Page 85 and 86:
Annexure - XXXIILosses of Ragi duri
Page 87 and 88:
Annexure - XXXIVS.No.Name of stateQ
Page 89 and 90:
Annexure - XXXVIS.No.Name of stateT
Page 91 and 92:
Annexure - XXXVIIIS.No.Name of stat
Page 93 and 94:
Annexure - XXXXTotal Sale of Ragi-Q
Page 95 and 96:
Annexure -XXXXIITotal Sale of Ragi-
Page 97 and 98:
Annexure - XXXXIVS.No. Name of stat
Page 99 and 100:
Annexure - XXXXVISale of Ragi - Age
Page 101 and 102:
Annexure - XXXXVIIISale of Ragi - W
Page 103 and 104:
Annexure - LSale of Ragi - Within V
Page 105 and 106:
Annexure - LIISale of Ragi - Outsid
Page 107 and 108:
Annexure - LIVSale of Ragi - Outsid
Page 109 and 110:
--2--S.No.Name of stateType of rete
Page 111 and 112:
S.No.Type of retentionTotal retenti
Page 113 and 114:
S.No.Name of stateType of retention
Page 115 and 116:
S. No. Name of stateType of retenti
Page 117 and 118:
Annexure - LXMarketed Surplus Vis-
Page 119 and 120:
Annexure - LXIIMarketed Surplus Vis
Page 121 and 122:
CREDITSCHIEF PROJECT COORDINATOR1)
show all

marketable surplus and post harvest losses of ragi in ... - Agmarknet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?