marketable surplus and post harvest losses of ragi in ... - Agmarknet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table No. 9PRODUCTION OF RAGI: HIGH YIELDING VARIETY AND TRADIONAL VARIETY(AVERAGE 1996-97, 97-98 and 98-99).(‘000 tonnes)S.No. CategoryProductionHYV TV Total1. Small 644.13(76.32)(39.90)199.88(23.68)(29.91)844.01(100.00)(36.97)2. Medium 462.03(68.85)(28.62)209.11(31.15)(31.29)671.14(100.00)(29.40)3. Large 508.37(66.22)(31.48)259.32(33.78)(38.80)767.69(100.00)(33.63)All category 1614.53(70.73)(100.00)668.31(29.27)(100.00)2282.84(100.00)(100.00)(The figures in parenthesis are percentages to the totals of the column/row)4.4.2 As stated earlier, the share of small category cultivators was 36.97 percent and other categories sharedthe balance of production. It is also noticed that in small category, the percentage of HYV was nearly76.32 percent, in medium category, it was was 68.85 percent and in large category, it was 66.22percent. It is an indicator of the fact that the small category cultivators were not lagging behind inadopting modern techniques like use of high yielding varieties.4.4.3 the state-wise break-up of estimated production of Ragi of high yielding varieties and traditionalvarieties is given in Table No. 10.TABLE NO. 10STATE-WISE BREAK-UP OF PRODUCTION OF RAGI: HIGH YIELDING VARIETIES (HYV) ANDTRADITIONAL VARIETIES (TV)(AVERAGE 1996-97, 1997-98 and 1998-99)(‘000 tonnes)S No Name of stateProductionHYV TV Total1 23 4 5Prod. % Prod. % Prod. %1 Andhra Pradesh 0.00 0.00 134.64 20.15 134.64 5.902 Arunachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.003 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.004 Bihar 14.43 0.89 55.45 8.30 69.88 3.065 Goa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006 Gujarat 20.79 1.29 0.00 0.00 20.79 0.917 Haryana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.008 Himachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 6.46 0.97 6.46 0.289 Jammu and Kashmir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0010 Karnataka 1165.80 72.21 150.17 22.47 1315.97 57.6511 Kerala 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012 Madhya Pradesh 0.00 0.00 3.69 0.55 3.69 0.1613 Maharashtra 0.00 0.00 158.82 23.76 158.82 6.9614 Manipur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0016 Mizoram 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017 Nagaland 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0018 Orissa 31.49 1.95 28.95 4.33 60.44 2.65
19 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0020 Rajasthan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0021 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0022 Tamil Nadu 290.48 17.99 8.85 1.32 299.33 13.1123 Tripura 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0024 Uttar Pradesh 91.54 5.67 121.28 18.15 212.82 9.3225 West Bengal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0026 ALL INDIA 1614.53 100.00 668.31 100.00 2282.84 100.004.4.4 Out of the total production of 2282.84 thousand tonnes, the share of states like Karnataka and TamilNadu, taken together, was more than 70 percent.
Page 1 and 2: MARKETABLE SURPLUS AND POST HARVEST
Page 3 and 4: LIST OF ANNEXURESAnnexure No.IIIIII
Page 5 and 6: XXXXXXXXIXXXXIIXXXXIIIXXXXIVXXXXVXX
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF TABLESTable No.Content1. Di
Page 9 and 10: 32. Contribution to the Marketed Su
Page 11 and 12: SUMMARY1. In view of the persistent
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER - IINTRODUCTION1.1 The Dire
Page 15 and 16: 2.1.2 SELECTION OF SAMPLE VILLAGES:
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER - IIIESTIMATION PROCEDURELe
Page 19 and 20: V hih′ v hi h′Yˆ hi h’′k =
Page 21 and 22: 11 Kerala 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 23: (26.70) (30.10) (29.40)3. Large 164
Page 27 and 28: Retention of Ragi by Farm Family Fo
Page 29 and 30: 9 Jammu & Kashmir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 31 and 32: 5.7.2 The state-wise break-up of to
Page 33 and 34: 5.9 UTILISATION OF RAGI FOR BARTER.
Page 35 and 36: TABLE NO. 24.UTILISATION OF RAGI FO
Page 37 and 38: Total Post Harvest Losses of Ragi(Q
Page 39 and 40: Losses of Ragi During Storage and T
Page 41 and 42: Total Sale of Ragi - Quarterwise(Qa
Page 43 and 44: Sale of Ragi - Agencywise(Qantity i
Page 45 and 46: Sale of Paddy - Within Village and
Page 47 and 48: 13 Maharashtra 158.82 27.12 17.0814
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER VIIIMARKETABLE SURPLUS8.1 I
Page 51 and 52: Production, Marketable Surplus and
Page 53 and 54: Annexure - I Area under Ragi - Irri
Page 55 and 56: Annexure - IIIS.No. Name of statePr
Page 57 and 58: Annexure - VRetention of Ragi for f
Page 59 and 60: Annexure - VIIRetention of Ragi for
Page 61 and 62: Annexure -IXTotal Retention of Ragi
Page 63 and 64: Annexure - XRetention of Ragi for A
Page 65 and 66: Annexure - XIIUtilisation of Ragi f
Page 67 and 68: Annexure - XIVUtilisation of Ragi f
Page 69 and 70: Annexure -XVIUtilisation of Ragi fo
Page 71 and 72: Annexure - XVIIIUtilisation of Ragi
Page 73 and 74: Annexure -X XUtilisation of Ragi fo
Page 75 and 76:
Annexure - XXIIUtilisation of Ragi
Page 77 and 78:
Annexure - XXIVLosses of Ragi durin
Page 79 and 80:
S.No.Name of stateLosses of Ragi du
Page 81 and 82:
Annexure -X XVIIILosses of Ragi in
Page 83 and 84:
Annexure - XXXS.No.Name of stateLos
Page 85 and 86:
Annexure - XXXIILosses of Ragi duri
Page 87 and 88:
Annexure - XXXIVS.No.Name of stateQ
Page 89 and 90:
Annexure - XXXVIS.No.Name of stateT
Page 91 and 92:
Annexure - XXXVIIIS.No.Name of stat
Page 93 and 94:
Annexure - XXXXTotal Sale of Ragi-Q
Page 95 and 96:
Annexure -XXXXIITotal Sale of Ragi-
Page 97 and 98:
Annexure - XXXXIVS.No. Name of stat
Page 99 and 100:
Annexure - XXXXVISale of Ragi - Age
Page 101 and 102:
Annexure - XXXXVIIISale of Ragi - W
Page 103 and 104:
Annexure - LSale of Ragi - Within V
Page 105 and 106:
Annexure - LIISale of Ragi - Outsid
Page 107 and 108:
Annexure - LIVSale of Ragi - Outsid
Page 109 and 110:
--2--S.No.Name of stateType of rete
Page 111 and 112:
S.No.Type of retentionTotal retenti
Page 113 and 114:
S.No.Name of stateType of retention
Page 115 and 116:
S. No. Name of stateType of retenti
Page 117 and 118:
Annexure - LXMarketed Surplus Vis-
Page 119 and 120:
Annexure - LXIIMarketed Surplus Vis
Page 121 and 122:
CREDITSCHIEF PROJECT COORDINATOR1)
show all

marketable surplus and post harvest losses of ragi in ... - Agmarknet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?