12.07.2015 Views

Baltimore-Washington Parkway Widening Feasibility Study

Baltimore-Washington Parkway Widening Feasibility Study

Baltimore-Washington Parkway Widening Feasibility Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Baltimore</strong>-<strong>Washington</strong> <strong>Parkway</strong> <strong>Widening</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong>Public Involvement4.3.1.3PublicMeeting#3February16,2012Public Meeting #3 was held on February 16, 2012, at the Greenbelt Community Center in Greenbelt,Maryland. The purpose of this third public meeting was to present and discuss the final findings of thestudy, including conceptual cost estimates, the draft Report to Congress, and answer any questions orconcerns related to the report prior to finalizing it.In addition, the meeting informed the public on when and how they will have access to the final reportof the feasibility study and provided recommendations on the requirements that will need to be furtherevaluated if the study is to move forward.Over 30 participants were present in the meeting providing comments and concerns that reflected thesame themes of those inputs received in the past Public Meetings and throughout the study.4.4StakeholderInterviewsIn order to engage the political leaders that could be affected by a potential widening of the B-W<strong>Parkway</strong>, the team arranged a series of stakeholder interviews between May 2011 and September 2011.These interviews involved local- and State-level elected officials, as well as business and communityleaders. The following themes were extracted from the comments and inputs received during theseinterviews:Economic development and growth could further constrain the corridor.Further congestion could constrain economic development opportunities.Safety implications of existing traffic.North/south alternatives are limited and should be evaluated for implications.The environment is an important component but should not be an overriding element.Multimodal options and a wider study are needed.Park (tree) buffer for communities is an important quality-of-life element.An open mind to the study is needed by all.4.5PublicAccessto<strong>Study</strong>InformationThe public was informed of the study through several means including a mailing list, newsletters, and aWebpage on the FHWA Web site.4.5.1MailingListandEmailContactsA mailing list of over 45,000 residents, employers, governmental agencies and political leaders in thestudy area was developed and maintained throughout the study. This list was used for invitations to thepublic meetings and for distributing newsletters. Meeting reminder blasts were also sent through emailto those on the mailing list.41 November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!