28.11.2012 Views

Management of Remand Detainees in South Africa - DCS-Home

Management of Remand Detainees in South Africa - DCS-Home

Management of Remand Detainees in South Africa - DCS-Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1. Introduction<br />

This chapter provides <strong>in</strong>formation on the current management <strong>of</strong> RDs, based on the situational<br />

analysis report prepared <strong>in</strong> 2008 which reflects the situation <strong>in</strong> SAPS, <strong>DCS</strong>, DSD and other relevant<br />

government departments as well as cluster strategies utilized to ensure down management <strong>of</strong> RDs.<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> clear guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the management <strong>of</strong> RDs is highlighted as need<strong>in</strong>g urgent attention.<br />

The chapter concludes with a brief outl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the challenges and proposals emanat<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />

issues discussed.<br />

5.2. Current Situation: <strong>Management</strong> and Governance <strong>of</strong> RDs<br />

The <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Constitution provides for a maximum period <strong>of</strong> detention <strong>of</strong> 48 hours by SAPS<br />

beyond which any further detention should be granted by a court <strong>of</strong> law. Detention <strong>in</strong> custody while<br />

await<strong>in</strong>g trial is widely utilized <strong>in</strong> CJS to keep the accused until his or her trial for more serious<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences, or if the accused is believed to pose a high risk <strong>of</strong> abscond<strong>in</strong>g or harm<strong>in</strong>g the public or<br />

where specifically required by law. Although the RDs have not been found guilty or sentenced, they<br />

are held <strong>in</strong> custody because there is a risk that they will fail to appear for further court date, they<br />

pose a danger to themselves and/or others or they present a risk to re-<strong>of</strong>fend.<br />

In these <strong>in</strong>stances, the arrest<strong>in</strong>g authority is obliged to present the accused to the courts for trial.<br />

Should there be any further need for <strong>in</strong>vestigation; a request can be submitted to the courts for<br />

delay <strong>of</strong> trial, pend<strong>in</strong>g further <strong>in</strong>vestigations. In this case, the courts can extend such detention for a<br />

further period <strong>of</strong> not more than seven (7) days <strong>in</strong> police custody or issue a warrant <strong>of</strong> detention (with<br />

a notice for appearance <strong>in</strong> court on the date stated <strong>in</strong> the warrant <strong>of</strong> detention.) Failure to collect<br />

any deta<strong>in</strong>ee for court appearance leads to unlawful detention as the detention period is valid until<br />

the court date. In that case the courts must be <strong>in</strong>formed as soon as possible and the accused be<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> the magistrate.<br />

5.3. Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> different Institutions<br />

Various government <strong>in</strong>stitutions or departments have the responsibility to carry through the court<br />

<strong>in</strong>structions by effect<strong>in</strong>g the warrant <strong>of</strong> detention. The roles <strong>of</strong> different <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> RDs are discussed <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />

5.3.1. <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Police Services (SAPS)<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> RDs by SAPS is limited to their functional need to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong><br />

cases and their historical responsibility to transport accused persons <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g RDs deta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>DCS</strong> and SCFs, to courts and provide general security functions. The latter is implicitly drawn as a<br />

mandate ow<strong>in</strong>g to SAPS’s responsibility to provide general public safety and hence it executes this<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!