DINOSAUR TRACKS FROM DORSET:A TWENTY-FIVE YEAR RETROSPECTIVEby Paul C. EnsomEnsom, P.C. 2006. Dinosaur tracks from Dorset: A twenty-five year retrospective. The<strong>Geological</strong> Curator 8(5): 227-241.The practicalities of <strong>and</strong> issues connected with the collection of dinosaur tracks areconsidered in the light of the writers experience while Assistant Curator at the DorsetCounty Museum from 1978-1989, <strong>and</strong> subsequently. A number of short case histories aregiven.Paul C. Ensom, Holly Tree House, Croquet Gardens, Wivenhoe, Essex. CO7 9PQ, UK;e-mail: P.Ensom@pensom.fsnet.co.uk. Received 5th July 2005.IntroductionThis article is based on a talk, ‘Dinosaur tracks fromDorset (A twenty year retrospective)’, given at theGCG Seminar meeting held at the Yorkshire Museumon December 4 th 2000. My brief was to review myexperience of dinosaur tracks in Dorset <strong>and</strong> the impactthey had on both the Dorset County Museum(DORCM), <strong>and</strong>, by extrapolation, could have onother <strong>museum</strong>s. The seminar was divided into twoparts. Firstly I offered a cautionary introduction undersix headings which looked at how such material hadbeen collected <strong>and</strong> the impact such specimens mayhave on the recipient institution, before giving ‘Atwenty year retrospective’ of my Dorset experienceswith dinosaur, <strong>and</strong> other, tracks. This article broadlyfollows the same format, with the addition of sectionsconsidering why dinosaur tracks are important <strong>and</strong>why we should consider their collection. In view ofthe lapse of over five years since the GCG seminar, Ihave exp<strong>and</strong>ed the retrospective’s time-span to 25years.Catalogue numbers (Cat. No.) given in the text arethose used by me (Ensom 1995a) when I reviewed themajority of Purbeck Limestone Group trackdiscoveries, published <strong>and</strong> unpublished, <strong>and</strong> provideda comprehensive indexed catalogue of them. Theindexes covered stratigraphy, locations, persons,repositories/institutions, palaeontology, <strong>and</strong> others –which included load-casts <strong>and</strong> water-hole.The importance of dinosaur tracksBefore considering the practicalities of collectingdinosaur trackways, why are dinosaur tracks of suchinterest? Trackways (two or more tracks) or an in situtrack (an individual print) provide unequivocalevidence for the presence of a dinosaur at that localitywhen the sediments had recently been laid down.Dinosaur bones found in sedimentary rocks may bederived from older strata or be parts of ‘recentlydead’ animals washed down by a river. Completecarcasses may have drifted down a river <strong>and</strong> out tosea, before sinking to the sea-floor <strong>and</strong> being buriedby sediment. The presence of the bones <strong>and</strong> even skinof scelidosaurs in the marine shales <strong>and</strong> clays of theLower Lias of west Dorset is a good example of adinosaur being found in a fully marine environment(Norman 1985). Tracks may be made in shallowwater <strong>and</strong> there are well documented examples ofswimming <strong>trace</strong>s (Whyte <strong>and</strong> Romano 2001), whichat least indicate the close proximity of l<strong>and</strong>. Dinosaurtracks may provide useful information about theenvironments in which they were made <strong>and</strong> the stateof sediments when walked on (Ensom 1995a, Romano<strong>and</strong> Whyte 2003). Dinosaur tracks have the potentialto provide valuable information on the distribution,social groupings, behaviour, biomechanics <strong>and</strong>locomotion of these extinct creatures (Alex<strong>and</strong>er1989, Thulborn 1990, Romano <strong>and</strong> Whyte 2003).Why collect them?Any <strong>museum</strong> confronted with the opportunity tocollect dinosaur tracks should be asking somesearching questions before doing so. Some of theseconsiderations are raised under the ‘Practicalities ofcollection’ heading below. Fundamentally, before adecision to collect them is made, thought must begiven as to whether the trackways or individual trackwould be better left where they are. Do they representsomething new, either ichnotaxonomically-227-
(preservational considerations are likely to be relevantin this context) or stratigraphically? Do they havedisplay potential? While in Dorset, I was responsiblefor publishing a number of short accounts recordingthe discovery of dinosaur tracks which were recordedin situ <strong>and</strong> not collected (Ensom 1995a, b).In working quarries, there will almost certainly befinancial reasons why the destruction of trackwayswill be inevitable if they are not collected. Either thator they will be broken up <strong>and</strong> sold off piecemeal tothe curious. The collection of pavements of any sizewill cause some disruption to an industry which relieson extraction taking place primarily during the ‘dry’summer season, so that stone can dry <strong>and</strong> ‘cure’before the winter months. Delay to stone extractionhas an economic impact; the heavy plant, hired to digthe stone, once on site costs money regardless ofwhether or not it is working! Exceptionally (see‘Kevin Keates Quarry’, below) there may beagreement to sacrifice reserves of valuable stone inorder to leave a pavement in situ. Coastal sections arelikely to be under constant attack from the sea <strong>and</strong>with the reality of rising sea levels this will becomeincreasingly so. Can representative prints or sectionsof a track be lifted <strong>and</strong> preserved which allow therelationship of the different tracks to be studied,especially if the track is new to science or showsfeatures not previously observed? Collectingrepresentative tracks of a large quadupedal dinosaurwill be a significant challenge in itself! The case forpreserving large parts of multiple trackway sites (see‘Townsend Road’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Sunnydown Farm Quarry’,below) may be compelling.Practicalities of collectionAny prospective collector would do well to rememberthat there are not many geological specimens whichcome bigger <strong>and</strong> heavier than dinosaur tracks. Theyshould consider very carefully a number of issuesbefore embarking on their collection. They includethe following:• The ownership of the site. Permission toinvestigate a site, then to excavate <strong>and</strong> collect,must be obtained from the l<strong>and</strong>owner(s). Issuesof ownership <strong>and</strong> where any specimens collectedwill go should be addressed as soon as practicable,unless the exercise is seen as purely an opportunityto record <strong>and</strong> publish the occurrence. The owner’sagreement that the information will be published<strong>and</strong>/or placed in a public archive should beobtained.• Legislation <strong>and</strong> planning. Not only shouldpermission from the owners of a site be obtained,-228-but consideration should also be given to whetherlocal or national laws might be infringed, e.g.,National Park <strong>and</strong>/or National Trust Byelaws,<strong>and</strong> restrictions pertaining to a site’s designationas an SSSI. Consulting representatives of EnglishNature or their equivalents in Wales <strong>and</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong>(both countries have trackway sites), or the localMinerals Officer with the County or DistrictCouncils, may be informative. Large-scaleexcavations may require planning permission ifsuch a consent does not already cover the site.• The accessibility of the site. Access to remote orinaccessible sites can present huge problems,both during the excavation phase <strong>and</strong>, critically,during the recovery operation. While quarrieswill normally have reasonable vehicular access,there may be restrictions on the number of vehiclemovements which can take place each day. Coastallocations usually present most of the difficultiesconfronted at the worst inl<strong>and</strong> venue, with theadditional hazards of rocky shores, <strong>and</strong> tideswhich can inundate sites <strong>and</strong> cut-off the unwary.Access by sea could be an advantage. Analternative is collection by helicopter (Figure 1).Access rights will at least need to be checked <strong>and</strong>may need to be cleared with the owners of adjacentl<strong>and</strong> or l<strong>and</strong> crossed to reach the site.• Manpower <strong>and</strong> equipment. Trackway sites willoften require several very fit <strong>and</strong> suitably equippedindividuals with appropriate skills in h<strong>and</strong>lingheavy blocks of stone with weights up to, <strong>and</strong>sometimes more than, a tonne. Access toequipment to lift <strong>and</strong> position such material maybe possible through contacts in the local quarryingindustry (see also ‘Risk assessment’, below).Angle grinders were used at a site in 1981 (Figure2) <strong>and</strong> can still be hired, though I underst<strong>and</strong> thatfitting the blade is a process for which the usershould have received training. These are highlydangerous machines, but very effective forisolating <strong>and</strong> thinning slabs of rock with trackwayspreserved.• Costs. Recovering a trackway site will ofteninvolve a considerable amount of time. If salariedstaff are involved or temporary labour is beingcontracted, salary costs with attendant overheadsshould be taken into account. Travel to <strong>and</strong> fromthe site will also need to be factored in along withsubsistence costs, <strong>and</strong>, possibly, overnightaccommodation. In the absence of friendly supportfrom local industry, the full costs of equipmenthire <strong>and</strong> transport will also have to be taken intoaccount. In the case of the Sunnydown Farmexcavation in 1986/87, the Dorset Natural History
- Page 3 and 4: TRACE FOSSILS IN THE MUSEUM: GUEST
- Page 5 and 6: Figure 1. Field photograph of an ou
- Page 8 and 9: elements actually containing boring
- Page 10 and 11: CONTINENTAL TRACE FOSSILS AND MUSEU
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 1. Continental environments.
- Page 14 and 15: Behrensmeyer and Hill 1980). Burrow
- Page 16 and 17: Continental environments and their
- Page 18 and 19: entombed within the trace itself (e
- Page 20 and 21: The exhibit of skink burrows could
- Page 22 and 23: of more social advanced wasps (Sphe
- Page 24 and 25: HASIOTIS, S.T., FIORILLO, A.R. and
- Page 28 and 29: & Archaeological Society paid for t
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 1. A Westland Wessex helicop
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 7. A BBC Southern TV crew fi
- Page 34 and 35: Figure 12. In the foreground, volun
- Page 36 and 37: Figure 18. The exposed surface of t
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 24. The 1 m 2 stringed grid
- Page 40 and 41: ENSOM, P.C. 1995b. Dinosaur footpri
- Page 42 and 43: TRACE FOSSIL COLLECTIONS AT THE UNI
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2. Life size reconstruction
- Page 46 and 47: TRACE FOSSILS: A SMALLER MUSEUM’S
- Page 48 and 49: of the Field Club (see above) and l
- Page 50 and 51: Naturalists’ Field Club (e.g., Ra
- Page 52 and 53: Keuper von Warwickshire. Neues Jahr
- Page 54 and 55: TRACE FOSSILS - THE POOR RELATIONS
- Page 56 and 57: amount of space needed to accommoda
- Page 58 and 59: DONOVAN, S.K., PICKERILL, R.K. and
- Page 60 and 61: TRACE FOSSILS IN TWO NORTH AMERICAN
- Page 62 and 63: One time was by a biology student w
- Page 64 and 65: eggs, are displayed just above, nex
- Page 66 and 67: Figure 8. This Early Cretaceous tra