COLLECTING INVERTEBRATE TRACE FOSSILSby Stephen K. Donovan, Ron K. Pickerill <strong>and</strong> Donovan J. BlissettDonovan, S.K., Pickerill, R.K. <strong>and</strong> Blissett, D.J. 2006. Collecting invertebrate <strong>trace</strong><strong>fossils</strong>. The <strong>Geological</strong> Curator 8(5): 205-210.Trace <strong>fossils</strong> result from the behavioural activities between organisms <strong>and</strong> variablesubstrates. They form an integral part of the collections of many natural history<strong>museum</strong>s, providing exciting specimens for display <strong>and</strong> important material for scientificresearch. Ichno<strong>fossils</strong> preserved parallel to stratification in sedimentary rocks can becollected in large slabs either from float or liberated by hammering or rock saw. Laterallyextensive specimens commonly have a repetitive morphology, so a fragment mayprovide ample data for identification <strong>and</strong> description. The morphology of an ichnofossilthat cross-cuts stratification will be more difficult to recognise in the field <strong>and</strong> mayrequire laboratory preparation of slabs using a rock saw. Bioerosive structures in or onlitho- or bioclasts may be easy to collect, but care must be taken to collect data relatingto provenance, that is, whether the clasts are autochthonous or allochthonous.Stephen K. Donovan, Department of Palaeontology, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum,Postbus 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s; e-mail: donovan@naturalis.nnm.nl,Ron K. Pickerill <strong>and</strong> Donovan J. Blissett, Department of Geology, University of NewBrunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5A3; e-mail: rpickeri@unb.ca.Received 5th July 2005.IntroductionWhy collect <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong>? After all, they are not<strong>fossils</strong> in the ‘true’ sense, but sedimentary structuresof one sort or another, generated by organic activity.Nevertheless, they are treated as palaeontologicalobjects <strong>and</strong> have a scientific value equivalent to thatof other geological specimens. Natural history<strong>museum</strong>s should acquire specimens of <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong>for all the reasons that they want body <strong>fossils</strong> (Knell1999; Allmon 2005), including the accumulation ofexceptional examples for display <strong>and</strong> the preservationof name-bearing types (see also Pickerill 1994;International Commission on ZoologicalNomenclature 1999).The <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong> considered in this contribution arethose macroscopic structures generated byinvertebrates <strong>and</strong> not, for example, microscopicarthropod coprolites (e.g., Blau et al. 1997) ormicroborings (e.g., Radtke 1991). The specimens ofinterest are those that are commonly formed either ator subsequent to the time of sedimentary depositionor lithification, either parallel to (trails, tracks, someburrows) or cross-cutting stratification (manyburrows); <strong>and</strong> borings <strong>and</strong> other bioerosive structuresin hard substrates (commonly rock (particularlylimestone), shells <strong>and</strong> bones).-205-Invertebrate <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong>, as discussed herein, can bedivided into two broad groups: those preserved inwhat was originally ‘soft’ (unlithified) sediment (or,rarely, weathered rock; P.J. Orr, writtencommunication), but which is now a lithifiedsedimentary rock, such as burrows, tracks <strong>and</strong> trails;<strong>and</strong> bioerosive structures in what were hard substratesat the time of <strong>trace</strong> formation, principally boringsinto limestones, shells <strong>and</strong> bones. Both groups caninclude <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong> preserved in analogous spatialrelationships to substrate, such as tracks, trails <strong>and</strong>burrows parallel to bedding, <strong>and</strong> borings on or withinancient hardgrounds or other lithic substrates, suchas unconformities. Herein, we adopt the artificial‘convention’ of considering <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong> with respectto their orientation to stratification, parallel <strong>and</strong> nonparallel, to which is added bioerosive structures inlitho- <strong>and</strong> bioclasts.Useful general references for underst<strong>and</strong>ing theterminology of <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong> include Häntzschel(1975), Frey (1975), Maples <strong>and</strong> West (1992),Donovan (1994), Bromley (1996) <strong>and</strong> McIlroy (2004).Terminology of <strong>trace</strong> fossil morphology used hereinfollows these references <strong>and</strong> generally accepteddescriptive criteria used throughout palaeontology.We do not discuss the many methodologies that aregenerally applicable to palaeontological <strong>and</strong>
Figure 1. Field photograph of an outcrop in the Miocene Pelleu Isl<strong>and</strong> Formation, White Limestone Group, Jamaicadepicting pronounced overhang of bedding plane surfaces (see Blissett <strong>and</strong> Pickerill 2004 for details on the ichnotaxa).geological collecting, <strong>and</strong> which are adequatelydescribed elsewhere (e.g., Rixon 1976). Further, werecommend Feldmann et al. (1989) for techniques ofpreparation, which are not discussed herein. Illustratedspecimens are deposited in the collections of theNationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden, TheNetherl<strong>and</strong>s (RGM), <strong>and</strong> the Geology Museum,University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston,Jamaica (UWIGM).Collecting specimens oriented parallel ornear-parallel to stratificationThis group embraces surface tracks <strong>and</strong> trails, certainburrows <strong>and</strong> burrow systems, <strong>and</strong> surface etchings,borings, etc., on hardground surfaces. It also includesopen infaunal burrow systems cast on the sole of thesucceeding bed in turbidites <strong>and</strong> tempestites,commonly found in, for example, Paleodictyon. Such<strong>trace</strong>s are best seen at sites where extensive beddingplanes are exposed (tops of beds, except where theyhave been inverted by tectonic activity) or in extensivevertical sections with more or less pronouncedoverhangs (e.g., Figure 1). In many cases these arethe easiest of <strong>trace</strong> <strong>fossils</strong> to recognise, yet they arenot necessarily the easiest to collect, such as wherethe <strong>trace</strong> fossil is situated in the centre of a surface orthe bed is more than a few tens of mm in thickness. Anextensive bedding surface (e.g., Figure 2) with avariety of <strong>trace</strong>s <strong>and</strong> other sedimentary structures canbe a spectacular display specimen, even if it has to becollected as a jigsaw of separate fragments for reassembly,broken up in the field by heavy hammeringor perhaps even a rock saw; a less destructivemethodology would be to cast the surface in the field.Important data, apart from that normally collected inthe field (Tucker 1982), includes labelling the top<strong>and</strong> bottom of the slab(s) (there may be differentassemblages of <strong>trace</strong>s on each surface), compassorientation, <strong>and</strong> numbering the separate pieces of a‘jigsaw’ that can be related to an explanatory sketch(for suggestions of how to glue a rock ‘jigsaw’ backtogether, see Wolberg 1989). The parts of a ‘jigsaw’may include pieces of burrow infill which have‘popped off’ of a bedding plane.Collecting in situ specimens from bedding planes islikely to involve intensive labour, using a heavyhammer <strong>and</strong>/or a rocksaw. It is easier (<strong>and</strong> lessdestructive to an exposure) to look for loose slabs at-206-
- Page 3: TRACE FOSSILS IN THE MUSEUM: GUEST
- Page 8 and 9: elements actually containing boring
- Page 10 and 11: CONTINENTAL TRACE FOSSILS AND MUSEU
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 1. Continental environments.
- Page 14 and 15: Behrensmeyer and Hill 1980). Burrow
- Page 16 and 17: Continental environments and their
- Page 18 and 19: entombed within the trace itself (e
- Page 20 and 21: The exhibit of skink burrows could
- Page 22 and 23: of more social advanced wasps (Sphe
- Page 24 and 25: HASIOTIS, S.T., FIORILLO, A.R. and
- Page 26 and 27: DINOSAUR TRACKS FROM DORSET:A TWENT
- Page 28 and 29: & Archaeological Society paid for t
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 1. A Westland Wessex helicop
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 7. A BBC Southern TV crew fi
- Page 34 and 35: Figure 12. In the foreground, volun
- Page 36 and 37: Figure 18. The exposed surface of t
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 24. The 1 m 2 stringed grid
- Page 40 and 41: ENSOM, P.C. 1995b. Dinosaur footpri
- Page 42 and 43: TRACE FOSSIL COLLECTIONS AT THE UNI
- Page 44 and 45: Figure 2. Life size reconstruction
- Page 46 and 47: TRACE FOSSILS: A SMALLER MUSEUM’S
- Page 48 and 49: of the Field Club (see above) and l
- Page 50 and 51: Naturalists’ Field Club (e.g., Ra
- Page 52 and 53: Keuper von Warwickshire. Neues Jahr
- Page 54 and 55:
TRACE FOSSILS - THE POOR RELATIONS
- Page 56 and 57:
amount of space needed to accommoda
- Page 58 and 59:
DONOVAN, S.K., PICKERILL, R.K. and
- Page 60 and 61:
TRACE FOSSILS IN TWO NORTH AMERICAN
- Page 62 and 63:
One time was by a biology student w
- Page 64 and 65:
eggs, are displayed just above, nex
- Page 66 and 67:
Figure 8. This Early Cretaceous tra