12.07.2015 Views

Heavy metal adsorption on iron oxide and iron oxide-coated silica ...

Heavy metal adsorption on iron oxide and iron oxide-coated silica ...

Heavy metal adsorption on iron oxide and iron oxide-coated silica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5CHARACTERIZATION OF IRON OXIDES AND SILICAIn this secti<strong>on</strong>, results are presented for characterizing ir<strong>on</strong> <strong>oxide</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>silica</strong>. Goethite wasproduced in earlier work (Trivedi, et al. 2001a); HFO is synthesized following the samemethod as of Axe <strong>and</strong> Anders<strong>on</strong> (1995). Characterizati<strong>on</strong> analyses are c<strong>on</strong>ducted incorresp<strong>on</strong>ding studies <strong>and</strong> are summarized below.5.1 Characterizati<strong>on</strong> of Ir<strong>on</strong> OxidesXRD analysis reveals that goethite is highly crystalline; the ESEM micrograph showsneedle shaped or acicular crystals of 0.5 to 1µm in length. In the particle size analysis,the goethite powder is re-suspended for 4 hours <strong>and</strong> the stabilized particles range from0.2 to 84 1.1m. The BET surface area of the goethite is 31 m 2 g-1 ; the pore size rangesfrom 2 to 220 nm <strong>and</strong> the porosity of goethite is 0.3%.Potentiometric titrati<strong>on</strong>s were performed to evaluate the PZC of goethite; theresult, 8.78 ± 0.97 (Figure 5.1), suggests slight drifting to a higher pH compared to thatfound earlier 7.8 ± 0.4 (Trivedi <strong>and</strong> Axe, 2000). Possible reas<strong>on</strong>s for this difference maybe that potentiometric titrati<strong>on</strong>s were performed <strong>on</strong> different batches of goethite. Studies(Schwertmann et al. 1985; Villalobos et al. 2003) have shown that crystalline shape, sizeof particles, <strong>and</strong> the resulting reactivity of goethite depended <strong>on</strong> experimental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ssuch as rate of additi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> total base added, presence of sorbing i<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> aging time.Small variances between different batches may exists <strong>and</strong> influence the PZC. Previousstudies (Evans et al. 1979; Zeltner <strong>and</strong> Anders<strong>on</strong>, 1988) have shown that when thegoethite suspensi<strong>on</strong> was purged for 2 m<strong>on</strong>ths, the PZC increased from 8.1 to 9.1 as45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!