Sandra Hopkins Final Report.pdf - University of Surrey

44. Broadhead D a, Chapple C-L, Faulkner K, Davies M L, and McCallum H, ‘The impact ofCardiology on the Collective Effective Dose in the North of England’, British Journal ofRadiology, 70 (1997), 492-49745. Chapple C-L, Broadhead D A and Faulkner K, ‘A phantom based method for derivingtypical patient doses from measurements of dose-area product on populations of patients’,The British Journal of Radiology, 68 (1995), 1083-108646. Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Dafnomili P, Koutelou M, Vano E and Neofotistou V;‘Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiologyprocedures’, The British Journal of Radiology, 77 (2004), 562-56747. Haji-Ali R, Monahan W and Ong L, ‘The digital flat plate detector imaging system reducesradiation exposure compared to conventional systems’, American Journal of Cardiology2000, 86,(supp1 8A)48. Ruiz-Cruces R et al, ‘Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascularprocedures: conventional versus digital systems’, Radiology, 205 (1997) 385-39349. Wagner L, Archer B and Cohen A, ‘Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopicallyguided interventional procedures’, (2000) 11, 25-3350. Geijer H, Beckman K , Andersson T and Persliden J, ‘Radiation dose optimisation incoronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Experimental studies’,European Journal of Radiology, 12 (2002), 2571-258151. Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing ‘Evaluation Report – Cardiovascular x-ray imagingsystems with flat panel detectors’, CEP09045, Feb. 201045