12.07.2015 Views

Download Update 11 - Update in Anaesthesia - WFSA

Download Update 11 - Update in Anaesthesia - WFSA

Download Update 11 - Update in Anaesthesia - WFSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92<strong>Update</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Anaesthesia</strong>kill<strong>in</strong>g zone of 25 m, and have an <strong>in</strong>jury zone of 200 m.Injuries to head, neck, chest, or abdomen are often fatal.• III (5%) from handl<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>e. The victim, often a child,susta<strong>in</strong>s severe upper limb <strong>in</strong>juries with associated face<strong>in</strong>juries.The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15% follow no particular pattern 5 . Coexist<strong>in</strong>glong-term <strong>in</strong>juries may <strong>in</strong>volve the eyes and peripheral nerves.Social impact. A study of 206 communities <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan,Mozambique, Cambodia, and Bosnia found a heavy toll<strong>in</strong> physical, mental, and economic disability 8 . The WHO GlobalBurden of Disease—which assesses the impact of social,economic, and physical handicap on the <strong>in</strong>dividual, the family,and society—rates below-knee amputation as the midpo<strong>in</strong>t ofseverity. Limb amputation impairs physical and hence earn<strong>in</strong>gcapacity and may be accompanied by profound psychiatricproblems and ostracism. Loss of <strong>in</strong>come occurs through lossof land and livestock, and reduced access to food andwater supplies. Agricultural production might be tripled <strong>in</strong>some areas by removal of landm<strong>in</strong>es 8 .Numbers of amputees. Fatality rates average around 40%.For each person killed, 1.5 are <strong>in</strong>jured 4,5,9 . Every year landm<strong>in</strong>eskill 15,000 people, ma<strong>in</strong>ly civilians of whom 20% are childrenyounger than 15 years 7,5 . Thus a decade from now, there will beabout 250,000 documented landm<strong>in</strong>e-related amputees. Theremay be many more, as there are 100,000 amputees <strong>in</strong> Angolaalready (J. Meynadier, personal observation). A retrospectiveanalysis of 720 patients <strong>in</strong>jured by m<strong>in</strong>es suggests an overallamputation rate of 28 %. By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ICRC data 5 aboutresidual disability with the above-cited survey of landm<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>jury prevalence 8 , one may estimate the number of amputees<strong>in</strong> the four countries studied. Further data on the numbers ofm<strong>in</strong>es per square mile <strong>in</strong> these and other countries 7 re<strong>in</strong>forcethese weapons’ potential health problems <strong>in</strong> terms of amputeesper 1000 <strong>in</strong>habitants (Table 1).Medical NeedsLandm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>jury victims are one group among many seek<strong>in</strong>gmedical care <strong>in</strong> those countries where m<strong>in</strong>es have been used.Their relatively small annual needs are compounded overtime because their long-term medical attention dra<strong>in</strong>s scarceresources, particularly as victims accumulate.Table 1: M<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>juries per year (from Ref. 8).Estimated numbers of amputees per 1000 population <strong>in</strong> parenthesesAge (yrs) Miles per45 square mileAfghanistan 40male 9.0 (2.5) 95.4 (26) 37.1 (10)female 8.0 (2.2) 4.5 (1.2) 18.1 (5.0)Bosnia 152male 0.7 (0.19) 8.1 (2.2) 2.3 (0.64)female 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) 0.5 (0.1)Cambodia 142male 4.0 (1.1) 51.3 (14.6) 29.4 (8.23)female 0.4 (0.<strong>11</strong>) 2.3 (0.64) 3.7 (1.0)Mozambique 7male 1.4 (0.39) 14.3 (4.0) 10.6 (2.9)female 1.0 (0.28) 3.2 (0.89) 5.6 (1.5)Acute care 3 . Evacuation of the <strong>in</strong>jured from the m<strong>in</strong>efield,control of bleed<strong>in</strong>g by pressure dress<strong>in</strong>g or tourniquet, andspl<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g of fractures are immediate needs. In wartime anepidemiological approach based upon first aid, tetanusvacc<strong>in</strong>ation, and antibiotic prophylaxis is more cost-effectivethan the traditional approach of urgent surgery. Basic nurs<strong>in</strong>gcare saves more lives than heroic surgical <strong>in</strong>terventions and ismore easily available locally. A chest dra<strong>in</strong> should be <strong>in</strong>sertedif penetrat<strong>in</strong>g chest <strong>in</strong>juries are suspected. Antibiotic prophylaxis(benzylpenicill<strong>in</strong>) and tetanus prophylaxis should beadm<strong>in</strong>istered. Delayed surgical <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong>fluences overallquality of survival 6 . Traumatic bilateral above-knee amputationand/or signs of <strong>in</strong>tra-abdom<strong>in</strong>al bleed<strong>in</strong>g are om<strong>in</strong>ous andjustify an aggressive approach 4 .Rehabilitation and pa<strong>in</strong> control for landm<strong>in</strong>e survivorshave ga<strong>in</strong>ed little attention so far. Instructions for thetreatment of postamputation pa<strong>in</strong> and PLP should bemade available for use by relief agencies and localhealth care workers.Evacuation may be slow. Only 25% of those treated by theICRC arrived with<strong>in</strong> six hours of <strong>in</strong>jury; 15% traveled more thanthree days. In-hospital care is often limited by <strong>in</strong>adequatepersonnel and resources that can make surgery lifethreaten<strong>in</strong>g.After excision of dead and contam<strong>in</strong>ated tissuethe wound should be left open for five days. Repeatedoperations and sk<strong>in</strong> graft<strong>in</strong>g may be necessary to achievesecondary closure. Sophisticated anesthetic practice may notbe possible <strong>in</strong> areas where landm<strong>in</strong>es are most common.Ketam<strong>in</strong>e and local anesthetics are generally available <strong>in</strong> suchsett<strong>in</strong>gs and potentially offer effective postoperative pa<strong>in</strong>relief. Sp<strong>in</strong>al anesthesia can be adm<strong>in</strong>istered safely by tra<strong>in</strong>ednonmedical personnel and is used frequently for subsequentoperations. Adequate pa<strong>in</strong> relief improves outcome byreduc<strong>in</strong>g complications and facilitat<strong>in</strong>g early recovery <strong>11</strong>–14 .Rout<strong>in</strong>e pa<strong>in</strong> assessment and organized provision of simpleanalgesic techniques will optimize postoperative analgesia <strong>11</strong> .Fig. 1, a modification of the WHO analgesic ladder forcancer pa<strong>in</strong>, depicts suggestions for the treatment of acutepostoperative pa<strong>in</strong>, burns, and trauma from a review publishedjo<strong>in</strong>tly by IASP and the World Federation of Societies ofAnaesthesiologists (<strong>WFSA</strong>) 12 . This review is available <strong>in</strong>French, Russian, and Arabic 15 .The <strong>WFSA</strong> “acute pa<strong>in</strong> treatment ladder” uses wellknownand simple techniques of regional anesthesia and alimited number of analgesics <strong>in</strong> a three-step approach. Itsapplication depends upon on-site availability of theseagents. Regional anesthesia provides excellent operat<strong>in</strong>gconditions and postoperative pa<strong>in</strong> relief. S<strong>in</strong>gle-shottechniques or long-act<strong>in</strong>g (>24 hour) blockade with dilutesolutions of bupivaca<strong>in</strong>e at plexus or peripheral nerves arealternatives when opioids are unavailable and pose less riskof hypotension, ur<strong>in</strong>ary retention, and immobilization thancentral axis blockade. Peripheral blockade requires lesssupervision postoperatively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!