Direct and Spillover Effects of ATP-Funded Photonics Technologies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Business Journal of Phoenix, The (2002), Three-Five Buys InViso Assets, April 29, 2002.Caplin, A. and J. Leahy (2004), The Social Discount Rate, Journal of Political Economy112, 1257–68.Chin, S. (2003), Small Display Makers Face Cash Crisis: Start-Ups Fight for SurvivalDespite Booming Market, Planet Analog, March 25, 2003. Available online atwww.planetanalog.com/news/OEG20030325S0047.Clark, D. (2001), What’s Ahead for Display Screens, Wall Street Journal, June 6, 2001, R18.Clark, N.A. and S.T. Lagerwall (1980), Submicrosecond Bistable Electro-Optic Switching inLiquid Crystals, Applied Physics Letters 36, 899–901.Denison, E.F. (1985), Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929–1982, The BrookingsInstitution, Washington, DC.DisplaySearch (2004), DisplaySearch Annual OLED and FPD Equipment Reports, InsightMedia, Norwalk, CT.Evenson, R.E. and Y. Kislev (1973), Research and Productivity in Wheat and Maize, Journalof Political Economy 81, 1309–29.Feldman, M.P. and M.R. Kelley (2001), Winning an Award From the Advanced TechnologyProgram: Pursuing R&D Strategies in the Public Interest and Benefiting From aHalo Effect, NISTIR-6577, National Institute of Standards and Technology,Gaithersburg, MD.Firester, A.H. (1992), Active Matrix Technology, Display Technologies in Japan, JapaneseTechnology Evaluation Center, June 1992. Available online at http://www.wtec.org/loyola/dsply_jp/toc.htm.Forgrieve, J. (2002), Survival on Display: Displaytech of Longmont Fights to Stay AfloatWith Its Microdisplay Technology, Rocky Mountain News, January 28, 2002, 1B.Fox, B. (1996), Battery Giants Ready for Battle Over Patent, New Scientist, March 16,1996, 2626.Geroski, P. (1995), Markets for Technology: Knowledge, Innovation, and Appropriability,in P. Stoneman, ed., Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and TechnologicalChange, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.Grant, E., P. Nolan, and D. Pinner (2002), Chips Off a New Block (Organic Thin FilmTransistors), McKinsey Quarterly, January 1, 2002.92 DIRECT AND SPILLOVER EFFECTS OF ATP-FUNDED PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGIES
Griliches, Z. (1958), Research Cost and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and RelatedInnovations, Journal of Political Economy 66, 419–31.Griliches, Z. (1964), Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate AgriculturalProduction Function, American Economic Review 44, 961–74.Griliches, Z. (1979), Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity, BellJournal of Economics 10, 92–116.Griliches, Z. (1986), Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s,American Economic Review 76, 141–54.Hicks, D. (2002), Indicators of Knowledge Value, Conference on Estimating the Benefits ofGovernment Sponsored Energy R&D, U.S. Department of Energy, March 4–5, 2002.Available online at www.esd.ornl.gov/benefits_conference/hicks.ppt.HM Treasury (2003), Annex 6: Discount Rate, The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluationin Central Government, HM Treasury, London. Available online atgreenbook.treasury.gov.uk/annex06.htm.Jaffe, A.B. (1986), Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence From Firms’Patents, Profits, and Market Value, American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.Jaffe, A.B. (1996). Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the AdvancedTechnology Program, NIST GCR–97–708, National Institute of Standards andTechnology, Gaithersburg, MD.Leonard, W.N. (1971), Research and Development in Industrial Growth, Journal of PoliticalEconomy 79, 232–56.Mansfield, E. (1986), Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study, Management Science32, 173–81.Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner, and G. Beardsley (1977), Social andPrivate Rates of Return From Industrial Innovations, Quarterly Journal of Economics91, 221–40.Metcliff, S. (1995), The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium andEvolutionary Perspectives, in P. Stoneman, ed., Handbook of the Economics ofInnovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.Nelson, R.R. (1959), The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research, Journal of PoliticalEconomy 67, 297–306.References 93
Page 1 and 2:
NIST GCR 06-893Direct and Spillover
Page 5 and 6:
AbstractTo evaluate the impact of t
Page 7:
AcknowledgmentsThis research would
Page 10 and 11:
This report presents the findings f
Page 12 and 13:
6. This case study suggests that ke
Page 14 and 15:
3. Comparison of Displaytech and Un
Page 17 and 18:
1. Introduction and BackgroundThe A
Page 19 and 20:
the Department of Defense (DOD), Na
Page 21 and 22:
Hence, we consider two additional s
Page 23 and 24:
area because many photonics technol
Page 25 and 26:
FIGURE 2Worldwide Photonics Compone
Page 27 and 28:
TABLE 3.Matched Case Study Firms by
Page 29 and 30:
2. DisplaytechINTRODUCTIONIn June 1
Page 31 and 32:
significant interest worldwide. The
Page 33 and 34:
FIGURE 3Cross-Section of a Ferroele
Page 35 and 36:
TABLE 4.Crowded Display Competition
Page 37 and 38:
FIGURE 4.Competing Electronic Displ
Page 39 and 40:
wafer. For FLC-on-silicon microdisp
Page 41 and 42:
FIGURE 5.Within-Market Increase in
Page 43 and 44:
FIGURE 6.Estimated ATP Employment E
Page 45 and 46:
subtracted the opportunity value of
Page 47 and 48:
FIGURE 8.Historic Display Price-Qua
Page 49 and 50:
TABLE 6.Estimated Consumer Surplus
Page 51 and 52:
TABLE 7.Organizations and Groups Mo
Page 53 and 54:
FIGURE 12.Patent Citations to Displ
Page 55 and 56:
ColorLink’s pi-cell color switche
Page 57 and 58: FIGURE 14.Geographic Distribution o
Page 59 and 60: competitors, were added by patent e
Page 61 and 62: FIGURE 16.Citations to Displaytech
Page 63 and 64: TABLE 9.Top Organizations and Indiv
Page 65 and 66: FIGURE 19.Corporate Citations to Di
Page 67 and 68: TABLE 10.Corporations Citing Post-1
Page 69 and 70: 3. Comparison ofDisplaytech and Uni
Page 71 and 72: acklights of LCDs; and they are bri
Page 73 and 74: which was to give DuPont access to
Page 75 and 76: FIGURE 20.Timing of Displaytech and
Page 77 and 78: Table 11. Organizations and Groups
Page 79 and 80: FIGURE 23.Patent Citations to Uniax
Page 81 and 82: In summary, together with Uniax ear
Page 83 and 84: TABLE 12.OLS Regression Results on
Page 85 and 86: FIGURE 26.Corporate Citations to Un
Page 87 and 88: TABLE 13.ContinuedTop 25 Individual
Page 89 and 90: FIGURE 28.Corporate Citations to Un
Page 91 and 92: 4. Findings and ObservationsFINDING
Page 93 and 94: microdisplays. We cannot fully dise
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 15.Publication and Citation R
Page 97 and 98: social ties, distance in the sense
Page 99 and 100: FIGURE 30.Flowchart of ATP Technolo
Page 101: government policies, which establis
Page 104 and 105: • ATP goals inherently involve se
Page 106 and 107: iv. Suppliers. Three or four on who
Page 110 and 111: Paul, J. (2000), A Brief History of
Page 113: ABOUT THE AUTHORSTodd A. Watkins is
show all

Direct and Spillover Effects of ATP-Funded Photonics Technologies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?