30.11.2012 Views

SEVEN PAPERS ON EXISTENTIAL ANALYSIS ... - Wagner College

SEVEN PAPERS ON EXISTENTIAL ANALYSIS ... - Wagner College

SEVEN PAPERS ON EXISTENTIAL ANALYSIS ... - Wagner College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

existence, that I exist, which others instantiate. My being-consciousness, as the "face" of my<br />

existence, does not show itself to me except in the faces of others.<br />

J. The Existence of the Other, Once More<br />

I will conclude with another look at the other. Consider this scenario: A stranger comes into the<br />

room where I am seated reading and sits down at a table a few feet away from me. We look at<br />

each other and exchange glances. I turn back to my book. The stranger leaves, unnoticed by<br />

me. The encounter between us was brief, yet we have validated each other's existence. What<br />

happened?<br />

The stranger's body entered my visual field and became a pattern of objects for my<br />

perceptual consciousness. His body's visible appearance was preceded by a few audible hints<br />

of the nearness of something moving, perhaps of something living. The rhythm of the footsteps<br />

was familiar. It was the unique rhythm of bipedal movement – walking. My expectation that it<br />

was a human being was confirmed when I saw the figure. It was what appeared to be an adult<br />

male with a certain physiognomy. At what point did I validate his existence?<br />

I would suggest that when our glances met validation occurred. We did not touch, nor<br />

did we exchange a word. Either of those events would have had the same effect, however.<br />

Though all three means of validating the other often tend to occur together, one is enough. The<br />

earliest of the equally basic modes of encounter – the gaze – is, in a way, the most powerful, but<br />

validation is just as poignantly exemplified by the handshake two people exchange or by<br />

greeting each other by name at a distance.<br />

What of those "featherless bipeds" walking by on the sidewalk outside or sitting across the<br />

room with their backs to me? I infer certain probable characteristics of what each of them is –<br />

that they are alive, not corpses, male or female, children or adults – but that is all. I believe<br />

something about what they are, but this has nothing to do with their existence. Validation of<br />

their existence requires the concurrent validation of my existence by one of them. Natural things<br />

and fabricated things, images and recollections of which I am consciousness, all confront me as<br />

beings, but another human being does not confront me in that way (although socialization can<br />

make encounter less likely).<br />

The gaze, the human touch, and speech are missing in non-human beings. Another<br />

human being is not only a thing, like a cat or a telephone. She is that, too, but first of all and<br />

primarily, she exists.<br />

In the example just given, the stranger's existence was more than his physical presence<br />

as a human being, although without that he might as well have been a well-designed robot. My<br />

existence means something only to another existing being. It lacks meaning, for example, for my<br />

cat. All that matters to my cat is what I am, especially as his reliable feeder.<br />

The human paradox of both being and existing is now clear. There stands a human being<br />

and all that I infer he is, but all that is directly accessible to me is his existence. Conversely, his<br />

own existence is inaccessible to him. He requires that from me and I provide it in acts of<br />

existential validation. My access to his existence is crucial for him. Surprisingly, as we have seen, it<br />

presents me with something missing, absent, not there; namely, all that the other is not.<br />

Intimacy is the effort to somehow overcome the absence which an other's existence<br />

opens up when I validate it. An other whom I try to bar from validating my existence becomes<br />

invisible. I try to see past him, refusing to recognize his existence. I fix him as a specimen of what I<br />

take him to be, or I try to see through him. This is the look of the professional, especially the<br />

medical clinician who looks at me with the eyes of an anatomist. I am the "living corpse" he<br />

treats, operates on, and manages as a case.<br />

When confronted by another human being, if I want to refuse him the validation of his<br />

existence, I ignore his gaze, avoid his touch, and listen only to the information his words<br />

communicate. I look away, I chill as the other brushes against my hand, I ignore his voice (27).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!