<strong>TERENA</strong> Compendium of National Research and Education Networks In Europe /Services3C.15 Indexation of the Digital DivideWithin the framework of the EARNEST studies, an attempt was made to developan index to measure the state of research and education networking in a countryand which allows comparisons between countries. The final report of the substudyis due to be published by <strong>TERENA</strong> towards the end of 2008.The index, termed the REDI (Research and Education Networking DevelopmentIndex), is based on five sub-indices, addressing:• infrastructure;• usage;• affordability;• knowledge;• quality.These sub-indices are based in part on Compendium data and in part ongenerally available data such as Gross Domestic Product, country size, number ofinhabitants and school / university enrolment figures. In other parts, further workis needed. Thus, in the area of quality, it is proposed to measure items such aspacket loss, TCP throughput, round-trip time, and jitter. These measurements arenot yet readily available for all NRENs.For the infrastructure index, the study makes certain assumptions about thenumber of users per country that need to be further tested.The EARNEST Summary Report recommends further work in this area andrecommends that NRENs provide online measurement of traffic data 2(as many already do).822EARNEST Summary Report, <strong>TERENA</strong>, 2008, p. 40.
<strong>TERENA</strong> Compendium of National Research and Education Networks In Europe /Tasks, Staffing, Funding4 FUNDING AND STAFFINGNote that some NRENs provide services only to the research and / or educationcommunities in their country. Some provide additional services as well; forexample, they administer the country-code top level domain or they connectcompanies or institutions that are clearly outside the research or educationcommunities. For the sake of comparability, we asked NRENs to provideinformation only about the activities for the research or education communities.For short, we have called these ‘NREN activities’.After the overview section (4.1), section 4.2 provides information about variousaspects of NREN staffing. Section 4.3 deals with NREN budgets and 4.4 and 4.5provide more information about income sources and expenditure categories,respectively. Lastly, section 4.6 provides information about how different networklevels are funded in different NRENs.4.1 OverviewIt is almost impossible to compare NRENs by staff or budget size. This isbecause NREN budgets are structured differently; they have different tasks,which are also funded in different ways.Section 4.2 details the considerable differences in the number of staff NRENs haveand the types of staff they employ, and provides an explanation for some of thedifferences.Section 4.3 provides similar information for NREN budgets. It explains that NRENbudgets may fluctuate considerably from year to year and they have differentfunded activities in each country.When comparing current budget data with data from past editions of theCompendium, it becomes clear that NREN budgets tend to be stable overtime. There are fluctuations from year to year, depending on whether or notan important investment takes place during that year. But on the whole, thetrend is that budgets stay relatively stable and that NRENs are able to delivermore bandwidth and more services for roughly the same amount of money.This trend is illustrated by the following table, which shows traffic increase vs.budget increase (or decrease) over the 2003-2007 period. Note that the tableand graph are meant to illustrate the general trend – because of the difficultiesin comparing NREN budgets, the data are not suitable for making directcomparisons between NRENs.Table 4.1.1 Traffic Growth and Budget Growth, 2003 – 2008EU/EFTACountriesOtherCountriesAllCountriesTotaltraffic,2003 (TB)Totaltraffic,2008 (TB)Totalbudgets,2003(MEUR)Totalbudgets,2008(MEUR)Trafficincrease,2003- 2008Budgetincrease,2003- 200840,165 168,372 311 341 319% 10%3,101 13,411 28 38 332% 34%43,266 181,782 339 379 320% 12%The situation is not as clear in the less developed NRENs. There, newpossibilities for significantly upgrading international bandwidth (for example,under the GN2, EUMEDCONNECT or SEEREN2 projects) could act as a catalystfor increased national NREN budgets.The data suggests that in these countries a modest increase in budget, inmany cases, leads to a significant increase in traffic. However, as is clear fromChapter 3, there is not always a commensurate increase in services.83