Effective gap-<strong>to</strong>-chord ratioFigure 1THE BUSEMANN SUPERSONIC BIPLANEBusemann's design of a drag-free supersonic wing is a classical study in shock wave dynamics. The ordinaryreflection of a shock is shown in a. The arrows show the direction of the fluid flow (the flow of air around thewing): As long as the flow is parallel <strong>to</strong> the wall (or wing), there is no shock wave. Thus, as shown in b, bybending the wall, the reflected shock can be "canceled" by an expansion at the corner.The Busemann biplane at zero lift is shown in c. As the wings travel through the air at a'velocity V 0 , part of theexpansion wave at the corner cancels the compression wave from the leading edge of the opposite plane <strong>and</strong>produces the symmetrical pressure distribution shown. The wave drag is zero.At slightly different speeds, the waves begin <strong>to</strong> leak out, as shown in d. Busemann describes this as the wingsacting like a nozzle. The graph, e, shows the drag as a function of the geometry of the wings, along with thereflections of the shock waves required <strong>to</strong> produce the various occurrences of zero drag.Surprises like this don't go so well when you can't afford<strong>to</strong> live on less than the <strong>to</strong>tal amount of your salary.Question: Was there a labora<strong>to</strong>ry there in Dresden?In Dresden there was a labora<strong>to</strong>ry for applications ofaerodynamics for engineering turbines <strong>and</strong> things likethat. And although you weren't supposed <strong>to</strong> say it, it wasfor airplanes, <strong>to</strong>o. While I was at Dresden I got invited <strong>to</strong>the Volta meeting [the 1935 European meeting in Italy thatlaid the foundation for supersonic aerodynamics]. Andthere we could say that Dresden was working on applications<strong>to</strong> aviation—but for 100 years in the future. But itdidn't take long—just 10 years later Germany had a war.Question: Were you thinking of those turbines for jetengines, or was it still the aerodynamic question of wingdesign?We had supersonic wing shapes, <strong>to</strong> have less drag <strong>and</strong>lots of lift. That was the subject I got <strong>to</strong> talk about at Volta,since I had worked on that. They invited all the peoplewho had worked on high speeds <strong>to</strong> the meeting in Volta,Italy in 1935. The subject was high-speed subsonic <strong>and</strong>supersonic flight. And they invited all the winners of theSchneider Cup <strong>to</strong> talk about how they had built theirairplanes for this special use <strong>and</strong> what their thinking wasabout engine changes, the wings, <strong>and</strong> things like that.Question: Did Germany enter the Schneider Cup race?No. We were not allowed <strong>to</strong> enter. The first race was in1913, I think, <strong>and</strong> the last one was in 1931. But during theFirst World War, there were no Schneider Cup races. Idon't know whether Germany had a chance <strong>to</strong> take partbetween 1913 <strong>and</strong> 1914; <strong>and</strong> in 1918, they <strong>to</strong>ld Germanyin the peace treaty, "no more airplanes anymore for you."We would supposedly only try <strong>to</strong> make war with them, <strong>to</strong>shoot things <strong>and</strong> throw things at other countries.Pr<strong>and</strong>tl, Ackeret, <strong>and</strong> I were invited <strong>to</strong> Volta. Ackeretwas another pupil of Pr<strong>and</strong>tl. He is now 80 years old. He'salive in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>.* He talked about wind tunnels.Pr<strong>and</strong>tl talked about the experience of the early years. Italked about lift at supersonic speeds. And von Karman[Theodor von Karman, a Hungarian scientist working inGermany who emigrated <strong>to</strong> the United States beforeWorld War II] talked about drag at supersonic speeds.* Ackeret died March 27, 1981 at the age of 83.36 FUSION Oc<strong>to</strong>ber-November 1981
I had the Busemann biplane. The idea was, when youare interested in getting no lift, you can use two surfaces<strong>and</strong> send the waves back, <strong>and</strong> they cancel each other outin between.You can have this cancellation at lower Mach numbers,at a higher concentration of shock waves, so that you canhave a finite volume of parameters that makes no wavedrag.Of course, it makes a lot of friction drag, especiallywhen you have four surfaces instead of two—the outside<strong>and</strong> the inside. The friction drag is at least doubled. Andwhen you have separation, you may have more than justfriction drag; therefore, you have <strong>to</strong> be very careful aboutit. That was von Karman's idea; it was his business <strong>to</strong> talkabout that.Question: What about your work on the conical focusingof shock waves?During the war I wanted <strong>to</strong> write a book about my newideas, but I wasn't allowed <strong>to</strong> do it, since I was so muchinvolved in secret things that even when I didn't intendit, they might just pop out.I gave the introduction <strong>to</strong> a secret meeting about shapedcharges. The Academy [German Academy of Sciences]wanted one speaker, as a member of the Academy, <strong>and</strong>they chose me. These [pointing <strong>to</strong> one of the view-graphshe used in his talk] are steady flows, <strong>and</strong> I made anotherview-graph <strong>to</strong> represent nonsteady flows. I wanted <strong>to</strong>publish this, but they didn't allow me.In this nonsteady flow, if you want <strong>to</strong> put it on twodimensionalpaper, you can put the time in one direction<strong>and</strong> then there's only one direction left. Therefore, youcan study nonsteady pipe flow created by pis<strong>to</strong>ns on bothends. I extended my studies <strong>to</strong> nonsteady waves goingthrough a conical pipe. This focuses the pressure. (That'swhat people like—<strong>to</strong> make shaped charges, so that theycan put them on a jeep or something, <strong>and</strong> then it reallymakes a hole.)Question: This is the idea the Russians use extensively intheir work on fusion. This idea of the conical focusing ofshock waves comes from you. is that right?Yes. Since I had only one direction left, I could onlymake a circle—a cylindrical one or spherical one, so thatI didn't have <strong>to</strong> make changes except on one radius. It isusually nicer <strong>to</strong> have one dimension, or three dimensions,or something odd-numbered. If it's even numbered, themathematics of it is sometimes a bit harder. Therefore,when I make a steady flow, I can make it only twodimensions. I make the drawing on a plane, <strong>and</strong> then Ican show the space in one direction only, <strong>and</strong> there mustbe an identical thing around in however many directionsyou may wish [that is, it must be independent of the othercoordinates]. Therefore, I could make it spherical, <strong>and</strong> thatwas what they liked best.Question: When did you start that work?After I was through with the work on the steady flowone, I started work on nonsteady flow in Dresden.Busemann's background in hydrodynamics, specificallythe dynamics of fluid vortices, led naturally <strong>to</strong> his discoveryof plasma vortices that <strong>to</strong>day have important applicationsin magnetic fusion. The pho<strong>to</strong>graph here shows flowpatterns forming around a model aircraft being tested ina water tunnel. The vortices generated over both wingsprovide aerodynamic lift.Question: You had a paper in 1942 or 1943 on self-similarsolutions <strong>to</strong> spherical shock waves?Yes. That was my introduction lecture at the secretmeeting I mentioned, since I wasn't working on explosives,but on nonsteady gas dynamics.Question: So it was in the late 1930s in Dresden that youstarted on this research on shaped charges?No. Just on nonsteady gas dynamics. The steady dynamicswere now finished—at least what you could put downin two dimensions—<strong>and</strong> the other ones had <strong>to</strong> wait untilthey invented movable wings. For nonsteady dynamics,you'd have <strong>to</strong> open the wing up <strong>and</strong> close it, <strong>and</strong> how canyou do that on an airplane? And you'd have <strong>to</strong> makehinges on it, doing that when you have no lift.But, you see, the flow that I drew on that biplane is notunique. It can be what I'd like it <strong>to</strong> be. It can be at thesame time a choked thing; <strong>and</strong> then it would spill the airaround on the sides instead of going through the middle.When the flow in the inside is not exactly what I want it<strong>to</strong> be, then it doesn't go through—the same amount offluid doesn't go through, but comes back. You see, whenwe choke the flow for a while, then the airplane goesthrough sonic speeds. Then the flow goes around, <strong>and</strong> itdoesn't come back <strong>to</strong> this one [pointing <strong>to</strong> one wing ofthe biplane] unless it starts from the sides where there isan opening <strong>and</strong> then goes around; <strong>and</strong> it doesn't comeback <strong>to</strong> this one [pointing <strong>to</strong> the other wing in the biplane(see Figure 1c)] unless it starts from the sides where thereis an opening, <strong>and</strong> then goes slowly through the middle.Question: So it was in the late 1930s that they wereworking on these supersonic wing designs <strong>and</strong> the rest intheir wind tunnel. Were you still at Dresden then?Yes, <strong>and</strong> I built my wind tunnel. But then, when Hitlerdidn't care about the conditions of the peace treaty <strong>and</strong>Oc<strong>to</strong>ber-November 1981 FUSION 37