Washing<strong>to</strong>nAdvanced Energy BudgetIn Holding Pattern; Worse <strong>to</strong> ComeNone of the Department of Energy'sadvanced energy programsmade it through the past months'budget-cutting process unscathed,but for the time being most managed<strong>to</strong> hold on <strong>to</strong> the majority of theirprojects.The magnetic fusion program, oneof the principal battlegrounds of thisyear's budget debate, maintained itsfiscal 1981 level of funding. However,this leaves the final budget at least $50million short of the amount m<strong>and</strong>atedby the Magnetic <strong>Fusion</strong> Energy EngineeringAct of 1980. The design workfor the congressionally m<strong>and</strong>ated <strong>Fusion</strong>Engineering Device (FED) is notupgraded or accelerated in the fiscal1982 budget, nor has the Reagan administrationformally decided <strong>to</strong> givethe go-ahead for the FED, <strong>to</strong> have i<strong>to</strong>n line by 1990 as scheduled. (See<strong>Fusion</strong> Report, p. 21 for details.)In early July, the Senate-House authorizationconference settled on a$473.5 million level for fiscal 1982.However, the House AppropriationsSubcommittee on Energy <strong>and</strong> Watercut that figure <strong>to</strong> $447 million, ensuringthat no new project starts or upgradeddesign work on the FED willtake place. As of this writing, theappropriations committee on theSenate side has yet <strong>to</strong> act on theDOE's fiscal 1982 request for magneticfusion. If the Senate appropriatesmore than the $447 million figure,then the appropriations bill will go <strong>to</strong>Senate-House conferenceMHD Lobby FormedOne of the advanced R&D programscut <strong>to</strong> zero in the Reagan administration'sbudget was the magne<strong>to</strong>hydrodynamics(MHD) programfor efficient energy conversion. In response,contrac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> potential utilityusers of MHD technology b<strong>and</strong>ed<strong>to</strong>gether for the first time <strong>and</strong>launched a lobbying effort that succeededin res<strong>to</strong>ring $29 million, al-The Reaganadministration has notdecided <strong>to</strong> give thego-ahead for the FED.most half the fiscal 1981 funding forthe program.The formation <strong>and</strong> activities of thisusers group was one of the main <strong>to</strong>picsof discussion at the MHD conferenceheld at the University of Tennessee'sSpace Institute June 15 <strong>to</strong> 17,the 19th Symposium on EngineeringAspects of MHD. In his address <strong>to</strong> themeeting, Dr. Heinz Pfeiffer of PennsylvaniaPower <strong>and</strong> Light reportedthat more than a dozen utilities havejoined the lobbying group, <strong>and</strong> hechastised the scientific <strong>and</strong> industrypeople involved in MHD developmentfor not taking "the information<strong>and</strong> potential value of MHD <strong>to</strong> decision-makers"sooner.Pfeiffer recommended that the advancesin coal research coming out ofthe MHD program be brought <strong>to</strong> theattention of policymakers on a regularbasis.. Breeder Program Back on TrackA similar industry mobilization <strong>to</strong>okplace last spring in response <strong>to</strong> thethreatened shutdown of the ClinchRiver Breeder Reac<strong>to</strong>r in Tennessee,the only U.S. demonstration fastbreeder project. When the authorizingHouse Committee on Science <strong>and</strong>Technology voted <strong>to</strong> terminate theproject in June, industry contrac<strong>to</strong>rssolicited statements of support fromgroups such as Scientists <strong>and</strong> Engineersfor Secure Energy. These wereentered in the Congressional Recordby the committee leadership alongwith the minority's probreeder position.A Senate-House conference committeehas now authorized $228 millionfor Clinch River in fiscal 1982,<strong>and</strong> the appropriations committeesare expected <strong>to</strong> follow suit.Prospects for FY 1983By mid-September, the DOE <strong>and</strong>other federal agencies must submittheir budget requests for fiscal year1983. The prospects that the advancedenergy programs will continue <strong>to</strong>squeak by without major cutbacks arenot good, Capi<strong>to</strong>l Hill sources report.With interest rates still at record highlevels, <strong>and</strong> no letup in the budgetcuttingfever in Washing<strong>to</strong>n, industry,the scientific community, <strong>and</strong> thepublic will have <strong>to</strong> maintain a highprofile if the DOE's advanced R&Dprograms are <strong>to</strong> survive <strong>and</strong> go forward.Remote Sensing:Is the U.S.Losing Its Lead?Recent congressional hearings onthe U.S. remote sensing program revealednot only that the United Stateshas no plans <strong>to</strong> launch new remotesensing satellite systems after 1983,but that France is on track <strong>to</strong> surpassthe U.S. lead in this area in 1984.The hearings, held July 22 <strong>and</strong> 23by the space subcommittees of theHouse Science <strong>and</strong> Technology <strong>and</strong>Senate Commerce Committees, wereprompted by concern in Congressthat the United States is falling behindother nations in this important area ofspace applications.The United States pioneered Earthremote sensing in the 1960s with itsmeteorological satellites. These delicatedevices have since gathered dataon crop conditions, agricultural pests<strong>and</strong> diseases, snow cover in the win-52 FUSION Oc<strong>to</strong>ber-November 1981 Washing<strong>to</strong>n
ter, spring water runoff, <strong>and</strong> manyother aspects of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sea conditions.The data have opened up enormouspossibilities for agriculturalmanagement, s<strong>to</strong>rm <strong>and</strong> disaster forefcasting, <strong>and</strong> minerals location.A French LeadIn his opening statement <strong>to</strong> thehearings, Sen. Harrison Schmitt (R-N.M.), the former Apollo astronaut<strong>and</strong> geologist who chairs the SenateSubcommittee on Science, Transporrtation, <strong>and</strong> Space, summarized therecent progress in remote sensingtechnology:"The instruments carried by theAmerican satellites of the Tiros <strong>and</strong>Nimbus series in the 1960s, which offereda ground resolution on the orderof 1,000 meters, were the first <strong>to</strong>reveal the potential of space as a vantagepoint. Second-generation rehmote sensing instruments, with a resolutionon the order of 100 meters,were developed during the 1970s forthe L<strong>and</strong>sat series of satellites. . . . The1980s will see the introduction of satellite-borneinstruments with resolutionsin the order of 10 meters, whichwill open up many new fields of application."Schmitt then revealed that this quotationwas taken from the introduction<strong>to</strong> the brochure for the Frenchremote sensing system, called SPOT.The USA, Schmitt stated, has no developmentprogram <strong>to</strong> follow theL<strong>and</strong>sat D series of satellites, whichwill be operational in 1983. The IOmeterresolution satellites will not belaunched by NASA but by the French!Because of budget cuts, NASA'sR&D program for remote sensing satellitetechnology has been eliminated,<strong>and</strong> there is now no doubt the Frenchwill be ahead of the United States by1984, when the SPOT satellites arescheduled <strong>to</strong> be launched.Both congressional subcommitteesare considering alternatives <strong>to</strong> get industry<strong>to</strong> take over part of the operationsof L<strong>and</strong>sat satellites, groundcollection stations, <strong>and</strong> data processingfacilities now funded by NASA, <strong>to</strong>free up NASA funds for advancedR&D work in remote sensing.An artist's conception of construction in space.NASA's Beggs: Space Station Is NextAt confirmation hearings June 17,incoming NASA Administra<strong>to</strong>r JamesM. Beggs, a former General DynamicsCo. executive, identified a permanentspace center as the most importantnext-step for the space program."It seems <strong>to</strong> me that the next majorstep is a space station because thatwill make a lot of other things possiblein space in the future," he said.The NASA confirmation hearingswere held by the Senate CommerceCommittee's Subcommittee on Science,Technology, <strong>and</strong> Space, chairedby former astronaut Sen. HarrisonSchmitt (R-N.M.). Dr. Hans Mark, thenew deputy direc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> former secretaryof the Air Force, concurredwith Beggs, stating, "I think the nextstep is development of a permanentpresence in space."The Space Shuttle's astronaut corps<strong>and</strong> space supporters in the House<strong>and</strong> Senate are already waging a lobbyingeffort for a space station, <strong>and</strong>NASA is now conducting preliminarydesign studies for the Space OperationsCenter.The new NASA administra<strong>to</strong>rs werealso asked their views on the futureNASAof NASA's space science program <strong>and</strong>the military use of space.Beggs said he hoped the space scienceprogram could be rejuvenated,as "planetary exploration has been agreat benefit <strong>to</strong> the country <strong>and</strong> ahallmark of the agency."On the much debated militaryquestion that came up during thedevelopment of the Shuttle, Markstated, "I support the space act whichseparates the civilian from military activitiesin space," though he addedthat separating the two functions isdifficult when the same vehicle (theShuttle) is <strong>to</strong> carry both kinds of payloads.Mark said he supports the proposalof Sena<strong>to</strong>r Goldwater for a flee<strong>to</strong>f 10 Shuttle orbiters, some of whichwould be dedicated <strong>to</strong> military uses.Exp<strong>and</strong> NASA's M<strong>and</strong>ateSchmitt challenged the new NASAteam <strong>to</strong> also think about exp<strong>and</strong>ingthe space agency's m<strong>and</strong>ate <strong>to</strong> dealwith other transportation issues."Would you see adding a maritime,rail, <strong>and</strong> au<strong>to</strong>motive R&D effort <strong>to</strong> theNASA charter?" Schmitt asked. Beggsreplied that "this should be studiedmore in depth."Washing<strong>to</strong>n Oc<strong>to</strong>ber-November 1981 FUSION 53