01.12.2012 Views

Guidelines for Transition Teams - The United Church of Canada

Guidelines for Transition Teams - The United Church of Canada

Guidelines for Transition Teams - The United Church of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 11: Soliciting In<strong>for</strong>mation and Feedback<br />

At various times, the <strong>Transition</strong> Team will need to gather in<strong>for</strong>mation or feedback from the<br />

congregation. A number <strong>of</strong> methods may be used: planned but casual conversations; write-in<br />

comments; paper and pencil surveys; one-to-one interviews; group interviews; congregational<br />

meetings; post-meeting feedback <strong>for</strong>ms.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e choosing a method, consider these questions:<br />

• What type <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation is desired? Is it reaction to some issue? Establishing priorities? Phrase<br />

the question so as to get the kind <strong>of</strong> answer you are looking <strong>for</strong>.<br />

• Choose the method <strong>of</strong> getting feedback according to the in<strong>for</strong>mation sought and the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

congregation to be heard from.<br />

• Who is likely to participate? (Bear in mind that a total response is not likely.)<br />

• Will the responses be representative or reflect a certain viewpoint? Will that be satisfactory?<br />

(Be realistic: e.g., a visioning response may be unlikely if there is a pervasive mood <strong>of</strong> gloom.)<br />

• Are the people you are asking in<strong>for</strong>med enough to be able to respond knowledgeably to the<br />

questions?<br />

Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and will provide different kinds <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Understand that the way questions are asked to a large extent determines whether responses will<br />

provide in<strong>for</strong>mation that is specific, relevant, and usable. Test the questions with each other to be<br />

sure you are asking in a way that elicits a useful response.<br />

Tips<br />

• Explain the purposes <strong>for</strong> collecting the in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

• Explain how the results will be used, and who will be seeing individual responses.<br />

• Make it easy <strong>for</strong> people to give the in<strong>for</strong>mation in as concise a way as possible.<br />

• Plan <strong>for</strong> how the in<strong>for</strong>mation will be collated; it may influence the way the questions are asked.<br />

• To test general reactions, use a rating scale (e.g., 1 to 5) rather than a yes/no choice.<br />

• On a paper response <strong>for</strong>m, always ask <strong>for</strong> “other” comments. (<strong>The</strong>se can sometimes produce gems!)<br />

• Respect confidentiality. Never divulge names unless permission is asked <strong>for</strong> and given.<br />

• If the resulting in<strong>for</strong>mation is returned to the congregation, do it in such a way that people may<br />

recognize their own contribution yet remain anonymous.<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Transition</strong> <strong>Teams</strong> 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!