ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERSquantitative researchACKNOWLEDGEMENTSProfessor MalcolmBattersby is acknowledgedfor advice onresearch design.FUNDING<strong>The</strong> study receivedfunding support from theSTAR Research Fund.COMPETING INTERESTSDr Janine Bycroft is aFlinders accredited trainer.self-reported outcome measures. This resultedin missing values where participants failed <strong>to</strong>answer some questions.InterventionWhile the nurses in the intervention practiceshad completed training in the Flinders Program TM ,none were using the approach in their usual workor were able <strong>to</strong> use the <strong>to</strong>ols initially with confidence.Additionally, the nurses were not accus<strong>to</strong>med<strong>to</strong> the length of structured appointmenttime required for a patient consultation (up <strong>to</strong> onehour) using the Flinders Program TM , and practiceworkloads made this difficult. <strong>The</strong> nurses didnot routinely have booked patient case loads andwere working <strong>to</strong> maximal capacity. <strong>The</strong> need fornurses <strong>to</strong> be confident and competent with theintervention prior <strong>to</strong> study commencement is animportant part of future studies.In order <strong>to</strong> reduce complexity, a narrower diseaserange may also have facilitated study processes. AUnited Kingdom study 19 found that nurses weremore confident in working with patients in theearlier, less complex, stages of their illness. <strong>The</strong>seissues, alongside a lack of practice organisationalcapacity and resources for the introduction of theintervention, all contribute <strong>to</strong> the difficulties ofundertaking a substantive trial.ConclusionSelf-management programmes in primary carewill continue <strong>to</strong> have focus and increasingly thiswill be a nurse role. However, the overall findingsfrom this study do not support a substantiveresearch trial of the Flinders Program TM in primarycare at this stage. Further work is first needed<strong>to</strong> determine how ‘new’ complex interventionscan best be introduced in<strong>to</strong> primary care. Thisincludes considering the report of Finlayson etal. 20 on primary care nursing which identifiesbarriers <strong>to</strong> nurses expanding their practice. <strong>The</strong>seinclude heavy nurse workloads, lack of physicalresources, lack of support and motivation fromgeneral practitioners (GPs), GP attitudes, lack ofleadership and poor nurse remuneration. Somenurses in the Finlayson study also reported a lackof self-confidence and a lack of a willingness <strong>to</strong>embrace change.References1. Bycroft J, Tracey J. Self-management support: A win-win solutionfor the 21 st century. NZ Fam Phys. 2006;33(4):243–248.2. National Health Committee. Meeting the needs of peoplewith chronic conditions. Welling<strong>to</strong>n: National Health Committee;2007.3. Ministry of Health. <strong>The</strong> 2006/2007 <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> HealthSurvey. Welling<strong>to</strong>n: Ministry of Health; 2008.4. Ajwani S, Blakely T, Robson B, Tobias M, Bonne M. Decadesof disparity: ethnic mortality trends in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>1980–1999. Welling<strong>to</strong>n: Ministry of Health and University ofOtago; 2003.5. Battersby M. Health reform through coordinated care: SAHealth Plus. BMJ. 2005;330:662–665.6. FHBHRU 2009 [cited <strong>The</strong> ‘Flinders Model’ of chronic conditionself-management. Available from: http://som.flinders.edu.au/FUSCA/CCTU/self_management.htm7. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patientself-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA.2002;288(19):2469–75.8. Glasgow NJ, Jeon Y-H, Kraus SG, Pearce-Brown CL. Chronicdisease self-management support: the way forward for Australia.MJA. 2008;189(10):s14–s16.9. Jordan JE, Briggs AM, Brand CA, Osborne RH. Enhancing patientengagement in chronic disease self-management supportinitiatives in Australia: the need for an intergrated approach.Med J Aust. 2008;189(10):9–13.10. Horsburgh M, Goodyear-Smith F, Bycroft J, Mahony F, RoyD, Miller D, et al. Lessons learned from attempting <strong>to</strong> assessthe evidence base for a complex intervention introduced in<strong>to</strong><strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> general practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;published online April 8, 2010; qshc.bmj.com doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.03443911. Battersby M, Ask A, Reece M, Markwick M, Collins J. <strong>The</strong>Partners in Health scale: the development and pyschometricproperties of a generic assessment scale for chronic conditionself-management. Aust J Prim Care. 2003;9(2&3):41–52.12. Glasgow R, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney L, ReidR, Greene S. Development and validation of the PatientAssessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care.2005;43(5):436–444.13. Glasgow NJ, Whitesides H, Nelson C, King D. Use of the PatientAssessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabeticpatients: relationship <strong>to</strong> patient charactersitics, receipt of careand self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2655–61.14. Lorig K, Sobel D, Ritter P, Layrent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a selfmanagementprogram for patients with chronic disease. EffClin Pract. 2001;4:256–262.15. <strong>The</strong> EQOL Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measuremen<strong>to</strong>f health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.16. Stewart A, Hays R, Ware J. <strong>The</strong> MOS short-form generalhealth survey: reliability and validity in a patient population.Med Care. 2005;1988(26):724–735.17. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J. <strong>The</strong> PHQ-9: Validityof a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Int Med.2001;16(9):606–13.18. Lawn S. PIH Comparisons on Noarlunga Mental Health Project.In. Personal communication ed. Adelaide; 12 Nov 2009.19. Macdonald W, Rogers A, Blakeman T, Bower P. Practicenurses and the facilitation of self-management in primary care.J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(2):191–199.20. Finlayson M, Sheridan N, Cumming J. Nursing developmentsin primary care 2001–2007. Welling<strong>to</strong>n: Vic<strong>to</strong>ria University ofWelling<strong>to</strong>n; 2009.302 VOLUME 2 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2010 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPErSquantitative researchHow do newly diagnosed patients withtype 2 diabetes in the Waika<strong>to</strong> get theirdiabetes education?Ross Lawrenson MD, FRCGP, FAFPHM, FFPH; 1 Grace Joshy MSC; 1 Yoska Eerens; 2 Wayne Johns<strong>to</strong>ne MA 3ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: Education is accepted as the mainstay of management for people with diabetes.However, there are few population-based studies describing what education has been delivered from thepatient’s perspective.Aim: To ascertain the sources of education for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes; whateducation was received and what were the patients’ views of group education. Delivery of education <strong>to</strong>Maori was compared with non-Maori.1Waika<strong>to</strong> Clinical School,<strong>The</strong> University of Auckland,Hamil<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>2University of Otago,Dunedin, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>3Te Puna Oranga, Waika<strong>to</strong>District Health Board,Hamil<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>Methods: A cross-sectional survey of patients identified from the Waika<strong>to</strong> Regional Diabetes Servicedatabase. Patients identified in one calendar year, having a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and being agedbetween 20 and 89 years were included in the survey. Patients were sent a four-page questionnaire. Nonresponderswere followed up by telephone.Results: 333/667 patients (50%) responded. <strong>The</strong> principal source of education for Waika<strong>to</strong> patientswas general practice, from the general practitioner and/or the practice nurse. Ninety-three percent ofpatients reported that they had received some education about diabetes at the time of diagnosis. <strong>The</strong>rewas no difference between Maori and non-Maori in the reported levels of diabetes education received,but the patient perceived knowledge score was significantly lower for Maori in all aspects studied.DISCUSSION: <strong>The</strong> overall impression was that patients were receiving appropriate information aboutdiabetes, but there does appear <strong>to</strong> be room for improvement in some areas, particularly the importanceof blood pressure and lipid control. We believe that further research on the educational needs of Maoriand ethnic minorities is needed.Keywords: Diabetes; family practice; education; <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>IntroductionType 2 diabetes is a lifelong condition that isassociated with increased risk of cardiovasculardisease, 1 renal disease, 2 peripheral vascular diseaseand blindness. 3 It is a disease that requires selfmanagementby the patient and so it is unders<strong>to</strong>odthat when they are diagnosed they need access <strong>to</strong>relevant information about their disease. Some diabeteseducation programmes have been shown <strong>to</strong>improve self-care, 4 glycaemic control 5,6 and generalhealth status and well-being in patients. 7,8,9 Educationprogrammes have also been used <strong>to</strong> targetthe reduction of risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as weight, bloodpressure and serum lipids, 10 but with less success.Patients who are from a lower socioeconomicbackground may be less receptive <strong>to</strong> educationand less likely <strong>to</strong> implement behavioural changes11 yet often these groups are also most at risk ofdeveloping complications of diabetes. 12 Reachingdisadvantaged groups such as Maori and ethnicminorities needs <strong>to</strong> be an important considerationin all education programmes <strong>to</strong> allow the education<strong>to</strong> be delivered as effectively as possible. 13<strong>The</strong> Waika<strong>to</strong> District Health Board serves a populationof 360 000 people, of whom 21% identifyas being Maori. It has a well developed regionaldiabetes service which provides advice for patientsJ PRIM HEALTH CARE2010;2(4):303–310.Correspondence <strong>to</strong>:Ross LawrensonProfessor, Waika<strong>to</strong>Clinical SchoolWaika<strong>to</strong> Hospital, PB 3200Hamil<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>ross.lawrenson@waik<strong>to</strong>dhb.health.nzVOLUME 2 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2010 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 303