12.07.2015 Views

The requirement to respect autonomy - The Royal New Zealand ...

The requirement to respect autonomy - The Royal New Zealand ...

The requirement to respect autonomy - The Royal New Zealand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

improving performanceFigure 1. Canterbury Pandemic CIMS structureREGIONAL CDEMCDHB INCIDENTCONTROLLERADVISORY GROUPCOMMUNICATIONSPLANNING /INTELLIGENCE(CPH)OPERATIONSLOGISTICSMANAGERWORKFORCECOMMUNITY &PUBLIC HEALTHSECONDARYPRIMARY1. Minimise transmission—‘flatten the curve’Text Box 1. Stages of the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> influenza pandemicaction plan 20062. Minimise infection rate in primary health care workers3. Maintain safe, quality care within general practice and the rest of the health systemfor non-’flu patients1. Plan for it2. Keep it out (border management)3. Stamp it out (cluster control)4. Manage it5. Recover from itText Box 2. Aims of the Canterbury response4. Provide safe and accessible care for patients with ’fluit was clear that H1N1 09 was spreading extensivelyin Canterbury and a shift <strong>to</strong> ‘manage it’was announced, coinciding with the opening ofthe central city ’Flu Centre. 6From May <strong>to</strong> Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2009 there were 595 confirmedcases of pandemic influenza A (H1N1 09)in Canterbury, with 187 hospitalisations andthree deaths. Confirmed cases were only asmall minority of community cases. A randomtelephone survey of 600 households in Augustestimated that 25% of Canterbury residentshad developed an influenza-like illness in thepreceding 10 weeks, a finding consistent with asubsequent national serosurvey. 7<strong>The</strong> aim of this paper is <strong>to</strong> describe the strategiesdeveloped by range of Canterbury agencies<strong>to</strong> work <strong>to</strong>gether in a co-ordinated health-ledresponse with the goal of minimising the impac<strong>to</strong>f H1N1 09 in the community and maintainingeffective health care services for both influenzaand non-influenza patients.StrategiesResponse co-ordinationFrom 25 April, Canterbury District HealthBoard’s (CDHB’s) Chief Medical Officer assumedoverall leadership of the response andestablished a CIMS structure that included allmajor operations groups (see Figure 1). <strong>The</strong> responsegroup met daily throughout the response.Significant CDHB funding (up <strong>to</strong> $2.8 million)was approved <strong>to</strong> support proactive managementby the sec<strong>to</strong>r.324 VOLUME 2 • NUMBER 4 • DECEMBER 2010 J OURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!