01.12.2012 Views

black sea

black sea

black sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

developed system, composed from two themes<br />

(Cherson and Lykostomion), and an allied people<br />

(Hungarians), inserted between Bulgaria and the<br />

latent dangerous steppe region. It is very likely<br />

that the last operation in which the fleet of<br />

Lykostomion was involved was the transshipment<br />

of the Hungarians in Bulgaria during the war of<br />

894-896. The failure of the campaign led also to<br />

the end of the ephemeral Danubian theme.<br />

Mesembria was also lost. 39 After the war of 917,<br />

Anchialos entered again under Bulgarian domination,<br />

together with the harbors of Mesembria,<br />

Develtos, Sozopolis and Agathopolis. The Byzantine<br />

domination in the western Pontic space was<br />

seriously damaged. The peace treaty of 927 has<br />

reconfirmed for Bulgaria the possession of<br />

Develtos, Sozopolis, Agathopolis, Anchialos and<br />

Mesembria (it seems that the latter remained free<br />

for the Byzantine navy). 40<br />

In the first half of the 10 th century, the Byzantine<br />

Empire broke the alliance with the Khazars,<br />

no more useful, because their power declined.<br />

When the Pechenegs evolved toward a potential<br />

supremacy in the North-Pontic steppes, it was<br />

necessary to stop this trend by supporting their<br />

rivals, the Rus’. It is true that they were potential<br />

enemies of the Byzantine Empire, but they were<br />

not able to launch offensives toward the Black Sea<br />

if they were hold back by the Pechenegs who<br />

controlled the Dnieper cataracts. By this reason,<br />

it was imperative to keep the hostility between<br />

Russians and Pechenegs.<br />

A persecution of the Christians launched by<br />

the Khazars was the alleged reason for a Byzantine<br />

maneuver, which was intended to oppose two<br />

potential enemies, the Khazars and the Rus’, in<br />

Kerch Strait area. At the request of Romanos I<br />

Lekapenos (920-944), knyaz Oleg started a war<br />

against Tmutorokan, around 940. The city was<br />

captured, but the commander of Kerch, a certain<br />

Pesah, was able to start his own campaign against<br />

Cherson. After the conquest of this city, he<br />

continued the war against the Rus’, defeating them<br />

and requesting them to attack Constantinople. The<br />

invasion took place in June 11 th , 941, under the<br />

common command of Oleg and Igor. A fleet<br />

composed of 1000 small boats sieged the capital<br />

and destroyed the suburbs like in 860, but it was<br />

finally defeated with the intensive use of the<br />

“Greek Fire”. 41 The Byzantine intrigue failed this<br />

time, but the idea of using the Rus’ as an instrument<br />

in the north Pontic policy was resumed after few<br />

years. The Rus’ launched in 943 another attack<br />

against the Khazarian fortresses Sudak and<br />

Tmutorokan. This fact gave to the Russians the<br />

opportunity to settle their control over one side of<br />

the Kerch Strait. Next, the Russians planned a<br />

new inroad in the Byzantine Empire, in alliance<br />

with the Pechenegs, but the invasion did not take<br />

place, because the Byzantines payed knyaz Igor to<br />

stop the war. Igor was thus convinced to close a<br />

treaty with the Byzantine Empire, in 944 or 945.<br />

He obliged himself to defend the isthmus of Crimea<br />

against the “Black Bulgarians” settled north of the<br />

Azov Sea and against the Pechenegs, and to do not<br />

occupy the Dnieper mouth. In the same time, the<br />

treaty allowed to the “Black Bulgarians” to attack<br />

the Khazarian territories in Crimea, because this<br />

matched the Byzantine interests. 42<br />

The Russian attack of 941 made necessary the<br />

improvement of the fighting capability of the navy.<br />

The emperor Romanos I Lekapenos, its former<br />

commander, acted in this direction. 43 It was<br />

supposed that in these circumstances was restored<br />

the port of call from Tomis, recorded in the sources<br />

with the new name Constantia (De Administrando<br />

Imperio, c. 9). The Byzantine ports of calls had in<br />

the same time commercial and military functions. 44<br />

It was already emphasized the increase of the<br />

amount of Byzantine coins at Constanţa in this<br />

period, that could reflect the revival of the port of<br />

call (another one was perhaps at Mangalia). 45<br />

Taking into account the peaceful Bulgarian-<br />

Byzantine relations reestablished after 927, the<br />

settlement of some Byzantine ports of call in<br />

Dobrudja would be not excluded, but we think that<br />

the few archaeological and numismatic remains<br />

can not surely support this hypothesis. From De<br />

Administrando Imperio, c. 9 results that, around<br />

953, Bulgaria mastered Dobrudja up to the Danube’s<br />

mouths, and that Constantia belonged to Bulgaria.<br />

The Russians who navigated along the coast<br />

reached Selinas (the Sulina channel) and from that<br />

point they entered in Bulgaria, a land that included<br />

the next branch of the Danube (Sfântu Gheorghe)<br />

and Constantia.<br />

For the time being, the Rus’ remained an useful<br />

ally for the Byzantines, if they were able to contain<br />

the Pechenegs and to fight against Bulgaria. The<br />

Russian hegemony in Crimea was perceived by<br />

the Byzantine Empire as a way to surround<br />

Bulgaria, which became again an enemy when tzar<br />

26 ����� Review of Military History �����

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!