01.12.2012 Views

black sea

black sea

black sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

supported the Romanian demand for the unification<br />

of the two provinces. The French government<br />

financed the first two Romanian loans in the Paris<br />

money markets in 1864 and 1866 and also that of<br />

1875 that would serve to support financially the<br />

newborn state. 20<br />

Since the Berlin Convention in 1878 and<br />

thereafter, the political orientation of Romania<br />

became principally pro-German because of the<br />

country’s border with the Austro-Hungarian<br />

Empire and the reign of King Charles I in Romania<br />

who was of German descent. In 1883, Romania<br />

joined the Triple Alliance. 21 In the economy, the<br />

building of the fundamental infrastructure around<br />

the end the 19 th century led to the development of<br />

other sectors of the Romanian economy. The food,<br />

forestry and minerals sectors started to be<br />

developed by large foreign companies, mainly<br />

British and German. 22<br />

From the 1870s decade to the outbreak of World<br />

War I in 1914, Romania remained largely controlled<br />

by the German capital and products. The German<br />

Banking group Disconto-Gesellschaft Bleichröder<br />

relying on its close ties with the Romanian Court 23<br />

was the one that essentially directed the negotiations<br />

with the Romanian government each<br />

time. 24 On the other side, the French banks<br />

Paribas, Société Générale and Comptoir<br />

National d´Escompte de Paris acting either<br />

separately, or as a group managed to gain some<br />

participation in the placements of capital in<br />

Romania along with the German Banks but always<br />

lagging behind and under the lead of their German<br />

counterparts. Thus the French participation in six<br />

of the twelve loans that Romania contracted from<br />

1880 until 1910 totalling approximately 1.5 billion<br />

francs amounted to 20% of the total capital. 25<br />

Naturally, the primacy of the German banks had<br />

commensurate consequences in the German<br />

exports to the country. The German side gained<br />

the lion’s share in the Romanian armaments as<br />

well as the rest of the industrial products. When in<br />

1901, the Romanian Government repeatedly<br />

approached the French Banks to contract a 250<br />

million francs loan in the French money market,<br />

the French Foreign Ministry (Foreign Minister<br />

Delcassé) initially adopted a negative stance. Not<br />

only because of the country’s political ties with the<br />

Triple Alliance but also because Romania looked<br />

for its orders of military material and machineguns<br />

elsewhere – principally to Germany. Despite<br />

everything, the French side had no intention to<br />

abandon Romania in the German hands. The<br />

German Ambassador in Bucharest stressed the<br />

special interests of French financiers and<br />

businessmen who anxiously sought to expand their<br />

corporate interests in Romania. 26<br />

Since 1902 the French government adopted<br />

the harder core policy that the French Banks<br />

should negotiate directly with the Romanian<br />

government and not in collaboration with the<br />

German Banks, as members of a French-German<br />

group. Thus, the French side would be in a better<br />

position to impose its terms, principally in<br />

relationship to the condition that industrial and<br />

military orders should necessarily be tied up to the<br />

placements of capital. The competition between<br />

the companies Schneider and Krupp became<br />

intense with the German side though finally<br />

prevailing. 27 Respectively, in a correspondence<br />

between the French bank Comptoir National<br />

d´Escompte de Paris and the German Disconto,<br />

the French side implied that its hands were tied by<br />

the French government in regard to a French -<br />

German collaboration in Romania. The reasons<br />

were mainly political and industrial. 28 Certainly,<br />

the German side protested that in contrast to what<br />

was happening in Greece, the German funds in<br />

Romania were used to feed the French industry as<br />

well. 29 The French government’s stance identified<br />

mainly with the efforts by French companies to<br />

secure orders from the Romanian army and seize<br />

them from the German Krupp. For that reason<br />

Schneider as well as Saint-Chamond directly<br />

approached Romanian officers for the procurement<br />

of a large number of machine-guns. The<br />

French Foreign Ministry even considered the<br />

possibility of a compromise between the particularly<br />

competitive Schneider and Krupp so as to win<br />

even a partial order. 30 At the same time, the French<br />

banks participated in the placement of a fraction<br />

of the 1903 loan in the French money market.<br />

However, the order of 450 machine guns would be<br />

given to the German Krupp for an amount of<br />

approximately 25 million francs. 31<br />

Similar incidents would more or less be<br />

repeated on the occasion of the contract of the<br />

large Romanian conversion loan of 1905 between<br />

the German and French Banks and particularly in<br />

the case of a parallel loan of 100 million francs,<br />

40% of which was meant for the payment of orders<br />

to Krupp. The minor French contribution and the<br />

40 ����� Review of Military History �����

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!