12.07.2015 Views

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

372 P. <strong>van</strong> Nieuwenhuizen. SupergravityIn what follows we will show that(I) fixing the gauge in the path integral one finds as a generalization of the Faddeev—Popovdeterminant a superdeterminant;(ii) exponentiating this superdeterminant by means of a super Gaussian integral one finds thegeneralized ghost actions.Consider a path-integral with bosonic and fermionic symmetries. We want to multiply by unitywriting as usual1 = Jd~”d~ 1,0(Fa foe) o(B 1, — b1,)J (5)where ~(~)are the bosonic (fermionic) gauge parameters, B(F) the gauge choices and b(f) ordinary(Grassmann) variables. We must first define the Dirac delta function for fermionic arguments. SincefdOO = 1, it follows that 0(O)= 0. Thus 0(F,. —f,.) is equal to (F,. —f,.) for fermionic F,. —f,,. Making achange of integration variables (~,~)-÷ (B, F), it follows that J is the Jacobian for the change ofintegration variables (B, F)—~~ (~,~j).Theorem: The Jacobian for x” —~ x’(x’, 0’),9”’ —* 0”(x’, 0’) is given by the superdeterminant1,/3x’)] (6)—det[~x”/3x’— (19f/o0”) det(t90”’/t991,) (30’/39)~”1,(89’where it does not matter whether one uses left or right derivatives except that lJx”/90” is a rightderivative. (In all other cases we use left derivatives.)We will begin by considering linear transformation(x’\(A B\fx 7~o’i ~C DROand derive that J = sdet M In this case it is clear that 3x”/30” is a right derivative. Consider first thecase of linear changes of anticommuting variables 0’ (i = 1, N). FromJ d9~ .dONOSJ 61=1=JdOhI...dOlNO7~’~=Jdo1...deNJo~N...o~1(8)with 0” = D’,O’ it follows that J = det D’, just the inverse oL what one has for bosonic variables. Forgeneral linear transformations involving commuting x’ and anticommuting 90 one has/x’\ fA B\ fx\ /1 BD1\ fA—BD’C 0\ / I O\ fx 9~o’) = ~C D) ~e) = ~o i I ~ 0 D) ~D1C i) ~o ()The first and last transformations are shifts of integration variables 0” and x’ respectively, and since theintegrals are translationally invariant these Jacobians equal unity. The second change of integration

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!