12.07.2015 Views

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218 P. <strong>van</strong> Nieuwenhuizen. SupergravityIn this action S, P, Am are clearly nonpropagating, and one sees that, as in the Wess—Zumino model,1.~OVtheir dimension is 2. Hence they must rotate into the gravitino field equation. The symbolis theRgravitino field equation R1. = 1.”~y5y~D~t/i0 (which we will discuss in the next subsection) but with thesupercovariant derivatives. Hence1.,co~~= “ysy~(D~~~,,,R ~ A,,y — 5t/i,, + ~‘Yu7l1/i~). (4)One obtains the supercovariantization D,.COV of the derivative O,.A of some field A transforming asOA = EB by adding the connection —4iB. Indeed, in that case S(D,.COVA) = 8(3,,A — i/i,.B) is free from3,. terms. For the gravitino this rule yields all m” terms inside D~for eq. (4), two except reasons. that First, we did thenot curltry [Dr,Do.] to addconnections is already supercovariant for the variations by itself 8t/i~= (and Da covariantizing and Swa Si/i,, = D,, by adding a connection, the whole curlwould <strong>van</strong>ish). Secondly, the spin connection w~mn(ei/i) is supercovariant by itself because it wasalready supercovariant without S, P, A,. while in ~,.mn (e, i/i) no 8i/i terms appear, so that the extra termsin Si/i,. cannot produce 0 terms in 5~mn One finds upon explicit computation [224]= ~ë(y~i/’,.~’~°” — 7ai/’,.b’~°”— y~/i~~CoV)+ ~ë(u~~fl+ 7P~7ab)i/’,. (5)where i/i~’ is the curl between parentheses in eq. (4).Let us now consider the gauge algebra. Without auxiliary fields, all commutators on em,., i/i”,. closeexcept the commutator of two local sypersymmetry transformations on the gravitino [235]. For thiscommutator on the tetrad one finds[S( ~),0(2)]e~,.= ~i27”D,. 1— 1 ~ 2. (6)Guided by the global anticommutator [e~0, i20] = ~i2y~ 1P,.,we expect on the right hand side generalcoordinate transformations with parameters ~ = 2 2Y~ I. Thus we rewrite (6) as2eAO,.( 27e1) + ~(3,.e”AXe2YA i)+ 4 2[7,,,.cd]~1~cd= ~{3(i2~yAEl)}emA+ ~(E27 E1XOAe ,.) + ~(D,.e~A— DAem,.)i2yA l+ ~ 2yEIwAen,.. (7)The first two terms are clearly a general coordinate transformation on the tetrad, with parameter~ The last term we recognize as a local Lorentz rotation with parameter mA —DAem,. ~i2yA =~l/i,.yml/’A iwAmn. The asremaining ~~~~(e terms can be rewritten, using the torsion equation D,.e m,. with parameter~_~(e 2yA l)t/,Aymq,,. and clearly constitute a local supersymmetry variation of e2yA l)t/iA. Hence, we can summarize that, as far as the tetrad is concerned, the following commutatoris valid[8~(e~),So( 2)]= S~(~~)+ SL(~~w,.~”)+ ~(8)r 2 27~ 1.This is the local version of the super Poincaré algebra. As one sees, the P in {Q, 01 = P is replaced by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!