12.07.2015 Views

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SUPERGRAVITY P. van NIEUWENHUIZEN To Joel Scherk 0370 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264 P. <strong>van</strong> Nieuwenhuizen. SupergravityThe Lagrange multiplier leads to the constrainthikyyTh/i = —2y4o~8j4,k= 0. (2)Thus only 4,,” appears in the action, since the longitudinal part~ô 4, <strong>van</strong>ishes in the first termin (1) after partial integration and use of (2). If we had worked with field equations, we would at thispoint have needed to introduce a gauge choice. Next we note that since we may replace 4’ by1/IT4’k -~ 8k L]= 0, ‘/‘T = (6/ — a,59’V~ 2)4, 1 (3)again due to the constraint in (2). Thus ‘y = 0 since I 8y’ is elliptic (Latin indices run alwaysfrom (1, 3)). Hence, only 4. appears in the action and is transverse both in ordinary space (a . i/i = 0) andin spinor space ~ 4. = 0). Thusa — (p3/2\a b = (~ a\TF 4‘PM — k’ MV) b’p,. — ~‘PM Iwhere F 312 is the spin 3/2 spin projection operator of subsection 1.13. The fields 41”’ and 41T are gaugeinvariant (i.e. invariant under 64,,,. = ~M~) so that the action has been decomposed into gauge invariantdynamical modes.The action becomes equal to7”’ (5)I = J d~x— ~“(y~84 + y’8~)4,if one uses the expansion of 7~~J7kand the double transversability of 4,,”~.Thus there are two physicalmodes, given already explicitly in subsection 1.13.Using electromagnetic notation, one can also rewrite the action as= —~./iy5(yA E + 70B) (6)whereE, = 4,1~rr, B’ = (7)so that the field equations read E + 75B =0.2.14. Dirac quantization of the free gravitinoAlthough a Majorana field is its own conjugate momentum, there is no problem in determininguniquely the canonical commutation relations, if one uses Dirac brackets { }D rather than Poissonbrackets in order to go from the classical to the6}Dquantum is nonzero theory. and Poisson in agreement brackets are with defined as usual,{4,M2, ~.,.b}D Inbut, second as quantized we will see, formthethere Dirac is no bracket problem {4’M’~’4’ at all, since one finds in ~ absorption operators a,, (k) andcreation operators a ~(k) (and not b~(k)since 4’Ma is a Majorana field) so that {4’M”, 4’V} evaluated at the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!