234 P. <strong>van</strong> Nieuwenhuizen, Supergravily1.14. Higher spin theoryOnly for N> 8 do the extended supergravity theories have a SU 3 x SU2 x th internal symmetrygroup. This is obvious since 0(9) contains 0(6) x 0(3) and 0(6) is isomorphic to SU(4) which containsSU3 x U,. However, for N> 8 one has also spin 5/2 fields and more than one graviton. The questionarises whether one can repeat history and construct consistent field theories for spin 5/2 and higher.Free field actions for any higher spin do indeed exist (for massive fields, see Hagen and Singh; formassless fields see Fang and Fronsdal [258,259]).We consider as spin 5/2 field a symmetric tensor spinor i/,~,,,= i/ic,.. Coupling it to an external sourceJ”,.,,, one can ask whether an action exists which leads to a propagator without ghosts or tachyons. (Thisis equivalent to requiring positive energy of the classical theory, and easier to prove.) The result is thatthere is an action, given for massless Majorana spinors by2’= —~i).j,,,1i/i,.,,— i/i,.,,yJy~ifr~,. + 2i/J,.,,y,,3Al/JA,.+~i/I~.Il/J,.,. i/IAA3,.7,,i/i,L,, + LJl~ (1)It is invariant under the following local gauge transformationsSi/i,.,, = 8,. ,,+ 8,,e,. with y” ,.= 0, (2)as first found by J. Schwinger.In fact, this action is unique as an analysis based on spin projection operators shows. The fieldequation can be written in a Christoffel-like way as~I_~i I —~ I —~ I —7 ~V,.I/)a$ OaI,V~/3 U$I~,.a —Since the free field action is invariant under local spin 3/2 gauge transformations, one might repeatthe analysis of supergravity and see whether minimal coupling to gravity by means of 3,. —* D,. leads to avariation of the action proportional only to the Einstein tensor. In that case one can add the Einsteinaction and define the tetrad variation such that the total system is invariant to lowest order (afterwardsone should then follow the Noether procedure). However, a simple calculation [153]shows that under= D,. ,,+ D,, ,. with y =0 one finds4i,.YA1PAb +SI = G,.b[~i,,y”l/i”~— ?‘y”i/i~+4j,,YSYcrl/i,.p t~P~~~ëA7vlfrnAeIJ~]+ Ep7alIJAbC — ~ p757al/JAb ”~’°’Cpgab. (4)The last two terms are proportional to the Weyl tensor and seem to exclude a consistent couplingbetween spin 2 and spin 5/2.Approaching the problem from the matter end, no matter systems have been found which areinvariant under transformations with constant parameters ,. satisfying y = 0 [153] (for such systemsone could couple i/i,.,, to the Noether current and iterate), while also taking for spin 5/2 a vierbein spinor(nonsymmetric i/i~,,.)did not improve matters [144].The massive spin 5/2 system contains a mass term for i/i,.,, plus an extra spin 1/2 field x and is, again,unique. Quite generally, for any higher spins, these extra auxiliary fields x couple only in the mass term
P. <strong>van</strong> Nieuwenhuizen, Supergravity 235to the i/c field; for spin 5/2 on has2’(mass) = —M(i/i,.4,.,, — ~. ‘y’y~i/iS — — —4~x). (5)Hence here there is already a so-called <strong>van</strong> Dam—Veltman mass-discontinuity in the action.For spin 3, a massless and massive theory exist, too. In this theory the limit m —*0 cannot even betaken in the sandwiched propagator. (For spin 2 there is a finite discontinuity.)Our conclusion is that it seems, at this moment, that Nature stops at spin 2.2. Quantum supergravity2.1. IntroductionSupergravity can be covariantly quantized by the same methods as any other gauge theory, providedthat the gauge algebra closes. This closure is obtained by adding auxiliary fields to the classical actionand these fields remain auxiliary fields in the effective quantum action, but become propagating in thecounter terms. The covariant quantization methods can be justified by a Hamiltonian path-integralapproach as we shall see, and, once quantized, unitarity and gauge invariance can be proven. Thesimplest way to do so is to use the Becchi—Rouet—Stora—Tyutin symmetry (BRST-symmetry) of thequantum action which is the quantum extension of the classical gauge invariance. We will also considerthe BRST formalism for gauge theories whose gauge algebra does not close, for example simplesupergravity without S. F, Am.Gravitational theories have a dimensional coupling constant, Newton’s constant, and this fact alone issufficient to rule out ordinary renormalizability for the following reasons. Due to the dimensionalcharacter of the gravitational coupling constant, one-loop (and higher loop) divergences have a differentfunctional form than the quantum action so that one cannot absorb these divergences back into theoriginal quantum action by rescaling of the physical parameters. For example, in Einstein gravity theone-loop divergences are on-shell proportional to2 and the two-loop divergences areproportional to (R,.,,aøR~”Rp,.t~) etc., whereas 5di~’= the original erR ~,,,+ /3R action is proportional to ,(2(g112R).Clearly, one cannot reabsorb the two-loop divergences back into 2’ by rescaling of g,.,, and K alone.(Expanding5di~’ into powers of h,.,, where Kh,.,, = g,.,, — ~, and subsequently replacing each field h,.,, byan infinite set of tree graphs with physical momenta and physical polarization tensors at the end of thetrees, one finds the divergences of the n-point Green’s functions on-shell.) One also finds that anyn-point Green’s function is divergent from the two-loop level on. At the one-loop level, i~2=0 sinceR,.,, = 0, where R,.,, = 0 because the fields g,.,, satisfy R,.,,(g,.,,) = 0 since they represent infinite sets oftree graphs with physical end-momenta and polarization tensors. For more details, we refer to ref. [6061,where the relation between normal field theory and the background field method is given.Thus gravitational theories are never renormalizable and only the two extremal cases are possible:finiteness of the S-matrix or the infinities in the S-matrix cannot be removed. The latter case isusually called “non-renormalizability of the S-matrix” but we stress that it is not the counterpart ofrenormalizability but of finiteness. Finiteness of the S-matrix is of course a much stronger property thanrenormalizability and one can expect it to occur only when “miraculous” cancellations of divergencesoccur due to a symmetry of the theory. It is here that supergravity has had impressive successes. First
- Page 3 and 4: In memoriam Joel ScherkJoel Scherk
- Page 6 and 7: 194 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 8 and 9: 196 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 10 and 11: 198 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 12 and 13: 200 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 14 and 15: 202 P. tan Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 16 and 17: 204 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 18 and 19: 206 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 20 and 21: 208 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrar
- Page 22 and 23: 210 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 24 and 25: 212 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 26 and 27: 214 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 28 and 29: 216 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 30 and 31: 218 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 32 and 33: 220 P. ran Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrar
- Page 34 and 35: 222 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 36 and 37: 224 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 38 and 39: 226 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 40 and 41: 228 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 42 and 43: 230 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 44 and 45: 232 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 48 and 49: 236 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 50 and 51: 238 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 52 and 53: 240 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 54 and 55: 242 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 56 and 57: 244 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 58 and 59: 246 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 60 and 61: 248 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 62 and 63: 250 P. ran Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 64 and 65: 252 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 66 and 67: 254 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 68 and 69: 256 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 70 and 71: 258 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 72 and 73: 260 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 74 and 75: 262 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 76 and 77: 264 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 78 and 79: 266 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 80 and 81: 268 P. Lan Nieuwenhui:en. SupergraL
- Page 82 and 83: 270 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 84 and 85: 272 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 86 and 87: 274 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 88 and 89: 276 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 90 and 91: 278 P. t’an Nieuwenhuizen, Superg
- Page 92 and 93: 280 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 94 and 95: 282 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 96 and 97:
284 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 98 and 99:
286 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 100 and 101:
288 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 102 and 103:
290 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 104 and 105:
292 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 106 and 107:
294 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 108 and 109:
296 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 110 and 111:
298 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 112 and 113:
300 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 114 and 115:
302 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 116 and 117:
304 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 118 and 119:
306 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 120 and 121:
308 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 122 and 123:
310 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 124 and 125:
312 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 126 and 127:
(A V,.”)00 = ~ s*a = (D,. + ~ A,.
- Page 128 and 129:
316 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 130 and 131:
318 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 132 and 133:
320 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 134 and 135:
322 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 136 and 137:
324 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 138 and 139:
326 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 140 and 141:
328 P. van Nicuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 142 and 143:
330 P. van Nieuwenhuizen Supergravi
- Page 144 and 145:
332 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 146 and 147:
334 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 148 and 149:
336 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 150 and 151:
338 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 152 and 153:
340 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 154 and 155:
342 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 156 and 157:
344 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 158 and 159:
346 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 160 and 161:
348 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 162 and 163:
350 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 164 and 165:
352 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 166 and 167:
354 P. van Nieuwenhuizen Supergravi
- Page 168 and 169:
356 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 170 and 171:
358 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 172 and 173:
360 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 174 and 175:
362 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 176 and 177:
364 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 178 and 179:
366 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 180 and 181:
368 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 182 and 183:
370 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 184 and 185:
372 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 186 and 187:
374 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 188 and 189:
376 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 190 and 191:
378 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 192 and 193:
380 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 194 and 195:
382 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 196 and 197:
384 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 198 and 199:
386 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 200 and 201:
388 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 202 and 203:
390 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 204 and 205:
392 P. van Nieuwenhui’zen, Superg
- Page 206 and 207:
394 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav
- Page 208 and 209:
396 P. van Nieuwenhuizen. Supergrav
- Page 210:
398 P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergrav