Literatur zu Kants Ethik - Ethikseite

1949 [90] Beck, Lewis White (1949): Introduction, in Immanuel Kant: Critique of Practical Reason and
Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, übersetzt und hrsg. von L. W. Beck, New York
1976, S. 1–49.
1955 [91] Beck, Lewis White (1955): Sir David Ross on Duty and Purpose in Kant, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 16, S. 98–107. Wiederabgedruckt in Beck, Studies in the
Philosophy of Kant, Indianapolis 1965, S. 165–76.
1957 [92] Beck, Lewis White (1957): Apodictic Imperatives, Kant-Studien 49, S. 7–24.
Wiederabgedruckt in Beck, Studies in the Philosophy of Kant, Indianapolis 1965, S.
177–99.
1960 [93] Beck, Lewis White (1960): Das Faktum der Vernunft: Zur Rechtfertigungsproblematik in der
Ethik, Kant-Studien 52, S. 271–82. – The Fact of Reason: An Essay on Justification in
Ethics, in Beck, Studies in the Philosophy of Kant, Indianapolis 1965, S. 200–214.
1960 [94] Beck, Lewis White (1960): A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago. –
Kants „Kritik der praktischen Vernunft“. Ein Kommentar, München 1974.
1962 [95] Beck, Lewis White (1962/63): The Importance of the Highest Good in Kant’s Ethics, Ethics
73, S. 179–87. – Deutsch in Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 23 (1969), S.
537–49.
1993 [96] Becker, Don (1993): Kant’s Moral and Political Philosophy, in The Age of German Idealism,
hrsg. von Robert C. Solomon und Kathleen Higgins, London, New York, S. 68–102
(Routledge History of Philosophy vol. 6).
1991 [97] Bencivenga, Ermanno (1991): The Metaphysical Structure of Kant’s Moral Philosophy,
Philosophical Topics 19, S. 17ff.
2006 [98] Bencivenga, Ermanno (2006): Ethics Vindicated: Kant’s Transcendental Legitimation of
Moral Discourse, Oxford. 13
1998 [99] Benn, Piers (1998): Ethics, Montreal, S. 91–111 (“Kant’s Ethics”).
1980 [100] Benton, Robert J. (1980): Kant’s Categories of Practical Reason as Such, Kant-Studien 71, S.
181–201.
1999 [101] Berkowitz, Peter (1999): Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism, Princeton, S. 106–33
(“Kant: Virtue within the Limits of Reason Alone”).
1910 [102] Bernays, Paul (1910): Das Moralprinzip bei Sidgwick und bei Kant, Abhandlungen der
Fries’schen Schule, Neue Folge 3, Heft 3, S. 501–82: S. 554–82 („Das Kantische
13 “Can we regard ourselves as having free will? What is the place of values in a world of facts? What grounds
the authority of moral injunctions, and why should we care about them? Unless we provide satisfactory
answers to these questions, ethics has no credible status and is likely to be subsumed by psychology, history,
or rational decision theory. According to Ermanno Bencivenga, this outcome is both common and
regrettable.
Bencivenga points to Immanuel Kant for the solution. Kant’s philosophy is a sustained, bold, and successful
effort aiming at offering us the answers we need. Ethics Vindicated is a clear and thorough account of this
effort that builds on Bencivenga’s previous interpretation of transcendental philosophy (as articulated in his
Kant’s Copernican Revolution) and draws on the entire Kantian corpus.”