Literatur zu Kants Ethik - Ethikseite

Kongresses, hrsg. von Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann und Ralph Schumacher,
Berlin, New York, Bd. III, S. 131–40.
2010 [45] Bacin, Stefano (2010): The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: the
Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason, in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason.
A Critical Guide, hrsg. von Andrews Reath und Jens Timmermann, Cambridge, S.
197–215.
2007 [46] Backström, Joel (2007): The Fear of Openness. An Essay on Friendship and the Roots of
Morality, Åbo, S. 138–53 (“Respect vs. love (Kant)”).
1993 [47] Baier, Annette (1993): Moralism and Cruelty: Reflections on Hume and Kant, Ethics 103, S.
436–57. Wiederabgedruckt in Baier, Moral Prejudices. Essays on Ethics, Cambridge,
Mass. 1995, S. 268–93.
1958 [48] Baier, Kurt (1958): The Moral Point of View. A Rational Basis of Ethics, Ithaca, London, S.
277–95 (“Kant’s Doctrines”). – Der Standpunkt der Moral. Eine rationale
Grundlegung der Ethik, Düsseldorf 1974, S. 259–75 („Kants Lehren“).
2010 [49] Bailey, Tom (2010): Analysing the Good Will: Kant’s Argument in the First Section of the
Groundwork, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18, S. 635–62. 8
1986 [50] Baker, Judith (1986): Do One’s Motives Have to be Pure?, in Philosophical Grounds of
Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends, hrsg. von Richard Grandy und Richard
Warner, Oxford, S. 457–73.
1988 [51] Baker, Judith (1988): Counting Categorical Imperatives, Kant-Studien 79, S. 389–406.
2011 [52] Bambauer, Christoph (2011): Deontologie und Teleologie in der kantischen Ethik,
Freiburg/München.
2003 [53] Banham, Gary (2003): Kant’s Practical Philosophy. From Critique to Doctrine, New York.
2007 [54] Banham, Gary (2007): Kant’s Moral Theory, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15,
S. 581–93.
1998 [55] Barcalow, Emmett (1998): Moral Philosophy. Theories and Issues, Belmont, CA, 2. Auflage,
S. 142–61 (“Kantian Moral Theory”).
1971 [56] Barnes, G. W. (1971): In Defense of Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good, Philosophical
Forum 2, S. 466–58.
1984 [57] Baron, Marcia W. (1984): The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting from Duty, Journal of
Philosophy 81, S. 197–220.
8 “This article contends that the first section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals provides a
sophisticated and valid argument, and that commentators are therefore mistaken in dismissing this section
as flawed. In particular, the article undertakes to show that in this section Kant argues from a conception of
the goodness of a good will to two distinctive features of moral goodness, and from these features to his
‘formula of universal law’. The article reveals the sophistication and validity of this argument by
considering it in the light of a number of criticisms that are commonly levelled at the section. In conclusion,
the article proposes that this interpretation of the section also has significant implications for the
understanding of Kant’s method, his formulas and his basic conception of the ‘moral’.”