12.07.2015 Views

Master Plan - City of Troy

Master Plan - City of Troy

Master Plan - City of Troy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The assessment awarded <strong>Troy</strong> just over 30 percent <strong>of</strong> the available points with regard to thefostering <strong>of</strong> attractive communities with a sense <strong>of</strong> place. The most points were awarded to the<strong>City</strong> for its strength in the area <strong>of</strong> promoting good site design for neighborhood commercial andhighway commercial development. The <strong>City</strong> missed points in the areas <strong>of</strong> historic preservation,light regulation, and streetscape design. Perhaps most notably, the <strong>City</strong> has not activelypromoted historic preservation programs, although the extent <strong>of</strong> resources which could bepreserved is not factored in.While site design practices for commercial development scored well, the same was not true forresidential developments or for streetscapes in general. In particular, areas for increasedscores could be found for streetscape landscaping, natural features preservation, or thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> more residential units in mixed-use developments.Tenet 5: Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost-effective.Points Awarded 400Points Missed 140Percentage 74%The <strong>City</strong> scored very well within the Tenet 5 section, which dealt with land use developmentdecision-making. The <strong>City</strong> received nearly 75 percent <strong>of</strong> the available points in this area, thanksto a strong perception that the <strong>City</strong> diligently maintains it’s Zoning Ordinance, <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, andother community planning documents, its consistency between its zoning and planning, andperception <strong>of</strong> fairness to the development community. Respondents felt that developers aregiven a fair chance to innovate in <strong>Troy</strong>, and that most new development makes a strongcontribution to the <strong>City</strong> as a whole.The <strong>City</strong> could score even higher in this area were it to permit additional density for developerswho propose more smart-growth oriented developments. Also, participants felt that moreattention to long-range planning could be paid, although there was a positive recognition thatcurrent practices for ongoing development were strong and fair.The <strong>City</strong> received extra points for supporting participation in elected and appointed <strong>of</strong>ficialtraining programs, such as the Michigan State University Extension Citizen <strong>Plan</strong>ner Program,and continuing education in the area <strong>of</strong> planningTenet 6: Mix land uses.Points Awarded 230Points Missed 531Percentage 30%Appendix 1.2: Smart Growth Readiness Assessment Results Summary 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!